MODIFICATION
61 -- RECHARGEABLE BATTERY AND INTEGRATED CHARGER FOR THE WIRELESS INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEM ON INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION
- Notice Date
- 3/25/2005
- Notice Type
- Modification
- NAICS
- 335911
— Storage Battery Manufacturing
- Contracting Office
- NASA/Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Houston Texas, 77058-3696, Mail Code: BH
- ZIP Code
- 77058-3696
- Solicitation Number
- NNJ0588720Q
- Response Due
- 4/1/2005
- Archive Date
- 3/25/2006
- Point of Contact
- Wendy E. Stone, Contract Specialist, Phone (281) 244-6459, Fax (281) 244-5337, Email wendy.e.stone@nasa.gov - Keith D. Hutto, Contracting Officer, Phone (281) 483-4165, Fax (281) 244-5337, Email keith.d.hutto@nasa.gov
- E-Mail Address
-
Wendy E. Stone
(wendy.e.stone@nasa.gov)
- Description
- THIS NOTICE CONSTITUTES AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE COMBINED SYNOPSIS/RFQ FOR RECHARGEABLE BATTERY AND INTEGRATED CHARGER FOR THE WIRELESS INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEM ON INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION. Companies shall acknowledge all amendment(s) in their quote. This notice serves as the official amendment to subject synopsis/RFQ and a written amendment will not be issued. The purpose of this amendment is to: 1 - Extend the due date of proposals to April 1, 2005, to allow for the resolution of questions which have arisen internally. If amendments to the SOW are necessary, they will be posted accordingly. 2 - Expand upon Mod 2, when answering the following question: "Para. 2.3 of the SOW defines a schedule of 16 weeks from contract award to delivery of flight units. The flight units are required to meet all the specifications for present onboard systems. This time interval appears very restrictive unless a present design already exists. Does NASA feel that this is a correct time span for delivery of the flight units given the space qualified parts may take up to one year to be available?". NASA’s response is as follows: Clarification; the units are required to meet the requirements of the RFP, which makes accommodations for use of commercial parts. Accordingly, NASA feels that the schedule required is a proper time span for delivery of the units. To aid offerors in the understanding of ratings the follow is provided from NSTS 22206 document, Criticality Ratings are defined as follows: FUNCTIONAL CRITICALITY DEFINITIONS FOR FLIGHT HARDWARE Criticality Potential Effect or Failure 1) Single failure which could result in loss of life or vehicle. 1R) Redundant hardware item(s), all of which if failed, could cause loss of life or vehicle. 2) Single failure which could result in loss of mission. 2R) Redundant hardware item(s), all of which if failed, could cause loss of mission. 3) All others. By default, this means Criticality 3 hardware failure does not cause a loss of mission impact. The due date for receipt of offers is extended to April 1, 2005. Companies shall provide the information stated in the synopsis/RFQ posted on the NASA Acquisition Internet Service (NAIS) on 3/4/2005. Documents related to this procurement are available over the Internet. These documents reside on a World Wide Web (WWW) server which may be accessed using a WWW browser application. The Internet site, or URL, for the NASA/JSC Business Opportunities home page is http://prod.nais.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/eps/bizops.cgi?gr=D&pin=73 NOTE: THIS NOTICE WAS NOT POSTED TO WWW.FEDBIZOPPS.GOV ON THE DATE INDICATED IN THE NOTICE ITSELF (25-MAR-2005); HOWEVER, IT DID APPEAR IN THE FEDBIZOPPS FTP FEED ON THIS DATE. PLEASE CONTACT fbo.support@gsa.gov REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
- Web Link
-
Click here for the latest information about this notice
(http://www.eps.gov/spg/NASA/JSC/OPDC20220/NNJ0588720Q/listing.html)
- Record
- SN00776515-F 20050327/050325213420 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |