Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF APRIL 03, 2004 FBO #0859
MODIFICATION

C -- A-E Services for Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Military Construction (MCON) Project P-410, Range Operation Complex, Pacific Missile Range Facilities (PMRF), Barking Sands, Kauai, Hawaii

Notice Date
4/1/2004
 
Notice Type
Modification
 
NAICS
541310 — Architectural Services
 
Contracting Office
Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Engineering Field Division, Pacific, Acquisition Department, Code ACQ0262, 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100, Pearl Harbor, HI, 96860-3134
 
ZIP Code
96860-3134
 
Solicitation Number
N62742-04-R-0004
 
Response Due
5/5/2004
 
Point of Contact
Melvin Yoshimura, Contracting Officer, Phone (808) 474-5406, Fax (808) 474-8908,
 
E-Mail Address
yoshimurams@efdpac.navfac.navy.mil
 
Description
Services include, but are not limited to design and engineering services for the preparation of a RFP package for a design build construction of a two story 85,000 square feet range operations complex facility. The facility will contain the range functional tracking and control rooms; conference facilities; instrumentation control rooms; range control and surveillance center; administrative offices; system laboratory; instrumentation laboratory; and emergency control center. This project includes demolish several existing facilities, reconstruct of one facility at an alternate location, and renovation of an existing facility. The new project will also include an Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) system, Intrusion Detection System (IDS) and an emergency generator. Supporting facilities include a storm drainage system, paved roadways and parking lots, landscaping, site fencing, fire protection, and utilities (mechanical and electrical). Other considerations include knowledge of Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board (DDESB), Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ), airfield, Electro Magnetic Radiation (EMR) and wetlands issues associated with design development and oceanfront and remote location design. If asbestos or hazardous materials exist, the Architect-Engineer (A-E) contractor shall identify and provide for their disposal in the required documents in accordance with applicable rules and regulations pertaining to such hazardous materials. The selected A-E may be required to participate in a pre-fee meeting within seven days of notification and provide a fee proposal within ten days of the meeting. Design and engineering services include the preparation of preliminary design documents, preparation of final design, post-construction award services; construction surveillance and inspection services; operational and maintenance support information services. Estimated construction cost is over $30,000,000. Estimated start and completion dates are July 2004 and June 2005, respectively, include review periods. Proposals may be subject to an advisory audit performed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. The following selection evaluation criteria, in relative order of importance, will be used in the evaluation of A-E firms: (1) Professional qualifications of firm and staff proposed for design of range operation center facilities, electrical and electronics systems laboratory or similar facilities in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and the Pacific Ocean area. (2) Specialized recent experience and technical competence of firm or particular staff members for design of range operation center facilities, electrical and electronics systems laboratory or similar facilities in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and the Pacific Ocean area. (3) Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules. (4) Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time. (5) Knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts and principles to facilities and infrastructure problems through an integrated design approach. A-Es quality control program experience. (6) Location in the general geographical area of the project and knowledge of the locality of the project; provided, that application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project. (7) Extent to which firms identify and commit to small business (SB), small disadvantaged business (SDB), women-owned small business (WOSB), historically underutilized business zone small business (HUBZoneSB), historically black college or university and minority institution (HBCU/MI) and veteran-owned small business (VOSB), and service disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB) in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. (8) Volume of work previously awarded to the firm by the Department of Defense shall also be considered, with the object of effecting an equitable distribution of Department of Defense A-E contracts among qualified A-E firms and firms that have not had Department of Defense contracts. IN BLOCK 10 OF THE SF255, INCLUDE A SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS IN NARRATIVE DISCUSSION ADDRESSING EACH OF THE ABOVE SELECTION EVALUATION CRITERIA. IF NECESSARY, CONTINUE ON PLAIN BOND PAPER. For selection criteria (3) the government will also evaluate each firms past performance and performance rating(s) from the Architect-Engineer Contract Administration Support System (ACASS) during the evaluation process, which can affect the selection outcome. For selection criteria (7), the Government will evaluate firms by the government wide goals; therefore, offeror should identify each firm (prime and subs) by name, discipline and size status. In addition, the offeror should provide information on past performance on SB, SDB, etc. and/or any awards received for outstanding support of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, and HBCU/MI or other documentation. Documentation may include SBA awards, final Subcontracting Reports for Individual Contracts (SF294), copies of performance evaluations on the implementation of subcontracting plans or periodic compliance reviews, and/or information on existing or pending mentor-protege agreements. The statutory Government wide goals for the total value of all prime contract awards per fiscal year are 23% to SB, 5% to SDB, 5% to WOSB, 5% to HBCU/MI, 2% to HUBZoneSB and 3% to VOSB & SDVOSB. Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) subcontracting goals are 73.7% to SB, 15.3% to SDB, 13.8% to WOSB, 3% to VOSB and 3.1% to HUBZoneSB. Small Disadvantaged Businesses must obtain formal certification from the Small Business Administration to receive contract evaluation benefits reserved for Small Disadvantaged Businesses. This includes receiving benefit as a prime contractor or subconsultant under a Subcontracting Plan for subcontracting to Small Disadvantaged Businesses. Small Disadvantaged Businesses: Contact your local Small Business Administration (SBA) representative for information on the certification program or visit the SBA agencys web site at http://www.sba.gov./sdb. Prime Contractors: To determine whether a prospective subcontractor is a certified small disadvantaged business, access SBA agencys database, PRO-Net website at http://www.pro-net.sba.gov/. This solicitation requires all interested firms to have on-line access to email via the Internet. Notifications will be via email, therefore, email address must be shown in block 3 of the SF 255. Large Business firms who are short-listed will be required to submit a subcontracting plan before negotiation begin for contract award. A-E firms meeting the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit complete, updated Standard Forms 254, Architect Engineer and Related Services Questionnaire, and 255, Architect-Engineer and Related Services Questionnaire for Specific Project. Two copies of your SF 254 and SF 255 are required: One paper copy and one electronic CD copy. A-E firms utilized by the prime A-E must also submit completed Standard Forms 254 and 255. The submittal/delivery address is Commander, Code ACQ0262 (A-E Solicitation No. N62742-04-R-0004), Attn: Mailroom (CMP0161), PACNAVFACENGCOM, 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100, Pearl Harbor, HI 96860-3134. This address is for all deliveries, including US Mail, courier service and/or personal delivery services; no other address is acceptable. The delivery address is inside a military installation, therefore, strict securities measures are in force; anticipate delays. Interested firms must allow sufficient time for receipt of submission. Firms responding to this announcement by 2:00 p.m. (HST) on Wednesday, May 5, 2004 will be considered. Firms having a current SF 254 on file with this office may also be considered. This is not a request for a proposal.
 
Place of Performance
Address: All Areas under the Cognizance of the Naval Facilities (NAVFAC) Engineer Field Division (EFD) Pacific Pearl Harbor, Hawaii
Zip Code: 96860
 
Record
SN00558508-W 20040403/040401212542 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.