PRESOLICITATION NOTICE
Y -- Narrows Powerhouse Generator Rewind Units 1-3
- Notice Date
- 1/3/2002
- Notice Type
- Presolicitation Notice
- Contracting Office
- US Army Engineer District, Vicksburg-Civil Works, ATTN: CEMVK-CT, 4155 Clay Street, Vicksburg, MS 39183-3435
- ZIP Code
- 39183-3435
- Solicitation Number
- DACW38-02-R-0002
- Response Due
- 3/14/2002
- Archive Date
- 4/13/2002
- Point of Contact
- Carla Koestler, 601-631-7903
- E-Mail Address
-
Email your questions to US Army Engineer District, Vicksburg-Civil Works
(carla.c.koestler@mvk02.usace.army.mil)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- N/A
- Description
- NA The work consists of the following: a. Design, manufacture, shop test, prepare and load for shipment, deliver f.o.b. destination, and unload three complete sets of stator coils and all accessories specified herein; b. Disassemble and remove three generat or units, including the exciter equipment, air housing, upper bracket, and rotor; c. Remove old stator coils; d. Remove the generator medium voltage power cables and potheads; e. Furnish and install new medium voltage power cables and potheads; f. Inst all and test three new stator windings and accessories specified herein; g. Inspect, clean and test three generator stator cores; h. At the option of the Government, restack three (3) stator cores and refurbish the existing laminations; i. At the option of the Government, design manufacture, shop test, prepare and load for shipment, deliver f.o.b. destination and unload (3) complete sets of the stator laminations and vent duct spacer and all accessories specified herein; j. At the option of the Governme nt, remove three (3) old stator cores; k. At the option of the Government, install and test (3) stator cores; l. Inspect, clean, and test three generator rotors; m. Furnish spare parts; n. Reassemble generators; o. Furnish manufacturer?s representat ive on-site services to supervise the installation of the generator stator coils; p. Furnish manufacturer?s representative on-site service to perform start-up, commissioning, and testing of two generators; q. Perform all work required to comply with the site operations, environmental protection, and safety and health provisions as specified herein. The estimated value of the proposed work is between $1,000,000.00 and $5,000,000.00. Specifications will be available on the Vicksburg Consolidated Contracti ng Office Web Page at http://www.mvk.usace.army.mil/contract/ and on compact disc at no charge. Hardcopies will not be available. The CD-ROM may be requested electronically by registering on our homepage or mailing your request to VCCO at 4155 Clay Stree t, Vicksburg, MS 39183-3435. Source selection for this procurement will be conducted on a best value basis; therefore, submittal of technical and price proposals is required. The Technical Criteria will require the offeror to submit a substantial amount of documentation. The Government reserves the right to make award without discussions, based solely upon initial offers and without the opportunity for revised proposals. If award is not made on initial offers, discussions will be conducted in accordance with FAR Part 15. Accordingly, each initial offer should contain the offeror?s best terms from a quality and price/cost standpoint. If however, revised proposals are requested, they will be evaluated against the same criteria as the initial proposals. The Government's primary objective in selecting an awardee is to make a Best Value determination by employing a subjective assessment of each offer that seeks to balance all of the stated evaluation factors against the offeror?s proposed integration of th ose factors in its offer. Award will be made to that responsive and responsible offeror whose proposal is determined to be most advantageous to the Government, cost and other criteria considered. Thus, in making the overall Best Value decision, the Gove rnment will consider the value of each proposal in terms of the technical and past performance offered for the estimated cost. The contract could, therefore, be awarded to other than the low final offeror, if it is determined to represent the greatest val ue to the government; however, the total cost is significant in that the Government may not be capable of awarding a contract simply because the proposal cannot be afforded. Proposals will be evaluated based on the following evaluation criteria. EVALUATI ON CRITERIA: Proposal Evaluation. Proposals must clearly demonstrate an understanding of this solicitation as presented by the Offeror. Offerors are advised that conciseness and relevance of the proposal is important and unrelated information that is not pertinent will reduce the evaluation scores. To facilitate the evaluation, the Offeror?s proposal should be sufficiently detailed and complete to clearly and fully demonstrate that the Offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirements of this solicitation. However, Offerors are advised that excessive wordiness; repetitiveness; extraneous materials, charts, tables, etc., will detract from the value assi gned to a proposal. Substantial extraneous information may be construed as indicative of the Offeror?s lack of understanding of this solicitation or a casual approach to the Request for Proposal. Statements that the Offeror understands and can or will co mply with all the specifications, statements paraphrasing the statements of work or parts thereof, and phrases such as standard procedures will be employed or well-known techniques will be used, etc., will be considered insufficient. The Selection Panel s hall evaluate Offeror?s Technical Proposal (Binder I) and Cost Proposal (Binder II), which are in their order of descending importance. In order to be determined acceptable, the proposal shall not have any fatal defects and shall be within the subjectivel y established acceptable range of ranking in each of the evaluated areas listed below. Failure to reach the acceptable range of ranking for any of the evaluated areas listed below will be cause for an Offeror?s proposal to be rejected as non-responsive, an d in this case, the Selection Panel may recommend to the Selection Official that the proposal will not be further evaluated. It is contemplated that discussions will not be conducted with Offerors. Accordingly, Binders I and II shall be submitted on the most favorable terms that the Offeror can submit to the Government. The major elements to be subjectively evaluated are as follows in the order of descending importance: BINDER I ? TECHNICAL PROPOSAL Company Experience Erecting Engineer Experience Assembly/Disassembly Crew Experience Stator Winding Manufacturing Details Stator Winding Losses Stator Winding Installation Details Stator Core Fabrication Details Stator Core Installation Details Stator Core Refurbishing Details This is not a request for proposals. A site visit will be required. The date for the site visit will be announced in the Request for Proposal. The issue date for the Request for Proposal is on or about 28 January 2002. Closing date for receipt of propo sals is on or about 14 March 2002.
- Web Link
-
- Army Single Face to Industry
(http://acquisition.army.mil)
- Place of Performance
- Address: US Army Engineer District, Vicksburg-Civil Works ATTN: CEMVK-CT, 4155 Clay Street Vicksburg MS
- Zip Code: 39183-3435
- Country: US
- Record
- SN20020105/00011133-020104090433 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
- FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(will not be valid after Archive Date) - Army Single Face to Industry
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |