Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF JANUARY 26, 2002 FBO #0055
SOLICITATION NOTICE

C -- Indefinite Quantity Contract for Services supporting Criteria Preparation, Value Engineering, and Customer Quality Surveys for Projects within NAVFACENGCOM?s Geographical Area

Notice Date
1/24/2002
 
Notice Type
Solicitation Notice
 
Contracting Office
Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Engineering Field Division, Atlantic, Headquarters, A/E Branch, Code AQ22D 1510 Gilbert Street, Norfolk, VA, 23511-2699
 
ZIP Code
23511-2699
 
Solicitation Number
N62470-02-R-7612
 
Response Due
2/28/2002
 
Archive Date
3/15/2002
 
Point of Contact
Bayla Mack, Program Analyst, Phone 757-322-8271, Fax 757-322-8285, - Brenda Perkins, Contract Specialist, Phone 757-322-8266, Fax 757-322-8264,
 
E-Mail Address
MackBL@efdlant.navfac.navy.mil, ChiltonJT@efdlant.navfac.navy.mil
 
Description
Architect-Engineer or Engineering Services are required for Criteria Support Services, Customer Quality and Quality Control Support, Cost Engineering, and Value Engineering within the Geographic Area of the Naval Facilities Engineering Command. The services will include both Navy unique and Tri-Service support in the professional areas described. The services are described as follows: (a) Criteria Support Services: These shall include services relating to the preparation, update and review of: (1) all guide specifications found in our SPECSINTACT automated system; and (2) design manuals, Military handbooks, Unified Facilities Criteria, computer graphics, design standard drawings and other publications. Requirements of this contract are not limited to existing documents. However, existing documents can be found on the NAVFACENGCOM web site, http://www.efdlant.navfac.navy.mil/criteria/, or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers site, http://www.hnd.usace.army.mil/techinfo/index.asp. All specification and design criteria documents, and standard drawings shall be produced in a Tri-Service Unified Facility format. The services may also include bench scale and prototype modeling, development of database and web-enabled design criteria support tools; (b) Quality Control Services: These shall include constructability/quality reviews where issues arise during design or construction. Generally, issues will be associated with adequacy of criteria definition; (c) Cost Engineering Support Services: These shall include development of parametric building cost models and preliminary and detailed project estimates; life cycle, economic, risk analyses and other cost engineering support services; and (d) Value Engineering: Studies may be conducted at any point in the planning or design process using either the NAVFAC Function Analysis Concept Design (FACD) methodology or conventional 40-hour team methodology. Best Value will be determined on life cycle cost. In order to assist the Command to more efficiently review all qualifications statements, provide staffing, consultant support and experience listed by each category of proposed work. Staff and consultant support should clearly show each individual?s background, registration(s), degrees, years experience with the firm, years experience as consultant to your firm (when applicable), specialized experience of the individual and individual awards or owner/customer points of contact. The A&E must demonstrate his and each key consultant's qualifications with respect to the published evaluation factors for all services. Evaluation factors (1) through (6) are of equal importance; factors (7) and (8) are of lesser importance and will be used as tie-breakers among technically equal firms. Specific evaluation factors include: (1) Specialized Experience - Firms will be evaluated in terms of their past experience and services in the areas of: (a) Preparation and understanding of the Tri-Services Criteria and specifications standards. A broad representation of recent experience and preparation of criteria and specifications for the military services and their field entities is required. Experience in preparation of Unified Facility Criteria (UFC) is required. Anti-Terrorist/Force Protection and the principals of sustainable improvement to facilities will apply to all criteria preparations. Exhibited understanding of the Department of Defense acquisition process is required. Web-enabled tools and database development integral to criteria resources are part of this factor. Licensed registration of those preparing criteria documents is mandatory; (b) Quality Control Services: Generally we will presume staff support from the foregoing item (a) unless shown otherwise. However, types of experience in quality assessment, and methodology(ies) used should be discussed; (c) Cost engineering: The variety of sources and databases used and reliability of estimates produced shall be presented. NAVFAC has adopted SUCCESS? as its corporate estimating system. Experience with this product and accuracy should be exhibited; cost engineering professional registration should be exhibited; and (d) Value Engineering: Study performance using the SAVE certified methodology, exhibiting summary return, life cycle improvement achieved and team participation. Function Analysis Concept Design (FACD) studies or charette based study experience is mandatory. Exhibit experience of all proposed team leaders. Team leaders must be registered Certified Value Specialist (CVS) and Architect/Engineer (RA or PE); (2) Professional qualifications and technical competence in the type of work required: Firms will be evaluated in terms of the staff?s: (a) active professional registration; (b) experience (with present and other firms) and roles of staff members specifically on projects addressed in evaluation factor number one; and (c) capability to provide qualified personnel surge to meet unexpected project demands; (3) Ability to perform the work to schedules, i.e., ability to perform several tasks concurrently and sustain the loss of key personnel while accomplishing the work within required time limits - Firms will be evaluated in terms of impact of this workload on the staff's projected workload during the contract period; (4) Past Performance - Firms will be evaluated in terms of (with emphasis on projects addressed in factor number one) demonstrated long term business relationships and repeat business with Government and private customers, and performance awards/letters of recommendations received; (5) Quality Control Program - Firms will be evaluated on the acceptability of their internal quality control program used to ensure a thorough and technically accurate product - list key personnel responsible; (6) Firm broad knowledge of building code and emerging code requirements over a broad geographical area - Firms will be evaluated with respect to the broad geographical area of the contract, their knowledge of codes, emerging International code consolidation(s), laws, construction materials and practices; (7) Volume of Work - Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DOD with the objective of affecting an equitable distribution of DOD A&E contracts among qualified A&E firms, including small and small disadvantaged business firms and firms that have not had prior DOD contracts; and (8) Small Business and Small Disadvantaged Business Subcontracting Plan - Firms will be evaluated on the extent to which they identify and commit to the published Small Business Subcontracting Program. The following are the published Naval Facilities Engineering Command goals expressed in terms of percentages of total planned subcontracting dollars for utilization of small businesses as part of the contract performance: Small Business (SB) - 65%; Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) - 12%; Women-owned Small Business (WOSB) - 5%; Historically Black Colleges/Universities/Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI) - 5%; Veterans Owned Small Businesses (VOSB) - 3%; Services Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSM) - 3%; HUBZone small businesses - 2%. Large Business Firms shall submit their Navy-wide SF 295 (Standard Form 295, Summary Subcontract Report) with their Standard Form 255. The slated firms will be required to provide a preliminary subcontracting plan (support for small business subcontracting) as part of the interview. The contract requires that the selected firm have an on-line access to E-mail via the internet for routine exchange of correspondence, and have Central Contractor Registration. The duration of the contract will be for one (1) year from the date of an initial contract award. The proposed contract includes two (2) one (1) year Government options for the same basic professional skills. The total A&E fee that may be paid under this contract will not exceed $5,000,000; however, the yearly maximum may total up to $2,500,000. No other general notification to firms for other similar projects performed under this contract will be made. Type of contract: Firm Fixed Price Indefinite Quantity Contract. Estimated start date is May 2002.--Architect-Engineer firms which meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit completed Standard Forms (SF) 254 (unless already on file) and 255, U. S. Government Architect-Engineer Qualifications, to the office shown above. In Block 10 of the SF 255, discuss why the firm is especially qualified based upon synopsized evaluation factors; and provide evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering, i.e., State registration number. For selection evaluation factor (1), provide the following information for only the staff proposed for this work using these column headings: NAME, RELATED PROJECTS WORKED ON, YEAR, FIRM, and TECHNICAL ROLE. Use Block 10 of the SF 255 to provide any additional information desired and continue Block 10 narrative discussion on plain bond paper. All information must be included within the SF 255. Provide a synopsis of the scope of work, point of contact and telephone number for each project listed in SF 255 Block 8. Firms having a current SF 254 on file with this office and those responding by 4:00 p.m. EST, 28 February 2002 will be considered. Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-10. Neither hand carried proposals nor facsimile responses will be accepted. Firms responding to this advertisement are requested to submit only one copy of qualification statements. The qualification statements should clearly indicate the office location where the work will be performed and the qualifications of the individuals anticipated to work on the contract and their geographical location.--This proposed contract is being solicited on an unrestricted basis, therefore, replies to this notice are requested from all business concerns.--The small business size standard classification is NAICS 541330 ($4,000,000).--This is not a request for proposals. Inquiries concerning this project should mention location and contract number. See Note 24.
 
Place of Performance
Address: Worldwide
 
Record
SN20020126/00018560-020124210312 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(will not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.