MODIFICATION
66 -- UAV-CAPABLE COASTAL HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGER
- Notice Date
- 4/5/2007
- Notice Type
- Modification
- NAICS
- 541710
— Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research, Naval Research Laboratory/STENNIS, John C. Stennis Space Center, Stennis Space Center, MS, 39529-5004, UNITED STATES
- ZIP Code
- 39529-5004
- Solicitation Number
- N00173-07-R-RS02
- Response Due
- 4/11/2007
- Archive Date
- 4/26/2007
- Point of Contact
- Richard Sewell, Contract Specialist, Phone 228-688-4571, Fax 228-688-6055, - Patricia Lewis, Contracting Officer, Phone 228-688-5593, Fax 228-688-6055,
- E-Mail Address
-
rsewell@nrlssc.navy.mil, plewis@nrlssc.navy.mil
- Small Business Set-Aside
- Total Small Business
- Description
- The purpose of this Amendment is to respond to technical questions submitted against RFP Number N00173-07-R-RS02. Question 1: Are the 'at spectral radiance' values in Tables 3 and 4 the expected signal at the UAV? Answer 1: Yes Question 2: What is the Governments intended application for the required system? Answer 2: The Government intends to use the required system to map and study riverine and coastal environments. Question 3: Is the Government strictly doing a mapping operation for analysis later, or would real-time target identification better suit its requirements? Answer 3: The Government intends to perform a mapping operation. Question 4: What are the Governments intended targets? Answer 4: See Answer 3, above. Question 5: Is the Government trying to measure the UV component for missile plumes? Answer 5: No. Question 6: Does the Government wish to track targets as they move? Answer 6: No. Question 7: Why is the Government linking the GPS/INS package to the Hyperspectral sensor? Answer 7: See Answers 2 and 3 above. Question 8: Could the need for GPS/INS be eliminated if the sensor did not require swath alignment? Answer 8: No. Question 9: Why does the Government require storing data on the airframe? Answer 9: See the Governments Storage Requirements on Page 7 of Attachment 1. The Government does not anticipate real-time transmission of data to the ground. Offerors may offer any system that meets the requirements and specifications set out in Attachment 1 to the RFP. Question 10: Would the Government prefer to transmit data to the ground in real-time? Answer 10: Offerors may offer any system that meets the requirements and specifications set out in Attachment 1 to the RFP. The Government encourages submission of innovative designs. Question 11: Would it be of interest to the Government to be able to point the instrument at targets. Answer 11: See Answer 10 above. Question 12: We hereby request an additional extension to the RFP deadline. Answer 12: No additional extension to the RFP deadline is anticipated. NOTE: THIS NOTICE WAS NOT POSTED TO FEDBIZOPPS ON THE DATE INDICATED IN THE NOTICE ITSELF (05-APR-2007); HOWEVER, IT DID APPEAR IN THE FEDBIZOPPS FTP FEED ON THIS DATE. PLEASE CONTACT fbo.support@gsa.gov REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
- Web Link
-
Link to FedBizOpps document.
(http://www.fbo.gov/spg/DON/ONR/Code3235/N00173-07-R-RS02/listing.html)
- Record
- SN01267824-F 20070407/070405224446 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |