Loren Data's SAM Daily™

FBO DAILY - FEDBIZOPPS ISSUE OF NOVEMBER 26, 2014 FBO #4750
SOLICITATION NOTICE

D -- Information Technology Consolidation Services - WORKLOAD ESTIMATES - PRICE BREAKOUT - PWS ITCC - PWS LABOR REPORTING

Notice Date

11/24/2014
 

Notice Type

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
 

NAICS

541513 — Computer Facilities Management Services
 

Contracting Office

Department of the Air Force, Air Force Materiel Command, AFLCMC / AFSC / AFNWC - HILL AFB, ., Hill AFB, Utah, 84056, United States
 

ZIP Code

84056
 

Solicitation Number

FA8201-14-R-InfoTechConsolidation
 

Archive Date

12/29/2014
 

Point of Contact

Andrew S. Taylor, Phone: 8017752394
 

E-Mail Address

andrew.taylor.31@us.af.mil
(andrew.taylor.31@us.af.mil)
 

Small Business Set-Aside

Total Small Business
 

Description

LABOR REPORTING Performance Work Statement PRICE BREAKOUT WORKLOAD ESTIMATES Request for Proposal: FA8201-14-R-InfoTechConsolidation This is a combined synopsis and solicitation for a commercial service prepared in accordance with the format in FAR Subpart 12.6 as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; therefore proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. This solicitation, FA8201-14-R- InfoTechConsolidation, is issued as a request for proposal (RFP) for Information Technology Consolidation Services per the attached Performance Work Statement (PWS). Submit only written offers; oral offers will not be accepted. All firms or individuals responding must be registered with System for Award Management (SAM). The NAICS code for this effort is 514513 and is being solicited as a 100% small business set-aside. The FSC code for this effort is D316. This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-77. Please Propose the following item: CLIN 0001 - All Services Described in the PWS. Quantity: 9 Unit of issue: Months CLIN 0002 - Over and Above Work. Quantity: 1 Unit of issue: Lot CLIN 0003 - Deliverables (CDRL) NSP. Quantity: 1 Unit of issue: Lot Type of Contract: Firm Fixed Price Deliveries or Performance: The period of performance for the contract will be nine (9) months. Site Visit: N/A POC: All questions regarding this solicitation can be sent to Andrew.Taylor.31@us.af.mil and must be received NLT 01 December 2014. Proposals are required to be received no later than 1300 (1pm MST), Sunday, 14 Dec 2014. Notice to Offerors: The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs. The following provisions and clauses apply to this acquisition: 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (IAW FAR 12.301(b)(1)) (APR 2014): Paragraph (b), entitled "Submission of Offers": (b) Submission of offers. Submit signed and dated offers to the office specified in this solicitation at or before the exact time specified in this solicitation. Offers may be submitted on the SF 1449, letterhead stationery, or as otherwise specified in the solicitation. As a minimum, offers must show -- (1) The solicitation number; (2) The time specified in the solicitation for receipt of offers; (3) The name, address, and telephone number of the offeror; (4) A technical description of the items being offered in sufficient detail to evaluate compliance with the requirements in the solicitation. This may include product literature, or other documents, if necessary; (5) Terms of any express warranty; (6) Price and any discount terms; (7) "Remit to" address, if different than mailing address; (8) A completed copy of the representations and certifications at FAR 52.212-3 (see FAR 52.212-3(b) for those representations and certifications that the offeror shall complete electronically); (9) Acknowledgment of Solicitation Amendments; (10) Past performance information, when included as an evaluation factor, to include recent and relevant contracts for the same or similar items and other references (including contract numbers, points of contact with telephone numbers and other relevant information); and (11) If the offer is not submitted on the SF 1449, include a statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation. Offers that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be excluded from consideration. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The proposal shall consist of two (2) separate volumes; Volume 1 - Cost/Price Proposal and Volume 2 - Technical Proposal (Maximum of 30 pages). Offerors are not required to provide past performance information. 52.212-2: EVALUATION - COMMERCIAL ITEMS: The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements. Proposals will be evaluated on lowest price technically acceptable basis. Award will be conducted under the provisions of FAR Part 12, Commercial Items, and FAR 13.5, Simplified Acquisition Procedures. Submit only written offers; oral offers will not be accepted. All firms or individuals responding must be registered with the System for Award Management (SAM). BASIS FOR AWARD EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD USING LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA) PROCEDURES A. BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD This acquisition will utilize Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedures, to make an integrated assessment for a best value award decision. Tradeoffs will not be permitted. Award will be made to the Offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 9, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation's requirements and is judged, based on the evaluation factors, to represent the best value to the Government. The SSA will base the source selection decision on an integrated assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation (described below). While the Government source selection evaluation team and the SSA will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective and, therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process. The Government reserves the right to award without discussions. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the Offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. B. NUMBER OF CONTRACTS TO BE AWARDED The Government intends to select one contractor for this acquisition. However, the Government reserves the right not to award a contract at all, depending on the quality of the proposals and prices submitted and the availability of funds. C. REJECTION OF UNREALISTIC OFFERS The Government may reject any proposal that is evaluated to be unrealistic in terms of program commitments, including contract or price terms and conditions, such that the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program. D. CORRECTION POTENTIAL OF PROPOSALS The Government will consider, throughout the evaluation, the "correction potential" of any proposal uncertainty. The judgment of such "correction potential" is within the sole discretion of the Government. If an aspect of an Offeror's proposal not meeting the Government's requirements is not considered correctable, the Offeror may be eliminated from the competitive range. E. EVALUATION CRITERIA 1. Factors: Factor 1 - Cost/Price Factor 2 - Technical Subfactor 1 - Security Management Subfactor 2 - Program Management Subfactor 3 - Technical Expertise Award will be made to the Offeror proposing the combination most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors herein. 2. Order of Importance: In LPTA, Proposals are evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using the non-cost/price factors. 3. Evaluation Methodology: Proposals will be first evaluated by price and then evaluated for technical acceptance. Once the offers are ranked by TEP, they will then be evaluated for technical acceptability from lowest price to highest price until a technically acceptable offer is found. When the offer with the lowest price is deemed technically acceptable, no further technical evaluations will be conducted for any of the remaining offers. Technical evaluations shall be evaluated as set forth in paragraph 5 below, with a determination of Acceptable or Unacceptable. 4. Factor 1 - Cost/Price: (1) Total Evaluated Price (TEP) The offeror's Price Volume will be evaluated for award purposes based upon the total anticipated contract value. The Total Evaluated Price (TEP) will be calculated as the sum of the Firm-Fixed-Price sub-CLINs under CLINs 0001-0003, and the sum of the sub-CLINs under CLIN 0002, "over and above" shall be evaluated for balance and reasonableness by comparing against commercial market rates and or wage determination rates. The TEP will be provided to the Source Selection Authority (SSA) for consideration in the best value decision. (2) Price Reasonableness An offeror's Price Volume will be evaluated, using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404, in order to determine if it is reasonable. A price is reasonable when it provides best value to the Government when consideration is given to the current market prices, technical and functional capabilities of the offeror and risk. IAW FAR 15.403-1(b), the Government may require submission of information other than cost or pricing data to the extent necessary to evaluate price criteria for reasonableness. When adequate price competition exists, generally no additional information is necessary to determine the reasonableness of price. (3) Unbalanced CLIN Prices Price analysis and evaluation of the information in the Price Volume will be used to determine if the prices for the proposed contract line items are balanced or unbalanced. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total solicitation effort price, the price of one or more contract line items or sub line items appears to be significantly over or under-stated. Unbalanced pricing may result in an offer being rejected if the Government determines that it presents an unacceptable risk to the Government. F. TRADEOFFS Tradeoffs are not permitted in LPTA procedures. G. DISCUSSIONS It is the Government's intent to award without discussions; therefore, it is imperative that offerors submit their best terms initially. However, if it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government, they will be held in written format. H. SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS, TERMS AND CONDITIONS Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as complete terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide accompanying rationale. 