SOLICITATION NOTICE
R -- Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN)
- Notice Date
- 3/14/2014
- Notice Type
- Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
- NAICS
- 541690
— Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services
- Contracting Office
- Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Acquisition Management Division, 100 Bureau Drive, Building 301, Room B130, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20899-1410, United States
- ZIP Code
- 20899-1410
- Solicitation Number
- SB1341-14-RQ-0131
- Archive Date
- 4/15/2014
- Point of Contact
- Abdul-Kudus Yahaya, Phone: 3019758497, Mimi Robinson, Phone: 301-975-3696
- E-Mail Address
-
abdul-kudus.yahaya@nist.gov, mimi.robinson@nist.gov
(abdul-kudus.yahaya@nist.gov, mimi.robinson@nist.gov)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- Total Small Business
- Description
- THIS IS A COMBINED SYNOPSIS/SOLICITATION FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FORMAT IN FAR SUBPART 12.6-STREAMLINED PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATION AND SOLICITATION FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS-AS SUPPLEMENTED WITH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE. THIS ANNOUNCEMENT CONSTITUTES THE ONLY SOLICITATION; QUOTATIONS ARE BEING REQUESTED, AND A WRITTEN SOLICITATION DOCUMENT WILL NOT BE ISSUED. THIS SOLICITATION IS BEING ISSUED USING SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF FAR SUBPART 13.5 TEST PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN COMMERCIAL ITEMS This solicitation is a Request for Quotation (RFQ). The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-72. The associated North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code for this procurement is 541690 with size standard of $14.0 Million. The Government requires all contractors doing business with the government to be registered with the System for Award Management (SAM). For additional information and to register in SAM, please access the following website: https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/. Award will not be made to any contractor that is not registered in SAM. This acquisition is being procured as 100% Small Business Set-Aside. Responsible quoters shall provide pricing for the following line item: LINE ITEM 0001: The Contractor shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, and services necessary for task 1, task 2, task 3 and task 4 below to develop and initiate an OMG procedure for testing BPMN 2 model interchange similar to the existing OMG procedure for UML and to translate OAGIS business scenarios into Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). LINE ITEM 0002: Travel Costs in accordance with Federal Travel Regulations, (Interested party shall provide Not to Exceed amount).All estimated cost for travel. BACKGROUND The Object Management Group (OMG) is a member-based not-for-profit open standards development organization (SDO) producing both general and domain-specific standards. The Business Modeling & Integration (BMI) Domain Task Force, within OMG develops specifications of integrated models to support management of an enterprise. These specifications promote inter- and intra-enterprise integration and collaboration of people, systems, processes, and information across the enterprise, including business partners and customers. The OMG Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) is the most widely used standard for enterprise-level process models, including manufacturing enterprises. It provides a notation that is readily understandable by subject matter experts, including engineers, supports the modeling of all processes, including engineering and manufacturing processes, and is also in a form usable by computers, creating a standardized bridge for the gap between process design and implementation. Upon request from multiple countries, BPMN is in the process of becoming an ISO approved standard. As an ISO approved standard, BPMN will make an even faster progression into organizations around the world. As such BPMN standardize interchange will play a vital role in ensuring free open access to best of breed engineering process management support for American BPMN tools providers and users. With the growing use of BPMN on significant real world projects involving large teams using many kinds of modeling tools, it is critical that interchange of BPMN models between tools be reliable and accurate. This is especially true for implementations of the recently-standardized second version of BPMN (BPMN 2), which contains major upgrades for models of processes within enterprises, and interactions between enterprises, such as supply chains. The BPMN Model Interchange Working Group (MIWG) is an OMG recognized working group whose objective is to establish a publically available BPMN 2.0 test procedure and test suite. It builds on successful OMG procedures for tool vendors to demonstrate interchange among modeling tools for other OMG standards. These procedures will include interchange test cases that will be available on a public portal (http://www.omgwiki.org/bpmn-miwg). Participating vendors will prepare exports for each test case and import the exports from other tools to test interoperability. The vendors will publicly post exports from their tools for the test cases, enabling tool users to assess model interchange capability by comparing the vendor exports to the expected reference file for each test case. It is expected that interchange of BPMN models between some of the leading tools on the market will significantly improve as a direct result of resolving issues found during this testing procedure. The first objective of this contract is to ensure tests for BPMN's descriptive capabilities go through the BPMN MIWG process. Part of ensuring completion of the process is to promote the use of the BPMN 2 interchange test suite and procedure among BPMN vendors and users. The Open Applications Group (OAG) is a member-based not-for-profit open SDO focused on standards-based engineering enterprise process integration. The Open Applications Group Integration Specification (OAGIS) provides common message architecture for interoperability between disparate systems, companies, and supply chains. Business Scenarios are provided as a starting point for integration and complemented with Business Object Documents (BODs) for capturing messages or documents exchanged between software applications or components; between companies; across supply chains; and between supply chains. These include such scenarios as engineering to order and plant data management. The business scenarios are understandable by engineers, but are not in form usable by computers. This community is focused on building process-based business standards for Mobile Business, Cloud Computing, eCommerce, Application Integration, Service Oriented Architecture (SOA), and Web Services. OAGIS is a cross industry business standard, and the OAG Policy Board has insured that OAGIS is free to download and to use. Potential benefits of integrating the Business Scenarios from OAGIS and the BPMN from OMG include more efficient and effective deployment of integrated processes across organizations. Separate engineering and business activities reduce efficiency of new product development by inhibiting communication between engineering departments and external stakeholders. Furthermore, these collaborations are not well defined or understood as integral parts of the overall business processes leading to sub-optimal engineering and overall management. This integration will lead to the availability of standardized Message Exchange Patterns (MEP) and Business Interaction Blueprints (BIB) in support of various industries. The second objective of this contract is to translate OAGIS business scenarios into BPMN notation. PURPOSE The purposes of this acquisition are to develop test cases for BPMN 2.0 Descriptive Conformance capabilities, and to translate OAGIS business scenarios into BPMN notation. TASKS Required work shall be performed in collaboration with the National Institute of Standards and Technology as part of the Smart Manufacturing Operations Planning and Control program. TASK 1: The Contractor shall develop test cases for BPMN's descriptive capabilities with the BPMN MIWG. The contractor shall work in coordination with BPMN MIWG to develop tests of BPMN 2.0 Descriptive Conformance capabilities (see http://www.omgwiki.org/bpmn-miwg). This includes promoting the use of the BPMN 2 interchange test suite and procedure among BPMN vendors and end users. The contractor shall write two reports and one set of presentation slides on this work. TASK 2: Give public demonstration of BPMN 2.0 descriptive capabilities tests. The contractor shall give a public demonstration of BPMN 2.0 descriptive conformance tests to the BPMN MIWG during an OMG Technical Meeting (see http://www.omg.org/news/schedule/upcoming.htm). The contractor shall write one report on this work. TASK 3: Develop BPMN models for OAGIS business scenarios The Contractor shall develop public interface collaboration BPMN models for all business scenarios of the current version of OAGIS (see References section). These models shall be in BPMN 2 interchange file format, covering abstract and concrete syntax. The contractor shall write a report identifying problems in the BPMN and OAG specifications identified during this work. TASK 4: Incorporate feedback from OMG and OAG into results of Task 3. The Contractor shall discuss the deliverables of Task 3 with members of OMG and OAG to gather and incorporate feedback on the deliverables before they are finalized. The Contractor shall write one report and one set of presentation slides that summarizes the communications with these organizations and participation in technical meetings of these organizations. DELIVERABLES Task Description Format & Due Date 1.1 Report on the BPMN MIWG process for BPMN descriptive capability testing. The report shall identify the organizations involved in the BPMN MIWG process and summarize their feedback on the test suite. The report shall detail the BPMN MIWG test process for the BPMN 2.0 Descriptive Conformance test suite and progress in adoption by the BPMN tool vendor and end user communities. 12 months from date of award, in MS Office or Open Office format. 1.2 Report on results of BPMN descriptive capability tests for BPMN tools that shall include commercial off-the-shelf and open source BPMN modeling tools. The report shall include the results of applying the BPMN 2.0 Descriptive Conformance test suite to BPMN tools. 12 months from date of award, in MS Office or Open Office format. 1.3 Presentation material on BPMN descriptive conformance testing. The presentation shall include the BPMN 2.0 Descriptive Conformance test procedure using the BPMN MIWG test suite, best practices and known BPMN 2.0 interchange misinterpretations, and recommendations to BPMN 2.0 tool vendors and end users. 12 months from date of award, in MS Office or Open Office format. 2.1 Report summarizing the public demonstration of BPMN 2.0 descriptive conformance tests. The report shall identify the organizations the demonstration is given to, and the software and hardware used in the demonstration. 12 months from date of award, in MS Office or Open Office format. 3.1 BPMN public interface collaboration diagrams for all Business Scenarios of OAG, covering abstract and concrete syntax. 12 months from date of award, in BPMN 2 interchange file format. The BPMN 2 interchange files shall be viewable in a commercial off-the-shelf or open source BPMN modeling tool. 3.2 Report on problems with the BPMN 2 and OAGIS Business Scenario specifications identified specification identified during model development. The report shall give an example in which the problem arises and identify the specific portions of the respective standards that are suggested to be changed. 12 months from date of award, in MS Office or Open Office format. 4.1 Presentation material on the deliverables of Task 3 that incorporates feedback from OMG and OAG. 12 months from date of award, in MS Office or Open Office format. 4.2 A report summarizing the communications with OMG and OAG and participation in technical meetings of these organizations resulting from Task 3. The report shall identify the organizations involved in the communications and summarize their feedback on the intermediate and final results of Task 3. 12 months from date of award, in MS Office or Open Office format. REFERENCES The Contractor shall use as basis of its work versions of the following standards at the time that the project is initiated: - OMG BPMN 2: http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN - OAGi OAGIS: http://www.oagi.org CONTRACTOR MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Key personnel performing the required work shall have a minimum of five years experience (within the last seven years) with BPMN interchange and testing (including at least three years with BPMN 2); three years' (within the last five years) experience with OMG standardization of BPMN 2; and ten years experience (in the last twelve years) in software development. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE The period of performance shall be twelve (12) months from the date of award. The Government estimates that this requirement will require no more than one person working no more than 134 8 hour workdays. PLACE OF PERFORMANCE Work will be performed at the Contractor's facility. TRAVEL The Contractor shall travel to NIST and OMG meetings, or other OAG meetings during the performance of this contract. -Travel to NIST: up to two trips, 1 working day for each trip, not including travel. -Travel to OMG and/or OAG meetings. NIST will not pay registration fees for OMG or OAG meetings because presentations by the offeror at these meetings do not require registration. Up to six trips, 3 to 5 working days for each trip, not including travel. Trips are planned for the following locations: Gaithersburg, MD in April 2014, Boston, MA in June 2014, Austin, TX in September 2014, and Long Beach, CA in December 2014, Washington, D.C. in March 2015. All travel costs shall be included in the Contractor's quotation and shall be in accordance with Government Travel Regulations. All travel cost estimates shall be approved in advance of the contractor incurring any costs. INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The NIST Technical Contact will review all deliverables submitted by the Contractor to ensure that deliverables are complete, accurate, comprehensive, and meet all requirements. Comments or approval shall be provided to the Contractor within seven days of receipt of any given deliverable. The Contractor shall revise deliverables in accordance with comments received at no additional cost to the Government and submit back to NIST within 14 days of receipt of the comments. DUE DATE FOR QUOTATIONS Questions relating to this solicitation must be forwarded in writing, via e-mail, to Abdul-Kudus Yahaya, Contract Specialist, not later than March 21, 2014. All quotations are due on 31, 2014 at 1:00 PM EST by email only to Abdul-Kudus Yahaya, Contract Specialist at Abdul-Kudus.Yahaya@nist.gov. An e-mail quotation shall be considered received when it is received in the electronic inbox of Abdul-Kudus.Yahaya@nist.gov. PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS Offerors shall examine and follow all instructions. Failure to do so will be at the Offeror's own risk. General 1. Offerors shall furnish the proposal in two separate volumes, Technical (Volume I) and Pricing (Volume II) in the quantities specified below. Each volume shall be complete in itself in order that evaluation of one volume may be accomplished independently of, and concurrently with, evaluation of the other. 2. The page limit for the entire proposal combined is thirty (30) pages, excluding resumes, cover letter and executive summary; any pages beyond the 30th page will not be evaluated. 3. The Offeror shall submit its proposal no later than the due date and time specified in this solicitation. 4. The Offerer must have and maintain an active registration in the System for Award Management (SAM), https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM. If not registered at SAM, a completed copy of the provision 52.212-2 Offeror's Representations and Certifications-Commerical Items must be included in the proposal. Overall Arrangement of Proposal 1. VOLUME I - TECHNICAL VOLUME A. Volume I consists of the actual offer to enter into a contract to perform the desired work. It also includes required representations, certifications, and acknowledgments; justifications for noncompetitive proposed subcontracts; identification of technical data to be withheld; and any other administrative information. Volume I also shall consists of the Offeror's response to the technical and management aspects of the acquisition. It should indicate your organization's capabilities and the means that the Offeror intends to use to satisfy the requirements of this solicitation. It will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria contained in the Solicitation. The proposal should be practical and be prepared simply and economically, providing straightforward, concise delineation of what it is you will do to satisfy the requirements of Solicitation. The proposal shall not merely offer to perform the work in accordance with the Statement of Work, but shall outline the approach proposed as specifically as practicable. A proposal that includes a mere repetition of the Solicitation may not be considered further for award. B. Format and Content. Volume I shall include the following: (B.1) Management Section (i) The solicitation number; (ii) The name of the company, DUNS number, Cage Code address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Offeror (and electronic address if available); (iii) Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror's behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation if applicable; (iv) Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent's authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office; and (v) Any other business or administrative information that the Offeror wishes to include in its proposal. (B.2) Technical Section (i) The Technical portion of Volume I shall not exceed 12 pages, single sided, single spaced, using Times New Roman 12 Point Font. The 12 page limitation is exclusive of tables and figures, resumes and related experience and past performance. Resumes shall be limited to 3 pages per person. Project descriptions for experience and past performance shall be limited to ½ page per project. Information on publications and research shall be limited to 3 pages. An executive summary can be included, no more than two pages, but will not be evaluated and does not count toward the 12 page limitation. (ii) Format shall include: (a) Table of Contents (b) List of Tables and Figures (c) Technical Solution. The technical solution section should be the major portion of Volume I. It shall include three parts ((1), (2), and (3)). The Offeror shall confine information pertaining to each part to its appropriate part. 1. Technical Capability and Specialized Experience: The Offeror shall demonstrate its understanding of the requirements, and ability to successfully perform them within the required timeframe. Specialized Experience: The Offeror shall describe its experience performing work similar to that required by the solicitation, specifically, experience in Specialized Experience: The Offeror shall describe its experience performing work similar to that required by the solicitation, specifically, experience in Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) and Open Applications Group Integration Specification (OAGIS) standards and testing. The Offeror shall also describe any certifications and forms of recognition from other entities with respect to the Offeror's experience and/or expertise, including any industry awards, certificates, and letters of recommendation. To the extent the Offeror will be subcontracting any portion of its effort under the contract; it shall describe its experience working with its proposed subcontractors on efforts similar to those required by the Statement of Work. 2. Management Approach: The Offeror shall describe how it intends to manage its efforts to perform the requirements articulated in the solicitation within the required timeframe. 3. Staffing Plan/ Key Personnel: The Government anticipates the following labor categories will be applicable to this contract. The Offeror may propose labor categories and not to exceed hours per each labor category, applicable to their proposal, that are different from those listed below; however, if an alternate labor mix is quoted, Contractor shall provide an explanation as to how the government will benefit from the alternate labor mix. (Note: This information will be used solely for evaluation of labor mix and overall price) Labor Categories: a. Computer Scientist (Key Personnel) (Key The offeror shall provide a complete staffing plan with an accompanying organizational chart. The staffing plan shall identify the offeror's proposed labor categories, describe the skills and experience required for each category, identify the number of labor hours proposed for each labor category, and thoroughly describe the rationale for the proposed labor mix. The Government estimates but does not guarantee that 1072 contractor labor-hours may be required to perform the base period requirements. The organizational chart shall identify who the offeror will assign to the contract, their roles and responsibilities, the lines of authority, lines of communication, both within the contractor' s organization also within the Government and each person's current employer. The offeror shall provide resumes for its proposed key personnel that include their name, employer, relevant education, capabilities, and experience, as well as their country of citizenship, and responsibilities of in support of this requirement. This should include relevant skill sets, experience level (that is, senior, intermediate, or junior) and whether their employer is an identified subcontractor, teaming/partnering entity, or joint venture partnership. (d) Past Performance Past Performance: The Offeror shall provide past performance information regarding 2 or more relevant contracts for the past 3 years with federal, state or local governments and commercial customers. The information shall describe contracts of a similar type and scope as the current requirement. If the offer intends to use subcontractor(s) for part of this requirement, then the Offeror shall also provide that organization's past performance information. If the Offeror and, if applicable, its subcontractor(s) has no relevant past performance information, it should include a statement to that effect in its proposal. For each of the past performance information contracts, the Offeror shall provide the following information: Contract/Order Number; Contract type utilized (e.g., fixed-price, time-and-materials, labor-hour, cost-reimbursement); Description and relevance to solicitation requirements; Period of Performance - Indicate by month and year the start and completion (or "ongoing") dates for the contract; Name and address of the client with current telephone number and email address of a point of contact of the client responsible for this contract ( If a Government contract (federal or state), identify the Procuring Contracting Officer, Administrative Contracting Officer, and Contracting Officer's Representative (COR)); Total dollar value of contract, including options, if any; Information regarding any problems encountered on the contract and corrective actions taken to resolve those problems. 2. VOLUME II - PRICING VOLUME The offeror shall propose a price for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) for all tasks (Task 1 through Task 4). The offeror shall also provide a detailed breakdown that shows how those price were derived and shall be based on the Offeror's proposal Volume I and solicitation requirements. The detailed breakdown shall include: A. labor categories B. labor rates (burdened) C. number of hours per labor category A monthly Firm-Fixed-Price that details the total Firm-Fixed-Price per month for the entire period of performance of this purchase order for 12 months from the date of award. Example CLIN 0001 (12 months X $.... = Extended Price $........ and CLIN 0002 1 lot. BASIS FOR AWARD Best Value, with the following criteria: Factor 1 - Technical Solution, Factor 2 - Past Performance, and Factor 3 - Price. All evaluation factors other than price both individual and when combined, are considered more important than price. However, the Government will not select an offeror for award on the basis of technical merit without concern and consideration of its price. The degree of importance of price as an evaluation factor will increase with the degree of equality in the technical merits of the proposals. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: 52.252-1 Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The Offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the Offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the Offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es): http://acquisition.gov/comp/far/index.html. The following provisions apply to this acquisition: 52.204-7 System for Award Management 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Items; 52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items; 52.212-3 Offerors Representations and Certifications- Commercial Items. The following clauses apply to this acquisition: 52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions-Commercial Items; 52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders-Commercial Items including subparagraphs: 52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards. 52.209-6, Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment. 52.209-10, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations. 52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside. 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns; 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting; 52.219-16, Liquidated Damages-Subcontracting Plan; 52.219-28 Post-Award Small Business Program Representation; 52.222-3, Convict Labor; 52.222-19, Child Labor - Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies; 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities; 52-222-26, Equal Opportunity; 52.222-36, Affirmative Action for Workers with Disabilities; 52.222-41, Service Contract Act of 1965; 52.223-18, Contractor Policy to Ban Text Messaging While Driving; 52.225-3, Buy American Act-Free Trade Agreements-Israeli Trade Act; 52.225-13, Restriction on Certain Foreign Purchases; 52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer-Central Contractor Registration; 52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services; 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons; 52.227-17 Rights in Data-Special Works; 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business Subcontractors 52.233-3, Protest After Award; and 52.233-4, Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim The following CAR clauses apply to this acquisition: Department of Commerce Agency-Level Protest Procedures Level above the Contracting Officer is also incorporated. It can be downloaded at www.nist.gov/admin/od/contract/agency.htm; and 1352.201-70 Contracting Officer's Authority 1352.201-72 Contracting Officer's Representative - 1352.209-73 Compliance with the Laws 1352.209-74 Organizational Conflict Of Interest 1352.213-70 Evaluation Utilizing Simplified Acquisition Procedures 1352.237-73 Foreign national visitor and guest access to departmental resources; 1352.237-75 Key Personnel 1352.239-72 Security requirements for information technology resources 1352.246-70 Place of acceptance - NIST 100 Bureau Drive Gaithersburg, MD NIST LOCAL 36 - TRAVEL NOTE (a) The government will reimburse the contractor for all necessary expenses in connection with travel authorized pursuant to this order/contract. Costs incurred for lodging, meals, and incidental expenses shall be considered to be reasonable and allowable only to the extent that they do not exceed on a daily basis the maximum per diem rates in effect at the time of travel as set forth in the Federal Travel Regulations prescribed by the General Services Administration. (b) Subsistence is authorized in accordance with the DoC and Federal Travel Regulations. Invoices requesting reimbursement for travel must be accompanied by itemized paid receipts. The invoices must be submitted to the payment office specified elsewhere in this order/contract. NIST LOCAL-04 Billing Instructions (a) NIST prefers electronic Invoice/Voucher submissions and they should be emailed to INVOICE@NIST.GOV. (b) Each Invoice or Voucher submitted shall include the following: (1) Contract Number. (2) Contractor Name and Address. (3) Date of Invoice. (4) Invoice Number. (5) Amount of Invoice and Cumulative Amount Invoiced to-date. (6) Contract Line Item Number (CLIN). (7) Description, Quantity, Unit of Measure, Unit Price, and Extended Price of Supplies/Services Delivered. (8) Prompt Payment Discount Terms, if Offered. (9) Any other information or documentation required by the contract. (c) In the event electronic submissions are not used, The Contractor shall submit an original invoice or voucher in accordance with the payment provisions of this contract to: NIST: Accounts Payable Office 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 1621 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-1621 (End of clause) NOTE: The Government does not anticipate any position being proposed to be under the Service Contract Act (SCA) of 1965. However, should your proposal include any of the labor categories covered under the SCA, the Applicable Service Contract Act Wage Determination information is as follows: Wage Determination No.: 2005-2103 Revision No.: 13 Date of Revision: 06/19/2013 If this is applicable to proposal, identify the labor category or categories.
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/DOC/NIST/AcAsD/SB1341-14-RQ-0131/listing.html)
- Record
- SN03311232-W 20140316/140314234536-7858b9de64ed5e2e1b623508156b9d51 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |