Loren Data's SAM Daily™

FBO DAILY - FEDBIZOPPS ISSUE OF OCTOBER 31, 2015 FBO #5090
DOCUMENT

C -- Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Architect-Engineer Services For Architectural Projects at Various Locations, NAVFAC HAWAII Areas - Attachment

Notice Date

10/29/2015
 

Notice Type

Attachment
 

NAICS

541310 — Architectural Services
 

Contracting Office

N62478 NAVFAC HAWAII ACQUISITION DEPARTMENT 400 MARSHALL RD, JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, HI
 

Solicitation Number

N6247816R5025
 

Response Due

12/2/2015
 

Archive Date

12/17/2015
 

Point of Contact

ALICE MENDE (808) 474-2365
 

Small Business Set-Aside

Total Small Business
 

Description

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM (SF) 330, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFCATIONS, IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO RFP PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. This solicitation is a 100% set-aside for small business concerns. The small business standard classification is NAICS 541310 ($7.5M in annual receipts over the past three years). Architect-Engineer (A-E) services are required for an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract to include design and engineering services for architectural projects at various locations under the cognizance of NAVFAC Hawaii. Services include, but are not limited to, design and engineering services for architectural projects at various locations under the cognizance of NAVFAC Hawaii. Services shall also include Functional Analysis and Concept Development (FACD)/design charrettes; preparation of engineering studies; construction cost estimates; cost certification; Request for Proposal (RFP) Design-Build (DB) solicitation documents; Design-Bid-Build (DBB)/Final plans and specifications contract documents; technical surveys and reports including site engineering investigation, topographical survey, geotechnical investigation, hazardous material survey, historic preservation, anti-terrorism/force protection and others; Comprehensive Interior Design (CID), including Structural Interior Design (SID) and Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF and E); as-built drawings; Post Construction Award Services (PCAS); and other miscellaneous services, as required. PCAS consist of technical consultation during construction, including, but not limited to, review of construction submittals, site visits, operations and maintenance support information, record drawings, and other miscellaneous services. Architectural projects consist of, but are not limited to, design and engineering for new construction, alterations, repair of buildings, structures and minor construction of bachelor quarters, admin/training facilities, fire station, fitness center, dining facility, auditorium/theater, exchange/retail store, school, headquarters building, industrial shops, maintenance shops, distribution warehouses, and armories. Supporting facilities may include utility connections (water, sewers, electrical, telecommunications, and cable television). Evaluation and selection of the most highly qualified firm will be based on the selection criteria stated herein. The A-E must demonstrate its qualifications with respect to the published selection criteria. The following selection criteria, in descending order of importance, will be used to evaluate the qualifications of the A-E firms: Criterion (1). Professional qualifications and specialized experience and technical competence of key personnel proposed. (a) Professional Qualifications: Professional qualifications of key personnel proposed for the design team. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part I, Section H. Identify key personnel for the design team proposed for the design of base development facility projects. Relevant base development facility projects shall include bachelor enlisted quarters, apartments, dormitories, consolidated club (officer/enlisted), fire station, fitness center, dining facility, auditorium/theater, exchange/retail store, school, headquarters building, administration building, aircraft hangar, maintenance shop, distribution warehouse, and armory for new building construction or building alterations, renovations and repairs type projects in Hawaii and similar tropical environments in the Pacific Ocean area. Submission of more variety in the types of base development facility projects will be more favorably considered. SF330, Part I, Section E. Submit professional qualifications for key personnel, including active U.S. professional registration (include State and discipline), number of years of experience, role in this contract, firm name and location, and education. For Cost Estimator, indicate years of experience, role in this contract, firm name and location, and education. Professional registration for Cost Estimator is not required. (b) Specialized Experience and Technical Competence: Key personnel specialized experience and technical competence in the design of base development facility projects, approximately $30 million or less in construction value per project/contract, completed within the past ten years, including specified design and engineering services. Relevant base development facility projects shall include bachelor enlisted quarters, apartments, dormitories, consolidated club (officer/enlisted), fire station, fitness center, dining facility, auditorium/theater, exchange/retail store, school, headquarters building, administration building, aircraft hangar, maintenance shop, distribution warehouse, and armory for new building construction or building alterations, renovations and repairs type projects in Hawaii and similar tropical environments in the Pacific Ocean area. Submission of more variety in the types of base development facility projects will be more favorably considered. Specified design and engineering services shall include execution of DD 1391 or similar project programming document, FACD/design charrettes, DB RFP solicitation documents, and DBB/Final Design contract documents. Specified design and engineering services for base development facility projects do not have to be within a single project scope; however, base development facility projects that contain several or all of these services will be given more favorable consideration than projects that contain only individual services. Base development facility projects designed and constructed in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and similar tropical environments in the Pacific Ocean area with demonstrated understanding of facility sustainment specifically regarding energy savings will be considered more favorably. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section E. Each Section E shall include a maximum of five completed relevant projects along with description of correlated A-E support services rendered. If more than five projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first five projects and disregard any other project information after the first five projects. Professional services of projects submitted must have been completed within the past ten years. Criterion (2). Firm ™s specialized recent experience. Firm ™s specialized recent experience in the design of base development facility projects, not more than $30 million in construction value per project/contract, completed within the past ten years, including specified design and engineering services. Relevant base development facility projects shall include bachelor enlisted quarters, apartments, dormitories, consolidated club (officer/enlisted), fire station, fitness center, dining facility, auditorium/theater, exchange/retail store, school, headquarters building, administration building, aircraft hangar, maintenance shop, distribution warehouse, and armory for new building construction or building alterations, renovations and repairs type projects in Hawaii and similar tropical environments in the Pacific Ocean area. Submission of more variety in the types of base development facility projects will be more favorably considered. Specified design and engineering services shall include execution of DD 1391 or similar project programming document, FACD/design charrettes, DB RFP solicitation documents, and DBB/Final Design contract documents. Specified design and engineering services for base development facility projects do not have to be within a single project scope; however, base development facility projects that contain several or all of these services will be given more favorable consideration than projects that contain only individual services. Base development facility projects designed and constructed in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and similar environments in the Pacific Ocean area will be considered more favorably. NOTE: A subcontractors or subconsultants specialized experience will not be given the same level of consideration as the prime contractor. Prime contractor-subcontractors with a demonstrated history of working successfully together on prior projects may be considered more favorably than those without such history. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section F. For the proposed team, provide in Section F a maximum of ten completed relevant projects which best demonstrate the firm ™s recent specialized experience in the design of base development facility projects AND the specified design and engineering services, described above. Professional services of relevant projects submitted must have been completed within the past ten years. If more than ten projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first ten projects and disregard any other project information after the first ten projects. Relevant projects shall be architectural or multi-disciplinary projects in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and Pacific Ocean areas. Each project shall include (1) project title; (2) location; (3) year completed; (4) project owner; (5) point-of-contact name, e-mail address, and phone number; (6) contract number or project identification number; (7) contract period of performance; (8) contract award amount; and (9) description of project and relevance to this solicitation. A project is defined as either a stand-alone contract or a single task order in an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract having the features described above. For IDIQs, the Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract and will only evaluate individual task order information. The submission shall include a discussion of who executed the project as pertinent to demonstrating the offeror ™s specialized experience. Section F, Block 25, item (3) ROLE, shall clearly identify the prime contractor (e.g., ROLE, Architect prime contractor). Criterion (3). Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of quality of work, cost control, compliance with performance schedules, and cooperation and responsiveness. Firms will be evaluated on past performance on relevant base development facility projects with respect to work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and cooperation and responsiveness. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. For each relevant project submitted in Section F pertaining to Criterion (2), Firm ™s Specialized Experience, submit a DD2631, Performance Evaluation (Architect Engineer). If a DD2631 is not available, provide a Performance Survey (download from NECO website https://www.neco.navy.mil) and submit the Performance Survey with the SF330. The Performance Survey shall be from the contracting agent and/or their representative responsible for the construction contract administration, or from the facility owner/user. It shall not be from the prime contractor on a design-build project nor shall it be from a prime contractor to a subcontractor. Past performance information not related to the projects described to meet Criterion (2) will not be considered. The information provided in the SF330 may provide the major portion of the information used in the Governments evaluation for past performance. The Government however, is not restricted to the information provided by the SF330 and may use other sources to assess past performance information such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and inquiries with previous customers/owners. PPIRS/CPARS will be evaluated for the firm that will perform the work and search will be based upon the DUNS number provided for the firm. If the A-E received any less than satisfactory past performance evaluations from customers/owners, it is incumbent upon the A-E to provide an explanation of the rating and what the A-E has done or will do to preclude less than satisfactory ratings on future contracts. A subcontractors or subconsultants past performance will not be given the same level of consideration as the prime contractor. Criterion (4). Capacity to perform the work in the required time and ability to accomplish multiple projects concurrently. Address staffing and capacity to accomplish the work under this IDIQ contract. Address how the firm ™s organizational construct is most efficient and effective in the execution of work. Identify team composition (prime A-E firm, subcontractor/sub-consultant of major design disciplines, and other required design firms) and personnel (key personnel and other personnel of major design disciplines only). For all key personnel identified in Selection Criterion (1), explain their roles and responsibilities in the proposed organization. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Describe the proposed team ™s ability to complete several large and small task orders concurrently requiring quick turnaround. Indicate the firm ™s current workload and the availability of the prime and sub-consultants for the specified performance period. Criterion (5). Knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts and principles to facilities and infrastructure problems through an integrated design approach including knowledge of most current LEED certification process. Firms will be evaluated in terms of their knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts through an integrated design approach and designing in accordance with the U.S. Green Building Council, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System or equivalent. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part I, Section H. Provide specific examples on a maximum of five completed projects that applied sustainability concepts and principles through an integrated design approach. Provide a maximum of five projects that have attained or been submitted for LEED certification. For projects not yet certified, identify the date the project was submitted. For all projects, identify the team ™s major contribution(s) (design elements, features, equipment, etc.) in attainment of the certification. If more than five projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first five projects and disregard any other project information after the first five projects. LEED certified projects will be considered more favorably than projects not yet certified. Discuss key LEED personnel experience and qualifications. Criterion (6). A-E ™s Design Quality Control Program (DQCP). Firms will be evaluated on the acceptability of their internal design quality control program used to ensure technical accuracy of drawings, specifications, cost estimates and other required technical data. Describe the design quality control organization structure; and list the responsible personnel. Discuss the methodology that will be used to eliminate errors, omissions, interferences, and inconsistencies between all design disciplines and consultants; inconsistencies between drawings, specifications, and cost estimates; and for the incorporation of the latest criteria, lessons learned and review comments. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Briefly describe how the prime A-E will ensure quality consistently across the entire team and how quality of subcontractors work is assured. Briefly describe internal quality assurance procedures and indicate effectiveness. Address the team ™s quality control processes for checking documents for errors, omissions and quality and incorporating and tracking review comments. Criterion (7). Firm ™s location in the general geographical area of the project and knowledge of the locality of the project; provided, that application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project; SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Indicate location of office that will be performing the work including sub-consultants offices. Describe and illustrate the team ™s knowledge of the geographical area. Address ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for on-site support. Criterion (8). Volume of work previously awarded to the firm by the Department of Defense shall also be considered, with the object of effecting an equitable distribution of Department of Defense A-E contracts among qualified A-E firms and firms that have not had Department of Defense contracts. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Provide a list of DoD contracts awarded in the last 12 months. Include dollar amount for each contract/task order awarded. Include the following items in Section H, Block 30 of the SF 330: (1) a summary of qualifications in narrative discussion addressing each of the above selection evaluation criteria, (2) an organization chart of the proposed team showing the names and roles of all key personnel listed in Section E with the associated firm as listed in Section C, (3) your DUNS, CAGE, and TIN numbers, and (4) evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering, i.e., State registration number. The planned contract type is an Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) type contract where work will be ordered via task orders on an as-needed basis during the life of the contract provided the Government and the contractor agree on the amount. Each task order will be a firm fixed price A-E contract. The duration of the contract will be for one (1) year from the date of initial contract award with four (4) additional one-year option periods. The total amount that may be paid under this contract (including option years) will not exceed $10,000,000 for the entire contract term. The options may be exercised within the time frame specified in the resultant contract at the sole discretion of the Government subject to workload and/or acceptable A-E performance under the subject contract. There will be no future synopsis in the event the options are exercised. The minimum guarantee for the entire contract term (including option years) is $10,000 and will be satisfied by the award of the initial Task Order or with a seed project negotiated and awarded concurrently with the basic IDIQ contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. No other general notification to firms for other similar projects performed under this contract will be made. Estimated construction cost of project is between $25,000 and $30,000,000. Estimated date of contract award is March 2016. All contractors are advised that registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Website at http://sam.gov. Completion of electronic annual representations and certifications are also mandatory prior to award of a contract. Refer to FAR 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications. The selected A-E firm may be required to participate in a pre-fee meeting within seven days of notification and provide a fee proposal within ten days of the meeting. The contract will require that the selected A-E firm have e-mail and Internet on-line access for routine exchange of correspondence. Fee proposals may be subject to an advisory audit performed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest, including NFAS 5252.209-9300 Organizational Conflicts of Interest. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates may be tasked to assist in the preparation of a statement of work, a plan, or a specification for a construction project. This includes concept design, project programming documents (DD1391), facility siting studies, environmental assessments, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract cannot provide the construction services for the same contract. This includes concept design, which includes preparation of project programming documents (DD 1391), facility studies, environment assessments, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost. The prime firm and consultants for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term. Interested firms must allow sufficient time for receipt of submission. Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. Electronic (e-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized. All questions should be submitted in writing and forwarded via e-mail to Ms. Alice Mende, Alice.Mende@navy.mil. Questions submitted within 15 days of the closing date may not be answered by the Government. All potential offerors are advised to check daily the Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO) website, https://www.neco.navy.mil or Federal Business Opportunities website, https://www.fbo.gov/, for any additional modifications pertaining to this pre-solicitation notice. A-E firms meeting the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed Standard Form 330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications. The printed format shall be in an 8-1/2 x 11 paper format, bound in a 3-ring binder, typed with a minimum 10-point font size, and one-sided. Any other information submitted such as company brochures, leaflets, etc., will not be considered. Two copies of your SF 330 are required: One paper copy and one electronic copy on a CD. The submittal/delivery address is Commander, NAVFAC HAWAII (Code OPHA1), 400 Marshall Road, Building A-13, Pearl Harbor, HI 96860-3139, (A-E Solicitation No. N62478-16-R-5025). You may also hand deliver your SF 330 to Building A-13 (please call Ms. Alice Mende at (808) 474-2365 to make arrangements to hand deliver). The delivery address is inside a military installation, therefore, strict security measures are in force and delays should be anticipated. This solicitation requires all interested firms to have an email address. Notifications will be via e-mail; therefore, e-mail address must be shown on the SF 330, Part 1, Section B8. Firms responding to this announcement by Wednesday, December 2, 2015 will be considered. Firms must submit forms by 2:00 p.m. Hawaiian Standard Time (HST). This is not a request for a proposal. Point of Contact is Ms. Alice Mende, Contracting Officer, Phone (808) 474-2365, email alice.mende@navy.mil.
 

Web Link

FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/DON/NAVFAC/N62742PH/N6247816R5025/listing.html)
 

Document(s)

Attachment
 

File Name: N6247816R5025_Performance__Survey.doc (https://www.neco.navy.mil/synopsis_file/N6247816R5025_Performance__Survey.doc)

Link: https://www.neco.navy.mil/synopsis_file/N6247816R5025_Performance__Survey.doc

 

Note: If links are broken, refer to Point of Contact above or contact the FBO Help Desk at 877-472-3779.
 

Place of Performance

Address: Various Locations in All Areas Under the Cognizance of NAVFAC Hawaii, JBPHH, HI

Zip Code: 96860
 

Record

SN03932760-W 20151031/151029234242-fa1341b4588fda5b184828872f31edfc (fbodaily.com)
 

Source

FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

---

| FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |