Loren Data's SAM Daily™

FBO DAILY - FEDBIZOPPS ISSUE OF JULY 31, 2013 FBO #4267
MODIFICATION

A -- CALL 020 NEMs Topic 2 Acoustic & Seismic Wave Propagation - Modification 3

Notice Date

7/29/2013
 

Notice Type

Modification/Amendment
 

NAICS

541712 — Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
 

Contracting Office

Department of the Air Force, Air Force Materiel Command, AFRL/RVK - Kirtland AFB, 3550 Aberdeen Ave SE, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico, 87117, United States
 

ZIP Code

87117
 

Solicitation Number

BAA-RV-10-01
 

Point of Contact

Francis M. Eggert, Phone: 5058467603, Jennifer Jaramillo, Phone: (505) 846 8501
 

E-Mail Address

Francis.Eggert@kirtland.af.mil, Jennifer.Jaramillo@kirtland.af.mil
(Francis.Eggert@kirtland.af.mil, Jennifer.Jaramillo@kirtland.af.mil)
 

Small Business Set-Aside

N/A
 

Description

CALL 020 Amendment # 1 posted 29 July 13 - Funding 29 July 13, Amendment # 1. NOTE! On Page 3 of CALL 020, now reads as follows: ANTICIPATED FUNDING (Amendment # 1): Anticipated funding for this CALL (not per contract or award) is a total of $3,000,000.00 for all contracts to be awarded. This funding profile is an estimate only and will not be a contractual obligation for funding. Offerors should note that funding for this effort is uncertain at this time and will be largely dependent on the next government fiscal year budget that has yet to be established. The Government reserves the right to select for award to responsible offerors/Contractors any, all, part, or none of the proposals that are received in response to this CALL, subject to the availability of funds. All funding is subject to change due to government discretion and availability of funds. === Basic CALL 020 posted 25 July 13 === 25 July 13, Posting CALL 020 NEMs for Acoustic & Seismic Wave Propagation. BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT BAA-RV-10-01 Air Force Research Laboratory/Space Vehicles Directorate PROPOSAL CALL ANNOUNCEMENT (CALL) 020 BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT TITLE: AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Battlespace Environment Division - BAA-RV-10-01 BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT NUMBER: BAA-RV-10-01 PROPOSAL CALL ANNOUCEMENT (CALL) TITLE: Topic Number #2 Battlespace Surveillance (RVBY): Acoustic and Seismic Wave Propagation PROPOSAL CALL ANNOUNCEMENT (CALL) NUMBER: 020 TECHNICAL POINT OF CONTACT: The technical point of contact for this CALL is Mr. Robert Raistrick, AFRL/RVBYE, Kirtland AFB, NM, Phone 505-846-6057, Email Robert.Raistrick@kirtland.af.mil CONTRACTING POINTS OF CONTACT: The contracting points of contact for this CALL are: Contract Specialist: Jennifer B. Jaramillo, Det 8 AFRL/RVKVB, Kirtland AFB, NM, Phone 505-846-8501, Email: jennifer.jaramillo@kirtland.af.mil or Contracting Officer: Mr. Francis M. Eggert, Det 8 AFRL/RVKVB, Kirtland AFB, NM, Phone 505-846-7603, Email: Francis.Eggert@kirtland.af.mil REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTION: The Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) leads the discovery, development, and timely transition of affordable, integrated technologies that keep the Air Force the best in the world. The subtopics being presented here are related to the Detection, Assessment and Mitigation's objective concerned with acoustic and seismic wave propagation through the earth, oceans, and atmosphere in order to characterize and discriminate sources of acoustic and seismic waves (such as earthquakes, explosions and volcanic eruptions) as outlined in BAA-RV-10-01, Full Text Announcement, Section 2, Topic Area 2, Paragraph C. This CALL is specifically requesting potential Offeror(s) to provide proposals on below subtopics. Note! Each proposal must be submitted against a single subtopic, even if that proposal partially addresses multiple topics. Each subtopic is of equal importance. The subtopics are described in detail below: Subtopic 2. A: Seismic Source Physics: Proposals are sought to improve predictions of source generation of seismic signals, from all shallow source types, that may be used for discrimination and/or yield estimation. Physical understanding of the dependence of seismic source generation on explosion emplacement conditions (depth, scaled depth, decoupling, material properties, pre-stress, and local structure) is of particular interest, especially for small seismic events. Hypothesis tests of proposed mechanisms for anomalous waveform characteristics, e.g. larger surface waves than predicted for explosions, are of interest. Investigations intended to distinguish between feasible source mechanisms are strongly preferred over efforts to assess the feasibility of a single mechanism. Methods of determining depth to within 10s of meters for shallow events are of particular interest. Partitioning of energy into P, S, and surface waves, and understanding of the higher frequencies that may be critical for local discrimination are of interest, as are methods that can discriminate chemical from nuclear explosions. Proposals are sought to quantify and explain the empirical behavior of Ms-mb discriminants for small nuclear explosions, and improve physical understanding of their generation of surface waves. Proposals may include one or multiple approaches, including analysis of existing nuclear and chemical explosion records, theoretical investigations, and/or numerical simulations. Subtopic 2. B: Discrimination and Yield Estimation: Proposals are sought to improve the accuracy of existing discriminants and estimates of their uncertainty or that develop new discriminants that have a firm physical and statistical basis. New understanding of the properties of small seismic events and their seismic waveforms at local (200 km or less) and regional (2,000 km or less) distances is of interest, as are extensions of existing regional discriminants to smaller, locally recorded events, and development of new discriminants that take advantage of the characteristics of small locally recorded events, with rigorous assessments of performance and uncertainty. Of particular interest are methods for estimating yield of seismic events recorded at local distances with low uncertainty. At regional distances, there is an interest in improved event characterization of smaller events as well as improved understanding of uncertainties. Methods to improve the accuracy of source characterization by moment tensors and their uncertainties, and new understanding of their limitations, are also of interest. Subtopic 2. C. Attenuation and Full Waveform Earth Models: Proposals are sought to improve the prediction of waveforms and amplitudes at local and regional distances. Of particular interest are: local and regional attenuation models, with emphasis on their ability to match observed amplitudes of Pn, Pg, Sn, and Lg phases, their codas, and surface waves; assessment of the extent and effects of censoring and application of appropriate methods to address censoring; new methods for measuring attenuation; models that fit multiple datasets (e.g. body wave and surface wave amplitudes), if the potential to improve predictions that affect discrimination can be shown; and proposals that utilize full waveforms and finite-frequency methods. In all cases, a robust estimate of uncertainty is an important consideration (confidence, resolution, and variance). Subtopic 2. D. Velocity Earth Models: Proposals are sought to develop advanced models of the Earth's velocity structure that will improve location capability. Priority will be given to P-wave velocity structure studies and studies of poorly calibrated regions within Eurasia. Of particular interest are: new techniques of determining 3-D, spatially variable velocity models; (1) new techniques for building models by fitting multiple datasets, especially of different types of data, if the potential to improve predictions that affect location can be shown; (2) techniques to estimate the uncertainty in geophysical models and assess the tradeoffs between different parameters of the models, as well as the uncertainty (confidence, resolution, and variance) in predicted observables, such as travel times; (3) new techniques for determining velocity structure in aseismic regions; (4) studies that compare different methods to show their strengths and weaknesses; and models that can predict structural effects on seismic amplitudes at 1 Hz and higher as well as travel times. Proposals that utilize full waveforms and finite-frequency methods are of interest. Techniques for accurately predicting P-wave travel times from surface wave based models are of interest. Subtopic 2. E. Location and Discrimination Ground Truth: There is interest in the collection of calibration events at a GT5 level (absolute location and depth errors less than 5 kilometers) or better in uncalibrated or very poorly calibrated areas. Studies that generate new discrimination calibration events, along with source geometry and other characterizing information are also sought. Accurate estimates of depth and origin time and their uncertainties are important elements of location calibration events. Improved techniques for event location using models and/or ground truth at local, regional or near-teleseismic distances, particularly methods that use more than a single type of data jointly are of interest. For multiple data type methods, the potential for improvement in location capability should be demonstrated. Robust estimation of uncertainty is an important consideration. ANTICIPATED FUNDING: Anticipated funding for this CALL (not per contract or award) is: FY 13: $500K; FY 14: $1M; FY 15: $1M; FY 16: $500K. TOTAL= $3M. This funding profile is an estimate only and will not be a contractual obligation for funding. Offerors should note that funding for this effort is uncertain at this time and will be largely dependent on the next government fiscal year budget that has yet to be established. The Government reserves the right to select for award to responsible offerors/Contractors any, all, part, or none of the proposals that are received in response to this CALL, subject to the availability of funds. All funding is subject to change due to government discretion and availability of funds. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: The anticipated period of performance for individual awards for a specific Sub-topic resulting from this CALL is between 15 and 39 total months. The period of performance is to be proposed in the format "includes XX months for technical effort and 3 months for a Guaranteed Final Report preparation." PROPOSAL DUE DATE AND TIME: The due date for proposals submitted in response to this CALL is no later than 12 Noon MDT 12 SEPT 2013. Proposals for any other technology area identified in the baseline Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) will not be accepted at this time unless a CALL for proposals in that specific area is open. Proposals received after the due dates and times shall be governed by the provisions of FAR 52.215-1(c)(3). CALL AMENDMENTS: Offerors should monitor FedBizOps/EPS http://www.fbo.gov for any additional notices to this CALL that may permit extensions to the proposal submission date or otherwise modify this announcement. ANTICIPATED TYPE OF CONTRACTS: The Air Force anticipates awarding either a Cost or Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract as a result of this CALL but reserves the right to award the instrument best suited to the nature of research proposed. A model contract will be provided to each apparent successful offeror for review and comment as part of the BAA solicitation and award process. ANTICIPATED NUMBER OF AWARDS: The Air Force anticipates awarding one or more contracts. However, the Air Force does reserve the right to make multiple awards or no awards pursuant to this CALL. ANTICIPATED AWARD DATE: Expected January 2014 through March 2014 INTENT TO PROPOSE: Potential offerors are requested to advise the contracting point of contact if they intend to submit a proposal in response to this CALL. Such notification is merely a courtesy and is not a commitment by the offeror to submit a proposal. DELIVERABLES ITEMS: 1. Quarterly Status Report (A001 CDRL) 2. Annual Technical Reports (A002 CDRL) 3. Final Report (A003 CDRL) OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION: 1. Per BAA-RV-10-01, Full Text Announcement, Section 6, General Information, Paragraph E: NOTE! Non Air Force (AF) Federally Funded Research Development Research Centers (FFRDC) such as Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Sandia National Laboratory (SNL), and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) may partner with proposers to this Broad Agency Announcement CALL provided the benefits of partnership are clearly stated and their efforts are included in the proposal but are technically and financially separable. The results and deliverables that will be achieved independently by the prime and their non-FFRDC partners must also be clearly stated. Furthermore, the offeror must specify and provide supporting rationale how the offeror envisions funding be transferred to the FFRDC for the proposed effort without Air Force involvement. The specified sponsor and funding mechanism must be identified (e.g., direct fund by the FFRDC's parent agency, subcontract to the prime, or other agency funding, through the "Work for Others" program of the Department of Energy (DOE), and a clear description of how the Prime plans to coordinate with the FFRDC to accomplish their proposed efforts in order to support the sub-topic. Please note that funding of the non-FFRDC partners is subject to funds availability. Points of contact for the following FFRDCs are: William Walter, LLNL, walter5@llnl.gov (925) 423-8777 Dale Anderson, LANL, dand@lanl.gov (505) 606-1960 Tim McDonald, SNL, tsmcdon@sandia.gov (505) 844-9616 James Hayes, PNNL, james.hayes@pnnl.gov (509) 375-1793 2. Program security classification for this CALL is UNCLASSIFIED. 3. Information is NOT expected to be ITAR restricted. 4. Government Furnished Property and Government Furnished Information are NOT expected to be provided. 5. Base Support: The Government is NOT expecting to be providing any base support for this effort. 6. Administrative Access to Proprietary Information: Administrative access to proprietary information may be necessary throughout completion of this effort. Service contracts contain a non-disclosure agreement that requires the service Contractors to protect the data and prohibits them from using the data for any purpose other than for which the data was presented. Offerors will be required to sign and submit the Representations and Certifications associated with this CALL; Currently the Kirtland Air Force Base has administrative support by the company "Chenega Aerospace, LLC". 7. Cost Proposal Instructions and AF Adequacy Checklist: see Attachment #02. 8. FAR Certifications and Representations must be completed and submitted with the proposal per attachment # 04. 9. Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI): OCI may apply to this action but cannot be determined prior to issuance of this announcement. This issue and the need for applicable clauses will be resolved prior to the award of any instrument resulting from an offeror's proposal. 10. Wide Area Work Flow Notice: Reference BAA-RV-10-01, Full Text Announcement, Section 10, Other Information, Paragraph B Section 10. Note! WAWF-RA requirement does not apply to Universities that are audited by an agency other than DCAA. 11. Limitations on Pass-Through Charges. As prescribed in FAR 15.408(n)(1) & 15.408(n)(2), provisions 52.215-22, "Limitations on Pass Through Charges - Identification of Subcontract Effort (Oct 2009)," and 52.215-23, "Limitations on Pass Through Charges (Oct 2009)," are contained in this solicitation. Any contract valued greater than the threshold for cost or pricing data threshold, except fixed price contracts awarded on the basis of adequate price competition, resulting from this solicitation, shall contain the Clause at FAR 52.215-23 (or Alt I). 12. Post-Award Small Business Program Representation: As prescribed in FAR 19.309(d), FAR Clause 52.219-28, "Post-Award Small Business Program Representation (Apr 2012)," is incorporated by reference in this CALL. This clause will be contained in any contracts resulting from this CALL. This clause requires a contractor to represent its size status when certain conditions apply. It provides detail on when the representation must be complete and what the contractor must do when a representation is required. 13. Subcontracting Plans, updated: Small Business Subcontracting Plans are required under FAR 19.702 for efforts anticipated to exceed $650,000. Prospective offerors shall submit applicable subcontracting plans in accordance with the requirements set forth in FAR 19.704, DFARS 219.704 and AFFARS 5319.704. Small business is exempt from this requirement. If a company has a master subcontracting plan, as described in FAR 19.701 or a comprehensive subcontracting plan, as described in DFARS 219.702, a copy of the plan shall be submitted with the proposal along with an individual plan for review. The subcontracting plan is a part of the cost/business section of the proposal and will not be included in the page count. Also, for proposed Subcontracting Plans that are below the statutory goals, the offeror shall provide additional information which demonstrates how it intends to provide meaningful subcontracting opportunities and rationale as to why the goals were not attainable. Finally, in accordance with FAR 19.702, Statutory requirements, if the apparent successful offeror fails to negotiate a subcontracting plan acceptable to the contracting officer within the time limit prescribed by the contracting officer, the offer will be ineligible for award. 14. Employment Eligibility Verification: As prescribed by FAR 22.1803, FAR Clause 52.222-54, "Employment Eligibility Verification (Jul 2012)," is hereby incorporated by reference in this CALL. Any contract awarded as a result of this BAA that is above the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, and contains a period of performance greater than 120 days, shall include this clause. This clause requires contractors to enroll as a Federal Contractor in the E-Verify program within 30 days after contract award. APPLICABILITY OF BASELINE BAA: All requirements of BAA-RV-10-01 apply unless specifically amended and addressed in this CALL. Any discrepancies shall be brought to the contracting officer's attention immediately in writing. For complete information regarding BAA-RV-10-01, refer to the initial BAA (posted to FEDBIZOPPS on 10 Nov 2009) and any amendments. It contains information applicable to all CALLS issued under the BAA and provides information on the overall program, proposal preparation and submission requirements, proposal review and evaluation criteria, award administration, agency contacts, etc. Direct questions to the "Contracting Points of Contact" identified on page 1. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION: (1) Proposal Instructions: Please prepare your cost proposal in accordance with Attachment #02. Submit Management (Business), Technical, and Cost Proposals IAW instruction provided in Section 8 of the Baseline BAA. (2) Proposal Preparation Requirements: Note! Each proposal must be submitted under a single subtopic, even if that proposal partially addresses multiple subtopics. Proposal information is requested to be submitted in three volumes. a. Volume 1, Management (Business) Summary. (Limited to 20 pages) The Management Summary is used for accounting and identification purposes in a variety of ways. The top level cost information in Volume 1 is the primary cost information. See Instructions below. b. Volume 1, Proposal Summary. The Proposal Summary shall include the following: 1. Statement that the document is a Proposal 2. BAA number and CALL number 3. Topic- number that the proposal is submitted under 4. Proposal Title 5. Statement that the proposal is valid for 180 days from the due date specified in the CALL 6. Name and address of Lead Institution 7. CAGE code 8. Full Name (including title and middle initial), mailing address, telephone number, electronic mail address of Lead Principal Investigator 9. Full Name (including title and middle initial), mailing address, telephone number, electronic mail address of Lead Institution Contract Administrator point of contact 10. Name(s) of Team Organizations 11. Full Name(s) (including title and middle initial), mailing address, telephone(s), email(s) of Principal Investigator(s) of Team Organizations 12. Full Name (including title and middle initial), mailing address, telephone number, electronic mail address of Proposal Preparer 13. Any concerns regarding the use of non-Government reviewers during the review process 14. Total equipment costs and first year's equipment costs 15. Submission date and proposed period of performance, 16. State if proposal contains any proprietary information, if so, provided a Data Assertions list per Attachment # 01. 17. Statement of whether or not use of IRIS PASSCAL seismic equipment is proposed 18. Dated signature of an authorized official of the organization c. Volume 2, Technical Proposal, please see Additional Proposal instructions below. The Technical Proposal is used for the merit review and is evaluated in accordance with the Evaluation Criteria found in BAA-RV-10-01, Section 9, Proposal Review and Evaluation Procedures, Paragraph B. d. Volume 2, Technical Proposal. The contractor shall follow the technical proposal preparation instructions in the BAA-RV-10-01 full text, on pages 14-16. The technical proposal must convey an understanding of the problems or limitations of the general technology area and the intended application(s), and provide solution(s). The Technical Proposal should comply with the following rules. Proposals are to be formatted for 8.5 x 11-inch paper with in type not smaller than 12 point. It is requested, that the Technical Proposal length should not exceed 30 single-spaced pages. The Government will not consider any pages as part of the submitted proposal that exceed the 30 page limitation. Note! Please, do not attach imbedded electronic files, such as movies, which require large areas of file space. These types of electronic files that are included with your submission are unlikely to be reviewed and may even be deleted prior to being uploaded to servers in order to conserve file space. The Technical Proposal should be comprised of the following components: e. Technical Proposal Identifier Information and Abstract (Limited to 1 page). The technical proposal identifier information must repeat key information from Volume 1, specifically; 1. BAA number and CALL number 2. Topic Number 3. Proposal Title 4. Statement of whether or not the proposal was submitted to last year's BAA 5. Name of Lead Institution 6. Name, mailing address, telephone number, and electronic mail address of Lead Principal Investigator 7. Name(s) of Team Organizations 8. Name(s), mailing addresses, telephone numbers, and electronic mail addresses of Principal Investigator(s) of Team Organizations 9. Statement whether or not use of IRIS PASSCAL seismic equipment is proposed 10. Statement of Equipment to be purchased, if any, and purpose for equipment f. Technical Narrative (30 page limit). It is requested that the technical narrative provide a detailed description of the proposed research, including the research objectives, the methodology and approaches for accomplishing those objectives, the anticipated results of the research, the value of these results to enhancing U.S. national security, the relevance of the proposed research and anticipated results to the program objectives stated in the BAA-RV-10-01, Full Text Announcement, Topic Area 2, Detection, Assessment and Mitigation. It should describe the purpose of the research, provide a review of previous and ongoing work, and identify any technical issues that need to be solved. The technical narrative is requested to be written as a clear, concise statement of the work proposed and specifically address: (1) the overall scientific and technical soundness of the proposal, and (2) the relevance to the mission To facilitate review of the Overall Scientific and Technical Soundness, a concise and clear description of the methods, approach, possible sources of error, and validation of research results (if appropriate) will provide evidence to the reviewer that the offeror understands the technical approach being proposed and can successfully complete the work proposed. It may be appropriate to include information that the offeror considers obvious, to avoid the possibility of a reviewer down-rating the proposal because information (e.g. particularly a statement of the method of statistical validation) was omitted. Regarding the Relevance to Mission section, a clear statement of how the work proposed will improve national capabilities and advance national technical means to detect, locate and identify nuclear explosions will help reviewers know that the offeror has focused the research on what is important. Any proposal that is to improve the international capabilities associated with the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty must state how such international improvement benefits U.S. national security. The discussion should also provide evidence about whether or not the research proposed would duplicate or complement other research, and should state which other "calls for proposals" the ideas in this proposal have been submitted to in whole or in part. The narrative includes any tables, figures, and references. Facilities, equipment and other resources of the offeror that will be used in the performance of the proposed research should be described. Any proposed usage of PASSCAL equipment must be explicitly detailed, and a list attached to be incorporated into the contract as an Attachment in Section J of the contract. Any collaborators are to be identified. Proposals from teams should state the intended benefits of the teaming arrangement. g. Work Plan and Schedule (Limited to 6 pages). This component provides a prose description of the work breakdown structure for the project. What the Government is attempting to accomplish with this proposal component is to have the offeror provide an almost contract-ready Contractor Statement of Work (CSOW). The research objectives are to be identified along with the major tasks that must be completed to accomplish the stated objectives; including their duration with projected start and end dates. Each task is to be divided into its subordinate subtasks and associated key decision points (milestones) and specify which team organization participates in each task. Include a table of tasks versus time (in weeks or quarters). Deliverables and their due dates are to be identified separately by task, and clearly listed to be stated in the contract. Deliverables include reports, data, hardware, software, and documentation, as applicable. For team proposals, the lead organization's technical proposal is to distinguish the technical role and contributions of each team member. The offeror should plan on attending and fully participating in the Technical Interchange Meeting and Monitoring Research Review, including paper preparation and submission, and travel. Any other proposed travel such as attending a professional society meeting, meeting with the Product Integrator, or any international travel must also be listed including a statement of purpose and value to the US government for the travel. Most importantly, a team member proposal(s) should show how their work efforts add value and technical completeness to the prime's proposal. h. Key Personnel. The proposal must identify all key personnel involved in the project. The proposal must include curricula vitae (background and experience information including a list of relevant publications, if any) of the principal investigator and other key personnel. Any changes to key personnel during the project will need the concurrence of the appropriate funding organization's Contracting Officer. i. Volume 3, Cost Proposal (Limited to 75 pages). Please prepare the Cost Proposal in accordance with the instructions outlined in Attachment # 2. j. Other Proposal Preparation Factors The following Other Proposal Preparation is offered as a recommended format for evaluation needs. This section addresses other considerations and requirements or further explains proposal requirements. (1) Eligibility Requirements Proposals must be: 1) signed by an individual who is authorized to commit the Proposing Organization; and 2) must commit the offeror Organization to comply with the terms and conditions of the award, if awarded. (Principal Investigators are not generally authorized to act for their institutions). (2) Proprietary Proposal Information Note! The data bearing restrictions may be subject to release under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), if the funding agencies or a court determines that the material so marked is not exempt under the FOIA. The Government assumes no liability for disclosure or use of unmarked data and may use or disclose such data for any purpose. The offeror may request that proprietary information not be disclosed to non-Government reviewers. Such information should be clearly marked and separable, so that the information may be removed prior to submitting the proposal for review. (3) BAA RV 10-01 FULL TEXT: Section 6 paragraph F does not apply to this CALL. (4) Two copies and an original of your proposal are requested. In addition, include an electronic copy of your proposal and four (4) compact disks (CD-R) or DVD's, (but not both) which shall also include a standard format such as Microsoft Excel 2007 or earlier compatible cost proposal. Proposals are due to this office no later than 12 Noon MDT 12 SEPT 2013. Please note, allow enough time to mail handler's to get through security. Also, it is the Offeror's responsibility to ensure that their proposal's arrive by the due date and time. Submit your proposal to the following address: Air Force Research Laboratory Det 8 AFRL/RVKVB ATTN: Francis M. Eggert (Contracting Officer) or (Contract Specialist), Jennifer B. Jaramillo 3550 Aberdeen Ave, S.E. (General Mail Room) Kirtland AFB NM 87117-5773 4 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment # 1, Data Assertions form Attachment # 2, Cost Proposal Instructions, includes AF Proposal Adequacy Checklist dated 08 APR 2013 Attachment # 3, CDRLs dated 24 July 2013 Attachment # 4, Representations and Certifications (Section K) dated 14 Feb 2012
 

Web Link

FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USAF/AFMC/AFRLPLSVD/BAA-RV-10-01/listing.html)
 

Place of Performance

Address: (Note! This is an updated mailing address for AFRL/RVKVB), AFRL/RVKVB, Attn: Contracting Officer, 3550 Aberdeen Ave. SE, KIRTLAND AFB NM 87117-5773, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87117, United States

Zip Code: 87117
 

Record

SN03129646-W 20130731/130729234222-66af8c64e1cd4a58c96d66ab797293ce (fbodaily.com)
 

Source

FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

---

| FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |