Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF FEBRUARY 22, 2007 FBO #1914
MODIFICATION

99 -- The Objective of this contract is to serve as the Project Manager Support for unit mission conversion and transformation process for ANG units converting to C21 Aircraft.

Notice Date
2/20/2007
 
Notice Type
Modification
 
NAICS
541618 — Other Management Consulting Services
 
Contracting Office
National Guard Bureau, Contracting Support, ATTN: NGB-AQC, 1411 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202-3231
 
ZIP Code
22202-3231
 
Solicitation Number
W9133L-07-R-0023
 
Response Due
3/1/2007
 
Archive Date
4/30/2007
 
Small Business Set-Aside
Total Small Business
 
Description
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Solicitation W9133L-07-R-0023, C-21 Conversion Project Manager Support, Air National Guard, Andrews AFB, MD The contractor is encouraged to surpass the minimal technical specifications as well as demonstrate technical, operational, and administrative expertise to support the customer in exceeding organizational and departmental objectives. It would be appreciat ed if you would provide us with comments regarding the contractors past performance. In order to maintain the integrity of the evaluation process, it is requested that you do not divulge the name of the contractor nor discuss your comments on this questio nnaire with any other individuals. Upon completion of the questionnaire, please provide your input as soon as possible to Mr. Reginald A. Caldwell at the following, email address or FAX Number: Reginald.caldwell@ngb.ang.af.mil FAX #: (703) 607-1667 Thank you for your cooperation. Contractor Name: ________________________ Address: _______________________________ Contract Number/Project Title being evaluated: _________________________ Description of Project:_____________________________________________ Contract Award Date:_____________________ Completion Date: ________________________ Contract Value: __________________________ Contract Type: __________________________ EVALUATOR: (the following information will assist in the analysis of past performance data. Information will be kept confidential) 1. Name of Evaluator: ___________________________________________________ 2. Phone Number: _______________________________________________________ 3. Orgnization/Address:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4. Position held in relation to the project: ____________________________________ 5. Email address: _______________________________________________________ RATING: Please evaluate the contractor's performance using the following ratings only: Rating Definition Excellent The contractor greatly exceeded contract requirements. Satisfactory The contractors performance met contract requirements. Unsatisfactory The contractors performance failed significantly to meet contract requirements. Performance was poor. 1. The relationship between the contractor and customers Consulting Support team. Rating:  Excellent  Satisfactory  Unsatisfactory Comments: ____________________________________________________________ 2. The contractor's on-site management and coordination of subcontractors. Rating:  Excellent  Satisfactory  Unsatisfactory Comments: ____________________________________________________________ 3. The contractor's overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness and cooperative conduct. Rating:  Excellent  Satisfactory  Unsatisfactory Comments: ____________________________________________________________ 4. The contractor's performance on delivery of quality work. Rating:  Excellent  Satisfactory  Unsatisfactory Comments: ____________________________________________________________ 5. The contractor's quality control. Rating:  Excellent  Satisfactory  Unsatisfactory Comments: ____________________________________________________________ 6. The contractor's ability/actions to meet schedule. Rating:  Excellent  Satisfa ctory  Unsatisfactory Comments: ____________________________________________________________ 7. The contractor's ability to control and provide the required work at a reasonable price. Rating:  Excellent  Satisfactory  Unsatisfactory Comments: ____________________________________________________________ 8. The contractor's compliance with labor standards. Rating:  Excellent  Satisfactory  Unsatisfactory Comments: ____________________________________________________________ 9. The contractor's compliance with safety standards. Rating:  Excellent  Satisfactory  Unsatisfactory Comments: ____________________________________________________________ 10. The quality of the end product. Rating:  Excellent  Satisfactory  Unsatisfactory Comments: ____________________________________________________________ 11. Would you award another contract to this contractor? Yes_______ No________ Comments: _______________________________________________________ 12. Overall Rating Rating:  Excellent  Satisfactory  Unsatisfactory Comments: ____________________________________________________________
 
Place of Performance
Address: National Guard Bureau, Contracting Support ATTN: NGB-AQC, 1411 Jefferson Davis Highway Arlington VA
Zip Code: 22202-3231
Country: US
 
Record
SN01235226-W 20070222/070220222710 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.