Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF JULY 09, 2010 FBO #3149
MODIFICATION

B -- Recognition and Incentive Program for State and Local Baldrige based Programs - Amendment 1

Notice Date
7/7/2010
 
Notice Type
Modification/Amendment
 
NAICS
541690 — Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services
 
Contracting Office
Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Acquisition Management Division, 100 Bureau Drive, Building 301, Room B129, Mail Stop 1640, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20899-1640
 
ZIP Code
20899-1640
 
Solicitation Number
SB134110RQ0472
 
Archive Date
7/16/2010
 
Point of Contact
Mario A. Checchia, Phone: 301-975-8407, WILLIAM N. LI, Phone: 3019753955
 
E-Mail Address
mario.checchia@nist.gov, William.Li@nist.gov
(mario.checchia@nist.gov, William.Li@nist.gov)
 
Small Business Set-Aside
N/A
 
Description
Contains Attachment 1 -DOC -Small Business Subcontracting Plan The following are questions received pertaining to Solicitation # SB1341-10-RQ-0472 and the responses. 1. Can the proposal/quotation be delivered electronically by July 13, 2010 12:00PM ET, or must it be delivered in hardcopy by that deadline? Response: Please deliver the proposal/quotation electronically. 2. Should the response include a proposal/quotation for the administration (ONLY) of a project that accomplishes the specific tasks, deliverables, and performance requirements outlined in the Statement of Work, or should the response also include a quotation for the funds that will be released to State & Local programs? It is not clear from the RFQ whether a response should outline recommended amounts of funding to State & Local programs for completing any of the four tiered evaluation methods and/or amounts of funding for improvement of local quality programs given the OFIs of the evaluation. Response: It is not necessary to include a quotation for the funds that will be released to the State and Local Programs in your response to the RFQ. However, as noted in the SOW Section III.1 and Section VII the [winning/selected] contractor will propose a plan to provide funds as incentive to participate which must be reviewed and approved by the COTR. 3. Do we need to respond differently since this is an RFQ rather than an RFP? Response: Please respond in accordance with 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Items (Jun 2008). 4. Will a Small Business Subcontracting Plan be required for this procurement? Response: A Small Business Subcontracting Plan may or may not be required depending upon the final price and pursuant to FAR 19.702(a)(1)(see Attachment 1 added as a separate document) in response to this solicitation for the Government's consideration.
 
Web Link
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/DOC/NIST/AcAsD/SB134110RQ0472/listing.html)
 
Place of Performance
Address: Contractor site, United States
 
Record
SN02198764-W 20100709/100707235401-c3919633bfcbfa21278eb13dae4b17c8 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.