Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY - FEDBIZOPPS ISSUE OF MARCH 27, 2016 FBO #5238
SPECIAL NOTICE

A -- Ultra -Low Cost Access to Space (ULCATS)

Notice Date
3/25/2016
 
Notice Type
Special Notice
 
NAICS
336414 — Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
 
Contracting Office
Department of the Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Maxwell AFB Contracting Squadron, 50 LeMay Plaza South, Bldg 804, Maxwell AFB, Alabama, 36112-6334
 
ZIP Code
36112-6334
 
Solicitation Number
ULCATSRFI
 
Archive Date
6/11/2016
 
Point of Contact
Gail A. Vendel, Phone: 334-953-3521, Bobby W. Ballow, Phone: 334-953-3350
 
E-Mail Address
gail.vendel@us.af.mil, bobby.ballow@us.af.mil
(gail.vendel@us.af.mil, bobby.ballow@us.af.mil)
 
Small Business Set-Aside
N/A
 
Description
ULTRA-LOW COST ACCESS TO SPACE (ULCATS) REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) (This is a request for information only. No acquisition is anticipated at this time.) Description A U.S. Government investment of financial and technical resources to stimulate efforts within the private sector could aid in the accelerated development and demonstration of new space transportation capabilities - Ultra-Low Cost Access To Space (ULCATS) systems - that are at least an order of magnitude lower cost than today's existing launch systems, and at least one order of magnitude more reliable than today's systems. A U.S. government partnership with industry might increase the amount of innovation and accelerate the development of ULCATS systems by commercial industry. These systems might create new methods for delivering payloads to low-Earth orbit (LEO) with dual use benefits to both commercial industry and U.S. government, including national security. As the U.S. Air Force stimulates private industry investments to provide assured access to space, we also are interested in the ideas for how to stimulate faster development of the next generation of commercial space launch systems. U.S. industry is already investing in, and developing, partially-reusable launch systems. Air University has been tasked with A) Evaluating even lower cost space access systems that are being conceived and/or in very early phases of development by U.S. industry, B) Assessing alternatives to stimulating their development in partnership with U.S. industry, C) Evaluating the potential military utility of those commercially-developed, -owned, and -operated systems, and D) Considering how the existence of ULCATS systems might influence and alter military theory and doctrine in the future. The purpose of this RFI is to collect information from U.S. industry to help Air University assess future concepts being developed by industry, and how they might be integrated into the U.S. Air Force long term plans as specified in "Air Force Future Operating Concept (AFFOC) - A View of the Air Force in 2035" and "America's Air Force: A Call to the Future". Air University is specifically requesting the following information: •1) Company or organization name, point of contact name, phone number, e-mail address, and nature of interest in ULCATS. •2) Sufficient information to determine if your company qualifies as a United States commercial provider of space transportation services as defined in Public Law 105- 303, Commercial Space Act of 1998. •3) What systems concepts and plans is your company is developing to achieve at least an order of magnitude reduction in cost, and at least an order of magnitude increase in reliability, over best in class launch systems that are operating today. What is the status of this development project, including development of critical path systems, and when do you anticipate that your system will be achieve a flight demonstration to orbit, and when will it become fully operational? What is the overall concept of operations? What is the technology readiness of your system, and how much have you invested in the development of the system to date? How much more capital is needed to complete development through the first orbital flight test? Do you have the capital in hand to complete development, or do you need to raise the remaining capital from other sources? •4) What key commercial markets and commercial businesses use cases is your ULCATS system being designed to serve? What civil space markets will your system effectively address? What national security markets do you anticipate your ULCATS system being able to serve, and what would be the benefits to U.S. national security? •5) What are the public benefits of ULCATS systems that the USG should consider when evaluating the merit of a potential USG investment in developing ULCATS systems? •6) How scalable is your baseline ULCATS system, and what are the limits on scalability? How do you anticipate your system will evolve over time? •7) The Air Force Future Operating Concept (AFFOC) - A View of the Air Force in 2035 discusses the concept of a Civil Space Reserve Fleet (CSRV) modeled after the aircraft civil reserve fleet. From your perspective, what are the pros, cons, and limitations of the CSRV concept? •8) The U.S Department of Defense (DOD) has previously entered into "other transactions authority" (OTA) agreements with U.S. commercial partners for the development and demonstration of innovative systems, such as the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicles that resulted in the successful development of the Delta IV and Atlas V launch vehicles. Separately, NASA has entered into funded "Space Act Agreements" using NASA's OTA for its Commercial Orbital Transportation Services program to stimulated cargo delivery capabilities to the International Space Station using pay for performance milestones that resulted in the successful development of the Falcon 9 and Antares launch vehicles, and the Dragon and Cygnus spacecraft. From your perspective, what were the pros, cons, and limitations for each of these approaches for the initial development and demonstration phase? What changes or improvements do you suggest to this strategy, or its related terms and conditions, for development of ULCATS systems that are owned and operated by U.S. commercial providers? •9) What is the approximate dollar magnitude of the minimum U.S. Government investment necessary to ensure the success of your company's ULCATS development and demonstration effort? What is the approximate government fiscal year phasing of this investment from award to completion of an orbital flight demonstration? What percentage of the total development cost would the USG contribution represent? •10) What significant USG furnished resources (equipment, facilities, material, services) would your company likely request to complete the ULCATS development and demonstration? •11) If the USG created a program to partner with your company to develop an ULCATS system, how much might this accelerate the development of your planned ULCATS system(s), and/or reduce the risk of delays in development? •12) What advanced technologies does your company recommend the USG invest in now, to increase its technology readiness level, in order to accelerate and stimulate the development of future ULCATS systems? •13) What non-financial and non-technical barriers to ULCATS - including policy, legal and regulatory - should the USG be aware of that your company would like to see addressed? What would your company recommend as a solution to this barrier? •14) What other recommendations does your organization have for the USG to accelerate the development of privately-owned and -operated ULCATS systems? •15) Questions must be submitted prior to 1300 CSDT. on 17 May 2016 to allow sufficient time for the government to respond. Questions should be sent via email to Ms. Gail Vendel, gail.vendel@us.af.mil, Contracting Officer and A1C Bobby Ballow, bobby.ballow@us.af.mil, Contract Specialist. •16) Responses should not exceed twenty (20) pages in length and are due by 27 May 2016 @ 1300 CSDT. Send responses via email to Gail Vendel, gail.vendel@us.af.mil, Contracting Officer and A1C Bobby Ballow, bobby.ballow@us.af.mil, Contract Specialist. This is a request for information only. It is not a procurement commitment to procure services, or request for proposals. Responses to this notice are not offers and cannot be accepted by Air University, or the Department of Defense, to form a binding agreement or contract. The U.S. Department of Defense is under no obligation to issue a solicitation or to enter into any agreement or award any contract on the basis of this RFI. Air University will not pay for any information solicited. No evaluation letters and/or results will be issued to the respondents. No solicitation exists; therefore do not request a copy of the solicitation. Although it is not Air University's intent to publicly disclose proprietary information obtained during this RFI, Air University reserves the right to share the information received in response to this RFI within the U.S. Government. Any information submitted in response to this RFI that is marked as "Proprietary" or "Confidential Commercial or Financial Information" will be treated as labeled. Additionally, any International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR)-restricted information should be appropriately labeled in responses to the RFI.
 
Web Link
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USAF/AETC/MaxAFBCS/ULCATSRFI/listing.html)
 
Place of Performance
Address: 50 S. Lemay Plaza, Maxwell AFB, Alabama, 36112, United States
Zip Code: 36112
 
Record
SN04062617-W 20160327/160325234025-41798418d854b955b4fc4016d58a6fa0 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.