Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF AUGUST 18, 2005 FBO #1361
MODIFICATION

66 -- Short Wave InfraRed Hyperspectral Imager

Notice Date
8/16/2005
 
Notice Type
Modification
 
NAICS
334513 — Instruments and Related Products Manufacturing for Measuring, Displaying, and Controlling Industrial Process Variables
 
Contracting Office
Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Ave. S.W., Washington, DC, 20375
 
ZIP Code
20375
 
Solicitation Number
N00173-05-R-MS06
 
Response Due
8/30/2005
 
Archive Date
9/14/2005
 
Point of Contact
Mary Sandy, Contract Specialist, Phone 202-767-2021, Fax 202-767-6197, - Carol Parnell, Contracting Officer, Phone 202-767-2372, Fax 202-767-6197,
 
E-Mail Address
mary.sandy@nrl.navy.mil, carol.parnell@nrl.navy.mil
 
Small Business Set-Aside
Total Small Business
 
Description
The purpose of this amendment is to answer questions received from potential offerors and reclassify the small business size standard. Question (1): Would you prefer a solution to include a range from 900 to 2500 nm? Or, were you thinking that something along the lines of 400 - 2500 nm is preferred? Answer (1): The spectral range must include a 900 to 1700 nm, with a goal of additional coverage outside this range as stated in the specification. The additional coverage from 400 to 2500 nm would be helpful, however the imager must not use any expendable cryogenic liquid, or a mechanical crycooler as stated in the specification. Question (2) After review of the RFP, a throughput model vs. wavelength was conducted for the system to estimate SNR?s, etc. and found what I think is an error in the spectral radiance tables in the RFP. Table 2 is the spectral radiance vs. wavelength that we get at the sensor for a 30% target, and Table 3 is the radiance we get for a 100% target (want the camera?s output from this radiance to be below the saturation level of the pixels). So, I would expect the ratio of the radiance values from the two tables to be about 3.33. However, they are of the ratio of 33. When I did the SNR estimate and photoelectron counts for Table 2, that seemed reasonable; but the photoelectron counts using Table 3 looked way too high. Answer (2): The spectral radiance values listed in Table 3 are incorrect. The specification has been revised and is posted at the following URL: http://heron.nrl.navy.mil/contracts/RFP/05ms06.htm The spectral radiance values listed in Table 2 are correct. The small business size standard is revised as follows: North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code: From: 334513 To: 334511 Number of Employees: From: 500 To: 750
 
Place of Performance
Address: Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook, Ave., SW, Washington, DC
Zip Code: 20375
 
Record
SN00871939-W 20050818/050816212934 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.