Loren Data's SAM Daily™

FBO DAILY ISSUE OF MARCH 14, 2007 FBO #1934
MODIFICATION

X -- Professional Development Symposium, to include Conference Space and Audio Visual Equipment

Notice Date

3/12/2007
 

Notice Type

Modification
 

NAICS

721110 — Hotels (except Casino Hotels) and Motels
 

Contracting Office

ACA, Capital District Contracting Center, Directorate of Contracting, 9410 Jackson Loop, Suite 101, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5116
 

ZIP Code

22060-5116
 

Solicitation Number

W91QV1-07-T-0026
 

Response Due

3/16/2007
 

Archive Date

5/15/2007
 

Small Business Set-Aside

N/A
 

Description

The purpose of this modification is to change the NAICS Code from 721199 to 721110 for solicitation number W91QV1-07-T-0026 and incorporate the Past Performance Questionnaire referenced in the Combined Synopsis/Solicitation Notice. PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (SERVICES) FOR COMPLETION BY OFFEROR. OFFERORS SHOULD COMPLETE ONE COPY OF THIS FORM FOR EACH REFERENCE PROVIDED. Name of Individual/Firm being evaluated:______________________________________ Name of Firm/Agency for which the referenced work was performed:_______________________________________________________________ Was this work with a: Commercial __ Fed. Govt ___Local/state Govt __ entity. Firms/Agency address:_________________________________________________________ Name, Title, Employer and Contact Information for Individual Providing Reference: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Period of Performance: ________________________________________________ Contract Award Date: _________________________________________________ Contract Completion Date: _____________________________________________ Check Contract Type: Fixed Price (FP)_ FP Incentive_ FP Economic Price Adjustment_ Award Fee_ Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) completion_CPFF Term_ CP Incentive Fee_ Cost Plus Award Fee_ Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity_ Basic Ordering Agreement_ Re quirement_ Labor Hour_ Time and Material_ Sealed Bid_ Negotiated_ Competitive_ Non-competitive_ Contract Amount: ___________________ Prime Contractor: YES NO The contract number and services provided: ____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Relevance of the referenced contract to the current requirement: ____________________ ________________________________________________________________________ PART II: FOR COMPLETION BY REFERENCE. References are asked to complete all items set forth in this Part II and return the completed form either by Fax: 703-806-4282; E-mail: sandra.elaine.tillman@us.army.mil or mail it directly to the address shown below no later than 16 March 2007 Capital District Contracting Center ATTN: Sandra E. Tillman 9410 Jackson Loop, Bldg 1425 Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5134 For each performance element identified below, references should evaluate performance of the firm or individual identified in Part 1 of this form. Where the reference lacks sufficient information to provide an evaluation for a particular performance eleme nt, this should be noted. Where any deficiency or unfavorable information is identified, the reference should identify any mitigating factors that may weigh in favor for the person/firm on whose behalf the reference is provided (i.e., problems due to caus es outside the contractors control). An individual within your organization that is knowledgeable of the contractors day-to-day operations and overall performance should complete this questionnaire. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the contractors performance with the judgment of others within their organization, as applicable. Name of Requestor: ____________________________________________________ Name of Respondent: __________________________________________________ Position and Title: _____________________________________________________ Telephone Number: _______________________FAX Number: ________________ Email Address:________________________________________________________ Address: ________________________________________________________ ___ _____________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Date Questionnaire was Completed: _____________ Detailed description of Work/Requirement: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __ Contract Amount:____________________ Was a Subcontracting Plan Required?______ Contract Award Date:____________Contract Completion Date:____________________ On what basis are you qualified to evaluate the performance of subject firm/individual? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ The following chart depicts the ratings that are to be used to evaluate the contractors performance: E VG S M U Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many. Problems, if any, were negligible, and were resolved in a timely and highly effective manner. Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some. There were few minor problems, which t he contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems; corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. Performance did not meet contractual requirements. There were serious problems, and the contractors corrective actions were ineffective. When responding to the questions listed, circle the letter that most accurately describes the contractors performance or situation. For any neutral, marginal, or unsatisfactory rating, please provide explanatory narratives in the remarks block. These na rratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. If a question is not applicable, circle N/A. If you circle a Yes/No answer that is marked with an asterisk (*), please provide a corresponding explanation in the remarks block. If more space is required, use the back of the questionnaire or attach additional pages. Handwritten responses to this questionnaire are acceptable. However, if responses are handwritten, please print legibly. Your time and effort in providing this vitally important information are greatly appreciated. PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS: QUALITY OF SERVICE 1. Contractors ability to meet minimum quality standards specified for performance. E VG S N M U N/A 2. Contractors ability to effectively control the quality of services provided. E VG S N M U N/A 3. Contractors compliance with contractual terms and conditions. E VG S N M U N/A 4. Quality of products furnished. E VG S N M U N/A 5. Overall rating of contractors standard of workmanship. E VG S N M U N/A 6. Overall rating of contractors quality of service. E VG S N M U N/A TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE 1. Contractors ability to meet specific response times and scheduled time frames for completion of specific tasks. E VG S N M U N/A 2. Contractors responsiveness/timeliness for providing administrative reports/documents required by the contract. E VG S N M U N/A 3. Contractors adherence to delivery schedules? E VG S N M U N/A 4. Contractors timeliness in responding to emergency service requirements. E VG S N M U N/A 5. Overall rating of contractors responsiveness/timeliness. E VG S N M U N/A BUSINESS RELATIONS 1. Contractors ability to identify problems and potential problems, and promptly notify the Contracting Officer. E VG S N M U N/A 2. Contractors ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner. E VG S N M U N/A 3. Contractors willin gness to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns. E VG S N M U N/A 4. Contractors ability to use effective approaches and provide technical expertise and resources to solve contract problems. E VG S N M U N/A 5. Extent to which the contractor has demonstrated reasonable and cooperative behavior. E VG S N M U N/A 6. Contractors effectiveness in interfacing with the Contracting Officer, quality assurance personnel, and customers. E VG S N M U N/A 7. Contractors flexibility in satisfying the requirements of its customers. E VG S N M U N/A 8. Extent to which the contractor provided prompt and courteous service when responding to customer complaints. E VG S N M U N/A 9. Contractors ability to coordinate, integrate, and provide for effective subcontractor management E VG S N M U N/A 10. Overall rating of customer satisfaction. E VG S N M U N/A 11. Overall rating of business relations. E VG S N M U N/A MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL 1. Contractors ability to select and retain cooperative and effective key personnel, such as the contract manager and quality control personnel. E VG S N M U N/A 2. Extent key personnel were knowledgeable about contractual requirements. E VG S N M U N/A 3. Contractors ability to meet appropriate staffing levels with qualified personnel in order to provide required services. E VG S N M U N/A 4. Rate the contractors ability to provide continuity of key personnel on the contract. E VG S N M U N/A 5. Rate the contractors ability to replace key personnel in a timely fashion E VG S N M U N/A 6. Contractors ability to effectively manage subcontractors. E VG S N M U N/A 7. Rate the level of the functional expertise of the contractors staff. 8. Overall rating of contractors management of key personnel. E VG S N M U N/A COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY, HEALTH, AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS 1. Has the contractor ever received any Notices of Violations for noncompliance with environmental laws or regulations? YES* NO 2. Contractors compliance with environmental requirements. E VG S N M U N/A 3. Contractors compliance with safety requirements. E VG S N M U N/A 4. Contractors compliance with health requirements. E VG S N M U N/A 5. Contractors compliance with security requirements. E VG S N M U N/A COST MANAGEMENT 1. Extent to which the contractor provided reliable, supportable cost estimates or proposals E VG S N M U N/A 2. Extent to which the contractor met the proposed cost estimates? E VG S N M U N/A CONTRACTUAL CONSIDERATIONS 1. If a subcontracting plan was required, extent to which contractor met applicable goals for small business participation. E VG S N M U N/A 2. Has an election ever been made not to exercise an option or continue relations due to contractors poor performance? YES* NO 3. Has a Contract Discrepancy Report ever been issued? YES* NO 4. Has a cure notice or show cause notice ever been issued? YES* NO 5. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience? YES* Partially _____ NO Completely ______ 6. Are there any pending terminations? YES* NO 7. Overall rating of contractors performance under this contract. E VG S N M U N/A 8. Would you hire this contractor again? YES NO* *REMARKS ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 

Place of Performance

Address: ACA, Capital District Contracting Center Directorate of Contracting, 9410 Jackson Loop, Suite 101 Fort Belvoir VA

Zip Code: 22060-5116

Country: US
 

Record

SN01249076-W 20070314/070312220641 (fbodaily.com)
 

Source

FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

---

| FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |