SOURCES SOUGHT
Y -- New Orleans to Venice, NOV-05A, Upper Reach A, West Bank Levee Back Levee,
- Notice Date
- 10/29/2013
- Notice Type
- Sources Sought
- NAICS
- 237990
— Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
- Contracting Office
- USACE District, New Orleans, ATTN: CEMVN-CT, P.O. Box 60267, New Orleans, LA 70160-0267
- ZIP Code
- 70160-0267
- Solicitation Number
- W912P8-14-B-0025
- Response Due
- 11/4/2013
- Archive Date
- 12/28/2013
- Point of Contact
- Tracey M. Lowe, 601/631-7707
- E-Mail Address
-
USACE District, New Orleans
(tracey.m.lowe@usace.army.mil)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- N/A
- Description
- The Vicksburg District Corps of Engineers, on behalf of the New Orleans District Corps of Engineers, is soliciting comments from the construction community addressing the potential use of Project Labor Agreements (PLA) for large scale construction projects (exceeding $25 million) within the New Orleans District for the following project: New Orleans to Venice, NOV-05A, Upper Reach A, West Bank Levee Back Levee, St. Jude to City Price, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana. Project Description: The work consists of construction and installation of new drainage structures; sliplining of existing drainage structures; clearing and grubbing, excavation of existing levee embankment to place structural geotextile, placement of new levee and berm compacted fill, uncompacted fill, and sand fill embankment; establishment of turf; construction of gravel access roads and ramps; installation of traffic control devices for cross-over construction; construction of highway cross-overs; removal of existing highway pavement; placement and installation of new highway embankment and pavement; the installation of temporary water line utilities; and the permanent relocation of water line utilities, including tie-ins and connections, air release valves, and fire hydrants. Range of Magnitude: $25 to $100 Million Period of Performance: 1300 calendar days after Notice to Proceed Some of the factors that may be considered regarding their use are: a. The involvement of multiple contractors and/or subcontractors working in multiple crafts or trades. b. The complexity of the project. c. Shortage of skilled labor in the region. d. Completion of the project will require an extended period of time. e. The use of PLA's on other comparable projects. f. The promotion of the Governments long term programs interests such as training of skilled workforce for future projects. g. The possibility of labor disputes that threaten timely completion. h. Additional costs from use of PLAs may be cost prohibitive. A PLA is defined as a pre-hire collective bargaining agreement with one or more labor organizations that establishes the terms and conditions of employment for a specific construction project and is an agreement described in 29 U.S.C. 158(f). Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Policy: a. Project Labor Agreement (PLA) is a tool that agencies may use to promote economy and efficiency in Federal procurement. Pursuant to Executive Order 13502, agencies are encouraged to consider requiring the use of project labor agreements in connection with large-scale construction projects. b. An agency may, if appropriate, require that every contractor and subcontractor engaged in construction on the project agree, for that project, to negotiate or become a party to a project labor agreement with one or more labor organizations if the agency decides that the use of project labor agreements will: 1. Advance the Federal Governments interest in achieving economy and efficiency in Federal procurement, producing labor-management stability, and ensuring compliance with laws and regulations governing safety and health, equal employment opportunity, labor and employment standards, and other matters; and 2. Be consistent with law. Reference: Provision: 52.222-33 Notice of Requirement for Project Labor Agreement Clause 52.222-34 Project Labor Agreement. In consideration of the above factors, and any others which may be deemed appropriate, the construction community is invited to comment on the use of PLAs. Of particular interest to the Government are responses to the following questions: a. Should PLAs be executed on selected large dollar contracts within the above referenced location by the New Orleans District? What other factors should the Corps consider before deciding to include PLA provisions in a New Orleans District contract? What type of project should or should not be considered for PLA? b. Is the use of PLAs effective in achieving economy and efficiency in Federal procurement? What is the estimated relative cost impact, or any other economies or efficiencies derived by the Federal Government, if using PLAs? Will a PLA impact the cost of submitting an offer? c. Is the use of PLAs effective in producing labor-management stability? Have labor disputes or other labor issues contributed to project delays in the local area? d. Is the use of PLAs conducive to ensuring compliance with laws and regulations governing safety and health, equal employment opportunity, labor and employment standards, and other relevant matters? Are there instances where these standards have not been met on Federal contracts in the local area? Were PLAs used for those specific contracts? e. Projects will require multiple construction contractors and/or subcontractors employing workers in multiple crafts or trades. Do you foresee any work on projects that may result in both the prime contractor and at least one subcontractor, or two or more subcontractors, employing the same trade? f. Are there concerns by prime contractors on the availability of skilled construction labor? Information may reference current apprenticeship statistics and workforce age demographics. g. Completion of anticipated projects will require an extensive performance periods. Will a PLA impact the completion time? What is the anticipated volatility in the labor market for the trades required for the execution of the project? Would a PLA benefit a project which contains a unique and compelling mission-critical schedule? h. Where have PLAs been used on comparable projects undertaken by Federal, State, municipal, or private entities in the geographic area of this project? i. Will the use of PLAs impact the ability of potential Offerors and subcontractors to meet small-business utilization goals? Please provide your comments via e-mail to Tracey M. Lowe, Contract Specialist at Tracey.M.Lowe@usace.army.mil no later than close of business on 4 November 2013. Agency/Contracting Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg District ATTN: Tracey M. Lowe, Room 144 4155 Clay Street Vicksburg, MS 39183
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USA/COE/DACA29/W912P8-14-B-0025/listing.html)
- Place of Performance
- Address: USACE District, New Orleans ATTN: CEMVN-CT, P.O. Box 60267 New Orleans LA
- Zip Code: 70160-0267
- Zip Code: 70160-0267
- Record
- SN03223972-W 20131031/131029234142-af44527e8481747174b26fc88ffeef7d (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |