DOCUMENT
80 -- 544-15-2-5087-0053-544-Comprehensive Lead Paint Service - Attachment
- Notice Date
- 2/9/2015
- Notice Type
- Attachment
- NAICS
- 238320
— Painting and Wall Covering Contractors
- Contracting Office
- Department of Veterans Affairs;W.J.B. Dorn VA Medical Center;6439 Garners Ferry Road;Columbia SC 29209-1639
- ZIP Code
- 29209-1639
- Solicitation Number
- VA24715R0323
- Response Due
- 2/11/2015
- Archive Date
- 4/12/2015
- Point of Contact
- Joseph Locke
- E-Mail Address
-
6-4000
- Small Business Set-Aside
- N/A
- Description
- STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) & CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR LEAD CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS/LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT SCOPE OF WORK 1.0PROJECT OVERVIEW, OBJECTIVES, AND DESCRIPTION OF WORK 1.1REFERENCES 1.1.1Federal 1.1.1.1Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) a.CPSC Finds Lead Poisoning Hazard for Young Children in Imported Vinyl Miniblinds, Press Release 96-150, June 25, 1996 b.CPSC, Lead Paint on Public Playground Equipment, Consumer Product Safety Review, Vol.1, No.2, 1996 1.1.1.2U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) a.EPA National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program, (NLLAP) Laboratory Quality System Requirements (LQSR) Revision 2.0, August 1, 1996 b."Lead; Requirements for Lead-Based Paint Activities in Target Housing and Child-Occupied Facilities", 40 CFR Part 745, Subpart L, Lead-Based Paint Activities; Final Rule, 61 FR 45813, August 29, 1996, c."Lead; Requirements for LBP Activities in Target Housing and Child- Occupied Facilities; Certification Requirements and Work Practice Standards for Individuals and Firms, Amendment"; 40 CFR Part 745, Subpart L, Lead-Based Paint Activities; Final Rule, 64 FR 42849, August 6, 1999. d."Lead; Identification of Dangerous Levels of Lead", Final Rule, 40 CFR Part 745, Subpart D Lead-Based Paint Hazards, and Subpart L, Lead-Based Paint Activities, 66 FR 1206, January 5, 2001. 1.1.1.3U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) a.Requirements for Notification, Evaluation, and Reduction of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Federally Owned Residential Property and Housing Receiving Federal Assistance; Final Rule 24 CFR Part 35, September 15, 1999. b.Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. June 1995. (Chapter 7 revised 1997) c.The Lead Listing, The National Lead Service Providers' Listing System. 1.1.1.4Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) a.Lead Exposure in Construction; Interim Final Rule 29 CFR 1926.62, May 4, 1993. 1.1.1.5American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) Environmental Lead Program Requirements, February 1994. (A2LA offers accreditation under NLLAP.) 1.1.1.6American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Analytical Quality Programs Quality Manual and Policies, Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELLAP) and Industrial Hygiene Laboratory Accreditation Program, July 1997. 1.1.1.7American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) a.E1605, Standard Terminology Relating to Abatement of Hazards from Lead-Based Paint in Buildings and Related Structures b.E1613, Standard Test Method for Analysis of Digested Samples for Lead by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES), Flame Atomic Absorption (FAAS), or Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption (GFAAS) Techniques c.E1644, Standard Practice for Hot Plate Digestion of Dust Wipe Samples for the Determination of Lead by Atomic Spectrometry d.E1645, Standard Practice for the Preparation of Dried Paint Samples for Subsequent Lead Analysis by Atomic Spectrometry e.E1726, Standard Practice for Sample Digestion of Soils for the Determination of Lead by Atomic Spectrometry f.E1727, Standard Practice for Field Collection of Soil Samples for Lead Determination by Atomic Spectrometry Techniques g.E1728, Standard Practice for Field Collection of Settled Dust Samples Using Wipe Sampling Methods for Lead Determination by Atomic Spectrometry Techniques h.E1729, Standard Practice for Field Collection of Dried Paint Samples for Lead Determination by Atomic Spectrometry Techniques i.E1792, Standard Specification for Wipe Sampling Materials for Lead in Surface Dust j.E1979, Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Extraction of Paint, Dust, Soil, and Air Samples for Subsequent Determination of Lead k.PS95-98, Standard Provisional Practice For Quality Systems For Conducting In Situ Measurements Of Lead Content In Paint Or Other Coatings Using Field Portable X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Devices l.PS116-99, Provisional Practice For The Performance Evaluation Of The Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer For The Measurement Of Lead In Paint Films 1.2REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 1.2.1Regulatory Authority/Requirements The Contractor shall conduct all work in accordance with the following Federal, state, and local regulations and requirements. Where inconsistencies exist between the requirements and this Scope of Work (SOW), the Contractor shall use the most protective and inform the COTR. 1.2.1.1Federal Requirements a.Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Procedures and Requirements. The Contractor shall comply with 24 CFR 35 Subparts B, C and R; and 40 CFR 745 Subpart D and L (as amended) in meeting the requirements of this SOW. Referenced methodologies in the Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, HUD, shall be used where applicable. Lead hazards shall be identified based on "Lead; Identification of Dangerous Levels of Lead"; 40 CFR 745 Final Rule, 66 FR 1206, 5 January 2001. b.Health and Safety Requirements The Contractor shall comply with applicable OSHA standards and ensure employees are trained in safe work practices. 1.3 SITE CHARACTERISTICS, OBJECTIVES AND DESCRIPTION OF WORK 1.3.1Site Location/Characteristics and Occupant Use Patterns The Contractor shall perform lead inspections/lead risk assessments at the WJB Dorn VA Medical Center, Buildings 100 and 103. Procedures and requirements for conducting these activities are defined in the following paragraphs. The physical characteristics, and occupant use patterns include Building 100 is the main hospital building consisting of 6 floors, 453,056 SF, utilized for various medical processes including a laboratory, radiology, surgical suite, out-patient surgical clinics, nutrition kitchen, and other various medical related processes. Building 103 is the Community Living Center (Nursing Home facility) consisting of 2 floors, 54,438 SF, utilized for resident rooms, dining rooms, general medical care, and day to day living activities. 1.3.2Previous Studies and Results The Contractor shall review the two (2) limited lead surveys completed in building 100 (attachments 1 and 2). 1.3.3Project Work Tasks/Description or Work The project work tasks include: The lead inspections/risk assessments for lead in building materials and lead-based paint and coatings shall include a visual assessment, and sampling each testing combination (see Glossary), and where found, sampling for the identification of lead hazards. Procedures and requirements for completing the inspection/risk assessment activities are defined in the paragraphs that follow. The combined lead inspection/risk assessment shall be performed at one time. 1.3.4Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) The Contractor shall meet the project-specific DQOs (see Glossary) for the sampling, analysis and Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) by meeting the requirements of Paragraphs 2.2 and 2.3. DQOs must be met in order to provide project required data quality. The data thus collected shall be compared to the action levels defining lead hazards provided in Table A-1 below. If the data are below the action levels, recommendations shall be made in the Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report in accordance with Paragraph 2.4.10. Table A-1 Lead-Based Paint and Hazard Levels for a Lead Inspection/Lead Risk Assessment Sample Matrix/Surface TypeAction and Lead Hazard Level1 Lead-based paint ¹1.0 mg/cm2 (XRF) 0.5% by weight or 5,000 µg/g (paint chip if not used in conjunction with XRF measurements. If paint chip is used in conjunction with XRF measurements, lab must report paint chip lead loading in units of mg/cm ² and must specify paint chip sample collection techniques required to the contractor) Deteriorated PaintAny Lead-Based Paint on any substrate (interior or exterior) that is peeling, chipping, chalking or cracking, or otherwise damaged or separated from the substrate. Paint-lead HazardAny friction surface subject to abrasion with horizontal dust lead levels below and nearest the surface equal or exceed Dust-Lead Hazard levels in this Table. Damaged or deteriorated lead-based paint impact surface such as caused by door knobs or out-of-plumb doors. Dust-Lead Hazard ² All Floors, Hard Surface and Carpeted Interior Window Sills >40 µg/ft ² >250 µg/ft ² 1 See Glossary ² See 40 CFR 745.65 2.0PROJECT REQUIREMENTS 2.1TASK 1 DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS/PROJECT WORK PLAN 2.1.1Background Data The Contractor shall review general information on facility characteristics and occupant use patterns. Any pre-existing survey data will be reviewed. 2.1.2Project Boundaries Identification/Floor Plans Floor plans for each building that will be inspected/assessed are provided in CADD format attached as a part of this SOW (attachment 3). The Contractor's risk assessor shall use the CADD floor plans/sketches when performing inspection/risk assessment to identify and record sample locations. 2.1.3Preliminary Site Visit/Walkover The lead inspector/risk assessor may conduct a preliminary site visit/walkover. This walkover shall be used to ensure that all site-specific conditions and special accessibility requirements are addressed in the Project Work Plan and Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Sampling Plan. 2.1.4Access The Contractor shall coordinate with the Contracting Officer and Medical Center Engineering Service and establish a schedule for entry based upon the contractor's Lead Inspection and Risk Assessment Sampling Plans and requirements of Paragraph 3.4.2. The Contracting Officer and Medical Center Engineering Service shall be notified of the approximate schedule of any required field-repeated testing QC process at least 5 days in advance. The Contracting Officer also has the right to request the contractor perform this repeated testing, so long as these requests do not exceed 10% of the surveyed area. 2.1.5Project Work Plan The Contractor shall prepare a project work plan after the preliminary site visit/walkover and preliminary review of this SOW. The project work plan shall address the following: "Radiation Safety Program describing procedures to limit and prevent radiation exposure from using XRF instruments "Project work tasks/description including any recommended changes following preliminary walkover and review, and review of the CADD facility floor plans, usability of preexisting data, access requirements, scheduling, escort requirements, and laboratory turn-around requirements. "The Lead Inspection Sampling Plan to include sample selection strategy, and the type, model and serial number of each XRF unit and its associated Performance Characteristic (PC) Sheet. "Risk Assessment Sampling Plan to include sample selection and analysis strategy. "Project personnel/team identification and qualifications "Identification and qualifications of each laboratory used to analyze lead samples 2.2TASK 2 - CONDUCT LEAD INSPECTION/RISK ASSESSMENT 2.2.1Lead Inspection The lead inspection shall be conducted using an X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzer (XRF) that meets the performance requirements specified in this SOW. 2.2.1.1Visual Assessment The lead inspector/risk assessor shall as a part of the visual assessment of the lead inspection, identify each interior and exterior component or component system (see Glossary) with a distinct painting history or suspect building materials that contain lead. The contractor shall prepare as a part of the visual assessment a list of all testing combinations (see Glossary) of the component or component systems in all interior rooms, and on all exterior-building surfaces to be submitted with the Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report. Descriptions or identification of testing combinations shall be sufficiently detailed to permit verification by the Contracting Officer. 2.2.1.2Substrate Correction The lead inspector/risk assessor shall perform substrate correction using the red NIST SRM (1.02 mg/cm2) over test locations that have been scraped clean of their paint covering. The lead inspector/risk assessor shall follow the computation methods for determining substrate correction values provided in the PC Sheet for each respective XRF instrument used during the survey. The contractor shall prevent the release of lead dust or debris during this process. The location of the substrate correction for each substrate material shall be indicated on the floor plans/sketches, and submitted as part of the QA/QC portion of the Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report. Should substrate correction not be required by the XRF manufacturer, the contractor shall comply with all instructions for use and calibration. 2.2.1.3Surface Testing Using XRF Measurement The lead inspector/risk assessor shall test at least three locations per testing combination, except for interior and exterior four-wall combinations comprising the typical room or building exterior, where four readings shall be taken, one on each wall. The selection of the test location for a specific testing combination shall be representative of the paint over the areas. All layers of paint shall be included and the XRF probe faceplate shall be able to lie flat against the surface at the test location. If no acceptable location for XRF testing exists for a given testing combination, paint-chip samples shall be collected and submitted to the laboratory per ASTM's Standard Practice for Field Collection of Dried Paint Samples for Lead Determination by Atomic Spectrometry Techniques (E 1729). All testing locations shall be marked on the floor plans/sketches and provided using HUD Guideline Forms 5.0-5.7 (HUD-1539-LBP) or equivalent. 2.2.1.4Classification of XRF Results The lead inspector/risk assessor shall classify the XRF results as positive, negative or inconclusive as defined in the XRF instrument's PC sheet. Test results are positive if they are greater than the upper boundary of the inconclusive range, negative if they are less than the lower boundary of the inconclusive range, or inconclusive if in between. The inconclusive range includes both its upper and lower bounds. All XRF data shall be recorded for each testing combination and submitted as an attachment to the Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report. Field-repeated testing shall be accomplished, at no additional cost to the VHA, in accordance with the XRF validation requirements of this SOW. Paint chip samples shall be collected for all inconclusive XRF readings in addition to those surfaces where the XRF cannot be properly operated (e.g., small, rounded, surfaces etc.). The location of all paint chip samples shall be documented on the building drawing and documented in accordance with this SOW. 2.2.2Risk Assessment 2.2.2.1Visual Assessment The lead inspector/risk assessor shall perform concurrently with the lead inspection visual assessment, an assessment of all rooms and surfaces to locate potential LBP hazards and to evaluate the magnitude of each hazard. Following the floor plans or sketches, the lead inspector/risk assessor shall visually inspect the exterior and every room that will be assessed to evaluate paint and other building components with a coating that might contain lead such as ceramic tile glaze and building conditions. Every lead containing building material and lead- based paint or coating component system with the same distinct painting or coating history (see Glossary) testing positive for lead shall be inspected for deterioration. The lead inspector/risk assessor shall review the XRF data recorded and identify through observation: "Any friction surface or impact surface with visibly deteriorated paint or coating, and "All other lead-based paint or coating surfaces with visible deteriorated paint. "Visible paint and coating debris and particulate "Damaged or deteriorated lead containing building materials The lead inspector/risk assessor shall visually assess surfaces in common areas. The lead inspector/risk assessor shall inspect deterioration on friction and impact surfaces by operating and examining the friction and/or impact surfaces of several of the windows and doors that are used most frequently (as determined by accessibility) that contain LBP. The visual assessment shall be documented using HUD Guidelines Forms 5.0-5.7 (HUD-1539-LBP) or equivalent. The forms shall be submitted as attachments to the Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report. 2.2.2.2Sample Location Selection The lead inspector/risk assessor shall select single surface dust wipe sample locations during the visual assessment. Paint chip samples, as required, should be selected in concert with the lead inspection phase of the project. Chip samples of other coatings will be obtained where possible and damage is not readily observable. Sample locations for each unit shall be identified on each unit floor plan or sketch, and shall be based on visual observations, separate component systems with distinct histories, pre- assessment unit information (including physical characteristics, use patterns, previous study results), and on the following: "Samples shall not be collected from worn portions of the painted surfaces. "Friction or impact surface hazards shall be evaluated by dust wipe analysis, and accordingly shall not require paint chip or coating sampling. a.Dust Wipe Sample Locations One dust sample shall be collected from interior window sills and floors in all areas representing distinct component systems. Any lead-based paint on a friction surface with visibly deteriorated paint or that is subject to abrasion shall be sampled where the lead dust levels on the nearest horizontal surface beneath the friction surface can potentially exceed the dust-lead hazard action levels in Table A-1. b.Paint and Coating Chip Sample Locations The lead inspector/risk assessor shall immediately review the results of the lead inspection, and determine if any identified lead bearing surfaces contain deteriorated paint or coating and note the extent of the damage. c.Bulk/Building Material Sample Locations The lead inspector/risk assessor shall collect a bulk/building material sample whereever XRF sampling cannot definitively delineate the lead containing material (ie. Paint, glazing, radiation shielding) 2.2.2.3Risk Assessment Sample and Sample Location Documentation All XRF testing locations shall be marked on the floor plans/sketches and forms at the time of actual testing during the inspection phase of the combined inspection/risk assessment. Bulk/building material, paint and coating chip, and surface wipe sample locations shall also be recorded on the floor plans/ sketches. The Contracting Officer and his technical representative reserves the right to audit the Risk Assessment Sample and Sample Location Documentation at any time during the course of the project. The Risk Assessment Sample and Sample Location Documentation shall be included as an attachment to the Risk Assessment Sampling Plan following completion of the fieldwork and submitted as a part of the Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report. 2.2.3Single Surface Dust Sampling Dust samples shall be collected for analysis by single surface wipe sampling. Dust wipe samples shall always be collected before paint and coating chip samples to avoid cross- contamination. The lead inspector/risk assessor shall collect wipe samples in accordance with ASTM's Standard Practice for Field Collection of Settled Dust Samples Using Wipe Sampling Methods for Lead Determination by Atomic Spectrometry Techniques (E 1728), using wipe materials meeting the requirements of Standard Specification for Wipe Sampling Materials for Lead in Surface Dust (E 1792). 2.2.4Deteriorated Paint and Coating Chip Sampling The XRF data of this assessment shall be used to evaluate all deteriorated paint surfaces for the presence of lead. Deteriorated painted surfaces that were not suitable for testing by XRF due to shape, or accessibility etc., or where inconclusive XRF readings were generated during the inspection phase, shall be tested destructively by chip sample collection. The chip samples shall be collected and submitted in accordance with the laboratory's SOP for collecting paint chip samples to determine lead loading per cc of surface area, and ASTM's Standard Practice for Field Collection of Dried Paint Samples for Lead Determination by Atomic Spectrometry Techniques (E 1729). 2.2.5Sample Identification Dust, paint and coating, and Bulk/Building Material samples shall be identified using unique sample numbers. Field and laboratory blanks and spiked samples submitted to the laboratory for QA/QC purposes shall be numbered in such a way that the sample identity will not be revealed to personnel conducting the analysis. 2.2.6Sample Chain-of-Custody The Contractor shall follow a standard chain-of-custody protocol to ensure and document a continuous record of sample possession from sample collection to receipt by the laboratory. The Contractor shall complete and maintain chain-of-custody forms for each set of samples shipped to the laboratory, and a copy of the forms shall accompany each shipment of samples. The Contractor shall include copies of all chain-of-custody forms completed during the assessment in the Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report. 2.2.7Decontamination Field sampling equipment shall be decontaminated following the appropriate ASTM standard. At a minimum, the field decontamination procedures for non-disposable sampling equipment (e.g., knives, coring devices, scrapers) shall consist of either wiping the equipment off twice using a clean wet wipe each time, or washing in a solution of non-phosphate detergent (e.g., Liquinox ®), and rinsing with distilled water. The equipment shall be decontaminated prior to each use, between each sample, and prior to leaving the site. The Contractor shall coordinate with the installation environmental officer to determine requirements for the disposal of decontamination waste and used personal protective equipment. 2.3TASK 3 SAMPLE DATA ANALYSIS, EVALUATION OF FINDINGS 2.3.1XRF Data Interpretation XRF results shall be interpreted by the Contractor in accordance with ASTM Standards, the XRF manufacturer's PCS, and as otherwise required in this SOW. 2.3.2Sample Preparation and Analysis Samples collected by the lead inspector/risk assessor during the assessment(s) shall be sent to a laboratory recognized by the EPA under the (National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Porgram (NLLAP) for analysis. The laboratory must be accredited for each type of analysis required. The Contractor shall submit copies of the laboratories NLLAP certification. 2.3.2.1Laboratory Turnaround Time The Contractor shall require the laboratory to report analytical results to the Contractor within 5 days of the laboratory's receipt of the samples in the laboratory. 2.3.3Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) 2.3.3.1XRF Performance Validation and Verification The lead inspector/risk assessor shall use only XRF spectrum analyzers with current, published Performance Characteristic (PCS) sheets that provide valid measurements at the levels specified in Table A-1. A copy of the PCS for the XRF instruments used on this project shall be submitted in the Lead Inspection Sampling Plan section of the Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report. The lead inspector/risk assessor shall perform calibration checks at the beginning and end of the inspection work or every four hours, whichever comes first or as otherwise specified in Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines: "Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, June 1995. (Chapter 7 revised 1997)". If the PCS of the XRF spectrum analyzer manufacturer requires additional or more stringent warm up, quality control, or calibration check instructions than those described in the HUD Guidelines, they shall be followed. Calibration shall also be performed before and after turning the instrument on or off throughout the inspection work (e.g., lunch breaks, changing batteries). If the failed calibration results occur at the end of a testing period, the results obtained during that testing period shall be discarded and the unit re-tested. The lead inspector/risk assessor shall record all calibration check results and submit this record in the Contractor Data Certification section of the Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report. Validation shall be accomplished with the lead inspector/risk assessor randomly selecting 10 testing combinations for retesting in the surveyed units for every 10 units tested or 5 tests per day, for single facility surveys. The retesting shall be with the same XRF spectrum analyzer. The average of the 5-10 XRF retest results shall not vary from the 5-10 original XRF results by more than the retest tolerance limit that is calculated as specified on the XRF PCS sheet. If the limit is exceeded, the procedure shall be repeated using 5-10 different testing combinations. If the retest tolerance is exceeded again, the original inspection is considered invalid.This process must be documented and submitted in the Contractor Data Certification section of the Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report. 2.3.3.2Field Blank Dust Wipe QA Samples Field blanks for single wipe sampling shall be collected in accordance with ASTM's "Standard Practice for Field Collection of Settled Dust Samples Using Wipe Sampling Methods for Lead Determination by Atomic Spectrometry Techniques", (E 1728). Wipe materials shall meet the requirements of "Standard Specification for Wipe Sampling Materials for Lead in Surface Dust", (E 1792) using the same wipe material used to collect the field wipe samples. There shall be no indication to the laboratory, by sample identification numbers or other means, that the field blank samples are QA samples. 2.3.3.3Field Spike Dust Wipe QA Samples The Contractor shall submit double-blind (spiked) QA dust wipe samples to the laboratory at a frequency of 2% of total samples collected, with a minimum of one sample using one of the two following options: a.The Contractor shall obtain commercially prepared spiked wipe samples meeting the same QA/QC requirements required in preparing spiked wipe samples used by the AIHA in its management of the Environmental Lead Proficiency Analytical Testing (ELPAT) laboratory certification program, for submittal to the laboratory. The contractor shall obtain and use wipes of the same brand and type as those used to prepare the spiked samples. The Contractor shall use these wipes to collect field samples and to prepare field blank samples. b. The Contractor shall hire a laboratory to prepare spiked wipe samples using National Institute of Standards and Testing (NIST) traceable materials. Spiked samples shall be prepared using leaded dust, not lead in solution. The lead concentration in the spiked wipe samples shall approximate the amount of lead in the lead action level criteria for hard floors in Table A-1 of this SOW. The Contractor shall provide uncontaminated wipes of the same brand and lot as the wipes that will be used to collect field samples, to the laboratory preparing the spiked samples. The laboratory shall use these wipes to prepare the spiked wipe samples. The laboratory preparing the spiked samples shall be independent of the laboratory that will be used to analyze the field samples and field QA samples. There shall be no indication to the laboratory analyzing the field samples, by sample identification numbers or other means, that the spiked samples are QA samples. 2.3.3.4Field Duplicate/Spike Paint Chip QA Samples The Contractor shall submit double-blind QA paint and coating chip samples to the laboratory for analysis. At a minimum, these shall include field duplicate samples, prepared by using standard mortar and pestle homogenizing techniques, collected at a rate of 2% of total samples collected, with a minimum of one sample. The Contractor may also submit standard reference samples (commercially-prepared paint chip samples with a known concentration of lead) at a rate of 2% of the total samples collected, to the laboratory for analysis. The lead concentration in the samples used shall be within 75% to 125% of the lead hazard action levels in Table A-1 if available. There shall be no indication to the laboratory, by sample identification numbers or other means, that the samples are QA samples. The Contractor shall evaluate the results of the analyses of QA samples and include this evaluation in the final report. 2.3.4Project Data Review and Assessment The Contractor shall review all project data collected as part of the current assessment and verify that the data is acceptable. Data review includes (1) Field sample collection and control review, and (2) analytical laboratory data review. Field sample collection and control review includes evaluating the adequacy of the Lead Inspection Sampling Plan and Risk Assessment Sampling Plan throughout the performance of the assessment. 2.3.4.1Field Dust Wipe Quality Assurance Verification Prior to beginning field dust sampling, the Contractor shall provide the laboratory with at least one uncontaminated wipe per each container of bulk packed wipes that will be used for collecting field dust wipes, to verify that the wipe material meets the requirements of Standard Specification for Wipe Sampling Materials for Lead in Surface Dust (E 1792). Wipes containing more than 5.0 g/wipe of background lead shall render the entire container of bulk packed wipes represented by the analyzed wipe, contaminated and disqualify the represented wipes for field use.Pre-analysis data by the vendor is acceptable as meeting this requirement. (See AIHA web site for a listing of wipe vendors meeting ASTM Method E 1792 criteria.) 2.3.4.2Laboratory QA and QC Verification. a.Evaluation of Laboratory Data The Contractor shall obtain and review NLLAP-required QC data generated for each sample run completed under this SOW. The QC data shall include batch QC validation data and the 95% confidence interval data (determined by the laboratory from QC charts or a QC database for each matrix, i.e., single surface dust wipe samples, deteriorated paint chip samples, soil samples) determined at concentrations equivalent to 40 g/ft2 for dust wipe samples, 0.5% by weight (5000 g/g (ppm)) for paint chip samples, and 400 g/g (ppm)) for bulk soil samples. The Contractor shall evaluate the data package to determine that the QA/QC data generated for each sample run falls within current NLLAP Laboratory Quality System Requirements (LQSR) parameters. Spiked samples submitted to the laboratory in accordance with this SOW shall fall within 75% - 125% of the true value. b.Rejection of Laboratory Data The Contractor shall not accept or use data from the laboratory that does not fall within current NLLAP LQSR parameters. If the laboratory fails to obtain spiked results within the specified error limits: "Two more spikes of the same matrix shall be sent immediately to the laboratory for analysis. "If the two additional spike samples fail, the sample batch shall be considered invalid for the matrix represented. If laboratory data are rejected and insufficient quantities of the samples remain to allow re-analysis of the samples while adhering to QA/QC requirements, the Contractor shall collect and submit additional samples, at no cost to the Government, for laboratory analysis using NLLAP QA/QC protocols. The Contractor shall also be responsible for any re-sampling required due to laboratory errors that result in the destruction or loss of data, or a failure to report results on any samples submitted. 2.3.4.3Contractor Certification of Project Data Validity The Contractor shall certify that all field data collected to determine the presence of a lead hazard were valid. 2.3.4.4Comparison with Lead Hazard Action Levels The Contractor shall compare the collected data and Table A-1 criteria to determine whether lead-based paint and/or lead hazards are present. This comparison shall be documented in the Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report and meet the HUD guidelines for Lead-Based Paint in Target Housing. For all lead hazard evaluations, the data shall be examined to determine if consistent patterns emerge (e.g., the window troughs contain high levels, while floors and interior sills are low); such patterns will be used in the development of recommendations for focused cost-effective control measures. 2.3.4.5Laboratory Report The Contractor shall require that the laboratory report information necessary for the Contractor to comply with the data evaluation/validation requirements outlined in this SOW. The Laboratory Report shall include the following information addressing all field samples submitted to it by the Contractor excluding sample data collected by the Contractor using XRF instrumentation: "Cover page information including Laboratory name and address, methods, dates, instruments, digestions, and laboratory director. "Sample information including identification and results for blanks, QC samples, samples, dilution factors, and batch identification. "Results of initial precision and accuracy runs. "Results of calibration, including sources of standards and detection limits. "Results of blanks, including type of blank, and any corrections used. "Results of calibration verification checks. "Results of tests for precision and accuracy. "Results of standard sample analysis to 95% confidence intervals which contain concentrations of lead that correspond to a given action level. 2.4TASK 4 LEAD INSPECTION/ RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT The Contractor shall prepare a Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report containing the elements described below. 2.4.1General Report Contents In addition to the information described in Paragraphs 2.4.2 through 2.4.10 below, the assessment report shall include: "Date of the lead inspection/risk assessment "Date of building construction "Name, signature, and certification number of each lead inspector/risk assessor conducting the lead inspection/risk assessment "Name, address, and telephone number of the Contractor's firm employing the certified lead inspector(s)/risk assessor(s). "Lead Inspection Sampling Plan with discussion of room equivalents, testing combinations, and XRF PC sheet. Also list the XRF instrument manufacturer, model, serial number, mode(s) of operation and age of radioactive source. "An XRF, paint and coating chip, wipe and soil data summary table listing results for all painted components tested. All field-completed XRF Readings/Results Forms can be submitted in place of this XRF data summary table with prior concurrence and approval of the Contracting Officer. This table shall report by building and floor the following: positive results, negative results and inconclusive results. This table shall list the actual result by substrate. For any inclusive results, the contractor shall list the corresponding paint chip sample results. "Risk Assessment Sampling Plan to include Risk Assessment Sample and Sample Location Documentation "Laboratory Reports (provided per 2.3.4.5) "Pre-existing data used in decision process (other than that provided as part of this SOW or addressed in Paragraph 2.4.2 below) 2.4.2The Contractor shall attach a Summary of Pre-existing Data and CADD. 2.4.3Other Field and Laboratory Data The report shall include correspondence, conference notes, field notes and forms and other documentation including copies of field calculations, building and paint evaluation forms, sample collection forms, chain-of-custody forms, and other records of field data that are not already addressed in the requirements for this report. 2.4.4Contractor Data Certification The Contractor shall certify that the data used to develop conclusions and recommendations were reviewed and are valid. 2.4.5Project Data Presentation - All data collected during activities described in this SOW is to be provided to the WJB Dorn VAMC in hard copy binders (2 each), and electronically on CD. 2.4.6Contractor Conclusions and Recommendations The contractor shall use the HUD Guidelines or equivalent in developing conclusions and control recommendations. The report shall contain the Contractor's conclusions and lead hazard control recommendations. 2.4.7Lead Hazard Identification Summary The Contractor shall prepare a lead hazard identification summary form for each building and floor assessed. The summary form shall contain the location, the surface type, and the basis of determination of each identified lead containing building material, lead-based paint hazard and any other potential lead hazards. The summary forms are to be submitted by the Contractor as a part of the Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report. The forms shall include as a minimum the information contained in Chapter 5 of the HUD Lead-based Paint Guidelines. 2.4.8Regulatory Statements of Compliance If lead hazards are not identified, the Contractor shall provide recommended monitoring protocols to minimize future lead hazard development, based on observations made during the inspection/assessment, and accepted practices. 3.0SUPPLEMENTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTRACTED SERVICES 3.1CONTRACTOR FIRM/PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS 3.1.1Contractor Firm Experience The contracted firm shall have a minimum of 10 years' experience in conducting lead inspections and risk assessments and have qualified staff. Three references, at a minimum, shall be required for completed projects equal in complexity to the one described in this SOW. 3.1.2Contractor Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor/Project Manager Qualifications The Contractor shall employ a certified lead inspector/risk assessor to complete the inspections and risk assessments described in this SOW. 3.1.2.1EPA Certification EPA certification (or certification under an EPA-approved state program) is required pursuant to 40 CFR 745.226. (64 FR 42849, 6 August 1999). 3.1.2.2Radioactive Materials License and training The contractor must have a current Radioactive Materials License if required by the State where the work will be performed. Employees shall have training in the hazards of radioactive sources and use. 3.1.2.3Evidence of Certification A copy of each current applicable certificate shall be included in the Project Work Plan for each Contractor lead inspector/risk assessor participating in this project. 3.1.2.4Record of Experience A resume or other description of the certified lead inspector/lead risk assessor's experience, which is directly applicable to the activities required under this SOW, shall be included in the Project Work Plan. 3.1.2.5Use of Lead Inspector/Risk Assessment Teams The Contractor shall specify in the Project Work Plan the number of lead inspection/risk assessment teams to be used to perform the lead inspection risk assessment. No more than 3 lead inspectors/risk assessors per team shall be assigned to conduct the lead inspection/risk assessments. Team leaders shall have a minimum of 5 years' experience in conducting lead hazard risk assessments. 3.1.2.6Project Manager Experience The project manager shall have a minimum of 7 years' experience in managing lead inspections and risk assessments. A resume or other description of the project manager's experience that is directly applicable to the activities required under this SOW shall be provided as a part of the Project Work Plan. 3.1.3Contracted Laboratory Qualifications The Contractor shall provide as a part of the Project Work Plan evidence of current NLLAP recognition for each laboratory used for either preparation or analysis of samples taken for this assessment. The evidence of NLLAP recognition shall include certifications for each sample matrix analyzed. The laboratory conducting any worker exposure air sample analysis shall be accredited by the AIHA and shall be a current successful participant in the AIHA's Proficiency Analytical Testing (PAT) Program for the analyte sampled. 3.1.4Contractor Errors and Omissions Liability Insurance The Contractor shall provide documentation to the Contracting Officer that the Contractor is currently covered by an errors and omissions liability insurance policy. 3.2PROJECT RECORDS 3.2.1Record keeping Requirements The Contractor shall maintain records related to the lead inspection/risk assessment for at least three years following completion of the assessment(s) outlined under this SOW. Records shall include the Project Work Plan and Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report. 3.3PROJECT COORDINATION The Contractor shall coordinate activities through the Contracting Officer. Contact with installation personnel, including the installation POC and other installation personnel shall be coordinated through the Contracting Officer, or as directed by the COTR. 3.4GOVERNMENT SUPPORT 3.4.1Government Quality Control Oversight The Contracting Officer and his technical representative reserves the right to audit the lead inspection and risk assessment sample and sample location documentation at any time during the course of the project. 3.4.2Security and Escorts Escort for each lead inspection/risk assessment team will be provided by the Medical Center Engineering Service. Engineering service personnel will facilitate access to all area's being assessed. The contractor is responsible for the security of their equipment (especially XRF units), their employees, and to relock doors upon exit. If special security arrangements must be made for the work, this should be noted below. This might include both personnel and vehicle passes, as well as any information or passes to enter secure locations. Contractor personnel will be required to sign in at the Engineering control center or Engineering administrative office (as determined by engineering) and to wear facility contractor identification badges. 3.5TRAVEL AND MEETINGS All meetings shall be attended by the Contractor project or task manager and the certified lead inspector/risk assessor. 3.5.1Preliminary Project Site Visit/Walkover The Contractor's project manager and/or lead inspector/risk assessor(s) may visit the facility that will be assessed with the Contracting Officer and/or installation POC. 3.5.2Project Work Plan Review and Start-up Meeting The Contractor shall attend a start-up meeting to review finalize and approve the Project Work Plan to include the Lead Inspection Sampling Plan and Risk Assessment Sampling Plan immediately prior to beginning field activities. The Contractor shall generate meeting minutes that will be submitted to the Contracting Officer within one week of the meeting. 3.5.3Final Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report Meeting The Contractor shall attend a meeting to review the Contractor's lead inspection and risk assessment data certification outcomes and final Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report prior to final submittal. 3.6SCHEDULES 1)Site visit/project walkover (with-in 5 days of contract award) 2)Project Work Plan submission/ Start-up meeting (with-in 10 days of contract award) 3)Data certification meeting/ Final Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report meeting (with-in 45 days of contract award) 3.7SUBMITTALS 3.7.1Project Work Plan The Contractor shall submit a Project Work Plan to the Contracting Officer's Representative for VHA acceptance. 3.7.2Progress Report(s) The Contractor shall provide weekly project progress reports to the Contracting Officer's Representative. The reports shall be due to the Contracting Officer Representative by close of business the first work day of the week for the previous week. The reports shall address progress, schedule and circumstances, as appropriate. 3.7.3Final Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Data Submission in Electronic Format The Contractor shall provide the lead inspection/risk assessment data in Microsoft Word and CADD format. 3.7.4Final Lead Inspection/Risk Assessment Report The Contractor shall provide 3 hard copies, in three ring binders, of the final report as described in Paragraph 2.4.A CD of this report shall be included in each binder. 3.8MISCELLANEOUS 3.8.1Glossary This paragraph contains acronyms, and terms commonly used in this SOW. For a more complete listing of terms commonly used in reference to lead-based paint projects consult appropriate regulations or ASTM standards. Certified lead inspector/risk assessorAn individual who has been trained by an accredited training program, as defined by 40 CFR 745.223, and certified by EPA pursuant to §745.226 to conduct lead inspections and risk assessments. The individual samples for the presence of lead in dust and soil and conducts risk assessments to identify lead hazards to children under six years old, associated with the presence lead in dust, paint and soil. Component, component system, building componentSpecific design or structural elements or fixtures of a building, or child-occupied facility that are distinguished from each other by form, function, and location. (40 CFR 745.223) Contracting OfficerContracting Officer or his/her authorized Representative (COR) or authorized Technical Representative (COTR) ContractorA contractor is a private firm, corporation, or individuals operating to provide service to clients. The contractor must possess all valid licenses and certifications as required by state regulations and the CO. The term "contractor" in this SOW also implies the firm that is or hires the lead inspectors/risk assessors. When this term is used in this SOW, it implies both. Data Quality Objective Deteriorated paintThe qualitative and quantitative statements, guidelines, and requirements presented in paragraphs 2.2 and 2.3 of this SOW that clarify study objectives, define the appropriate type of data, and specify the tolerance levels of potential errors that will be used as the basis for establishing the quality of the data needed to support decisions. Paint that is cracking, flaking, chipping, peeling, or otherwise separating from the substrate of a building component. (40 CFR 745.223) Distinct painting historyThe application history, as indicated by its visual appearance or a record of application, over time, of paint or other surface coatings to a component or room. (40 CFR 745.223) Double-blind sampleFor the purposes of this SOW, this refers to a QC sample (replicate, duplicate, spiked sample, etc.) that is sent to the laboratory with no indication of the possible lead content and without identifying the sample as a QC sample. Lead-based paint (LBP)Paint or other surface coatings that contain lead equal to or in excess of 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter or more than 0.5 percent by weight (5000 g/g or parts per million). (40 CFR 745.223). Throughout this document, "lead-based paint", "paint", and "coating" are used to cumulatively refer to substances applied to the surfaces of building materials for decorative or functional requirements or purposes. Lead-based paint hazard Any condition that causes exposure to lead from dust- lead hazards, soil-lead hazards, or lead-based paint that is deteriorated or present in chewable surfaces, friction surfaces, or impact surfaces, and that would result in adverse human health effects. (40 CFR Part 745) Lead-based paint inspectionA surface-by-surface investigation to determine the presence of lead-based paint and coating and the provision of a report explaining the results of the investigation. (40 CFR Part 745) µg/ft2Micrograms per square foot µg/gMicrograms per gram (parts per million on mass/mass basis) Occupant use patternsCharacteristics of occupants, use patterns including entrances most frequently used, windows opened most frequently, use of window air- conditioners. QAQuality assurance; defined by NLLAP as an "integrated system of activities involving planning, QC, quality assessment, reporting, and quality improvement to ensure that a product or service meets defined standards of quality within a state level of confidence." (NLLAP LQSR ) QCQuality control; defined by NLLAP as the "overall system of technical activities whose purpose is to measure and control the quality of a product or service so that it meets the needs of users. The aim is to provide quality that is satisfactory, adequate, dependable, and economical. (NLLAP LQSR) Random SamplingA technique for selecting a sample of n elements from a population of elements in such a way that each combination of n elements has the same probability of being selected. In statistical sampling, the process of selecting sample units in such a way that all units under consideration have the same probability of being selected. (ASTM E1605) Rinsate BlankA sample of "used" cleaning fluid rinse solution, also called equipment blank. The rinsate blank is used in rinsing collection equipment to monitor possible cross contamination.(EPA, 757-R-92-006, May 1993) Risk assessmentAn on-site investigation and report to determine the existence, nature, severity, and location of lead-based paint hazards. The provision of a report by the individual or the firm conducting the risk assessment, explaining the results of the investigation and options for reducing lead-based paint hazards. (40 CFR 745.223) Room equivalentA room equivalent is an identifiable part of a residence, such as a room, a house exterior, a foyer, staircase, hallway, or an exterior area (exterior areas contain items such as play areas, painted swing sets, painted sandboxes, etc.). For multifamily units or apartment buildings, common areas and exterior sites are treated as separate types of units, not as room equivalents (HUD Guidelines, Chapter 7, current Revision). SubstrateThe substrate is the material underneath the paint or coating. Substrates should be classified into one of six types: brick, concrete, drywall, metal, plaster, or wood. These substrates cover almost all-building materials that are painted and are linked to those used in the XRF performance characteristic sheets.( HUD Guidelines, Chapter 7, current Revision) Suspect Building MaterialBuilding materials which brands or manufacturers are known contain lead or which have coatings or glazings that have been known to contain lead or lead paints. Testing CombinationA unique combination of room equivalent, building component type, and substrate. (HUD guidelines, Chapter 7, current revision) X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzer (XRF) XRF Performance Characteristic Sheet (PC)An instrument that determines lead concentration in milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) using the principle of x-ray fluorescence (XRF). (HUD Guidelines) The "P.C. Sheet" is unique for each XRF Instrument. It specifies the inconclusive range, calibration check tolerance, and other instrument - specific information.
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/VA/CSCVAMC/WJBDDVAMC/VA24715R0323/listing.html)
- Document(s)
- Attachment
- File Name: VA247-15-R-0323 VA247-15-R-0323_1.docx (https://www.vendorportal.ecms.va.gov/FBODocumentServer/DocumentServer.aspx?DocumentId=1856291&FileName=VA247-15-R-0323-000.docx)
- Link: https://www.vendorportal.ecms.va.gov/FBODocumentServer/DocumentServer.aspx?DocumentId=1856291&FileName=VA247-15-R-0323-000.docx
- Note: If links are broken, refer to Point of Contact above or contact the FBO Help Desk at 877-472-3779.
- File Name: VA247-15-R-0323 VA247-15-R-0323_1.docx (https://www.vendorportal.ecms.va.gov/FBODocumentServer/DocumentServer.aspx?DocumentId=1856291&FileName=VA247-15-R-0323-000.docx)
- Record
- SN03637445-W 20150211/150209234936-1b07b78c273adc0196f4cf3a4e6b92f3 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |