Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF JUNE 23, 2005 FBO #1305
MODIFICATION

72 -- 84

Notice Date
6/21/2005
 
Notice Type
Modification
 
NAICS
443112 — Radio, Television, and Other Electronics Stores
 
Contracting Office
Other Defense Agencies, U.S. Special Operations Command, USASOC, ATTN:E-2929, Fort Bragg, NC, 28310
 
ZIP Code
28310
 
Solicitation Number
H92239-05-T-0035
 
Response Due
6/22/2005
 
Archive Date
7/7/2005
 
Point of Contact
Valaida Bradford, Contract Specialist, Phone 910 3960560, Fax 910 4329345,
 
E-Mail Address
bradforv@soc.mil
 
Description
AMENDMENT 0001 H92239-05-T-0035 61” and 84” PLASMAS & ACCESSORIES Question 1. I have a question concerning the 84” plasma specifications on the RFQ H92239-05-T-0035. The specification reads for an NEC 84VP5A plasma with except for two items. The first item is the seamless virtue. These screens are really four individual plasmas that act as one, but have 1.5 edged frames. The other question is that while these monitors come a static mount a tilt mount would be applicable to each individual screen. We have an 84 plasma screen available that meets the seamless aspect better and has a mount but doesn’t’ have all the specified inputs like the NEC specification. To the best of my knowledge these are the two items currently available. All others are prototypes. Is there a priority? Answer 1. In reference to the seamless virtue it is like the ORION PK-8401 has with a 3MM seam. We are looking for a Display that has the ability to project four screens in the 84” area and has the smallest seam. The ORION had the 3mm seam and was virtually unseen. It allowed us to split the screen into four display areas. We could display from 4 different feeds to these display areas. Thus by having three screens mounted we could monitor 12 displays. The tilt mount we were trying to get allowed the entire 84” screen to be tilted, if each screen like in the NEC example was tilted separately the gap would increase beyond the 1.5 gap. Is that 1.5 inches or mm, big difference in the seam if it is inches. Question 2. We are interested in bidding on the plasma screen solicitation, what kind of drawings are you requesting along with our bid? Answer 2. Drawings of the plasma screens you are providing. NOTE: THIS NOTICE WAS NOT POSTED TO WWW.FEDBIZOPPS.GOV ON THE DATE INDICATED IN THE NOTICE ITSELF (21-JUN-2005); HOWEVER, IT DID APPEAR IN THE FEDBIZOPPS FTP FEED ON THIS DATE. PLEASE CONTACT fbo.support@gsa.gov REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
 
Web Link
Link to FedBizOpps document.
(http://www.eps.gov/spg/ODA/USSOCOM/FortBraggNC/H92239-05-T-0035/listing.html)
 
Place of Performance
Address: Ft Bragg, NC
Zip Code: 28310
Country: USA
 
Record
SN00834175-F 20050623/050621213510 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.