5. Factor 2 - Technical: Each subfactor within the technical factor will receive one of the ratings described below based on the criteria listed below. Individual subfactor ratings will be used to determine the overall technical acceptability of each proposal. To be technically acceptable at the factor level, the Offeror must be rated acceptable in each subfactor. A final unacceptable subfactor assessment will determine an overall technical unacceptable rating. ACCEPTABLE - The proposal meets specified minimum requirements necessary for acceptable contract performance. UNACCEPTABLE - The proposal fails to meet specified minimum requirements necessary for contract performance. Proposals with an Unacceptable rating are not awardable. Subfactor 1: Security Management The Government will assess the Offeror's proposed Security Management approach. The subfactor threshold (minimum) is met when the Offeror's proposal demonstrates details and development of the processes on all of the following essential components and is supported by the inclusion of previous contract experience in these areas: a. SECURITY CLEARANCE PROCESS: (PWS ref: 4.1, 4.2) The offer demonstrates a clear understanding of the security clearance process to ensure contractor personnel have the applicable clearances to accomplish the Base-Wide Network, Web and PC Support Services mission IAW DoD 5220.22-M "National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual" (NISPOM), AFI 31-501, "Personnel Security Program Management", and AFI 31-601, "Industrial Security Program Management". b. INFORMATION ASSURANCE: (PWS ref: 1.7, 4.24) The offer demonstrates a clear understanding of an Information Assurance process to ensure the availability, integrity, authentication, confidentiality and non-repudiation of Air Force information and information systems (IS), that provides for restoration through incorporation of protection, detection, reaction capabilities, and contingency procedures IAW AFI 33-138, "Enterprise Network Operations Notification and Tracking" and AFI 33-200, "Information Assurance (IA) Management". c. SECURITY INCIDENT PROCESS: (PWS ref: 4.17) The offer demonstrates a clear understanding of a security incident process that effectively addresses the identification, reporting, prevention and remediation of security incidents involving classified and unclassified Air Force networks and/or equipment IAW AFI 33-138 "Enterprise Network Operations Notification and Tracking" and 33-200, "Information Assurance (IA) Management". d. SOFTWARE MANAGEMENT: (PWS ref: 1.6 & throughout) The offer demonstrates a clear understanding of software management that effectively addresses a process for license management of Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) IAW AFI 33-114, "Software Management". e. ASSET MANAGEMENT: (PWS ref: 1.9 & throughout) The offer demonstrates a clear understanding of the asset management process that addresses conducting inventories, asset management and documentation, initiation of the Report of Survey Process (ROS) and other asset management duties IAW AFI 33- 112, "Information Technology Hardware Asset Management". Subfactor 2: Program Management The Government will assess the Offeror's proposed Program Management approach. The subfactor threshold (minimum) is met when the Offeror's proposal demonstrates details and development of the processes of the following essential areas: a. EDUCATION AND TRAINING PROGRAM (PWS ref: Throughout): 1) Capability to identify and categorize the positions and certification of contractor personnel conducting Information Assurance (IA) functions for an effective and practical application of skill sets IAW DoD 8570.1-M, Chapters 3 and 4, "Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program" for all areas of the PWS. Capability to ensure contractor personnel obtains and maintains the required commercial certifications. 2) Capability to effectively address new and evolving technologies such as Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) that demonstrates how the Offeror's program ensures personnel are current and qualified. 3) Capability to effectively provide an adequate labor skill mix and sufficient plan to recruit and retain qualified personnel with required certifications and qualifications required by the PWS (which includes DoD 8570.01-M) needed to fulfill the requirements of this contract that identifies the types of certifications required for level one, two, and three at the technical and managerial levels. b. TRANSITION PLAN (PWS ref: 4.37): 1) A capable identification plan which successfully mitigates anticipated risks associated with the transition of existing support requirements. 2) Capability to effectively perform transition management of on-going base-wide IT workload Subfactor 3: Technical Expertise The Government will assess the Offeror's proposed Technical Expertise approach. The subfactor threshold (minimum) is met when the Offeror's proposal demonstrates all of the following essential disciplines and is supported by the inclusion of previous contract experience in these areas: a. Network Management (network routers and switches) - (PWS ref: 1.10) The government will assess the Offeror's approach to provide effective, efficient, secure, and reliable information network services used in critical Air Force communications and information processes and manage the increasingly complex network environment and provide customers high quality services. IAW AFI 33-115, Volumes 1 and 2. b. Service Desk Support - (PWS ref: 1.5) The government will assess the Offeror's Service Desk support approach to receive, document, assign, troubleshoot, resolve, report and track to completion all end user, workstation and information network issues using a documented process. IAW AFI 33-115, Volumes 1 and 2. c. Client Support Technician (desktop management) - (PWS ref: 1.8) The government will assess the Offeror's approach to perform the installation of equipment, connection of peripherals, and the installing/deleting of client level software, configuration of client level software, modify software configuration, perform basic configuration management functions, perform initial client workstation diagnostics and troubleshooting of client workstations assigned to them, report security breaches and distribute security information and other duties IAW AFI 33-115, Volumes 1 and 2. d. Server Administration - (PWS ref: 1.12 )The government will assess the Offeror's approach to ensure servers are properly configured for network operation, are on-line, and are available to customers to include clusters, Storage Area Networks (SAN), EMC Storage Systems, Hill-2K Domains, Exchange Mail Systems, Blackberry Enterprise Servers and Enterprise Backup Systems. The current supported environment includes Windows (2000 and 2003) and UNIX (Solaris/Linux) servers, tape libraries, SAN and network attached storage (NAS). IAW AFI 33-115, Volumes 1 and 2. e. Enterprise System Management/Patch Management - (PWS ref: 1.7.1) The government will assess the Offeror's approach to implement Time Compliance Network Order (TCNO) countermeasures, coordinate TCNO implementation, report TCNO compliance metrics, assist Air Force customers in eradicating malicious logic from a network, information systems, and stand-alone computing devices and assist Air Force customers in assessing the scope of unauthorized network activities or incidents IAW AFI 33-138. 52.212-3 OFFEROR REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (IAW FAR 12.301(b)(2)) Nov 2013: An offeror shall complete only paragraph (b) of this provision if the offeror has completed the annual representations and certifications electronically via https://www.acquisition.gov If an offeror has not completed the annual representations and certifications electronically at the System for Award Management (SAM) website, the offeror shall complete only paragraphs through of this provision. 52.212-4 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS-COMMERCIAL ITEMS ITEMS (MAY 2014)(IAW FAR 12.302) Addendum to 52.212-4 Paragraph (c), entitled ‘Changes': Changes in the terms and conditions of this contract may be made only by written agreement of the parties with the exception of administrative changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) may be changed unilaterally by the Government. 52.212-5 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT STATUTES OR EXECUTIVE ORDERS-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (DEVIATION 2013 - O0019)(JUL 2014): (a) Comptroller General Examination of Record. The Contractor shall comply with the provisions of this paragraph (a) if this contract was awarded using other than sealed bid, is in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, and does not contain the clause at 52.215-2, Audit and Records -- Negotiation. (1) The Comptroller General of the United States, or an authorized representative of the Comptroller General, shall have access to and right to examine any of the Contractor's directly pertinent records involving transactions related to this contract. (2) The Contractor shall make available at its offices at all reasonable times the records, materials, and other evidence for examination, audit, or reproduction, until 3 years after final payment under this contract or for any shorter period specified in FAR Subpart 4.7, Contractor Records Retention, of the other clauses of this contract. If this contract is completely or partially terminated, the records relating to the work terminated shall be made available for 3 years after any resulting final termination settlement. Records relating to appeals under the disputes clause or to litigation or the settlement of claims arising under or relating to this contract shall be made available until such appeals, litigation, or claims are finally resolved. (3) As used in this clause, records include books, documents, accounting procedures and practices, and other data, regardless of type and regardless of form. This does not require the Contractor to create or maintain any record that the Contractor does not maintain in the ordinary course of business or pursuant to a provision of law. (b) (1) Notwithstanding the requirements of any other clause in this contract, the Contractor is not required to flow down any FAR clause, other than those in this paragraph (b)(1) in a subcontract for commercial items. Unless otherwise indicated below, the extent of the flow down shall be as required by the clause- (i) 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct (Apr 2010) (Pub. L. 110-252, Title VI, Chapter 1 (41 U.S.C. 251 note)). (ii) 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (Dec 2010) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(2) and (3)), in all subcontracts that offer further subcontracting opportunities. If the subcontract (except subcontracts to small business concerns) exceeds $650,000 ($1.5 million for construction of any public facility), the subcontractor must include 52.219-8 in lower tier subcontracts that offer subcontracting opportunities. (iii) 52.222-17, Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers (Jan 2013) (E.O. 13495). Flow down required in accordance with paragraph (1) of FAR clause 52.222-17. (iv) 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity (Mar 2007) (E.O. 11246). (v) 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans (Jul 2014) (38 U.S.C. 4212). (vi) 52.222-36, Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities (Jul 2014) (29 U.S.C. 793). (vii) 52.222-37, Employment Reports on Veterans (Jul 2014) (38 U.S.C. 4212). (viii) 52.222-40, Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act (Dec 2010) (E.O. 13496). Flow down required in accordance with paragraph (f) of FAR clause 52.222-40. (ix) 52.222-41, Service Contract Act of 1965, (Nov 2007), (41 U.S.C. 351, et seq.) (x) 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons (Feb 2009) (22 U.S.C. 7104(g)). ___ Alternate I (Aug 2007) of 52.222-50 (22 U.S.C. 7104(g)). (xi) 52.222-51, Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Act to Contracts for Maintenance, Calibration, or Repair of Certain Equipment--Requirements (Nov 2007) (41 U.S.C. 351, et seq.). (xii) 52.222-53, Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Act to Contracts for Certain Services--Requirements (Feb 2009) (41 U.S.C. 351, et seq.) (xiii) 52.222-54, Employment Eligibility Verification (Jul 2012). (xiv) 52.226-6, Promoting Excess Food Donation to Nonprofit Organizations. (Mar 2009) (Pub. L. 110-247). Flow down required in accordance with paragraph (e) of FAR clause 52.226-6. (xvi) 52.247-64, Preference for Privately-Owned U.S.- Flag Commercial Vessels (Feb 2006) (46 U.S.C. Appx 1241(b) and 10 U.S.C. 2631). Flow down required in accordance with paragraph (d) of FAR clause 52.247-64. (2) While not required, the contractor may include in its subcontracts for commercial items a minimal number of additional clauses necessary to satisfy its contractual obligations. 52.219-6 NOTICE OF TOTAL SMALL BUSINESS SET ASIDE (Nov 2011) (15 U.S.C. 644). 52.222-3 CONVICT LABOR(IAW FAR 22.202) 52.222-19 CHILD LABOR- Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies (Jan 2014) (E.O. 13126) 52.222-21 PROHIBITION OF SEGREGATED FACILITIES(IAW FAR 22.810(a)(1)) JUN 2003FEB 1999 52.222-26 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY(IAW FAR 22.810(e)) APR 2002 52.222-35 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR VETERANS JUL 2014 52.222-36 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION FOR WORKERS WITH DISABILITIES(IAW FAR 22.1408(a)) 52.222-50 COMBATING TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS (FEB 2009) (22 U.S.C. 7104(g)) 52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving (Aug 2011) (E.O.13513). 52.225-13 RESTRICTIONS ON CERTAIN FOREIGN PURCHASES(IAW FAR 25.1103(a)) DEC 2003 52.232-33 PAYMENT BY ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER-CENTRAL CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION(IAW FAR 32.1110(a), (a)(1), (b), and (e)(1)) OCT 2003 (c) The Contractor shall comply with the FAR clauses in this paragraph (c), applicable to commercial services, that the Contracting Officer has indicated as being incorporated in this contract by reference to implement provisions of law or executive orders applicable to acquisitions of commercial items. 52.233-3 PROTEST AFTER AWARD (AUG 1996) (31 U.S.C. 3553). 52.233-4 APPLICABBLE LAW FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM (OCT 2004) (Public Laws 108-77, 108-78 (19 U.S.C. 3805 note)). 52.252-2 CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE(IAW FAR 52.107(b)) FEB 1998 This contract incorporates one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. Also, the full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es): http://farsite.hill.af.mil. OTHER FAR CLAUSES AND PROVISIONS 52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.203-6 Restrictions On Subcontractor Sales To The Government SEP 2006 - Alt 1 52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement To Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights APR 2014 52.204-2 Security Requirements AUG 1996 52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards JUL 2013 52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment AUG 2013 52.209-9 Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters JUL 2013 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business (IAW FAR 19.708(a)) MAY 2004 52.219-14 Limitations On Subcontracting NOV 2011 52.222-1 Notice To The Government Of Labor Disputes FEB 1997 52.222-3 Convict Labor JUN 2003 52.222-17 Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers 52.222-21 Prohibition Of Segregated Facilities FEB 1999 52.222-22 Previous Contracts and Compliance Reports FEB 1999 52.222-41 Service Contract Labor Standars (MAY 2014)(41 U.S.C chapter 67) 52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons FEB 2009 52.222-99 Establishing A Minimum Wage For Contractors (DEVIATIONS 2014-O0017) JUN 2014 52.224-1 Privacy Act Notification APR 1984 52.224-2 Privacy Act APR 1984 52.225-25 Prohibition on Contracting with Entities Engaging in Certain Activities or Transactions Relating Iran-Representation and Certifications DEC 2012 52.228-5 Insurance - Work On A Government Installation JAN 1997 52.229-3 Federal, State And Local Taxes FEB 2013 52.232-1 Payments APR 1984 52.232-23 Assignment Of Claims JAN 1986 52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations JUN 2013 52.233-1 Disputes JUL 2002 52.237-2 Protection Of Government Buildings, Equipment, And Vegetation APR 1984 52.239-1 Privacy or Security Safeguards AUG 1996 52.246-4 Inspection of Services--Fixed Price AUG 1996 52.252-4 Alterations in Contract APR 1984 52.252-6 Authorized Deviations in Clauses APR 1984 52.222-42 STATEMENT OF EQUIVALENT RATES FOR FEDERAL HIRES (MAY 2014) In compliance with the Service Contract Labor Standards statute and the regulations of the Secretary of Labor (29 CFR part 4), this clause identifies the classes of service employees expected to be employed under the contract and states the wages and fringe benefits payable to each if they were employed by the contracting agency subject to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 5341 or 5332. THIS STATEMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY: IT IS NOT A WAGE DETERMINATION Employee Class Monetary Wage-Fringe Benefits DOL 14160 Personal Computer Support Tech GS-07 - $21.75 (End of clause) DFARS CLAUSES AND PROVISIONS 252.201-7000 Contracting Officer's Representative DEC 1991 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials SEP 2011 252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013 252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials NOV 2011 252.204-7000 Disclosure Of Information AUG 2013 252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product APR 1992 252.204-7005 Oral Attestation of Security Responsibilities NOV 2001 252.204-7012 Safeguarding of unclassified controlled technical information NOV 2013 252.204-7015 Disclosure of Information to Litigation Support Contractors FEB 2014 252.205-7000 Provision Of Information To Cooperative Agreement Holders DEC 1991 252.223-7006 Prohibition On Storage And Disposal Of Toxic And Hazardous Materials APR 2012 252.225-7048 Export-Controlled Items JUN 2013 252.232-7007 Limitations on Government's Obligation APR 2014 252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006 252.237-7010 Prohibition on Interrogation of Detainees by Contractor Personnel JUN 2013 252.239-7001 Information Assurance Contractor Training and Certification JAN 2008 252.239-7016 Telecommunications Security Equipment, Devices, Techniques, And Services DEC 1991 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012 252.245-7002 Reporting Loss of Government Property APR 2012 252.245-7003 Contractor Property Management System Administration APR 2012 252.245-7004 Reporting, Reutilization, and Disposal MAY 2013 Additional applicable DFARS clauses cited within DFARS clause 252.212-7001: 252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports JUN 2012 252.232-7006 Wide Area Work Flow Payment Instructions MAY 2013 252.246-7000 Material Inspection and Receiving MAR 2003. The Government reserves the right to award on a multiple award or an all or none basis. 252.217-7028 OVER AND ABOVE WORK. (DEC 1991) (a) "Definitions." As used in this clause - (1) "Over and above work" means work discovered during the course of performing overhaul, maintenance, and repair efforts, to include maintenance, repair, troubleshooting, administration and support of networks, systems and computers that is -.... (i) Within the general scope of the contract; (ii) Not covered by the line item(s) for the basic work under the contract; and (iii) Necessary in order to satisfactorily complete the contract. (2) "Work request" means a document prepared by the Contractor which describes over and above work being proposed. (b) The Contractor and Administrative Contracting Officer shall mutually agree to procedures for Government administration and Contractor performance of over and above work requests. If the parties cannot agree upon the procedures, the Administrative Contracting Officer has the unilateral right to direct the over and above work procedures to be followed. These procedures shall, as a minimum, cover - (1) The format, content, and submission of work requests by the Contractor. Work requests shall contain data on the type of discrepancy disclosed, the specific location of the discrepancy, and the estimated labor hours and material required to correct the discrepancy. Data shall be sufficient to satisfy contract requirements and obtain the authorization of the Contracting Officer to perform the proposed work; (2) Government review, verification, and authorization of the work; and (3) Proposal pricing, submission, negotiation, and definitization. (c) Upon discovery of the need for over and above work, the Contractor shall prepare and furnish to the Government a work request in accordance with the agreed-to procedures. (d) The Government shall - (1) Promptly review the work request; (2) Verify that the proposed work is required and not covered under the basic contract line item(s); (3) Verify that the proposed corrective action is appropriate; and (4) Authorize over and above work as necessary. (e) The Contractor shall promptly submit to the Contracting Officer, a proposal for the over and above work. The Government and Contractor will then negotiate a settlement for the over and above work. Contract modifications will be executed to definitize all over and above work. (f) Failure to agree on the price of over and above work shall be a dispute within the meaning of the Disputes clause of this contract. (End of clause)(This clause has been modified) AFFARS CLAUSES 5352.201 Ombudsman (2014) (a) An ombudsman has been appointed to hear and facilitate the resolution of concerns from offerors, potential offerors, and others for this acquisition. When requested, the ombudsman will maintain strict confidentiality as to the source of the concern. The existence of the ombudsman does not affect the authority of the program manager, contracting officer, or source selection official. Further, the ombudsman does not participate in the evaluation of proposals, the source selection process, or the adjudication of protests or formal contract disputes. The ombudsman may refer the interested party to another official who can resolve the concern. (b) Before consulting with an ombudsman, interested parties must first address their concerns, issues, disagreements, and/or recommendations to the contracting officer for resolution. Consulting an ombudsman does not alter or postpone the timelines for any other processes (e.g., agency level bid protests, GAO bid protests, requests for debriefings, employee-employer actions, contests of OMB Circular A-76 competition performance decisions). (c) If resolution cannot be made by the contracting officer, the interested party may contact the ombudsman, [Kevin Flinders, 6038 Aspen Ave., Hill AFB, UT 84056, 801-777-6549, kevin.flinders@us.af.mil]. Concerns, issues, disagreements, and recommendations that cannot be resolved at the Center/MAJCOM/DRU/HQ AFICA/AFISRA/SMC ombudsman level, may be brought by the interested party for further consideration to the Air Force ombudsman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary (ADAS) (Contracting), SAF/AQC, 1060 Air Force Pentagon, Washington DC 20330-1060, phone number (571) 256-2395, facsimile number (571) 256-2431. (d) The ombudsman has no authority to render a decision that binds the agency. (e) Do not contact the ombudsman to request copies of the solicitation, verify offer due date, or clarify technical requirements. Such inquiries shall be directed to the Contracting Officer. 5352.242-9000 CONTRACTOR ACCESS TO AIR FORCE INSTALLATIONS(NOV 2012) All proposals must be sent to SrA Taylor by email, Andrew.Taylor.31@us.af.mil or mailed to 6038 Aspen Avenue, BLDG 1289 NE, Hill AFB, UT 84056. Proposals are required to be received no later than 1300 (1pm MST), Sunday, 14 Dec 2014. Attachments -Performance Work Statement -Price Breakout -Workload Estimates -PWS Labor Reporting
 

Web Link

FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USAF/AFMC/OOALC/FA8201-14-R-InfoTechConsolidation/listing.html)
 

Place of Performance

Address: Hill AFB, Hill AFB, Utah, 84056, United States

Zip Code: 84056
 

Record

SN03580805-W 20141126/141124234605-346928cec25b4b1a6a0287ec01ef8969 (fbodaily.com)
 

Source

FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

---

| FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |