MODIFICATION
59 -- Pedestal Tracking Mount
- Notice Date
- 5/28/2002
- Notice Type
- Modification
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research, Naval Research Laboratory/STENNIS, John C. Stennis Space Center, Stennis Space Center, MS, 39529-5004
- ZIP Code
- 39529-5004
- Solicitation Number
- N00173-02-R-RS03
- Response Due
- 5/29/2002
- Archive Date
- 6/13/2002
- Point of Contact
- Richard Sewell, Contract Specialist, Phone 228-688-4571, Fax 228-688-6055, - Patricia Lewis, Contracting Officer, Phone 228-688-5593, Fax 228-688-6055,
- E-Mail Address
-
rsewell@nrlssc.navy.mil, plewis@nrlssc.navy.mil
- Description
- The purpose of this notification is to amend synopsis/ solicitation number N00173-02-R-RS03 for a Pedestal Tracking Mount, previously posted in the FBO on 29 April 2002. This amendment is numbered 0003. The purpose of this amendment is to respond to technical and business questions posed against the original synopsis/solicitation, and to extend the closing date. The closing date of the solicitation is hereby extended to 03 JUN 2002. Question 1: The stated Target acceleration is 500 degrees/ sec/sec. How long does the target accelerate before reaching maximum velocity? In the Manual Mode, it is stated, the Pedestal will be slaved to an external source. At what data rate will the pointing information be transferred to the pedestal in the slave mode? What is the accuracy of the external pointing system? What is the size and contrast of the target and how far from the target is the tracking site, i.e. geometry of the test? Is a profile of the target velocity and acceleration available? Are the velocity and acceleration values for both Azimuth and Elevation? Are the maximum target velocity and acceleration values referenced to the tracking site or the target? Answer 1: The gimbal shall be capable of getting up to maximum track capability in approximately 150 milliseconds upon command. The specification provided in RFP Number N00173-02-R-RS03 is for the gimbal rather than the optional camera tracker. The Government is willing to look at any and all camera/tracker systems of varying performance that are proposed. Question 2: Further clarification of the evaluation factor criteria, i.e. what percentage weighting do each of the three evaluation factors carry? Answer 2: The Government is only required to notify offerors of the relative importance of each evaluation criteria. See the original synopsis/solicitation for the ordinal ranking associated with this acquisition. No other changes are made in the synopsis/solicitation.
- Record
- SN00084221-W 20020530/020528213438 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |