SOLICITATION NOTICE
C -- Architect-Engineer Services for Preparation of Plans & Specifications for Military Construction FY11 MCON P-005 Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command (JPAC), Hickam Air Force Base, Oahu, Hawaii
- Notice Date
- 9/16/2008
- Notice Type
- Presolicitation
- NAICS
- 541330
— Engineering Services
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, NAVFAC Pacific, Acquisition Department, N62742 NAVFAC PACIFIC, ACQUISITION DEPARTMENT 258 Makalapa Drive Suite 100 Pearl Harbor, HI
- ZIP Code
- 00000
- Solicitation Number
- N6274208R0017
- Response Due
- 10/16/2008
- Archive Date
- 1/31/2009
- Point of Contact
- MELVIN YOSHIMURA (808) 474-5406
- Small Business Set-Aside
- N/A
- Description
- Services include, but are not limited to, design and engineering services for design bid build construction of a multi-story facility of approximately 145,600 square feet reinforced concrete building for the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command. Facility provides central identification laboratory, administrative office spaces, and warehouse. The facility will include, but not limited to fire sprinkler system, fire alarm system, FM-200 clean agent fire protection system for sensitive equipment/items in Record Storage and Central Identification Lab Evidence spaces, air conditioning including direct digital control (DDC) system, ventilation, plumbing (hot water, cold water, waste, vent, acid waste and vent system, compressed air, and vacuum), power, lighting, telecommunication systems (voice, Non-Classified Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRNET), Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNET), and Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System (JWICS)), standby p! ower distribution system, uninterrupted power supply (UPS) with battery back-up, mass notification system, and shielding in the laboratory areas. Building roof will be constructed to accommodate radio frequency antennas and an antenna distribution system. Built-in equipment includes elevators. Special features of the building include intrusion detection control system, closed circuit television system, access control system, and a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF). A single story facility will be constructed to support the standby diesel-engine generator, diesel-driven fire pump, and air conditioning chiller plant. Supporting facilities include site civil improvements (water, sewer, and drain), sidewalks, landscaping, pavement work, electrical and telecommunications ducts, fencing, exterior lighting, and on-site and off-site parking lots. Comprehensive building and furnishings related interior design services are required. Anti-terrorism force prote! ction measures are required. Sustainable design will be integrated into the design, development, and construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123. The project will be designed to obtain Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) silver-level rating certification from the U.S. Green Building Council and shall comply with the Energy Policy Act of 2005. If asbestos or hazardous materials exist, the Architect-Engineer (A-E) contractor shall identify and provide for their disposal in the required documents in accordance with applicable rules and regulations pertaining to such hazardous materials. The selected A-E may be required to participate in a pre-fee meeting within seven days of notification and provide a fee proposal within ten days of the meeting. Design and engineering services includes but not limited to Functional Analysis and Concept Development (FACD), preparation of final plans and specifications, Post Construction Award Services (PCAS); construction surveillance and inspection services and opera! tional and maintenance support information services. Estimated construction cost of project is between $25,000,000 and $100,000,000. Estimated date of contract award is November 2008. Proposals may be subject to an advisory audit performed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. The following selection evaluation criteria, in order of importance, will be used in the evaluation of A-E firms: (1) Professional qualifications of firm and staff proposed in designing new administrative and laboratory facilities including building shielding in a humid and corrosive environment, with emphasis on forensic laboratory designs and electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding designs; (2) Specialized recent experience and technical competence of firm or particular staff members in designing new administrative and laboratory facilities including building shielding in a humid and corrosive environment, with emphasis on forensic laboratory designs and electromagnetic interference (EMI) s! hielding designs; (3) Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules; (4) Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time; (5) Knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts and principles to facilities and infrastructure problems through an integrated design approach; (6) A-Es quality control program experience; (7) Location in the general geographical area of the project and knowledge of the locality of the project; provided, that application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project; (8) Extent to which firms identify and commit to small business (SB), small disadvantaged business (SDB), women-owned small business (WOSB), historically underutilized business zone small business (HUBZoneSB), historically black college or university and minority institution (HBCU/MI) and veteran-owned small business (VOSB), and service disabled veteran! -owned small business (SDVOSB) in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. For this selection criterion, the government will evaluate proposals based on two Sub-factors: (A) Past performance in Utilization of Small Business Concerns and (B) Participation of Small Business Concerns in this Project; (9) Volume of work previously awarded to the firm by the Department of Defense shall also be considered, with the object of effecting an equitable distribution of Department of Defense A-E contracts among qualified A-E firms and firms that have not had Department of Defense contracts. Include a summary of qualifications in narrative discussion addressing each of the above selection evaluation criteria on the SF 330, Part 1, Section H. If necessary, continue on plain bond paper. For selection criterion (3), the Government will also evaluate each firm's past performance and performance rating(s) from the Architect-Engineer ! Contract Administration Support System (ACASS) during the evaluation process, which can affect the selection outcome. For selection criterion (8), the Government will evaluate firms by: In support of Sub-factor (A), (1) the offeror shall provide historical data on utilization of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, and SDVOSB over the past three years showing dollar value, percentage of work (of total contract value) subcontracted to large businesses, SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, SDVOSB, and HBCU/MI; (2) Information on national awards received within the past five years for outstanding support to SB concerns. National awards received within the last five years will be considered more favorably than national awards beyond five years; (3) Information showing ratings received on completed projects with regards to the firm's implementation of subcontracting plans; (4) Information on any existing, planned or pending mentor-protg agreements under either the DOD or SBA 8(a) Programs; (5) Information on use of Community Rehabilitation Program organizations cer! tified under the Javits-Wagner O' Day Program by the National Industry for the Severely Handicapped (NISH) or the National Industry for the Blind (NIB); and (6) Final SF 294s on projects completed within the past 3 years, and if subcontracting goals were not met, provide an explanation. In support of Sub-factor (B), the offeror shall identify each sub-consultant by name, discipline and size status and also identify, in terms of dollar values and percentage of total proposed price, the extent of work you will perform as the prime contractor. The offeror is advised that the Government-wide goals for the total value of all prime contracts per fiscal year are 23% to SB; 5% each to SDB, WOSB and HBCU/MI; and 3% each to HUBZone SB, VOSB and SDVOSB. In addition, the Naval Facilities Engineering Command FY09 subcontracting targets in term of dollar value of subcontracts are 77.51% to SB, 16.18% to SDB, 14.53% to WOSB, 1.42% to HUBZone SB and.14% to SDVOSB. FAR 52.219-8, Utiliz! ation of Small, Small Disadvantaged and Women-Owned Small Business Concerns states in part, the Contractor hereby agrees to carry out this policy in the awarding of subcontracts to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance. If the offeror does not intend to subcontract, provide a detailed explanation why subcontracting would not result in efficient contract performance. The offerors are reminded that in order to receive proposal evaluation benefit as SDB or HUBZone SB either as prime or subconsultant, proposed SDBs and HUBZoneSBs must be certified by the Small Business Administration. Prime contractors may determine whether a prospective subconsultant is a certified SDB or HUBZone by accessing the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) at www.ccr.gov. The Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFAR) require the use of On-Line Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) in Federal solicitations as part of the proposal submission process. Offerors are req! uired to complete the ORCA on-line via website http://orca.bpn.gov. Refer to FAR Clauses 52.204-7 Central Contractor Registration (JUL 2006) and 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications (JAN 2006) and http://orca.bpn.gov for additional information. Contractors are provided access to the DFAR provisions only by answering affirmatively that your firm would like to do business with the Department of Defense. If your firm does not answer affirmatively, the ORCA record could display as being invalid. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract cannot provide the construction services for the same contract. This includes concept design, which includes preparation of project programming documents (DD1391), facility siting studies, environmental assessments, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost. The prime firm and consultants for this contract will be requ! ired to perform throughout the contract term. A-E firms meeting the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed Standard Form 330, Architect Engineer Qualifications. The submittal/delivery address is Commander, Code NAVFAC PAC ACQ13 (A-E Solicitation No. N62742-08-R-0017), Attn: Mailroom (MS2), NAVFAC PACIFIC, 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100, Pearl Harbor, HI 96860-3134. This address is for all deliveries, including U.S. Mail, courier service and/or personal delivery services; no other address is acceptable. The delivery address is inside a military installation, therefore, strict securities measures are in force; anticipate delays. Interested firms must allow sufficient time for receipt of submission. Consultants to the prime A-E firm are required to submit only Part II of the SF 330. This solicitation requires all interested firms to have an email address. Notifications will be via email, therefore, email address must be shown on the SF 330, Part 1, Section B8. Large Business firms who are short-list! ed will be required to submit a subcontracting plan before negotiations begin for contract award. Two copies of your SF 330 are required: One paper copy and one electronic copy on a CD. Firms responding to this announcement by Thursday, October 16, 2008 will be considered. Firms must submit forms by 2:00 p.m. Hawaiian Standard Time (HST). This is not a request for a proposal.
- Web Link
-
FedBizOpps Complete View
(https://www.fbo.gov/?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=33528434d7847a1744b68770f542b783&tab=core&_cview=1)
- Record
- SN01671537-W 20080918/080916220440-33528434d7847a1744b68770f542b783 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |