MODIFICATION
C -- INDEFINITE QUANTITY ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACT FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS IN NORTHERN AND CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, NEVADA AND UTAH
- Notice Date
- 12/1/2004
- Notice Type
- Modification
- NAICS
- 541310
— Architectural Services
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest Division, IPT West, 2001 Junipero Serra Blvd. Suite 600, Daly City, CA, 94014-1976
- ZIP Code
- 94014-1976
- Solicitation Number
- N68711-05-R-7005
- Response Due
- 12/20/2004
- Archive Date
- 1/10/2005
- Point of Contact
- Elizabeth Johns, Contract Specialist, Phone 650-746-7477, Fax 650-746-7480, - Jo Ann Yamane, Contract Specialist, Phone 650-746-7476, Fax 650-746-7480,
- E-Mail Address
-
elizabeth.johns@navy.mil, joann.yamane@navy.mil
- Description
- This modified synopsis supercedes original synopsis posted on 11/19/04. Indefinite Quantity Architect-Engineer Contract for Various Projects in Northern and Central California, Nevada and Utah. There is no RFP package to download. However, Standard Form (SF) 330 (ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS) will be available electronically via the Internet at https://esol.navfac.navy.mil. All information needed for submission is contained in SF 330 and as described herein. This solicitation is being issued as Unrestricted for an Indefinite Quantity Firm-Fixed Price Contract. NAICS Code for this procurement is 54131 and the annual size standard is $4,000,000.00. Two firms may be selected from the responses received from this synopsis. Architectural-engineering services required are primarily architectural in nature but a strong full service team is required. Special emphasis is placed on the capabilities of the structural (seismic design, high-bay facilities, and progressive collapse), Anti-Terrorism Force Protection (ATFP), civil, mechanical, fire protection, and electrical team members. Contract term will be for a Base year plus four (4) option years. Each performance period will run 365 calendar days from date of award/exercise of option or until the maximum limit is reached, whichever occurs first. The maximum fee limit may not exceed $2,000,000 for the first year, and $l, 500,000 for each option year. Multiple task orders may be awarded with similar delivery schedules requiring the selected firm to provide services with overlapping work/delivery dates. A minimum of $5,000 is guaranteed for the base year and for each option year if no work is ordered after contract/option award. The major locations served by this contract will be Naval Air Station, Lemoore, California; Naval Air Station, Fallon, Nevada; Travis Air Force Base, Fairfield, California; and Naval Post Graduate School, Monterey, California. Primary work will be: (1) assessment reports of existing military facilities and infrastructure (2) development of requirements documents and feasibilities studies (3) development of Design/Build RFPs for repair and renovation of existing facilities and/or the construction of new facilities (including estimation of construction cost) and (4) development of 100% plans and specifications for repair and renovation of existing facilities and/or the construction of new facilities (including estimation of construction cost). Facilities range from small/limited scope renovations to renovations of large complex structures including classroom/lab facilities, administration buildings, aircraft operations support facilities, airfields, and troop housing. New construction requirements may address a wide range of facilities as well. Additional services which may be required by this contract include estimation of probable construction cost using the required SUCCESS software (both budget level and detailed), preparation of economic analyses, preparation of various engineering studies supporting the budget process or design phase, seismic analyses of existing structures, historic preservation, LEEDS analysis, energy consumption analyses, hazardous materials (primarily asbestos and lead based paint) surveys, preparation of documents defining existing conditions, preparation of topographic surveys, accomplishment of sub-surface investigations, preparation of utility studies, provision of advice regarding the design and construction of facilities that support the Governments sustainable design goals, the provision of planning services, provision of interior design services, provision of construction support services, and participation in coordination efforts with the State Historical Preservation Office. Estimated start date for this contract is March 2005. Note: If the selected firm prepares the statement of owner’s requirements for Design/Build procurements, the firm is prohibited from competing during the subsequent design/construction procurement. SELECTION CRITERIA AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: The selection of the firm for this contract will be based on the following criteria: Criteria 1, Professional Qualifications (SF 330, Section E); Criteria 2, Recent Experience (SF 330, Section F); (The remaining Criteria is to be addressed in SF 330, Section H), Criteria 3, Past Performance; Criteria 4, Quality Control; Criteria 5, Capacity; Criteria 6, Sustainable Design; Criteria 7, Location; Criteria 8, Volume of Work and Criteria 9, Commitment to Small Business Concerns. Criteria 1 through 4 are of equal importance. Criteria 5 through 9 are in descending order of importance. SF 330s will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firm based on criteria responses. Evaluating past performance and experience may include information provided by the firm, customer inquiries, Government databases, and publicly available sources. Failure to provide requested data, inaccessible points of contact, or invalid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified. All projects provided in the SF 330 (Architect-Engineer Qualifications) must be completed by the office/branch/individual team member actually performing the work under this contract. Projects not performed by the office/branch/individual team member will be excluded from evaluation consideration. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: The SF 330 is limited to 35 single-sided pages, this restriction does not include (Criteria 3, Past Performance documentation, Organizational Chart, Cover Sheet or Cover Letter). Minimum font size is 10. Those firms that meet the requirements described in this announcement and wish to be considered shall submit an original and four (4) copies of a SF 330 for the prime and all consultants proposed. Qualification shall not exceed 35 printed pages with a minimum font size of 10 (double sided is two pages). All information must be included on the SF 330 (cover letter, other attachments and pages in excess of the 35 page limit will not be included in the evaluation process). Firms not providing the required information in the format and content specified may be negatively evaluated under selection criteria. An original and four (4) copies of the SF 330 submittal package is to be received in this office no later than 1:00 P.M., Pacific Time on 20 December 2004. Submittals received after this date and time will not be considered. Telegraphic and facsimile of SF 330’s will not be accepted. Submit the information as follows: SF 330, SECTION E: CRITERIA 1, PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: Professional qualifications of the proposed team that will be specifically assigned, including all proposed key consultants (Architectural, Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, Fire Protection, Structural, Cost Estimator, Landscape Architect, and ATFP). Identify the proposed team(s) including alternate members, if necessary, including the cost estimator and the person(s) preparing the specifications. Provide information in matrix format with rows listing team member names and proposed assignments. For each team member listed provide firm name and location, location of professional registration including license number, number of years of professional experience, number of years with current firm, highest education level and area of concentration (i.e. BS mechanical engineering) and percent of time to be spent on this team (estimated). For project managers and team leaders, in addition to resume information, provide the number of teams they have managed over the past three years. Describe scope of the team leader assignment. SF 330, SECTION F: CRITERIA 2, RECENT FIRM EXPERIENCE: Recent experience of the proposed team is defined as work undertaken in the past five years with Specialized experience of the proposed team in the services listed above in the contract scope. Specific experience in preparing design-build RFP statements of work; specific experience in undertaking facility renovation projects of varying sizes (estimated construction cost in the range of $50,000 to $40,000,000 (majority of projects range in size from $3,000,000 to $6,000,000); specific experience in providing facilities that minimize energy consumption is especially valued. In a second matrix form, identify the work performed by team members that best illustrates experience relevant to this contract scope and the specific issues addressed in the factor. Include only projects for which construction started during December 1999 to present. Provide project title, location, identify how the project is relevant to the issues identified in the factor, identify the team member who participated in the cited project and the nature of their responsibility, dollar value of the work for which the team member was responsible, total project cost, date of construction completion, owner’s point of contact (name, title, current phone number or e-mail address. For proposed project manager(s) or team leader(s), provide examples of experience during December 1999 to present, managing similar contract types or managing multiple delivery requirements at the same time. Provide information illustrating past experience of the team in successfully delivering projects in compliance with performance schedules and in providing timely construction contract support. Provide information illustrating past experience of the team in successfully completing multiple products with similar delivery dates (December 1999 to present). SF 330, SECTION G, Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects: Submit in accordance with the SF 330 Instructions. From the total projects listed in Section F, provide a maximum of ten (10) projects. SF 330, SECTION H, Address the remaining Criteria 3 through 9; additional sheets may be used, if required. Clearly identify the Criteria number and title. CRITERIA 3, PAST PERFORMANCE: Past performance of the firm during contracts with government agencies and/or private industry with respect to cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules. Demonstrated long-term Government or private business relationships, repeat business on related efforts and construction support are valued. Provide copies of excellent performance ratings or letters of commendation received by either the prime, sub contractor or joint venture partner during the years December 1999 through present. Include private or DOD clients. Explain the role of the recognized firm/person in the work being addressed. Owner’s points of contact provided in the response to Criteria 2 may be contacted to gather information on past performance. CRITERIA 4, QUALITY CONTROL: The demonstrated success of the quality control program used by the firm to ensure the provision of quality products. Submit: 1) Organization Chart Identifying Relationship, Responsibilities, and 2) QC Program Summary. SF 330, SECTION D, ORGANIZATION CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM: In addition to the Instructions provided for the SF 330, identify the overall relationship and lines of authority of the proposed team, including key sub consultants. (Note: All individuals listed on the organizational chart are not required to have a resume in Section E, such as administrative or lower level engineering positions.) Describe the prime contractor’s quality control program/process; identify who has the responsibility for implementation of the program, discuss how the prime contractor instills a culture of quality throughout the team. Illustrate the firm’s success in implementing the program. Illustrate the team’s success in estimating the probable project cost. Of special interest are projects listed as team experience above and any projects in the geographical area of the contract scope. Discuss the process the team will employ to exercise budget control during the design phase. CRITERIA 5, CAPACITY: The ability of the firm to accomplish contemplated work within a reasonable minimum time limit as demonstrated by the team’s history of successfully completing projects in compliance with performance schedules and providing timely construction support. Of primary concern is the team’s ability to deliver work on multiple overlapping task orders. Evidence of successful completion of past projects with concurrent time frames and the ability to manage four (4 ) concurrent projects (two (2) 100% plans and specifications and two (2) Design/Build RFPs). Indicate specialized equipment available. Indicate the firm’s and key personnel prior security clearances. CRITERIA 6, SUSTAINABLE DESIGN: Demonstrated success in designing or establishing minimum requirements for facilities that maximize energy efficiency through an integrated design concept. Experience in prescribing the use of recovered materials and achieving waste reduction in facility design will also be considered. Describe any specific concepts the team utilizes to optimize energy conservation in design. Describe experience of the team in influencing/ encouraging the use of waste minimization techniques. CRITERIA 7, LOCATION: The location of the firm and its proposed project team in the general geographical area of the contract and the firm’s demonstrated knowledge of the contract areas as reflected in experience with selection of appropriate construction materials, knowledge of conditions affecting project costs and bidding climate. Provide information illustrating a working knowledge of construction in the geographic area covered by this contract. The major facilities serviced by this contract include Naval Air Station Lemoore, Naval Post-graduate School Monterey, Travis Air Force Base and Naval Air Station Fallon Nevada. Response should also address knowledge of construction costs in the area addressed by this contract. CRITERIA 8, VOLUME OF WORK: Volume of work previously awarded by DOD in the past 12 months to the firm with the objective of effecting equitable distribution of contracts among qualified architect-engineer firms including minority owned firms and firms that have not had prior DOD contracts. CRITERIA 9, COMMITMENT TO SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS: Provide a list indicating your subcontracting goals for this contract to indicate your commitment to small businesses. List the small or disadvantaged or woman-owned business firms used a primary consultants or as sub consultants. If a large business concern is selected for this contract, they will be required to submit a subcontracting plan prior to award that should reflect the Navy’s minimum goals as follows: 25% to small business concerns, 5% to small disadvantaged business, 5% to woman-owned small business, 3% to small disadvantaged veteran owned small business and 3% to veteran-owned small business. If a large business concern is selected they will be required to provide goals that meet or exceed the goals provided with the SF 330 and these same percentage goals and dollar values must be included in your Subcontracting Plan. SELECTION INTERVIEW REQUIREMENTS: Personal interviews may be scheduled for firms slated as most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to explain management and the Firm’s abilities. Elaborate presentations are not desired. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: SF 330, PART 1, SECTION A: Contract Information: In Block 3, list the solicitation number, and Block 5; in addition to your firm’s name, provide your company’s Duns number. Site visits will not be arranged during the submittal period. Solicitation Package, Technical Information, or Plan Holders List will not be issued. It is the offeror’s responsibility to check the NAVFAC electronic website at https://esol.navfac.navy.mil for any revisions to this announcement, other notices, and to access the Plan Holders List. In accordance with DFAR 252.204-7004, all firms must be registered with the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) prior to any award of a contract. To obtain information on registration, offerors may call 1-888-227-2423, or via the Internet at http://www.ccr.gov. Responses are to be submitted to Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, Integrated Product Team (IPT) West, Pacific Plaza, 2001 Junipero Serra Boulevard, 6th Floor, Suite 600, Daly City, California 94014-1976. Please address-mailing envelope as follows: “A-E SERVICES, N68711-05-R-7005, Attention Elizabeth Johns.” THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. NOTE: THIS NOTICE WAS NOT POSTED TO WWW.FEDBIZOPPS.GOV ON THE DATE INDICATED IN THE NOTICE ITSELF (01-DEC-2004); HOWEVER, IT DID APPEAR IN THE FEDBIZOPPS FTP FEED ON THIS DATE. PLEASE CONTACT fbo.support@gsa.gov REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
- Web Link
-
Link to FedBizOpps document.
(http://www.eps.gov/spg/DON/NAVFAC/N62474/N68711-05-R-7005/listing.html)
- Place of Performance
- Address: 2001 Junipero Serra, Pacific Plaza, 6th Floor, Suite 600, Daly City, CA
- Zip Code: 94014
- Country: USA
- Zip Code: 94014
- Record
- SN00715608-F 20041203/041201213729 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |