MODIFICATION
10 -- MNK-BAA-07-0005 - Concept Weapon Simulation Software Development (CWSSD)
- Notice Date
- 8/23/2007
- Notice Type
- Modification
- NAICS
- 541710
— Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Air Force, Air Force Materiel Command, AFRL - Eglin Research Site, 101 West Eglin Blvd Suite 337, Eglin AFB, FL, 32542-6810, UNITED STATES
- ZIP Code
- 32542-6810
- Solicitation Number
- MNK-BAA-07-0005
- Response Due
- 9/5/2007
- Archive Date
- 9/20/2007
- Point of Contact
- Mark Fitzgerald, Contract Specialist, Phone (850)883-2670, Fax (850)882-9599,
- E-Mail Address
-
mark.fitzgerald@eglin.af.mil
- Description
- Special BAA announcement MNK-BAA-07-0005, as revised through Amendment 2, is further revised as follows. The due date for proposals is unchanged and remains not later than 2:00 PM Central Time, 5 Sep 07, to AFRL/MNK, attention Mr. Mark Fitzgerald and Mr. Chris Slayton: 1. Paragraph E ? BASIS FOR AWARD, Factor (2), last paragraph is revised to read as follows: Capabilities and experience may include unique combinations of these sub-factors, which are integral factors for achieving proposal objectives. Any resumes should be in a separate Appendix, which is not included in the Technical Proposal page limits. The Government team may request supplemental historical information if required to confirm/verify experience and capabilities. 2. Paragraph E ? BASIS FOR AWARD, Factor (3), is revised to read as follows: Factor (3) Cost ? Reasonableness and realism of proposed costs. The total cost to be evaluated will include the cost of performing Task Order 1, the cost of testing, and any applicable offsets for GFP or acquisition of data rights. 3. The following evaluation template is incorporated as Attachment 1 as follows: ATTACHMENT 1 Individual Proposal Evaluation Template Announcement: MNK-BAA-07-0005, CWSSD Program Offeror: Evaluator: Evaluation Factors 1 ? 3 are in descending order of importance: Factor (1) Scientific/Technical Merit ? Sub-factors (a) through (d) in Factor (1) are of equal importance (50%). (a) Soundness of offeror?s proposed technical approach. (b) Extent to which the Proposals demonstrates that the defined requirements can be accomplished with the proposed technology. (c) Scope and feasibility of proposed research. (d) Scope of technologies to be investigated. Strengths: Weaknesses: Technical Issues/ Clarifications: Proposal Risk Assessment *: High___ Moderate___ Low___ Pertinent Comments re: Risk Assessment Rationale and Mitigation Factors: * Proposal Risk Definitions: High: Likely to cause significant disruption of schedule, increase cost, or degradation of performance. Risk may be unacceptable even with special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring. Moderate: Can potentially cause some disruption of schedule, increase cost, or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will probably be able to overcome difficulties. Low: Has little potential to cause disruption of schedule, increase cost, or degradation of performance. Normal contractor effort and normal Government monitoring will probably be able to overcome difficulties. Factor (2) Capabilities and Experience ? Subfactors (a) through (c) in Factor (2) are of equal importance (30%). (a) Personnel/Management: Experience and capabilities of all key personnel (both technical and management); experience and capabilities to manage technical risks, control cost and schedule. (b) Facilities, equipment and techniques necessary to accomplish the project. (c) Subcontract Management: Experience and capabilities to manage subcontractor performance, cost and schedule; nature and extent of reliance on subcontractor. Capabilities and experience may include unique combinations of these sub-factors, which are integral factors for achieving proposal objectives. Any resumes should be in a separate Appendix, which is not included in the Technical Proposal page limits. The Government team may request supplemental historical information if required to confirm/verify experience and capabilities. Strengths: Weaknesses: Technical Issues/ Clarifications: Proposal Risk Assessment *: High___ Moderate___ Low___ Pertinent Comments re: Risk Assessment Rationale and Mitigation Factors: * Proposal Risk Definitions: High: Insignificant, or unsuccessful, related capabilities and/or experience. Risk may be unacceptable even with special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring. Moderate: Some related capabilities and experience, but not directly associated with this technology. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will probably be able to overcome difficulties. Low: Significant relevant capabilities and experience directly associated with this technology. Factor (3) Cost (20%) ? Reasonableness and realism of proposed costs. The total cost to be evaluated will include the cost of performing Task Order 1, the cost of testing, and any applicable offsets for GFP or acquisition of data rights. Strengths: Weaknesses: Technical Issues/ Clarifications: Proposal Risk Assessment *: High___ Moderate___ Low___ Pertinent Comments re: Risk Assessment Rationale and Mitigation Factors: * Proposal Risk Definitions: High: Cost proposed, labor mix and number of hours does not reflect that the Contractor has a clear understanding of the effort required to achieve technical objectives. Risk may be unacceptable even with special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring. Moderate: Indicators exists that additional labor categories or hours may be required to complete the technical effort. Low: Cost proposed, labor mix and number of hours reflect that the Contractor has a clear understanding of the effort required to achieve technical objectives. NOTE: THIS NOTICE WAS NOT POSTED TO FEDBIZOPPS ON THE DATE INDICATED IN THE NOTICE ITSELF (23-AUG-2007); HOWEVER, IT DID APPEAR IN THE FEDBIZOPPS FTP FEED ON THIS DATE. PLEASE CONTACT fbo.support@gsa.gov REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
- Web Link
-
Link to FedBizOpps document.
(http://www.fbo.gov/spg/USAF/AFMC/AFRLERS/MNK-BAA-07-0005/listing.html)
- Place of Performance
- Address: Vicinity of Eglin AFB and Fort Walton Beach, Florida
- Zip Code: 32542
- Country: UNITED STATES
- Zip Code: 32542
- Record
- SN01383706-F 20070825/070823230825 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |