Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF SEPTEMBER 07, 2006 FBO #1746
MODIFICATION

38 -- PHYSICAL SECURITY UPGRADE U.S. CONSULATE IN NAPLES ITALY

Notice Date
7/20/2006
 
Notice Type
Modification
 
NAICS
236220 — Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
 
Contracting Office
Department of State, Office of Logistics Management, Acquisition Management, P.O. Box 9115 Rosslyn Station, Arlington, VA, 22219
 
ZIP Code
22219
 
Solicitation Number
SALMEC-06-R-0099
 
Response Due
8/10/2006
 
Point of Contact
Robert Powell, Chief, Phone 7038755164, Fax 7038756699, - Tyler Sinclair, Contract Specialist, Phone 703-875-6110, Fax 703-875-5272,
 
E-Mail Address
powellrr@state.gov, sinclairte@state.gov
 
Description
The previous notice is removied in its entirety and replaced as follows below and attached. U.S. CONSULATE IN NAPLES ITALY PHYSICAL SECURITY UPGRADE SALMEC-06-R-0099 THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS), Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO) is seeking to pre-qualify firms for Design-Build services for the above project. The contract will require design and construction services to include (but not limited to) anti-ram bollards, active vehicle anti-ram barriers, anti-climb fencing, anti-climb motorized gates, hard-line walls, 15-minute FEBR windows, 15-minute FEBR doors, PAC, Post-1, Technical Security infrastructure, new stairs, hydraulic lifts, architectural, electrical structural and mechanical work. All work on this contract is unclassified. Approximate Size: The site size is approximately 1940 square meters with a 6 story building with a foot print of 50-meters by 14-meters. All floors are the same size. Estimated design-build cost: $6-10 million. Award of this contract is subject to the availability of funds. Project Solicitation THE PROJECT SOLICITATION WILL CONSIST OF TWO PHASES. This announcement for pre-qualification is Phase I. The Department of State will evaluate and rate the pre-qualification proposals based on the evaluation criteria set forth in the following Evaluation Factors. Those offerors receiving a satisfactory evaluated rating from the technical board will be issued a formal solicitation (Request for Proposal) and invited to submit proposed pricing in Phase II. The government reserves the right not to pre-qualify any offeror receiving less than a satisfactory rating in any evaluation factors and sub-factors. Prior Prequalification Firms that submitted a prequalification package for projects of similar scope and dollar value during FY 2004 and/or 2005 and/or 2006 and were successfully pre-qualified by the OBO technical panel need not resubmit a complete pre-qualification package under this announcement. If interested, the previously pre-qualified offerors must send the POC a letter of interest as described below prior to the closure date of this solicitation. Letter of Interest: The letter must be submitted in accordance with the above. However, if any changes have occurred in a company's structure, size status, or Primary Design-Build Team since the submission of the original design-build pre-qualification package, the offeror must identify the change(s) in the letter for the government to review and evaluate. The government will determine if such changes are acceptable. Offerors must ensure that they cite the RFP number of the previous pre-qualification solicitation and what specific changes were made since pre-qualification. A change by the contractor must be sent for evaluation to this office regardless of how minor the offeror may believe it is. If no changes have occurred since pre-qualification, the offeror must state this in the letter of interest. Offerors are reminded that the letter of interest is due prior to the closure time and date of this solicitation otherwise the offeror will not be evaluated for pre-qualification for these projects. Prequalification based on successful prior prequalification is subject to a satisfactory evaluation of Past and Present Performance as described in Factor 3 below. Offerors need not provide additional Past Performance information. The Government will determine the extent to which past performance will be evaluated and the internal and/or external sources from which past performance information will be sought, if any. Prequalification Requirements The submissions received in response to the Phase II formal solicitation shall be submitted in the formats provided and will be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation procedures contained in the solicitation. Due to time constraints, it is anticipated that the pre-qualified firms will be required to participate in visits to the project sites within 10 to 15 days after the issuance of the design-build RFP. Phase I MANDATORY PREQUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS: Section 11 of the Foreign Service Buildings Act of 1926, as amended, (22 U.S.C. 302), known as the “Percy Amendment,” applies to the project described in this announcement. The act provides a 10% price preference to U.S. firms on any Department of State contract when the project is estimated to exceed $5,000,000.” The Percy Amendment also requires exclusion of firms from countries that exclude U.S. firms from their diplomatic construction projects. The requirements of the Act will be applied to all Phase II proposals received. Each company responding to this notice shall contact the DOS Contract Specialist for a copy of the pamphlet " PERCY AMENDMENT CERTIFICATION FORM" (The form contained in the FEDBIZOPPS announcement.) The form must be completed and included as part of the pre-qualifications package. If a joint venture is formed, the company having 51 percent or greater interest in the JV must be the one completing the pamphlet. Phase I Proposal Submission Requirements PRE-QUALIFICATION PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Offerors that meet the above mandatory requirements must submit documentation as described in the following evaluation factors if not already prequaulified in fiscal year 2004, 2005 or 2006 as previously described. To be considered for qualification, offerors must address the following criteria in writing, and meet the requirements of each of the criteria fully. Offerors are cautioned that only the information contained in their submission and any additional information obtained concerning past performance will be considered during the evaluation of offerors. Each of the factors below will be evaluated on a pass/fail basis. Submissions must be provided in original and three copies, and formatted according to evaluation factors. Submissions must be formatted and tabulated by evaluation factor: Factor 1 - Technical Approach and Business Management Plan; Factor 2 - Technical Qualifications; 2a - Professional Qualifications Construction, 2b - Security; 2c - Capacity; Factor 3 - Previous experience in the design and construction of projects that included a substantial degree of physical security elements Factor 4 - Past and Present Performance. Proposal Format: Maximum page limit for submissions is 150 single sided pages/75 doubled sided pages. The required SF Form 330 is limited to 50 single sided pages and is included in the total page count. No more than 25% of the total number of pages may be foldouts, maximum size 11.5” by 17”. Offers shall be submitted in size twelve (12) font, except the SF Form 330 which may be prepared in size ten (10) font. The pages comprising the pre-printed package required for the Certifications Relevant To Public Law 99-399, and the copy of the Joint Venture Agreement, when applicable, are not included in the maximum page count. Indicate project of interest on the face of the proposal(s). NOTE: Project lists and other information required in the SF 330 may be cross referenced in other areas of the submission. Information provided in the SF 330 need not be duplicated. FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL APPROACH AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT PLAN. Provide a business management plan for construction projects that explains the offeror's methodology for decision-making, personnel management, team approach, quality control and assurance, etc. in the execution of the contract scope, schedule establishment and control, and budget allocation. Demonstrate effective schedule and cost control by listing the planned and actual construction duration, construction contract award amount and final price, and construction change order rate in tabular form for four recent projects. Provide an organizational chart and description that clearly demonstrates the relationship amongst the offeror, subcontractors and OBO. Included in this shall be identification of key management personnel (identify individuals by name) to include construction, project management, administration, and quality control. Describe your quality assurance/quality control program and show the process and method of identifying and correcting deficiencies. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror's proposed plan demonstrates: a previous record of performing similar projects on schedule while maintaining effective cost and quality control and assurance program; a comprehensive and effective approach for management and coordination of decision making, project personnel, and control of project schedules and budgets. FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS. SUB-FACTOR 2a: PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION. Provide a minimum of four projects, maximum of five and provide construction volume per year in the last three years. Provide resumes of all key construction management personnel. It will be possible to substitute personnel if invited to phase II, however, qualifications must meet/exceed those submitted for phase I. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror's proposal: (a) Demonstrates professional qualifications, specialized experience, and technical competence in the construction of projects involving multiple contractor and subcontractor disciplines. (b) Demonstrates successful construction of project of similar scope and dollar value as that specified in this notice. SUB-FACTOR 2b: SECURITY. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror's proposal demonstrates capability in the construction of physical and technical security systems for buildings, including blast and HVAC chemical and biological protection. SUBFACTOR 2c: CAPACITY. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror's proposal demonstrates capacity (financial, professional, and personnel resources) to accomplish work within the $9 to 14 million range. The package will be evaluated to determine the extent to which it demonstrates the offeror has sufficient financial, bonding, professional, and personnel resources to accomplish the project. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror demonstrates sufficient capacity should the offeror be awarded the contract during Phase II. FACTOR 3: Submit previously successfully completed projects that included physical security elements and quantify by numbers the quantity of Active Vehicle Anti-ram Barriers, FEBR doors, FEBR windows, linear feet of FEBR walls, Anti-climb/Anti-ram Walls and Fences that were included in the projects FACTOR 4: PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE. Offerors shall submit detailed information concerning Federal, State and Local Government, and private contracts considered to be relevant in demonstrating ability to perform construction similar to that identified in this notice. Performance shall have been within the last three years. This information may include efforts performed by other divisions, corporate management, or critical subcontractors, if such resources will be brought to bear or significantly influence the performance of the proposed effort. Information shall include: offeror's company/division; program title; customer contract agency/company; contract number; brief description of effort and relevance to the proposed effort; type, value and performance period of contract; and offeror's role in past work (prime or sub). Provide name, address, email address and telephone number of current or last, Program Manager, Contracting Officer, and/or Contract Manager for each referenced project. Failure to provide ALL requested information may be grounds for nonprequalification. Offerors may include additional relevant information demonstrating significant achievements or explain performance problems they consider relevant to the proposed efforts. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror's past performance demonstrates conformance to specifications and compliance with contract terms and conditions; adherence to contract schedules; effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract costs; responsiveness and business-like concern for the customer; and effective management of subcontractors and key personnel, including timely award of subcontracts and selection, retention, and replacement (when necessary) of key personnel. If the Government, is unable to obtain past performance information from at least 2 references the offeror shall receive a neutral rating regarding past performance. Note: As prescribed in the Federal Acquisition Regulation at 15.305(a)(2)(iv), an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available will receive a neutral rating. Phase II Summary Of Statement Of Work (RFP) The statement of work, standards, and criteria issued with the RFP for each noted project will include: project scope, design requirements, design process, design documentation, design expertise, construction process, and post construction activities, reference drawings and specifications, codes and standards, and security requirements. Prime Contractor Requirements The design-build firm shall be the “Designer of Record.” The design-build firm will also be responsible for completing the construction drawings and specifications in accordance with the solicitation documentation provided. The contract type for this project will be firm fixed-price. Construction services will include construction labor and materials to execute the OBO accepted design; on-site organization with management of lines of authority to ensure overall project coordination; and overall control throughout the life of the project. Required services include preparation of construction documents, quality control plans, safety plans, project schedules, cost estimates, and project close-out activities. Design/Build Services The types of services to be provided include: architectural; structural, civil, electrical, seismic and geo-technical engineering, signage, security, landscaping design, cost estimating, scheduling, anti-ram bollards, active vehicle anti-ram barriers, anti-climb fencing, anti-climb motorized gates, hard-line walls, 15-minute FEBR windows, 15-minute FEBR doors, PAC, Post-1, Technical Security infrastructure, new stairs, hydraulic lifts, and coordination of the various disciplines involved. Closing ALL SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY 3:00 P.M. EST August 10, 2006. TRANSMISSION OF PROPOSALS: Offerors are advised to hand deliver or submit proposals by courier (FedEx, UPS Express Mail, DHL, ETC.) to the following address (DO NOT USE the U.S. POSTAL SERVICE (PO Box) ADDRESS) U.S. Department of State: Attn: Tyler Sinclair/Robert Powell A/LM/AQM/FDCD/CON, Room L-600, SA-6 1701 North Fort Myer Drive Arlington, VA 22209 Include the solicitation number, on the face of the package. REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATIONS must be submitted in writing to Tyler Sinclair/Robert Powell by email SinclairTE@state.gov and PowellRR@state.gov or via facsimile at (703) 875-6699. NOTE: THIS NOTICE MAY HAVE POSTED ON FEDBIZOPPS ON THE DATE INDICATED IN THE NOTICE ITSELF (20-JUL-2006). IT ACTUALLY APPEARED OR REAPPEARED ON THE FEDBIZOPPS SYSTEM ON 05-SEP-2006, BUT REAPPEARED IN THE FTP FEED FOR THIS POSTING DATE. PLEASE CONTACT fbo.support@gsa.gov REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
 
Web Link
Link to FedBizOpps document.
(http://www.fbo.gov/spg/State/A-LM-AQM/A-LM-AQM/SALMEC-06-R-0099/listing.html)
 
Place of Performance
Address: NAPLES
Zip Code: N/A
Country: ITALY
 
Record
SN01134543-F 20060907/060905222015 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.