Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 FBO #1766
MODIFICATION

B -- Industry Audience Usability Testing of CDRH Website

Notice Date
8/24/2006
 
Notice Type
Modification
 
NAICS
541519 — Other Computer Related Services
 
Contracting Office
Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Office of Acquisitions and Grants Services, 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 2129, Rockville, MD, 20857-0001
 
ZIP Code
20857-0001
 
Solicitation Number
FDA-SOL-06-003440
 
Response Due
8/31/2006
 
Point of Contact
Angela Dash, Contract Specialist , Phone 301-827-5094, Fax 301-827-7101,
 
E-Mail Address
angela.dash@fda.hhs.gov
 
Small Business Set-Aside
Total Small Business
 
Description
This Amendment 0001 is to provide information on how quotations should be submitted. An electronic copy should be sent to Angela.Dash@fda.hhs.gov as well as 3 hard copies via mail to DHHS/Food and Drug Administration, Office of Acquisitions and Grants Services, Attn: Angela Dash, 5630 Fishers Lane,HFA-500, Room 2129, Rockville, MD 20857. All other terms and conditions remain the same. CDRH staff to discuss work plan and schedule (September, 2006); B.Written usability testing plan; C.Written scripts of screening questionnaire to recruit users and scenarios for users to follow; D.Written report summarizing the results of the usability testing, user performance metrics, and immediate and long-term recommendations for improving the website; ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS THAT WERE DUE 08/23. Q. What is the contract type? Is it firm fixed priced? A. Firm fixed price Q. Is there a ceiling value for this procurement? A. Yes Q. What is the program office associated with this program? A. Office of Communication, Education and Radiation Programs, Division of Device User Programs and Systems Analysis Q. Is there an incumbent? If so, do you have the; A. There is no current incumbent. Q. What is the estimated level of effort in hours? A. The hours depend on the project proposal, to include the following: managing the project, attending meetings, developing materials, pilot-testing questions, conducting sessions, analyzing data, writing report. Q. Will travel be required to conduct interviews? A. It depends on the project proposal. Remote testing sessions could be acceptable if the contractor can demonstrate experience and competence in this method. Q. Is the usability tool to be created by the contractor an automated tool or just a moderator?s guide for the web usage? A. The usability tool is the moderator's guide combined with the method proposed to conduct the actual testing. This could be automated or non-automated. Q. Are usability tests required for both FDA internal users and vendor users? A. The usability testing will be conducted on actual representatives from regulated industry only. Q. Is the deliverable testing script the same as the moderator?s guide? A. Yes. Q. Is the activity in section 2)B. going to be done by the FDA representative or is this activity done by the contractor? It currently reads like these are FDA driven activities and if so they that would impact contractor deliverables. A. Yes, the section IIB states "The FDA, in the person of the project officer or her designee, will perform the following tasks:" These tasks will be completed by the FDA representatives who will be responsible for interacting with the contractor to accomplish the terms of the contract. Each of these tasks will influence the contractor's deliverables. Q. In section II.A.1.f there is mention of two rounds of usability testing with 8 ? 9 users in each round. In section IV and V.D there is mention of a written report (singular). Is the intent that the two rounds will take place concurrently, or at least around the same time, or will they be separated by substantial time? If separated, is there a need for a report after each round, or only one report after both rounds have been completed? A. The 2 rounds of usability testing can take place around the same time. We are proposing 2 different rounds rather than one larger round so that each can address a different subset of the audience or can contain more targeted questions Q. Under Submission of Responses, the RFQ says the 10 page limit for the proposal does not include sample materials and personnel resumes. What sort of ?sample materials? are requested? Should costing be included in the 10 page limit, or should costs be submitted in a separate document? A. We are not requesting/requiring any specific sample materials. However, if you would like to demonstrate your ability to conduct usability testing by submitting test scripts, reports, or company protocols, we would be happy to review them. Your technical proposal should not exceed 10 pages, and you may submit your cost proposal as a separate document. Q. Can you provide a ceiling price or ballpark price range that has been budgeted for this project? A. We are not able to provide that information, please submit a brief description on your pricing for the necessary personnel, materials, services in support of this project. NOTE: THIS NOTICE MAY HAVE POSTED ON FEDBIZOPPS ON THE DATE INDICATED IN THE NOTICE ITSELF (24-AUG-2006). IT ACTUALLY APPEARED OR REAPPEARED ON THE FEDBIZOPPS SYSTEM ON 25-SEP-2006, BUT REAPPEARED IN THE FTP FEED FOR THIS POSTING DATE. PLEASE CONTACT fbo.support@gsa.gov REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
 
Web Link
Link to FedBizOpps document.
(http://www.fbo.gov/spg/HHS/FDA/DCASC/FDA-SOL-06-003440/listing.html)
 
Place of Performance
Address: 1350 Piccard Dr Rockville, MD
Zip Code: 20850
Country: UNITED STATES
 
Record
SN01154496-F 20060927/060925223330 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.