SOLICITATION NOTICE
A -- Prepare Two Case Studies
- Notice Date
- 7/9/2004
- Notice Type
- Solicitation Notice
- Contracting Office
- Environmental Protection Agency, Adp Hardware Management Section, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, Nw, Washington, DC 20460
- ZIP Code
- 20460
- Solicitation Number
- RFQ-DC-04-00231
- Response Due
- 7/19/2004
- Archive Date
- 8/19/2004
- Point of Contact
- Point of Contact, Beverly Hemsley, Purchasing Agent, Phone (202) 564-4727
- Description
- NAICS Code: 54172 THE STATEMENT OF WORK: Tasks the contractor shall perform: Prepare a work plan to describe how the two case studies will be developed and cost estimate work. The workplan shall also include a QA/QC plan to address how the use of secondary data will be handled to carry out this work assignment. Secondary data are defined as the review or use of someone else's environmental or health data that was developed for a different purpose. This includes data used from citations from literature searches, hard copies, and computer data bases. Within 2 weeks of award, the contractor shall submit the work plan to the EPA Project Officer for approval. After incorporating EPA comments, the contractor shall finalize and submit the final the work plan to EPA's Project Officer. 1. Within a week of work plan approval, the contractor shall convene a conference call with the EPA project officer and technical contact to clarify outstanding questions and confirm schedule and specific tasks for the task order. 2. The contractor shall prepare and submit to the EPA project officer an Annotated Outline for case study 1, EPA will review the annotated outline and the contractor shall incorporate EPA's comments and submit the final outline for approval. 3. The contractor shall develop and present Case study 1 to a EPA technical panel for review. The contractor shall incorporate comments into revisions of case study 1. 4. The contractor shall prepare and submit for approval an annotated outline for Case study 2 employing the children's risk assessment framework for a more site specific approach including aggregate and cumulative exposures scenarios where a minimal data set exists. This case study can be based on the fictional case study for "inhalate" in the RfD/RfC report. This example also should employ some creativity and not be a chemical specific assessment. There may also be significant gaps in the data base in this case study. The contractor shall incorporate EPA comments and submit the final outline for approval. 5. A draft of Case study 2 shall be submitted to the EPA project Officer for review. The contractor shall incorporate EPA's comments and revised the case study as appropriate and submit it to the EPA project officer . 6. After incorporating comments, the contractor shall submit a final report for both case studies to the project officer. The Project officer will arrange for the internal peer review of the case studies. The contractor shall provide all materials electronically to the EPA project officer in Word format. 7. The contractor shall attend at his own expense and clarify questions that may be raised during the EPA internal workshop that is being planned to be held in the Washington DC metropolitan area in September/October, 2004. 8. The contractor shall not quote, cite, duplicate or distribute the EPA draft children's risk assessment framework without written permission from the project officer. 9. The contractor shall not publish full or partial products without a written approval of EPA project officer.
- Record
- SN00618357-W 20040711/040709212630 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |