MODIFICATION
Y -- Privatization of Military Family Housing (Little Rock AFB ARK)
- Notice Date
- 7/30/2002
- Notice Type
- Modification
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Air Force, Air Force Materiel Command, HQAFCEE - Headquarters Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence, 311 HSW/PKV 3207 Sidney Brooks, Brooks AFB, TX, 78235
- ZIP Code
- 78235
- Solicitation Number
- AFCEE-02-0001
- Response Due
- 8/14/2002
- Point of Contact
- Larry Hagan, Contract+Specialist, Phone 210-536-8783, Fax 210-536-3498, - Julie Heise, Contracting Officer, Phone 210-536-1029, Fax 210-536-3498,
- E-Mail Address
-
larry.hagan@brooks.af.mil, julie.heise@brooks.af.mil
- Description
- 30 July 2002 AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION ISSUED BY: Department of the Air Force Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence 311 HSW/PKOA 8107 Aeromedical Road Brooks AFB, TX 78235-5219 SUBJECT: Solicitation AFCEE-02-0001, Amendment 03, Privatization of Military Family Housing (Little Rock AFB, AR) The purpose of this amendment is to change the solicitation as indicated. Offerors shall acknowledge all solicitation amendments as required by the Offeror?s Cover Page, Appendix S of the solicitation. Any numbering discrepancies caused by the inclusion of these amended items into the RFP do not impact the submittal requirements outlined in the RFP. If you have questions or concerns please contact Jones Lang LaSalle at http://www.jllpsc.com/ Change the following solicitation paragraphs as follows: 1. Para 3.4 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION, pg 21 Replace: ?NOTE: Offerors shall include all project requirements in their proposals. Offerors are encouraged to submit desired features and other enhancements. Desired features identified for the new development are not listed in any order of importance.? With: ?NOTE: The solicitation identifies requirements, 3.4.1.1, (the absolute lowest threshold the Government will accept) and desired features, 3.4.1.2, (deemed by the Government to be beneficial to the military families). Offerors shall include all project requirements noted in 3.4.1 in their proposals; Offerors failing to submit all such requirements may not receive further consideration during the evaluation process. Offerors are encouraged to submit contractor-proposed enhancements, which they believe will enhance the project, even though they are not identified as requirements or desired features in this solicitation. The desired features identified in 3.4.1.2 for the new development are not listed in any order of importance.? 2. Para 3.5.8 MUNICIPAL SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE GOVERNMENT, pg 43 Replace ?Subject to future annual appropriations, the Government will provide fire and security police services to the East, West and South Housing Areas. However, the Government retains the right to be reimbursed for fire and police services costs incurred by the Government on behalf of the Successful Offeror.? With ?The Government will provide fire, law enforcement services, and other emergency services to housing located within the Installation boundaries? 3. Para 5.1 SUMMARY OF THE STEP-ONE, STEP-TWO AND STEP-THREE EVALUATION PROCESS, pg 52 The government is deleting the requirement to prepare and submit Volume VI. Therefore: Delete VI Required and Desired Features One original, seven copies & one electronic copy 4 30 pages 4. Para 5.2 BASIS FOR SELECTION, pg 52 Replace within the table ?4. Volumes III through VI may be submitted on the same CD-ROM.? With ?4. Volumes III through V may be submitted on the same CD-ROM.? 5. Para 5.2 BASIS FOR SELECTION, pg 53 Replace ?Please refer to the diagram on page 50 for a depiction of the Evaluation Rating Guidelines.? With ?Please refer to the diagram in section 5.2 for a depiction of the Evaluation Rating Guidelines.? 6. Para 5.2 BASIS FOR SELECTION, pg 56 Replace ?Step Three of the process evaluates the Offeror?s technical, financial and feasibility plans for the privatization. The evaluation team will evaluate the proposal risk associated with the detailed proposals provided by the Offerors in Step Three. The following chart identifies proposal risk guidelines:? With ?Step Three of the process evaluates the Offeror?s technical, financial and feasibility plans for the privatization. The Air Force reserves the right to award additional evaluation credit to desired features and offeror-proposed enhancements based on its assessment of their benefit to military families. Offerors shall provide a listing of the desired features and enhancements they propose within the factor that they apply. These additional lists do not count against the page limitation specified in the table shown in section 5.1. The evaluation team will also evaluate the proposal risk associated with the detailed proposals provided by the Offerors in Step Three. The following chart identifies proposal risk guidelines:? 7. Para 5.2 BASIS FOR SELECTION, pg 56 Replace ?The results of the Past Performance (Volume II) evaluation in Step One shall be carried forward and incorporated into the overall results of the evaluation of the Business Arrangements, Financial Plan and Structure (Volume III), Design and Construction (Volume IV), Property Management (Volume V), and Required and Desired Features (Volume VI) evaluation in the Step Three.? With ?The results of the Past Performance (Volume II) evaluation in Step One shall be carried forward and incorporated into the overall results of the evaluation of the Business Arrangements, Financial Plan and Structure (Volume III), Design and Construction (Volume IV), and Property Management (Volume V) evaluation in the Step Three.? 8. Para 5.3.1.2 Factor 2: Team Strength, pg 58 Add Evaluation Standard ? Description of team experience in working together on similar projects. 9. Para 5.4.3 PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT RATING, PG 67 Replace ?Jones Lang LaSalle will utilize the Past Performance Assessment Ratings identified on page A-19 to evaluate the proposal?s overall performance confidence rating.? With ?Jones Lang LaSalle will utilize the Past Performance Assessment Ratings identified in section 5.2 to evaluate the proposal?s overall performance confidence rating.? 10. Para 5.6.1 RATED ORDER OF IMPORTANCE, PG 73 Replace ?Unit Design and Construction is the most important factor. Experience is the next most important factor. Project Viability Over 50-Year Business Arrangement, Financial Strategy, Project Management, and Property Management are next in rated order of importance and equal in importance to each other. Air Force Participation in Project Financing, Development Cost Compared to Local Market, Mechanics of Accounts, and Community Development Plan are next in rated order of importance and are equal in importance to each other. Utility Services, Required Features, and Desired Features are last in rated order of importance and are equal in importance to each other.? With ?Unit Design and Construction, Project Viability over the 50-year Business Arrangement, Financial Strategy, and Air Force Participation in Project Financing are the most important factors and are equal in importance to each other. Project Management, Property Management, and Community Development Plan are next in rated order of importance and equal in importance to each other. Development Cost Compared to Local Market, Mechanics of Accounts, Utility Services, and Experience are next in rated order of importance and are equal in importance to each other.? 11. Para 5.6.2 VOLUMES III, IV, V AND VI? BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS AND TECHNICAL PROPOSALS, PG 73 Replace ?5.6.2 VOLUMES III, IV, V AND VI? BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS AND TECHNICAL PROPOSALS Offerors are advised that a selection may be made without discussion or any contact concerning the proposal received. Therefore, proposals shall be submitted initially on the most favorable terms regarding financial, technical, and other factors. Do not assume that firms will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss, or revise proposals. If discussions are conducted, Offerors will be allowed to submit final proposal revisions. The Government will select the proposal representing the ?Best Value.? Step Three of the evaluation process will focus on the Technical Proposal submission consisting of Volumes III, IV, V and VI. This evaluation will be an integrated assessment of the Offeror?s proposed development. Its purpose is to: (1) assess how well the Offeror has structured the development financing (i.e., will the financing be credible in equity and debt markets and minimize Government commitments and risks); and (2) evaluate how well the construction, management and operation of the proposed development, balanced with the projected Government costs, satisfies the requirements of the solicitation. Down-selected Offerors have a minimum of 60 calendar days to respond with Technical Proposals after notification of down-selection status conducted during Step Two.? With ?5.6.2 VOLUMES III, IV, AND V? BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS AND TECHNICAL PROPOSALS Offerors are advised that a selection may be made without discussion or any contact concerning the proposal received. Therefore, proposals shall be submitted initially on the most favorable terms regarding financial, technical, and other factors. Do not assume that firms will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss, or revise proposals. If discussions are conducted, Offerors will be allowed to submit final proposal revisions. The Government will select the proposal representing the ?Best Value.? Step Three of the evaluation process will focus on the Technical Proposal submission consisting of Volumes III, IV, and V. This evaluation will be an integrated assessment of the Offeror?s proposed development. Its purpose is to: (1) assess how well the Offeror has structured the development financing (i.e., will the financing be credible in equity and debt markets and minimize Government commitments and risks); and (2) evaluate how well the construction, management and operation of the proposed development, balanced with the projected Government costs, satisfies the requirements of the solicitation. Down-selected Offerors have a minimum of 60 calendar days after notification to submit Technical Proposals.? 12. Para 5.6.4.1.1, Submittal Requirements, PG 85 Delete ?5) Desired Features/Enhancements. List the design enhancements proposed that exceed the project basic requirements. Provide a list, narrative description and/or drawing as appropriate of any enhancements proposed for incorporation in the project.? 13. Para 5.7 VOLUME VI - REQUIRED AND DESIRED FEATURES EVALUATION, pg 102-103 Delete in its entirety 5.7 VOLUME VI ? REQUIRED AND DESIRED FEATURES EVALUATION 14. APPENDIX M: LITTLE ROCK AFB UTILITY RATES Replace 1. Utility sales rates for Little Rock AFB for FY02 are provided below: 1 Other Non- Utility Unit DOD Federal Federal2 Electric KWH $ 0.04293 $ 0.04377 $ 0.04674 Natural Gas KCF $ 3.41846 $ 3.47976 $ 3.88069 Water KGAL $ 0.00188 $ 0.00214 $ 0.00298 Sewer KGAL $ 0.00235 $ 0.00246 $ 0.00326 1. Rates current as of April 02. Rates change each calendar year and when the cost to the govermment increases or decreases by 10 percent per AFI 32-1061. 2. Air Force guidance requires non-federal tenants to pay the local prevailing rate or the non-federal rate, whichever is higher. With 1. Utility sales rates for Little Rock AFB for FY02 are provided below: 1 Other Non- Utility Unit DOD Federal Federal2 Electric KWH $ 0.04293 $ 0.04377 $ 0.04674 Natural Gas KCF $ 4.16045 $ 4.19781 $ 4.46401 Water KGAL $ 1.88000 $ 2.14000 $ 2.98000 Sewer KGAL $ 2.35000 $ 2.46000 $ 3.26000 1. Rates current as of April 02. Rates change each calendar year and when the cost to the government increases or decreases by 10 percent per AFI 32-1061. 2. Air Force guidance requires non-federal tenants to pay the local prevailing rate or the non-federal rate, whichever is higher.3. Total consumption for 2002 has not been determined. ADD THE DESCRIPTION AMENDMENT 1 TO THE MODIFICATION 1 PREVIOUSLY POSTED TO FEDBIZOPS. END OF AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE
- Place of Performance
- Address: LITTLE ROCK AFB AR
- Zip Code: 72099
- Country: USA
- Zip Code: 72099
- Record
- SN00128439-W 20020801/020730213558 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |