Loren Data's SAM Daily™

FBO DAILY ISSUE OF SEPTEMBER 16, 2006 FBO #1755
MODIFICATION

C -- IQ A/E FACILITIES PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DOCUMENTATION IN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, NEVADA, AND NEW MEXICO

Notice Date

5/22/2006
 

Notice Type

Modification
 

NAICS

541330 — Engineering Services
 

Contracting Office

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, NAVFAC Southwest, Capital Improvement Contract Core, Attn: Code RAQ20 1220 Pacific Highway, San Diego, CA, 92132-5190
 

ZIP Code

92132-5190
 

Solicitation Number

N62473-06-R-1048
 

Response Due

6/21/2006
 

Point of Contact

vanessa schutt, Contract Specialist, Phone 6195323779, Fax 6195324789,
 

E-Mail Address

vanessa.schutt@navy.mil
 

Description

Amendment 0002 dated 01 June 06. Correct sections SF330, Sections E and G. Section E: “completed projects” definition is any project which is at the 100% or final phase. Section G: “provide a maximum of ten (10) projects” is corrected to read :”provide a maximum of five (5) projects.” End of amendment 0002. Amendment 0001 dated 22 May 06. Correct title to read DESCRIPTION: Preparation of Navy and Marine Corps Facilities Planning and Environmental Documentation in California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Idaho, Alaska, Washington , Montana and Utah. Add to description: Firms must be registered at the following sites prior to submitting the SF 330: 1, Central Contractor Registration at http://www.ccr.gov.; 2, Online Representations and Certifications Application at http://orca.bpn.gov.; and 3, Veterans 100 at http:vets100.cudenver.edu. End of amendment 0001. DESCRIPTION: Architect/Engineer (A/E) services are required for a firm fixed-price Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract for Preparation of Navy and Marine Corps Facilities Planning and Environmental Documentation in California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Idaho, Alaska, Washington , Montana and Utah. The maximum contract value may not exceed $7,500,000 aggregate total. The minimum guarantee for the contract shall be $5,000. The maximum value of individual task orders executed under this contract may not exceed $500,000. Multiple task orders may be awarded with similar completion schedules and overlapping delivery dates. Contract term is for a one-year base period with four option periods. Each performance period will run 365 calendar days, or until the maximum dollar limit is reached, whichever occurs first. The hourly rates will be negotiated for each calendar (12 month period) year and are independent of which option year is in effect. The government may exercise the option period unilaterally. Per NFAS 17.208-100(c)(1), options for post construction award services may be negotiated on individual task orders for unilateral exercise. Estimated start date for this contract is September 2006. Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Part 36.6 (Brooks Act) selection procedures apply. This is an unrestricted procurement. The NAICS Code for this procurement is 541330 and the annual small business size standard is $4.5M. The Government makes no representation as to the number of task orders or the actual amount of work to be ordered. Contractors are not guaranteed work in excess of the minimum guarantee. Firms that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract or task order issued under the resulting contract are prohibited from providing the subsequent construction. This limitation also applies to subsidiaries/affiliates of the firm. REQUIRED SERVICES: Required services are primarily the following: PLANS: Base Development Plans, Activity Master Plans; Regional Functional Plans; Maintenance and Sustainment Plans; Encroachment Action Plans; Family Housing and Bachelor Quarters Comprehensive Neighborhood Plans (CNP); Activity Overview Plans; Business Plans; Base Exterior Architecture Plans (BEAP) STUDIES: Regional Planning Studies; Regional Shore Infrastructure Planning (RSIP) studies; Concept Studies; Special Planning Studies; Traffic/Parking/Movement (Pedestrian & Vehicular) Studies; Anti-Terrorism (AT) Facilities Planning studies; Sustainable Planning studies; Feasibility Studies, Safety Studies, Air Installation Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) studies; Range Air Installation Compatible Use Zones (RAICUZ) studies; site studies; facilities life cycle studies EVENTS: Visioning and Scenario conferences, Functional Analysis Concept Development (FACD) sessions (design charettes), facilitated charrettes In addition, the secondary focus of this contract includes requirements for: PROJECT PLANNING DOCUMENTS: The preparation of Military Construction (MILCON), Demolitionning documentation elements: MILCON and Special Project Planning Documentation (DD Form 1391 project planning documentation); Construction Cost Estimates, Preliminary and Parametric Cost Estimates; Siting-Land Use Studies/Analyses; Special Site Approvals (EMR, Ordnance etc.); Economic Analyses (EAs); Basic Facilities Requirements (BFR) Documentation; Facilities Planning Documents (FPD); Engineering Evaluations (EE); Preliminary Hazard Analyses (PHA); Preliminary Hazard Lists (PHL) Sustainable Design (LEEDS). GEO-SPATIAL INFORMATION & SERVICE: The preparation of Geo-Spatial Data services includes, maps and database information with primary focus to assess, evaluate, manipulate, convert, correct, project, load, link, scan and provide quality assurance of maps, charts, hard copy, legacy database information utilizing Microsoft Office, Adobe Acrobat, Oracle, AutoCAD, ARCVIEW, ARCINFO, ARCIMS, SDS and ESRI. All Geo-Spatial Data and related graphics within the plan or study shall be spatially geo-referenced. Any data gathered during creation of plans and studies shall be developed as a database table integrated within the RSIP-Link NEPA PLANNING: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents, including Categorical Exclusions (CATEX), Environmental Assessments (EA), and Environmental Impact Statements (EIS); Environmental planning documentation including, but not limited to, historical, cultural, archeological and biological studies, Biological Assessments for threatened and endangered species, marine studies, Coastal Consistency Determinations (CCD), and documentation for Army Corps of Engineers permits. Geo-Spatial Data including digitize or scan graphic or textual information sources into a digital format, create tabular database files, collect primary data using approved global positioning system (GPS) equipment and/or explicitly stated field data collection methodologies, compile graphic data using aerial photogrammetric techniques, create ESRI 9.1 and SDS ver. 2.5 compliant attributed data files, produce hard copy graphic or tabular data outputs from GIS data, make approved modifications to existing GIS data provided by CNRSW GIS as required to meet specific project requirements. SELECTION CRITERIA AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: The selection will be based on the following criteria and are in descending order of importance: Criteria 1: Professional Qualifications (SF 330, Section E); Criteria 2: Recent Experience (SF 330, Section F), (SF 330, Sections F & H); The remaining Criteria is to be addressed in SF 330, Section H. Criteria 3: Capacity; Criteria 4: Past Performance; Criteria 5: Quality Control; Criteria 6: Location; Criteria 7: Volume of Work; Criteria 8: Commitment to Small Business Concerns (Large Firms Only); Criteria 9: Partnering. SF 330s will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firm based on criteria responses. Evaluating past performance and experience may include information provided by the firm, customer inquiries, Government databases, and publicly available sources. Failure to provide requested data, inaccessible points of contact, or invalid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: The SF 330 is limited to 30 pages, 8.5”x11” Submit the following: a) One (1) original and five (5) copies of SF 330 for the prime offeror (SF330 should also include team’s key subconsultants) addressing the following selection criteria information; and b) one compact disk copy, in Adobe Acrobat format, of the SF330 being submitted by the firm. The required services indicate a broad service type with a number of subtype projects, for example, NEPA is a service, EA is a subtype. The government will place greater value on a through explanation of a service using a subtype example, as opposed to providing brief explanations of every subtype in a service. SF330, Part I, Section A: Contract Information: In Block 5, list firm’s Dunn and Bradstreet and Taxpayer Identification Number in addition to the name of the firm. SF330, Section D: Organization Chart: In addition to the Instructions provided for the SF 330, identify the overall relationship and lines of authority of the proposed team, including key subconsultants and office quality control. (Note: All individuals listed on the organization chart are not required to have a resume in Section E, such as administrative or lower level engineering positions.) This chart shall not be counted as part of the 30 page limitation. This chart must be affixed to the submittal to avoid separation in handling. SF 330, Section E: CRITERIA 1, PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: Professional qualifications of the proposed team members assigned to this project in Architect-Engineer (A-E) services including the preparation of the required services. Submission Requirements: Provide brief resumes of each proposed team member who will specifically perform the major tasks listed above for this contract. All Key personnel must be professionally registered/accredited in their discipline. Provide the highest level of education achieved and the number of years engaged in the discipline. Each resume shall include a maximum of five (5) specific completed projects that best illustrate the individual member’s experience. SF330, Section F, CRITERIA 2, RECENT TEAM EXPERIENCE: Specialized experience and technical competence of the proposed team members assigned to this project experienced in the preparation of the required services. Submission Requirements: For the team, provide a maximum of five (5) specific completed projects that best illustrate overall team experience. Include within block 24 of SF330, Section F, a brief narrative for each project. Discuss effectiveness by conformance to scope, adherence to performance schedules, limiting changes and delivering a product that satisfies the customers requirements. SF330, Section G, Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects: Submit in accordance with the SF 330 Instructions. From the total projects listed in Section F, provide a maximum of ten (10) projects. SF330, Section H, Additional Information requested by Agency. Address the remaining Criteria 3 through 9; additional sheets may be used up to the maximum of 30 total sheets, if required. See submission requirements. Clearly identify the Criteria number and title. CRITERIA 3, CAPACITY: Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time. Submission Requirement: Describe firm’s capacity to accomplish work in required time frames. Indicate the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project team (including consultants) for the specified contract performance period. Indicate specialized equipment available. Indicate the firm’s and key personnel prior security clearances. CRITERIA 4, PAST PERFORMANCE: Past performance with Government agencies and private industry with respect to quality of work. Points of contact provided in other criteria may be contacted. A proposal with no record of relevant past performance information shall be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Submission Requirements: For each project provided as experience under Criteria 2, list any applicable awards and commendations. Other performance evaluation results and awards may also be listed separately. Reference agency/company issuing evaluation/award/commendation and respective date. If a federal contract, state evaluation type and rating. If not a federal contract, provide any applicable similar evaluation information. If no documentation exists, so state. CRITERIA 5, QUALITY CONTROL: Demonstrated success of the Office Quality Control (QC) program used by the firm to ensure quality products. Submission Requirement: Describe the prime’s QC program; who is primarily responsible for the QC program, how does the prime firm ensure quality consistently across the enime’s QC program; who is primarily responsible for the QC program, how does the prime firm ensure quality consistently across the entire team. Illustrate success in implementing the program. Address the team’s QC processes for checking documents for errors, omissions and quality, and incorporating and tracking review comments. Of special interest are the QC processes in place that minimize the government’s effort to QA the A/E’s work product for errors, omissions, and quality. CRITERIA 6, LOCATION: Firm’s demonstrated knowledge of the general geographical areas in which projects could be located. Firm’s location of main offices, branch offices, and sub consultants offices, The Firm’s ability to perform work in the western United States. Submission Requirements: Describe and illustrate the team’s knowledge and availability to work in the geographical area. CRITERIA 7, VOLUME OF WORK. Volume of DOD work awarded to firm in past 12 months with objective of equitably distributing contracts among firms, including minority owned firms and firms without prior DOD contracts. Submission Requirement: Provide a list of DOD contracts awarded in the last 12 months. Firms with multiple offices shall indicate which branch office completed each project. Include agency phone numbers and points of contact. CRITERIA 8, COMMITMENT TO SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS (Large business firms only) : Use of small business concerns as subconsultants. Submission Requirement: Demonstrate commitment and use of small business concerns as subconsultants on this contract. Provide a chart with each small business category, identify the proposed names of the small businesses, and the dollar amount and subcontracting percentage the prime anticipates subcontracting to each firm. Additionally, provide a brief narrative as to how your firm will meet the following small business subcontracting goals: Small Business (SB)–30%; Small Disadvantaged Business–5%; Women-Owned SB–10%; HUBZone SB-3%; Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned SB–3%; Veteran-Owned SB–3%; and NOTE: If a large business firm is selected for award, an acceptable subcontracting plan that reflects a minimum of subcontracting goals stated above must be submitted before price negotiations begin for contact award. CRITERIA 9, PARTNERING : Demonstrated success and knowledge in partnering and facilitation with the government. Illustrate the ability to succeed with NAVFAC as a client working with Navy and Marine Corps customers. Submission Requirements: Describe the team’s experience in facilitation and partnering. SELECTION INTERVIEW REQUIREMENTS: Personal interviews may be scheduled for firms slated as most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to explain management and the Firms abilities. Elaborate presentations are not desired. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: All information must be included in the SF 330 package, (cover letter, attachments and excess number of pages will be excluded from the evaluation process). Per DFAR 252.204.7004, firms must be registered with Central Contractor Registration prior to contract award. Registration information is available at their website, http://www.ccr.gov. Those firms that meet the requirements in this announcement and wish to be considered must submit the SF330 per Submission Requirements above, to: NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND SOUTHWEST, Code AQ2.VS, 1220 Pacific Highway, Attn: Vanessa Schutt, San Diego, CA 92132-5187, no later than 2:00 p.m. local time, PST, on 21 June 06. Submittals received after this date and time will not be considered. Firms not providing the required information may be negatively evaluated. Facsimile submittals will not be accepted. Site visits will not be arranged during this period. Debriefing requests will not be entertained prior to 45 days after the submittal due date. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. ALL INFORMATION NEEDED TO SUBMIT SF 330 DOCUMENTS IS CONTAINED HEREIN. NO SOLICITATION PACKAGE, TECHNICAL INFORMATION, OR BIDDER/PLAN HOLDER LIST WILL BE ISSUED. It is the offeror’s responsibility to check the NAVFAC electronic solicitation website at: http://esol.navfac.navy.mil for any revisions to this announcement or other notices. E-mail address for inquiries is: vanessa.schutt@navy.mil. NOTE: THIS NOTICE MAY HAVE POSTED ON FEDBIZOPPS ON THE DATE INDICATED IN THE NOTICE ITSELF (22-MAY-2006). IT ACTUALLY APPEARED OR REAPPEARED ON THE FEDBIZOPPS SYSTEM ON 14-SEP-2006, BUT REAPPEARED IN THE FTP FEED FOR THIS POSTING DATE. PLEASE CONTACT fbo.support@gsa.gov REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
 

Web Link

Link to FedBizOpps document.
(http://www.fbo.gov/spg/DON/NAVFAC/N68711AC/N62473-06-R-1048/listing.html)
 

Place of Performance

Address: SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

Zip Code: 92132

Country: UNITED STATES
 

Record

SN01144523-F 20060916/060914230218 (fbodaily.com)
 

Source

FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

---

| FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |