Loren Data's SAM Daily™

FBO DAILY ISSUE OF FEBRUARY 17, 2005 FBO #1179
MODIFICATION

R -- ISO 9001:2000/AS9700-2001

Notice Date

2/15/2005
 

Notice Type

Modification
 

NAICS

541611 — Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
 

Contracting Office

Department of the Navy, Naval Air Systems Command, JACKSONVILLE NAVAL AVIATION DEPOT, 6206 Avaiation Avenue, Jacksonville, FL, 32212
 

ZIP Code

32212
 

Solicitation Number

N65886-05-T-0001
 

Response Due

2/22/2005
 

Archive Date

3/9/2005
 

Point of Contact

Jennifer Reeder, Contract Specialist, Phone (904) 317-1987, Fax (904) 317-1991,
 

E-Mail Address

ReederJL2@navair.navy.mil
 

Description

Questions and Answers: Question #1: Is it truly a requirement to have RvA accreditation in addition to ANAB (formerly ANSI-RAB) accreditation? Answer #1: NADEP JAX seeks both RvA and ANAB for business purposes. As mentioned in the PSOW paragraph 1.2.4, the Depot’s customers include the following countries: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Republic of Kuwait, Malaysia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, NATO, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, United Kingdom, and United States of America. Question #2: Does a registrar (certification body) having ANAB Accreditation to provide ISO 9001:2000 and AS9100-2001 certification / registration, satisfy the accreditation requirements cited in the mentioned solicitation? Or will not having RvA accreditation (for ISO 9001:2000) impact a registrar's technical rating assigned to its proposal? Answer #2: NADEP JAX seeks certification/registration under ANSI-RAB accreditation for AS9100-2001 and certification/registration under RvA accreditation for ISO9001:2000 for business purposes. Therefore, both RvA and ANSI-RAB Accreditations are required for a pass rating for this technical subfactor. Question #3: With regards to corporate or individual-site certificates, the solicitation seems to infer that it will be a single certificate (NADEPJAX) with the detachment facilities coming under this certificate? Is this correct? Answer #3: Yes, a Corporate certificate is sought for the Depot and detachment facilities. (Depot-Wide) Question #4: Will Section 7.3 of the Statement of Work (Design responsibility) be excluded from this requirement(that NADEPJAX does not do parts design)? Answer #4: 7.3 is included. It applies to NADEPJAX’s organizational functions that deliver design services to their external customers. Question #5: What are the Employee levels at each facility? Answer #5: Please see Tables 1 and 3 of the PSOW. Question #6: In the case of a Corporate certificate, not all detachment facilities would normally be audited semi-annually. Is the intent for all detachment facilities to be audited semi-annually also? Answer #6: All detachment facilities are to be audited ANNUALLY consistent with the Corporate certification standards. The Depot is to be audited on a SEMI-ANNUAL basis. NOTE: THIS NOTICE WAS NOT POSTED TO WWW.FEDBIZOPPS.GOV ON THE DATE INDICATED IN THE NOTICE ITSELF (15-FEB-2005); HOWEVER, IT DID APPEAR IN THE FEDBIZOPPS FTP FEED ON THIS DATE. PLEASE CONTACT fbo.support@gsa.gov REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
 

Web Link

Link to FedBizOpps document.
(http://www.eps.gov/spg/DON/NAVAIR/N65886/N65886-05-T-0001/listing.html)
 

Place of Performance

Address: Jacksonville Naval Aviation Depot 6206 Aviation Avenue Jacksonville, Florida

Zip Code: 32212

Country: USA
 

Record

SN00752014-F 20050217/050215213709 (fbodaily.com)
 

Source

FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

---

| FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |