Loren Data's SAM Daily™

FBO DAILY ISSUE OF JUNE 12, 2011 FBO #3487
MODIFICATION

Y -- Renovate B-603 @ Saufley Field, NAS Pensacola, FL

Notice Date

6/10/2011
 

Notice Type

Modification/Amendment
 

NAICS

236220 — Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
 

Contracting Office

N69450 NAVFAC SOUTHEAST, SOUTHEAST BLD 903 Building 903 P. O. Box 30 NAS Jacksonville Jacksonville, FL
 

ZIP Code

00000
 

Solicitation Number

N6945011R0762
 

Response Due

6/17/2011
 

Archive Date

7/17/2011
 

Point of Contact

William (Mike) McGrattan (904) 542-6811 Point of Contact(s):
 

E-Mail Address

a
 

Small Business Set-Aside

N/A
 

Description

Y--Solicit Comments on Potential Use of Project Labor Agreements at B603 Saufley Field, Naval Air Station (NAS) Pensacola, Florida Solicitation Number: N69450-11-R-0762 Agency: Department of the Navy Office: Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast (NAVFAC-SE) Location: IPT-Gulf Coast, NAVFAC-SE Solicitation Number: N69450-11-R-0762 Notice Type: Sources Sought Synopsis: Added: June 10, 2011 Project Description: Renovate B-603 @ Saufley Field, NAS Pensacola, FL. Reconfigure interior walls; replace suspended ceiling/floor coverings; modify fire suppression sy B603 Saufley Field, Naval Air Station (NAS) Pensacola, Florida s; paint walls; replace windows with glazing to meet ATFP, hurricane, and energy reduction standards; replace existing A/C sys w/ chilled water sys; resurface existing parking. Bring building into compliance with current life safety and fire codes. Upgrade electrical feeder. Replace east side elevator. Range of Magnitude: between $25,000.000 and $100,000,000. Period of Performance: 2 years after date of award. Some of the factors that may be considered regarding their use are: a.) The involvement of multiple contractors and/or subcontractors working in multiple crafts or trades. b.) The complexity of the project. c.) Shortage of skilled labor in the region. d.) Completion of the project will require an extended period of time. e.) The use of PLA's on other comparable projects. f.) The promotion of the Governments long term programs interests such as training of skilled workforce for future projects. g.) The possibility of labor disputes that threaten timely completion. h.) Additional costs from use of PLAs may be cost prohibitive. PLA is defined as a Pre-Hire collective bargaining agreement with one or more labor organizations that establishes the terms and conditions of employment for a specific construction project and is an agreement described in 29 U.S.C. 158(f). Federal Acquisition Regulation, (FAR), Policy: a.) Project Labor Agreement,(PLA), is a tool that agencies may use to promote economy and efficiency in Federal Procurement. Pursuant to Executive Order 13502, Agencies are encouraged to consider requiring the use of project labor agreements in connection with large-scale construction projects. b.) An Agency may, if appropriate, require that every contractor and subcontractor engaged in construction on the project agree for that project to negotiate or become party to a project labor agreement with one or more labor organizations if the Agency decides that the use of project labor agreements will: 1.) Advance the Federal Government's interest in achieving economy and efficiency in Federal procurement, produce-labor management stability and ensure compliance with laws and regulations governing safety and health. Equal opportunity, labor and employment standards and other matters and... 2.) Be consistent with law. Reference Provision: 52.222-23 Notice of Requirement for Project Labor Agreement Clause 52.222-34 Project Labor Agreements. In consideration of the above factors and any others which may be deemed appropriate, the construction community is invited to comment on the use of PLA's. Of particular interest to the Government are responses to the following questions: a.) Should PLA's be executed on selected large dollar contracts within the Naval Air Station (NAS) Pensacola, Florida area? What other factors should NAVFAC-SE consider before deciding to include PLA provisions in a NAVFAC-SE contract? What type of project should or should not be considered for the utilization of a PLA? b.) Is the use of PLA's effective in achieving economy and efficiency in Federal procurement? What is the estimated relative cost impact or any other economies or efficiencies derived by the Federal Government if using PLA's? Will a PLA impact the cost of submitting an offer? c.) Is the use of PLA's effective in producing labor-management stability? Have labor disputes or other labor issues contributed to project delays in the local area? d.) Is the use of PLA's conducive to ensuring compliance with laws and regulations governing safety and health, equal employment opportunity, labor and employment standards and other relevant matters? Are there instances where these standards have not been met on Federal contracts in the local area? Were PLA's used for those specific contracts? e.) Projects will require multiple construction contractors and/or subcontractors employing working in multiple crafts or trades. Do you foresee any work on projects that may result in both prime contractor and at least one subcontractor or two or more subcontractors employing the same trade? f.) Are there concerns by prime contractors on the availability of skilled construction labor? Information may reference current apprenticeship statistics and workforce age demographics. g.) Completion of anticipated projects will require an extensive performance period. Will a PLA impact completion time? What is the anticipated volatility in the labor market for the trades required for the execution of the project? Would a PLA benefit a project which contains a unique and compelling mission-critical schedule? h.) Where have PLA's been used on comparable projects undertaken by Federal, State, Municipal or private entities in the NAS Pensacola, FL area? i.) Will the use of PLA's impact the ability of potential offerors and/or subcontractors to meet the Small Business utilization goals? Please provide your comments via email ONLY to: william.mcgrattan@navy.mil no later than close of business on 17 June 2011. Agency/Contracting Office: Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast (NAVFAC-SE) ATTN: IPTGC P. O Box 30 Jacksonville, Florida 32212-0030 Place of Performance: B603 Saufley Field, Naval Air Station (NAS) Pensacola, Florida Point of Contact: William (Mike) McGrattan William.mcgrattan@navy.mil NAVFAC-SE, IPTGC Contracting Office Address: Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast (NAVFAC-SE) ATTN: IPTGC P. O Box 30 Jacksonville, Florida 32212-0030 US
 

Web Link

FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/notices/53ea38b21d79194d75271f7aed981d09)
 

Place of Performance

Address: B603 Saufley Field, Naval Air Station (NAS) Pensacola, Florida, Pensacola, FL

Zip Code: 32508
 

Record

SN02469772-W 20110612/110610235128-53ea38b21d79194d75271f7aed981d09 (fbodaily.com)
 

Source

FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

---

| FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |