Loren Data's SAM Daily™

FBO DAILY - FEDBIZOPPS ISSUE OF OCTOBER 08, 2015 FBO #5067
MODIFICATION

10 -- ***FAMILY OF WEAPON SIGHTS- CREW SERVED (FWS CS) SOLICITATION W91CRB-15-R-0024: AMENDMENT 0005***

Notice Date

10/6/2015
 

Notice Type

Modification/Amendment
 

NAICS

333314 — Optical Instrument and Lens Manufacturing
 

Contracting Office

ACC-APG - Aberdeen Division D, ATTN: AMSSB-ACC-A, 4118 Susquehanna Avenue, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-3013
 

ZIP Code

21005-3013
 

Solicitation Number

W91CRB15R0024
 

Response Due

10/30/2015
 

Archive Date

12/5/2015
 

Point of Contact

Andrew Craig Mitchell, 410-306-2765
 

E-Mail Address

ACC-APG - Aberdeen Division D
(andrew.c.mitchell1.civ@mail.mil)
 

Small Business Set-Aside

N/A
 

Description

***AMENDMENT 0005: PROVIDE GOVERNMENT RESPONSES TO [OPEN] INDUSTRY QUESTIONS RECEIVED AS OF 5 OCTOBER 2015*** Amendment 0005 provides Government responses to [open] Industry questions received as of 5 October 2015, as follows: Question #41 Reference Section B CLIN 0019; Section C, 3.2.5.4.5, FWS-CS First Article Test (FAT) Exit Criteria; and Table 3.2. Anticipated FWS-CS LRIP Test Schedule. Section B states, quote mark CLIN 0019, PY5 FIRST ARTICLE TEST (FAT) REPORT FFP FWS-CS First Article Test (FAT) Report, IAW SOW paragraphs 3.3.8.7 quote mark Test Reports quote mark and 3.2.5.4.6 quote mark FWS-CS First Article Test (FAT) Exit Criteria. quote mark Section C, 3.2.5.4.5 states, quote mark The Contractor shall successfully address the following questions and deliver all CDRLs, see CDRL-GGG associated with the event. CLIN 0019 shall apply toward FAT report. Government approval that the Contractor has accomplished/verified the following: quote mark SOW paragraph 3.2.5.4.6 refers to quote mark FWS-CS PRR Exit Criteria quote mark and we assume this CLIN 0019 reference should instead be to 3.2.5.4.5. SOW paragraph 3.2.5.4.5 requires FAT as a 3.2.5.4 FWS-CS LRIP Formal Review, Table 3.2 indicates it as an LRIP Test Event 4 months after FRP. Does the Government require FAT to be priced during LRIP as part of CLIN 0012, the tests performed for CDRL-GGG? This would be outside of the LRIP period of performance and would use the FRP First Lot Build. Or is CLIN 0019 to be used to price all FAT activities and FRP First Lot Build units? Or is CLIN 0019 used only for FAT activities and test reports? Please clarify the intent of First Article Test as an LRIP event as well as the CLIN(s) used for FAT pricing. Government Response to Question #41 FAT is to be conducted on a sample from the first production lot of the final production configuration of LRIP, incorporating all changes resulting from prior testing (IOT&E, RGT-2, PQT, etc). Conduct of the FAT is not a separately priced event and should be captured in the offeror's LRIP system production unit pricing in CLIN 0003 (reference Question #33 of Amendment #3). CLIN 0019 should include pricing for the FAT Report, not conduct of the FAT itself. Execution of the FAT on a sample of systems from the first production lot of LRIP will occur per the timeline cited in Table 3.2, approximately 4 months following the FRP decision. Section B, CLIN 0019 narrative was revised to correct the SOW paragraph reference to 3.2.5.4.5 for FWS-CS First Article Test (FAT) Exit Criteria in Amendment 0003 (Question #25). Question #42 Reference RFP Amendment 0003 Question #29 Answer, and Section C 3.3.4.1 Level of Repair Analysis (LORA). The RFP states, quote mark The Contractor shall initiate the LORA process for the FWS-CS system and associated TMDE during EMD, see CDRL-DDD, and update during LRIP, if an option is awarded, (see CDRL-HHH and CDRL-III) to aid in assessing the supportability of a system. quote mark The first requirement for TMDE availability begins with the LORA requirement to initiate the LORA process during EMD with CDRL-DDD as deliverable. The first TMDE unit delivery does not occur until LRIP as noted by the Answer to Question #29 for TM training and for PQT. No design review is required for the TMDE prior to LORA. Additionally, no guidance is provided on how TMDE NRE should be priced. We assume we should price TMDE NRE in CLIN 0001. Is this assumption correct? Please clarify the timing and CLIN (s) to be used for TMDE NRE as well as when design reviews of the TMDE occur. Government Response to Question #42 TMDE NRE pricing should be included as part of CLIN 0010 (CDRL-EEE, LRIP System Engineering). TMDE hardware is not required until LRIP. SOW paragraph 3.4.6 TMDE, cites that TMDE is required to fulfill CLIN 0013 (CDRL-HHH, LRIP IPS & HSI for TMDE) and CLIN 0014 (CDRL-III LRIP IPS & HSI), along with CLINs 0002 (LRIP Qual Systems), 0008 (TMDE), and 0009 (TMDE Spares), all which occur during LRIP. In SOW paragraph 3.4.7 EAD, it states that the Government will verify all repair actions using the Contractor's Fault-Tree analysis. CDRL-DDD (IPS & HSI), which is part of CLIN 0001 EMD, references Operator/Crew Training Materials, and DID-023 states specific content for basic diagnosis and fault finding. CLIN 0001, CDRL-DDD, Technical Guide would include Root Cause System Fault Tree Flow Chart to be used at EAD. The intent is to analyze the vendor's process for repair before building any TMDE equipment. This is reinforced per SOW paragraph 3.4.8.2 Maintainer Level LD, which is a subparagraph of 3.4.8 Logistic Demonstration, where the Government states that the Sustainment LD(s) will demonstrate that the FWS-CS and TMDE meet all logistics/maintainability and HSI requirements at the Sustainment-Level, and will identify any system design changes needed for improved supportability and/or reduced life cycle cost. FWS-CS and TMDE must be available to support the FWS-CS Sustainment Level LD, and supporting tasks shall be shown in the Contractor's IMS. SOW paragraph 3.4.10 Training, cites that the Government requires training as stated - During LRIP, the Contractor shall provide required training material to the Government for RGT-2, GDT, LD and IOT&E and to adequately reflect the FWS-CS, and TMDE being provided under this contract and in accordance with the approved maintenance concept. In SOW paragraph 3.4.10.2 Training Materials, the Government states that training shall provide students with the skills necessary to operate and maintain the system(s), see CDRL-HHH for TMDE training materials. CDRL appendix shows CDRL-HHH as LRIP IPS & HSI for TMDE, and DID-023 provides the specific content to be addressed for CDRL-HHH. Question #43 Reference RFP Amendment 0003, Question #29 Answer. The Answer to Question #29 states, quote mark... Starting at PQT, 18 systems and 1 TMDE system will be required. quote mark It is our experience on programs of similar size, scope and structure that the initial delivery of a TMDE set occurs during EMD. Question #29 indicates the first delivery of a TMDE set occurs during LRIP. Does the Government require the delivery or the availability of a TMDE set in EMD? If so, when? Please clarify the earliest Government required TMDE availability or delivery. Government Response to Question #43 See response to Question #42. TMDE hardware is not required until LRIP. Question #44 Reference Section C, 3.4.1 Warranty of Equipment which states, quote mark quote mark... For the production phase, the Contractor shall provide a storage/transportation warranty, which extends from the date of initial Government acceptance and expires one year hence or until initial issue, whichever occurs first. TMDE warranty will be for a minimum of 1 year for LRIP, and through production... During the warranty period, the Contractor shall repair or replace within 3 months of receipt - at no cost to the Government - any FWS-CS system, TMDE, and related spare parts that fails under normal operations, while in storage, or during transportation... Government acceptance of a storage warranty does not limit the Government's rights under any other term or condition of this contract. quote mark Are Offerors correct in interpreting the requirement as two separate warranties? 1. For Systems (a storage/transportation warranty of 1 year): quote mark For the production phase, the Contractor shall provide a storage/ transportation warranty, which extends from the date of initial Government acceptance and expires one year hence or until initial issue, whichever occurs first. quote mark AND 2. For TMDE (a standard 1 year warranty for material and workmanship): quote mark TMDE warranty will be for a minimum of 1 year for LRIP, and through production. quote mark Then is the word quote mark applicable quote mark implied as interpreted correctly here, quote mark During the ( quote mark applicable quote mark ) warranty period, the Contractor shall repair or replace within 3 months of receipt - at no cost to the Government - any FWS-CS system, TMDE, and related spare parts that fails under normal operations, while in storage, or during transportation. quote mark ? And the Government clearly understands, by reaffirmation, that they have accepted a storage warranty as detailed in 3.4.1, quote mark Government acceptance of a storage warranty does not limit the Government's rights under any other term or condition of this contract. quote mark and that no other warranty exists or is implied? Please clarify that this interpretation of 3.4.1 is correct. Government Response to Question #44 Yes, there are two different warranties required (one for systems/spares and one for TMDE). The intent for systems/spares is a storage warranty. For TMDE, a standard 1 year warranty is required. The statement referenced in paragraph 3.4.1 remains as stated. There may be occasions where specific additional warranty remedies may be required (i.e. a defect specific warranty may be agreed upon as part of closure a failure report, which would be in addition to contract warranty requirements). Question #45 Reference Section C, 3.4.10, 3.4.10.1 which states, quote mark The TMDE shall command the LRF to fire and measure pulse energy and beam divergence. quote mark While the performance of a phosphor coated camera is less than an InGaAs camera, the InGaAs camera performance comes at an exponentially higher cost. We believe a phosphor coated camera provides sufficient information for a maintainer repair decision. Can the field-expedient LRF beam divergence measurement be limited to what is possible using a phosphor coated camera? This would enable a higher TMDE value proposition (TMDE cost versus performance). Will the government approve the use of a phosphor coated camera for the LRF divergence measurement? Please modify the requirement to allow a phosphor coated camera for the LRF divergence measurement by the TMDE. Government Response to Question #45 The Government is not requiring specific equipment as part of the TMDE, but rather specifying TMDE capabilities needed for maintenance and verification testing in the field. The offeror shall determine what equipment is required to meet the stated requirement quote mark The TMDE shall command the LRF to fire and measure pulse energy and beam divergence quote mark for their proposed FWS-CS solution and provide supporting narrative as part of Subfactor 3, Logistics, of the proposal. Question #46 Reference Section C, 3.4.11.1 Instructor and Key Personnel Training (I&KPT) which states, quote mark The Contractor shall prepare I&KPT materials. The Contractor shall conduct an Operator and Crew-level training course and a Maintainer-level training course. Training shall be conducted within the Continental United States (CONUS) Government-selected sites. The objective of the I&KPT is to provide FWS-CS operators and maintainers the required skills to operate and support the systems in a structured school environment, in garrison, and in a field environment, see CDRL-DDD and CDRL-III. quote mark The Government requires a Maintainer-level training course during EMD with submission identified in CDRL-DDD. To develop the maintainer-level training a complete TMDE Set is required. Is it the Government's intention to require a TMDE Set be built for these classes? Please clarify the Government's intent on availability of the TMDE during EMD. Government Response to Question #46 See response to Question #42. TMDE hardware is not required until LRIP. Question #47 Reference Section C, 3.4.11.1 Types of Manuals which states, quote mark For the EMD phase, the Contractor shall deliver a Technical guide for the operator/crew level and maintainer level maintenance and training documentation for operator/crew level, maintainer level training, see CDRL-DDD, for presentation for EAD. The Technical guides shall provide inspection, basic operation procedures, and troubleshooting procedures for FWS-CS during the EMD phase. quote mark The Government requires a maintainer level maintenance and training documentation for operator/crew level, maintainer level training, see CDRL-DDD, for presentation for EAD during EMD To develop the maintainer-level Technical guides a complete TMDE Set is required. Is it the Government's intention to require a TMDE Set be built as would be required to develop these guides? Please clarify the Government's intent on availability of the TMDE during EMD. Government Response to Question #47 See response to Question #42. TMDE hardware is not required until LRIP. Question #48 Reference Section C, Appendix A 6.6.1 which states, quote mark The TMDE shall command the LRF to fire and measure pulse energy and beam divergence. quote mark While the performance of a phosphor coated camera is less than an InGaAs camera, the InGaAs camera performance comes at an exponentially higher cost. We believe a phosphor coated camera provides sufficient information for a maintainer repair decision. Can the field-expedient LRF beam divergence measurement be limited to what is possible using a phosphor coated camera? This would enable a higher TMDE value proposition (TMDE cost versus performance). Will the government approve the use of a phosphor coated camera for the LRF divergence measurement? Please modify the requirement to allow a phosphor coated camera for the LRF divergence measurement by the TMDE. Government Response to Question #48 See response to question #45 ***END AMENDMENT 0005*** ***AMENDMENT 0004: UPDATE PROPOSAL DUE DATE TO 30 OCTOBER 2015, UPDATE SOLICITATION DOCUMENTATION (SECTIONS A, B, H, and L), AND PROVIDES GOVERNMENT RESPONSES TO [OPEN] INDUSTRY QUESTIONS RECIEVED AS OF 30 SEPTEMBER 2015*** Amendment 0004 updates the proposal due date to 12:00PM (noon) Eastern Standard 30 October 2015, updates Sections A, B, H and L, and provides Government responses to [open] industry questions received as of 30 September 2015. Any question(s) received by 30 September 2015 that are not answered in this amendment shall be addressed in a subsequent amendment. Solicitation Documentation Changes: Section A has been updated to reflect a proposal due date of 12:00PM NOON 30 October 2015 (see Question #49 below for details). Section B, CLINs 0016, 0016AA, and 0016AB have been updated to correct the SOW paragraph reference for quote mark Measurement Interface Equipment quote mark (see Question #37 below for details). Section H, Special Contract Requirements, 52.211-11, Liquidated Damages-Supplies, Services, or Research and Development has been modified to update the consideration formula (see Question #39 below for details). Section L, Paragraph 1.1.2.1 Volume 1 - Offer has been revised to update point of contact information for NCI (see Question #40 below for details). W91CRB-15-R-0024 Amendment 0004 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Question #37 Reference Section B, CLINs 0016, 0016AA and 0016B SOW Reference which states, quote mark...Measurement Interface Equipment, IAW SOW paragraph 3.3.2.2.3 quote mark. There is no paragraph 3.3.2.2.3 in the SOW. Please confirm that SOW paragraph 3.3.2.2.2. Measurement Interface Equipment, is the correct reference for these CLINs. Response to Question #37 SOW paragraph 3.3.2.2.2. Measurement Interface Equipment, is the correct reference for CLINs 0016, 0016AA, and 0016AB. Section B has been updated accordingly. Question #38 Reference Section H-Special Contract Requirements, 52.211-11, Liquidated Damages-Supplies, Services, or Research and Development which states, quote mark (a) If the Contractor fails to deliver the supplies or perform the services within the time specified in this contract, the Contractor shall, in place of actual damages, pay to the Government liquidated damages of new FWS-CS units delivered to the Government, including coverage of transportation and shipping fees, or other goods/services agreed upon by the Government. Consideration shall be resolved between the contractor and the Government within 30 days after first missed delivery against the contract baseline schedule, unless otherwise agreed upon by the Government. Consideration may require the initiation of a new delivery order from the Government to close consideration. The consideration formula is as follows: _(i=1)^n (Unit Cost * Total Systems Delinquent for Monthi * Fielding Factor for Monthi) The fielding factor for a given month's delinquent delivery will be determined based on the following criteria: Fielding Factor Number of Days Until Fielding 1% 180 2% 90- 179 3% 32-89 5% 31 quote mark Please confirm our calculation of Liquidated Damages based upon the following scenario: Schedule Date: 8/31/2016 Fielding Date: 9/30/2016 Delivery Date: 8/31/2017 System Unit Price of $1 Number of Systems: 10 Total Contract Price for 10 systems: $10 Liquidated Damages are calculated to be $6. If our interpretation of this clause is correct, doesn't it operate more as a penalty clause than one that compensates the Government for its reasonable damages for late delivery? Response to Question #38 Based on the consideration formula as cited, the calculation of liquidated damages for the scenario described would be $6 to compensate the Government for a one year delay in delivery. Question #39 Reference Section H-Special Contract Requirements, 52.211-11, Liquidated Damages-Supplies, Services, or Research and Development which states, quote mark (a) If the Contractor fails to deliver the supplies or perform the services within the time specified in this contract, the Contractor shall, in place of actual damages, pay to the Government liquidated damages of new FWS-CS units delivered to the Government, including coverage of transportation and shipping fees, or other goods/services agreed upon by the Government. Consideration shall be resolved between the contractor and the Government within 30 days after first missed delivery against the contract baseline schedule, unless otherwise agreed upon by the Government. Consideration may require the initiation of a new delivery order from the Government to close consideration. The consideration formula is as follows: _(i=1)^n (Unit Cost * Total Systems Delinquent for Monthi * Fielding Factor for Monthi) The fielding factor for a given month's delinquent delivery will be determined based on the following criteria: Fielding Factor Number of Days Until Fielding 1% 180 2% 90- 179 3% 32-89 5% 31 quote mark To bound the risk to the contractor: a. Would the Government consider eliminating the quote mark fielding factor quote mark component as that factor is beyond the control of the contractor and in its place tie it to a quote mark delivery factor quote mark which would be tied to the contractual delivery schedule? b. Would the Government consider limiting the total amount of Liquidated Damages that can be assessed under the contract to $1,000,000? c. Would the Government consider limiting the amount of Liquidated Damages that can be assessed under the contract to 5% of the price of the delinquent unit? Response to Question #39 The formula in Section H has been modified to eliminate the fielding factor. The updated formula is related to the expected 10 year system life of the FWS-CS. For every 30 days (or portion thereof) a system is late, the formula calculates the value of one month of a 120 month (10 year) system life. The updated consideration formula is as follows: _(i=1)^n ((Unit Cost)/120* Total Systems Delinquent for Monthi) b. No. c. No. Question #40 Reference Amendment 0003, Government Response to Question 30, NCI. The Amendment includes the following email for the NCI point of contact: gmkirkland@nciinc.com. Please confirm the email address for the NCI POC. Email messages have not been successfully delivered, and to date, we have be unable to contact Mr. Kirkland by phone. Response to Question #40 Section L, paragraph 1.1.2.1 has been revised to update point of contact information for NCI as follows: Company Name: NCI Information Systems, Inc. Company Address: 11730 Plaza America Dr Suite 700, Reston, VA 20190-4764 Contract: W91CRB-15-C-0035 Delivery Order: N/A POC: Gary Kirkland (Principal Contracts Administrator) Phone: 703-707-6713 (office), 703-585-3647 (mobile) Email: gmkirkland@nciinc.com Alternate POC: Matt O'Brien (Senior Director of Contracts) Phone: 703-707-6626 (office), 571-329-2244 (mobile) Email: mobrien@nciinc.com Question #49 Reference Section A regarding requests for proposal submission extension. Response to Question #49 The Government has received multiple requests for a change to the proposal submission date with various lengths of extension requested. Amendment #4 provides an updated proposal due date of 12:00PM NOON 30 October 2015. No additional extensions are planned based on current information. ***AMENDMENT 0003: UPDATE PROPOSAL DUE DATE TO 19 OCTOBER 2015, UPDATE SOLICITATION DOCUMENTATION, and PROVIDE GOVERNMENT RESPONSES TO INDUSTRY QUESTIONS SUBMITTED AS OF 16 SEPTEMBER 2015*** Amendment 0003 updates the proposal due date to 19 October 2015, provides minor updates to solicitation documentation, and provides Government responses to open Industry questions received as of 16 September 2015. Questions received after 16 September 2015 shall be addressed in a subsequent amendment. Solicitation Documentation Changes: a. Section A has been updated to reflect a proposal due date of 12:00PM NOON 19 October 2015. b. Section B, CLIN 0019 has been updated to correct the SOW paragraph reference for quote mark FWS-CS First Article Test (FAT) Exit Criteria quote mark c. Section C, Appendix A, Paragraph 6.2.4 has been modified to clarify TMDE equipment requirements. d. Section L, Paragraph 1.1.1.1.2 Acquisition Source Selection Interactive Support Tool (ASSIST)2Industry is amended to add the following: quote mark All Offerors are advised that ASSIST2Industry has been updated and it is now the responsibility of PRIME Contractors to establish accounts for their SUBCONTRACTORS to respond to Government ENs. A separate area within ASSIST2Industry has been created to allow authorized Subcontractor POCs to upload proposal files only. Subcontractors will not be able to access any other information on the ASSIST2Industry website (e.g. Questions/Evaluation Notices, Responses, etc.). Once a Subcontractor has been added, they will receive a user ID (e.g. subcontractor0001) and password (an initial password) that will be sent via two separate system generated e-mails. A Subcontractor will have one user ID for all PRIMES and solicitation responses, i.e. if you are a Subcontractor to multiple Prime Contractors and multiple solicitation responses, you will only have one user ID. Once an account has been established for the Subcontractor, go to https://ASSIST2Industry.army.mil access the account. Prime Contractors will only be able to see the number of files submitted by their Subcontractors; but, will be UNABLE TO VIEW the Subcontractor's files. NOTE: Both Prime Contractors and Subcontractors are instructed to review the ASSIST2Industry User's Guide, located under the quote mark Getting Started quote mark tab on the website. The guide has been updated and provides step by step instructions on how to perform functions and navigate the website. Offerors can contact the ASSIST2Industry Helpdesk via e-mail at usarmy.jbmdl.acc.list.vce-helpdesk@mail.mil or by telephone at (609) 562- 5988 or (609) 562-7050 for any technical assistance that may be needed. quote mark e. Section L, Paragraph 1.1.1.1.6 General Appearance has been amended to allow shading only for table headings and alternate table rows/columns. f. Section L, Paragraph 1.1.2.2.1.1.1 FWS-CS Optical Prescriptions to Support Performance Specification has been revised to clarify that a.zar file is acceptable for this submission provided it meets the remaining requirements of the paragraph. g. Section L, Paragraph 1.1.2.2.2 Section 2 - FWS-CS Sample Hardware and Section M, Paragraph 1.2.3.1.2.2 Government Verified Sample Hardware Performance have been revised to allow +/- 2 degrees for Sample Hardware HFOV. h. Section L, Paragraph 1.1.2.1 Volume 1 - Offer has been revised to clarify that all clauses requiring an offeror fill-in are to be completed and submitted in Volume 1. i. Section L, Paragraph 1.1.2.1 Volume 1 - Offer has been revised to add NCI along with their contact information. j. Attachment #1, FWS-CS Purchase Description, Paragraph 3.3.8.9.1 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Requirements has been updated to clarify inclusion of conducted EMI requirements. k. Attachment #1, FWS-CS Purchase Description, Tables 4.6-1 and 4.6-3 have been revised to include a line for I-LRF Alignment to specify test method and frequency. l. Attachment #1, FWS-CS Purchase Description, Paragraph 3.3.5.4 External Power has been revised to include a vehicle cable length and a ruggedized, military standard end connector for the vehicle power cabling. NOTE: The revised Attachment #1 - FWS-CS Product Description dated 16 September 2015 is a restricted distribution attachment. The revised FWS-CS PD shall be provided to offerors via AMRDEC SAFE distribution. Contact admin POC at jennifer.c.mccormick.ctr@mail.mil and cc contracting specialist at andrew.c.mitchell1.civ@mail.mil to request the updated FWS-CS Product Description. ***END AMENDMENT 0003*** ***AMENDMENT 0002: GOVERNMENT RESPONSES TO INDUSTRY QUESTIONS RECEIVED AS OF 8 SEPTEMBER 2015*** Amendment 0002 provides Government responses to industry questions received as of 8 September 2015; questions received after 8 September 2015 (or any questions submitted prior to 8 September 2015 and not addressed in Amendment 0002), shall be addressed in a subsequent Amendment. Questions 1-8, 11, 12, 16-19, 23, and 25 are reserved; answers to these questions shall be provided in a subsequent Amendment. ***END AMENDMENT 0002*** ***AMENDMENT 0001: UPDATE SECTION J ATTACHMENT 7 and SECTION J ATTACHMENT 9*** Solicitation W91CRB-15-R-0024, Amendment 0001 updates Section J Attachment 7 (Total Evaluated Price Matrix) and Section J Attachment 9 (Past Performance Questionnaire). Attachment 7 incorrectly identified EMD Risk Reduction Test Articles (PY3, 2018); Amendment 0001 provides an updated copy of Attachment 7 (EMD Risk Reduction Test Articles- PY1, 2016). Attachment 9 has an incorrect header and footer; Amendment 0001 provides an updated copy of Attachment 9 to correct the errors. ***END AMENDMENT 0001*** ***ORIGINAL SOLICITATION 31 AUGUST 2015*** This is a solicitation for Family of Weapon Sights- Crew Served (FWS-CS), prepared in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations, publicizing of contract actions (FAR Part 5). This announcement constitutes the only solicitation. Solicitation W91CRB-15-R-0024 is for the procurement of FWS-CS. This is NOT a commercial item solicitation. The following attachments (Section J in the attached Solicitation Document) are restricted for distribution. Attachment 1: FWS-CS Product Description Attachment 2: FWS- CS NVThermIP 2009 Modeling Guidance Attachment 3: FWS-CS Sample Hardware Offeror Measured Data Matrix Attachment 4: FWS-CS Sample Hardware Measurement and Interface Instructions Attachment 6: FWS-CS Security Classification Guide Attachment 10: Mount Assembly, Drawing A3301511, Rev B Attachment 11: Assy, Bracket - M2, Drawing A3170570 Attachment 12: Mount Assy - MK19, Drawing A3260830 Attachment 21: NV ImageJ Instructions Attachment 22: NV ImageJ-win32-1.47a (zip file) Attachment 23: NV ImageJ-win64-1.47a (zip file) Attachment 26: FWS-CS SSCamIP 2009 Modeling Guidance Attachment 27: FWS-CS Laser Range Finder Modeling Guidance All requests for the above restricted-distribution documents shall be submitted to the administrative Point of Contact, Ms. Jennifer McCormick: e-mail jennifer.c.mccormick.ctr@mail.mil and carbon-copy (CC) Contract Specialist, Mr. Andrew Mitchell: e-mail Andrew.C.Mitchell1.civ@mail.mil. Please include the following information in your request for restricted-distribution documents: company name, CAGE code, business unit(s), business address(es), primary POC phone number, primary POC e-mail address. The Government shall provide restricted-distribution documents via the Army Missile Research, Development, and Engineering Command Safe Access File Exchange (AMRDEC SAFE). Recipients SHALL: 1. Read and comply with distribution markings 2. Direct all requests for distribution to other parties to the Contract Specialist: e-mail Andrew.C.Mitchell1.civ@mail.mil and cc Contracting Officer Victoria Watkins at Victoria.M.Watkins.civ@mail.mil 3. Destroy the documents once they are no longer required to support this solicitation. Recipients SHALL-NOT: 1. Redistribute the documentation outside their company/organization, to include other subsidiaries within the corporate structure. All questions in response to this solicitation, including questions on technical documents, attachments and exhibits, shall be directed to the Contract Specialist via the e-mail address Andrew.C.Mitchell1.civ@mail.mil; cc the Contracting Officer, email victoria.m.watkins.civ@mail.mil.
 

Web Link

FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/notices/7bd1e7e92327439bdef20ceb055c6d89)
 

Place of Performance

Address: ACC-APG - Aberdeen Division D ATTN: AMSSB-ACC-A, 4118 Susquehanna Avenue Aberdeen Proving Ground MD

Zip Code: 21005-3013
 

Record

SN03915276-W 20151008/151006234738-7bd1e7e92327439bdef20ceb055c6d89 (fbodaily.com)
 

Source

FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

---

| FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |