SOLICITATION NOTICE
58 -- Design/Develop, Prototype, and Produce Joint Threat Emitter (JTE) Increment 2 (JI2)
- Notice Date
- 11/4/2008
- Notice Type
- Modification/Amendment
- NAICS
- 334511
— Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Air Force, Air Force Materiel Command, Hill AFB OO-ALC, OO-ALC/PKXB, 6038 Aspen Ave (Bldg 1289), Hill AFB, Utah, 84056
- ZIP Code
- 84056
- Solicitation Number
- FA8217-08-R-JTE2
- Response Due
- 11/12/2008 4:30:00 PM
- Archive Date
- 11/27/2008
- Point of Contact
- James G Thiros,, Phone: 801-586-1229, Christine J. Parker,, Phone: 8017776171
- E-Mail Address
-
james.thiros@hill.af.mil, christine.parker@hill.af.mil
- Small Business Set-Aside
- N/A
- Description
- When responding, please submit a copy of your response directly to Christine Parker. Christine's e-mail is christine.parker@hill.af.mil; her fax number and address are the same as what is identified for James G. Thiros in the original synopsis. Please provide Christine the same e-mail notification that the synopsis requests that you provide to James G. Thiros. Even though you submit a copy of your response to Christine, you must still submit your response to James G. Thiros. The original synopsis states that a second source selection competition (that would result in a best value award to only one contractor as part of the 2nd phase) would include a requirement for delivery of one prototype using a cost-plus type pricing arrangement. Given that this same award would also include a requirement for delivery of production units at firm-fixed-prices, it is currently anticipated that the prototype requirement would use a firm-fixed-price pricing arrangement (instead of the cost-plus type). As part of your company's response, please indicate if the company does not believe that a firm-fixed price pricing arrangement is reasonable for the prototype; if the response is that a firm-fixed-price would not be reasonable for the prototype, please provide rationale. As a minimum, the rationale must identify why firm-fixed-prices are not reasonable for the prototype even though (1) both the prototype and production units will be proposed after a "development" point at which the Government anticipates (based on market research) contractors can propose firm-fixed-price production units; and (2) production units will depend on the prototype completion. When your company provides a response to the requests that are identified in the "Request each interested contractor:" section of the original sources-sought-synopsis, as well as to the additional request identified in the paragraph above, it would be appreciated if each specific request was answered in a separate section and if each section began with a restatement of the specific Government request.
- Web Link
-
FedBizOpps Complete View
(https://www.fbo.gov/?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=fd6fdfc2cb4efb64ac681083d2a62aca&tab=core&_cview=1)
- Place of Performance
- Address: N/A, United States
- Record
- SN01700181-W 20081106/081104214440-fd6fdfc2cb4efb64ac681083d2a62aca (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |