Loren Data's SAM Daily™

FBO DAILY - FEDBIZOPPS ISSUE OF MARCH 30, 2016 FBO #5241
SOLICITATION NOTICE

17 -- Hill AFB Transient Alert Services - Performance Work Statement - Wage Determination - Utah - Wage Determination - National - DD 254 - DD 1423s A001-F001 - DD 254 FOUO Addendum - DD 254 OPSEC Addendum

Notice Date

3/28/2016
 

Notice Type

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
 

NAICS

488190 — Other Support Activities for Air Transportation
 

Contracting Office

Department of the Air Force, Air Force Materiel Command, AFLCMC / AFSC / AFNWC - HILL AFB, ., Hill AFB, Utah, 84056, United States
 

ZIP Code

84056
 

Solicitation Number

FA8201-16-R-HillTA
 

Archive Date

5/14/2016
 

Point of Contact

Kirk J. Herman, Phone: 8015868594, Andrew R Dowling, Phone: 8017752212
 

E-Mail Address

kirk.herman@us.af.mil, andrew.dowling@us.af.mil
(kirk.herman@us.af.mil, andrew.dowling@us.af.mil)
 

Small Business Set-Aside

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business
 

Description

DD 254 OPSEC Addendum DD 254 FOUO Addendum DD 1423s A001-F001 Security Form Wage Determination - National Wage Determination - Utah Performance Work Statement - 17 March 2016 Combined Synopsis/Solicitation (i) This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for the acquisition of commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in FAR Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this announcement. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; a written solicitation will not be issued. (ii) Solicitation Number: FA8201-16-R-HillTA. This solicitation is issued as a request for proposal (RFP). (iii) This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-84. (iv) Contracting Officer's Business Size Selection 100% Service-disabled veteran-owned small business NAICS Code 488190 Small Business Size Standard $32.5M (v) Contract Line Items: CLIN Nomenclature Pricing Structure UI QTY Unit Price Extended Price Basic Year 0001 Orientation Period IAW PWS 22.1.1 - 30 days beginning date of award. FFP MO 1 0002 Transient Alert services during normal hours of operation IAW the PWS. Period of performance: 11 months beginning the end of the transistion period. FFP MO 11 *0003 Transient Alert services outside normal hours of operation IAW the PWS. Any unused amount under this CLIN will be deobligated at the end of the performance period. Hours will be worked and approved IAW the PWS Section 15.1.2.1. Outside normal hours of operation shall not exceed 800 hours and will be billed at a hourly rate proposed by the contractor. Period of performance: 11 months beginning the end of the transistion period. FFP LO 1 0004 Training and travel for Transient Alert personnel. Period of performance: 11 months beginning the end of the transistion period. FFP LO 1 0005 Data Items - Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) A001 through F001 NSP Total Basic Year Option Year 1 1002 Transient Alert services during normal hours of operation IAW the PWS. Period of performance: 12 months beginning the end of the basic year. FFP MO 12 *1003 Transient Alert services outside normal hours of operation IAW the PWS. Any unused amount under this CLIN will be deobligated at the end of the performance period. Hours will be worked and approved IAW the PWS Section 15.1.2.1. Outside normal hours of operation shall not exceed 800 hours and will be billed at a hourly rate proposed by the contractor. Period of performance: 12 months beginning the end of the basic year. FFP LO 1 1004 Training and travel for Transient Alert personnel. FFP LO 1 1005 Data Items - Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) A001 through F001 NSP Total Option Year 1 Option Year 2 2002 Transient Alert services during normal hours of operation IAW the PWS. Period of performance: 12 months beginning the end of option year 1. FFP MO 12 *2003 Transient Alert services outside normal hours of operation IAW the PWS. Any unused amount under this CLIN will be deobligated at the end of the performance period. Hours will be worked and approved IAW the PWS Section 15.1.2.1. Outside normal hours of operation shall not exceed 800 hours and will be billed at a hourly rate proposed by the contractor. Period of performance: 12 months beginning the end of option year 1. FFP LO 1 2004 Training and travel for Transient Alert personnel. FFP LO 1 2005 Data Items - Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) A001 through F001 NSP Total Option Year 1 TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE *PRICING NOTE: Overtime CLINs 0003, 1003 and 2003 - the quantity of 800 is for evaluation purposes only. The award quantity will be for 1 Lot. The 800 hours will be mulitplied by the proposed fully loaded labor rate to calculate the extended Price for the TEP, reference Factor 1 Cost/Price below. (vi) Description of services to be acquired: The contractor shall provide requested Transient Alert services located at Hill AFB, Utah. Reference the attached Performance Work Specifications (PWS) dated 17 Mar 2016 for detailed specifications. (vii) Period of Performance: anticipated to be from 1 June 2016 - 31 May 2017, with two 1-year options. Place of Performance: Hill AFB UT (viii) Questions: (if Necessary) All questions and comments regarding this solicitation must be sent to the Contract Specialist (CS) SSgt Kirk Herman via email at kirk.herman@us.af.mil and must be received NLT 4 April 2016. (ix) The following provisions and clauses apply to this acquisition: FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition. Proposal Submission Information: Offers are due no later than 1200 MST, 29 April 2016. All offers shall be provided via electronic mail to SSgt Kirk Herman at kirk.herman@us.af.mil. ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS Notice to Offerors: The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs. INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS: A. Submission of offers. Submit signed and dated offers to the office specified in this solicitation at or before the exact time specified in this solicitation. Offers may be submitted in accordance with (IAW) section (viii) above, offerors shall provide a cover letter on letterhead stationery, or as otherwise specified in the solicitation. As a minimum, offers must show -- (1) The solicitation number; (2) The time specified in the solicitation for receipt of offers; (3) The name, address, telephone number and cage code of the offeror; (4) A technical description of the services being offered in sufficient detail to evaluate compliance with the requirements in the solicitation. This may include product literature, or other documents, if necessary; (5) Terms of any express warranty; (6) Price and any discount terms; (7) "Remit to" address, if different than mailing address; (8) A completed copy of the representations and certifications at FAR 52.212-3 (see FAR 52.212-3(b) for those representations and certifications that the offeror shall complete electronically); (9) Acknowledgment of Solicitation Amendments; (10) Past performance information, when included as an evaluation factor, to include recent and relevant contracts for the same or similar items and other references (including contract numbers, points of contact with telephone numbers and other relevant information); and (11) If the offer is not submitted on the SF 1449, include a statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation. Offers that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be excluded from consideration. INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO RESPONDENTS FOR PROPOSAL PREPARATION USING TRADE-OFF PROCEDURES B. PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVE The Government plans to award one twelve (12) month base year, plus two (2), twelve (12) month option year's contract for Transient Alert Services to support Hill AFB, UT. The Government reserves the right to award without discussions; however, discussions may be conducted if it's in the Government's best interest to do so. C. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 1. This section of the Instructions to offerors (ITO) provides general guidance for preparing proposals as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal. The offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested by the ITO and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. Any offeror who submits an incomplete package may be considered ineligible for award. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and appendices. Non-conformance with the instructions provided in the ITO may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation. 2. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal. 3. Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired. 4. The proposal acceptance period is a minimum of 90 calendar days from date of submission. The offeror shall make a clear statement in the proposal documentation volume that the proposal is valid until this date. 5. In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals. D. PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS 1. Proposals must be completed and submitted prior to 1200 (12:00 PM) MST, Monday, 29 April 2016. Late proposals will only be considered IAW FAR 52.212-1(f). The "original" proposal shall be clearly identified and shall be addressed to the Contract Specialist (CS). 2. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. The proposal shall consist of three (3) separate volumes; Volume 1 - Cost/Price Proposal, Volume 2 - Technical Proposal, Volume 3 - Past Performance. 3. The CO has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the CO will review this determination and if, in the CO's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional data will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the CO determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit cost data to the extent necessary for the CO to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price. 4. Discrepancies If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the CO in writing with supporting rationale. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions. 5. Amendments to Solicitation If this RFP is amended, all terms and conditions that are not amended remain unchanged, in full force and effect. Offerors shall acknowledge receipt of any amendment and provide confirmation upon submission of the offeror's proposal. Any unacknowledged amendments in the offeror's proposal will be considered as non-acceptance by the offeror and may negatively affect their evaluation. 6. Submission, Modification, Revision, and Withdrawal of Proposals Proposals and modifications to proposals shall be submitted to the Contract Specialist via email at the address shown in Section (viii) of the RFP. Proposals shall be delivered no later than the time and date specified for receipt, and shall clearly be marked with the solicitation number, name, address, and telephone number of the offeror. 7. Page Limitations Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal. Each page shall be counted except the following: blank pages, title pages, tables of contents, tabs, and glossaries and those parts of the Proposal noted as unlimited. 8. Page Size and Format A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Page size shall be 8.5 x 11 inches, not including foldouts. Pages shall be single-spaced. Except for the reproduced sections of the solicitation document, the text size shall be no less than 12 points Times New Roman Font. Tracking, kerning, and leading values shall not be changed from the default values of the word processing or page layout software. Use at least 1 inch margins on the top and bottom and 3/4 inch side margins. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume. Legible tables, charts, graphs and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. These displays shall be uncomplicated and shall not exceed 11 x 17 inches in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume, and count as a single page. Foldout pages may only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams and schematics; not for pages of text. For tables, charts, graphs and figures, the text shall be no smaller than 10 point. 9. Pagination: Every page of the Proposal Volume shall be numbered. 10. Electronic Copies Indicate on each document the volume number and title. Use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions, including subfactor required plans, exhibits, appendices and attachments, if any. The electronic copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by 2010 version of Microsoft (MS) Word®, MS Excel®, and MS-Power Point®, or Microsoft Office XP®, as applicable. Scanned pdf files will not be accepted. 11. Cost or Pricing Information All cost or pricing information shall be addressed ONLY in the Cost/Price Proposal delivered separately from all other volumes to the attention of the CS. 12. Cross Referencing To the greatest extent possible, each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated with a minimum of cross-referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Information required for proposal evaluation that is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted. 13. Indexing Each volume shall contain a more detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections. 14. Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each. Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes. E. OFFERS 1. The offer/proposal and other information submitted in response to this RFP shall be submitted in electronic copy format. The proposal shall consist of the following volumes: Volume 1 - Cost/Price Volume 2 - Technical Volume 3 - Past Performance Separate documents are required for each volume. Offerors are advised to submit sufficient information to enable evaluators to fully ascertain the offeror's capability to perform the requirements contemplated by the solicitation. The data submitted with each proposal shall be complete and concise but not elaborate. 2. VOLUME 1- COST/PRICE PROPOSAL (Electronic Copy: 1 via Email. Page Limitation: Unlimited) PRICE PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS (PPI) a. In the price volume, the Offeror shall provide the following information in addition to the pricing in Section (v) of the solicitation. These instructions are to assist you in submitting information required to evaluate the reasonableness of your proposed cost/price. Compliance with these instructions is mandatory and failure to comply may result in rejection of your proposal. b. General Instructions Information beyond that required by this instruction shall not be submitted. Pricing shall be provided on the contract line item structure in Section (v) of this combination synopsis/soliciation. If further cost or ricing data is required by the CO, it will be requested as stated in paragraph 3 below. c. Total Evaluated Price (TEP): Prices shall be proposed and a Total Evaluated Price (TEP) will be calculated for evaluation purposes only. The TEP will be calculated based on the total price proposed for the basic requirements (basic award) and all options. Offerors shall propose on Unit Prices, Extended Prices, Yearly Totals and Total Evaluated Price. (1) Unit Prices: CLIN 0001 - Orientation Period: Offeror shall propose a one-time monthly rate for the 30 day transition period. CLINs 0002, 1002 and 2002 - TA Services: Offeror shall propose a Firm Fixed Price monthly rate to perform the services required by the PWS during normal hours of operation IAW the PWS. The first period of the basic TA services after the orientation period will be for an 11 month period. CLIN 0003,1003 and 2003 - Overtime: Offeror shall propose a fully loaded hourly labor rate for serices to be performed outside of the normal hours of operation IAW the PWS. CLIN 0004, 1004 and 2004 - Training and Travel: Offeror shall enter $5,600.00 as their unit price for all "Training &Travel." This Line Item will be direct reimburseable based on actual costs, with no fee IAW FAR 31.205-46. CLIN 0005, 1005 and 2005 - Data Items: Shall be not separately priced. (2) Extended Prices: The extended price for each Line Item will be calculated by multiplying each Unit Price by its corresponding evaluation Quantity as identified in the CLIN Schedule. (3) Yearly Prices: Yearly Prices are calculated by adding all Extended Prices for the year. (4) Total Evaluated Price Calculation: The TEP shall be calculated as the sum of the offeror's proposed prices for each year. (5) FAR clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services will apply to this effort and will be evaluated at time of award as part of the TEP. All prices that comprise the TEP are contractually binding, and must be populated. Offerors are reminded that the evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the options. Note: Work Load Estimates can be found under Appendix C of the PWS. Typical/recommended Labor Categories include but are not limited to Contract Site Manager (Supervisor), Aircraft Servicers, and/or Dispatcher. d. Price Reasonableness, Balance, and Price Realism Offeror's proposal will be evaluated for reasonableness, balance, and realism. Offers should be sufficiently detailed to demonstrate their reasonableness The burden of proof for credibility of proposed prices rests with the offeror. Unbalanced pricing may pose an unacceptable risk to the Government and may be a reason to reject an offeror's proposal. Additionally, proposed pricing must demonstrate an adequate understanding of the requirement, including program complexity. e. Cost or Pricing Information in Other Volumes All pricing information shall only be addressed in the Price Proposal Volume. If cost/price information of this nature is provided in the other volumes, provide this information in the Price Proposal Volume under a separate section so identified. f. Rounding All dollar amounts shall be rounded to the nearest penny. g. Volume Organization The price volume shall be organized in sections. The price instructions for the "sections" will be explained below: h. Table of Contents The price volume shall be prefaced by a Table of Contents and shall specify, by page number, the location of information requested in these instructions. i. Pricing Assumptions Summarize all significant pricing assumptions, scope limitations and/or qualifications of the cost proposal. The offeror shall state the period for which the proposed price is valid, 90 day is requested, reference section B.4 above. j. General Estimating Methodology The offeror will provide a brief summary description of their pricing methodology as it pertains to this acquisition. k. Total Evaluated Price (TEP) The TEP is for award determination purposes only and will be a consideration in the best value award decision. This is pending that all the proposed unit prices are considered balanced, reasonable and realistic. The Total Evaluated Price (TEP) for this acquisition will be established by adding together the total prices for each year. l. SCA/CBA It is the responsibility of the Offeror and the subsequent contract awardee to comply with the Service Contract Labor Standards FAR clause 52.222-41 (previously known as the Service Contract Act) or Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). An attachment of the Department of Labor current wage determination will be attached with this solicitation. 3. VOLUME 2: FACTOR 2 - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (Electronic Copies: 2 (*1 original, 1 redacted) via email, Page Limitation: Not to exceed 60) *NOTE: Redacted Technical Proposals shall be submitted in the same manner as the original copies. Information to be redacted shall include all references to the offerors and teaming partners or subcontractors company, i.e. company names/ key personnel names and any company references, logos, etc. No pricing information shall be included in the technical volume. a. The Technical Volume should be specific and complete. Legibility, clarity and coherence are very important. The offeror's proposal will be evaluated against the Technical subfactors defined in FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Items of this solicitation. Using the instructions provided below, the offeror will provide as specifically as possible the actual methodology that you would use for accomplishing/satisfying these subfactors. All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory. By your proposal submission, you are representing that your firm will perform all the requirements specified in the soliciation and agrees to the requirements of the PWS. It is neither necessary nor desirable for the offeror to affirm this in their proposal. Do not merely reiterate the objectives or reformulate the requirements specified in the solicitation. Additionally, it is neither necessary nor desirable to provide resumes for individual personnel as part of the proposal. b. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions. In the event the Government awards without discussions, failure to meet any one of the subfactors or elements within the subfactors shall result in a failure of the technical evaluation. If the government enters into discussions, failure to meet any one of the subfactors or elements within the subfactors may result in a failure of the technical evaluation. c. Format and Specific Content In the Technical Volume, address your proposed approach to meeting the minimum performance or capability requirements of each technical subfactor. d. Volume Organization The Technical Volume shall be organized according to the following general outline: (1) Table of Contents (2) List of Tables and Drawings (3) Glossary (4) Subfactor One - Manpower & Staffing Plan (5) Subfactor Two - Employee Hiring, Training & Certification Plan (6) Subfactor Three - FOD/DOP and Safety Program Plan e. Technical Subfactor 1: Manpower & Staffing Plan, meeting requirements in PWS Section 3.1 Manpower Availability, Section 15 Hours of Operation, Section 16.1 Employee Clearance Requirements, and Section 18 Personnel specifically addressing Section 18.2 and 18.5. Description: This subfactor evaluates the offeror's proposed capability in providing manpower and staffing plan to enable effective execution of the PWS requirements. The plan shall contain the following information: (1) Projected manhours required per week to cover normal hours of operation. (2) A description of proposed labor categories, experience, and technical certifications clearly identifying the number and use of full and/or part time laborers. (3) An approach that demonstrates the ability to provide manpower coverage that will deliver a consistently flexible capability to support two to four simultaneous aircraft servicing operations during weekdays, weekends, and during 24/7 surged operations periods. (4) An approach for ensuring personnel will be able to obtain and retain appropriate drivers licenses to operate a motor vehicle on the flight line. (5) An approach for obtaining secret security clearances. f. Technical Subfactor 2: Employee Hiring, Training & Certification Plan, meeting requirements in PWS Sections 18.2 Servicer Qualifications and 18.3 Personnel Records (employee technical skill & experience validation), Section 19 Contractor Provided Training, and Section 20. Government Furnished Training. Description: This subfactor evaluates the offeror's proposed approach to deliver an employee hiring, skill validation, and training strategy that delivers a Transient Alert team that is professional and competent across a variety of military aircraft types and aircraft servicing needs as specified in the PWS. The plan shall contain the following information: (1) An approach to recruitment of employees with the required technical skills. (2) A description of how technical skills will be validated. (3) An approach to how on-the-job and follow-on training will be implemented that will not disrupt day-to-day operations. (4) A description of how training, qualification, and certification records will be documented and maintained. g. Technical Subfactor 3: FOD/DOP and Safety Program Plan, meeting PWS Section 3.7 Foreign Object Damage (FOD) and Dropped Object Prevention (DOP) Programs, and Section 3.10. Safety Program Description: This subfactor evaluates the offeror's proposed approach in establishing and operating effective FOD/DOP and Safety Programs. The plan shall contain the following information: (1) A description of employee roles. (2) A description of company policies. (3) A description of project management processes and how they align to ensure effective safety and FOD/DOP prevention protocols that will support and sustain the aircraft servicing operations and hours of operation requirements without causing service degradation or loss of capability. 4. VOLUME 3: FACTOR 3 - PAST PERFORMANCE (Electronic Copy: 1 via email. Page Limitation: Not to exceed 3) a. General: Each offeror shall submit a past performance volume with its proposal, containing past performance information in accordance with the format contained in the attachment provided on FedBizOpps. This information is required on the offeror and all subcontractors, teaming partners, and/or joint venture partners proposed to perform the work outlined in the solicitation. Offerors are cautioned that the Government will use data provided by each offeror in this volume and data obtained from other sources in the evaluation of past performance. Along with the information required in this paragraph, the offeror shall submit a consent letter (attachment 1) executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing release of adverse past performance information to the offeror so the offeror can respond to such information. For each identified effort for a commercial customer, the offeror shall also submit a client authorization letter (attachment 2), authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the offeror's performance. Along with the information required in this paragraph, the offeror shall submit a consent letter (attached) executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing release of adverse past performance information to the offeror so the offeror can respond to such information. For each identified effort for a commercial customer, the offeror shall also submit a client authorization letter authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the offeror's performance. b. Past performance information shall be limited to the following: (1) Three Government contract numbers (for each contractor for which past performance is being submitted) meeting the definition of "recent" and "relevant" as defined under Factor 3: Past Performance in FAR clause 52.212-2. (2) A short description of the effort and the contractor's role in that effort. (3) A Government point of contact, i.e. the CO, Contract Specialist, COR or PM. c. Early Past Performance Information Each offeror is requested to submit the information shown above for each relevant contract no less than 7 days (earlier submittals are acceptable) prior to the date set for receipt of proposals. Failure to submit early proposal information will not result in offeror disqualification. 5. EXCEPTIONS TO SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. Each exception shall be specifically related to each paragraph and/or specific part of the solicitation to which the exception is taken. Provide rationale in support of the exception and fully explain its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, cost, and specific requirements of the solicitation. Contractor's format is acceptable but must clearly identify what area the exception relates to. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being removed from consideration for award. 6. OTHER INFORMATION REQUIRED a. Authorized Offeror Personnel Offerors shall provide the name, title and telephone number(s) of the company/division point(s) of contact regarding decisions made with respect to the proposal and who can obligate the company contractually. Also, offerorsshall identify those individual(s) authorized to negotiate with the Government for this solicitation. b. Company/Division Address, Identifying Codes, and Applicable Designations Offerors shall provide company/division's street address, county and facility code; CAGE Code; DUNS Number; and size of business (large, small, 8(a), etc.). c. Teaming Arrangement(s) and/or Letter(s) of Intent Offeror shall clearly identify and include as an attachment the written contract/teaming arrangement agreements and letters of intent with those subcontractors will perform more than 25% of the services. All written contract teaming arrangements and letters of intent shall be signed by all parties, reference FAR 9.601(2), and shall include the offeror's teaming partner/subcontractors company/division's street address, county and facility code; CAGE Code; DUNS Number; and size of business (large, small, 8(a), etc.). 7. ALTERNATE PROPOSALS Alternate proposals will NOT be accepted. FAR 52.212-2: Evaluation -- Commercial Items (a) The Government will award one contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers: Factor One: Cost/Price (Volume I) Factor Two: Technical Capability (Volume II) Subfactor 1: Manpower and Staffing Plan Subfactor 2: Employee Hiring, Training and Certification Plan Subfactor 3: FOD/DOP and Safety Program Plan Factor Three - Past Performance (Volume III) Note: Technical and Past Performance, when combined, are significantly more important than Price. (b) Options. The government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options will not obligate the government to exercise the option(s). (c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, will result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award. ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2, EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS A. Basis for Contract Award 1. This acquisition will be a best value utilizing the Performance Price Tradeoff (PPT) process. Evaluation will be in accordance with FAR 12.6 and as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS), and Air Force Mandatory Procedures. 2. By submission of its offer in accordance with the instructions provided in clause FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors, the offeror agrees to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. All technically acceptable offers will be considered equal. The tradeoff will occur only between the past performance factor and the price factor as stated below in the evaluation process: B. Evaluation Process 1. All offers will be evaluated for technical acceptability. After being determined to be technically acceptable, offers will be ranked by price and will receive a performance confidence assessment rating based on past performance information, in accordance Factor 3 of this addendum. If the lowest priced evaluated offeror is evaluated to have "Substantial Confidence" performance rating and the offerors are determined to be responsible, the said offeror will represent the best value for the government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any of the other offerors. 2. If the lowest priced offeror for is not evaluated to have a "Substantial Confidence" performance assessment rating, the next lowest priced offer will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an offeror is found to have "Substantial Confidence" performance assessment or until all offerors are evaluated. The Source Selection Authority shall then make an integrated assessment best value award decision. 3. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in the Instruction to Offerors, provided in clause 52.212-1, to permit a meaningful assessment of past performance. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision. 4. If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision. If the offeror's proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or exceptions in the Final Proposal Revision are subject to evaluation and may introduce risk that the offeror's proposal be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award. C. Evaluation Factors Evaluation Factors and Subfactors The following evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to evaluate each proposal. Award will be made to the offeror proposing the combination most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors and subfactors described below: Factor 1: Cost/Price Factor 2: Technical Capability Subfactor 1: Manpower and Staffing Plan Subfactor 2: Employee Hiring, Training and Certification Plan Subfactor 3: FOD/DOP and Safety Program Plan Factor 3 - Past Performance The relative importance of each factor and subfactors is as follows: As listed, Factor 2 (Technical) and Factor 3 (Past Performance) are equal in importance, and when combined are significantly more important than Factor 1 (Price). Within the Technical Factor, the subfactors are not in any order of importance; they are equally important. All evaluation factors other than price, when combined, are significantly more important than price. 1. FACTOR 1- COST/PRICE (a) The Government will review the offerors cost/price proposal for completeness, balance, and reasonableness. (b) Completeness: The Government will review the offerors price proposal for completeness. For pricing to be considered complete, the offeror must have submitted a price for each CLIN in Section (v) and have provided a fully loaded labor rate for overtime hours. The extended price, yearly totals and Total Evaluated Price must be calculated. Unit prices shall not be extended beyond two decimal places. Failure to provide complete pricing may result in a proposal being determined "non-responsive" and therefore unawardable. (c) Price Reasonableness The Government will review the prices submitted in Section (v) Contract Line Item worksheet and the resultant TEP for Price Reasonableness. Pricing may be considered "unreasonable" if any specific unit price or if the TEP is significantly above the Government estimate or the median price of all Offerors for that specific element. Failure to provide reasonable prices may result in a proposal being rated unawardable. When adequate price competition exists, generally no additional information is necessary to determine the reasonableness of price. However, if adequate price competition does not exist the Government may require submission of information other than cost or pricing data to the extent necessary to evaluate price criteria for reasonableness IAW FAR 15.403-1(b). (d) Unbalanced CLIN Prices Price analysis and evaluation of the information in the Price Volume will be used to determine if the prices for the proposed line items are balanced or unbalanced. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total solicitation effort price, the price of one or more contract line items or sub line items appears to be significantly over or under-stated. Unbalanced pricing may result in an offer being rejected if the Government determines that it presents an unacceptable risk to the Government. (e) Price Realism Unrealistic prices may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from the competition based on an apparent lack of adequate understanding of the requirement or failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program. Offerors are cautioned to not use underbidding as a pricing strategy with the intention of recovering under-bid costs after contract award via Requests for Equitable Adjustments (REAs) or other devices. (f) Total Evaluated Price (TEP) The offeror's Price will be evaluated for award purposes based upon the total evaluated price proposed for basic year and all options. The TEP will be calculated as the sum of all CLINs as defined in Section (v) Contract Line Items above. The overtime labor rate shall be evaluated for balance, reasonableness and realism by comparing against commercial market rates and or wage determination rates. The TEP will be provided to the Source Selection Authority (SSA) for consideration in the best value decision. Offerors whose price is determined to be unreasonable, unbalanced, or unaffordable may not be considered for award. (g) FAR Clause 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services which allows the Government to extend services for up to six months at any time during contract performance and will be priced at the current rate if exercised, is included in this requirements and will be evaluated as follows. The evaluation is FOR EVAUATION PURPOSES ONLY and will not be included in the total amount of the potential contract award. The contractor shall not propose a price for the six month option; however, the option price will be evaluated by calculating six months at the monthly rate proposed for CLIN 2004. This amount will be calculated by the Government Pricing Team and will be included as part of the TEP. Evaluation of the six month extension option shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option. 2. FACTOR 2 - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (a) The offerors technical proposal will be evaluated for acceptability in accordance with the criteria set forth in this section. The offeror's Technical Proposal must convey to the Government that the offeror is capable, possesses adequate technical expertise and experience, possesses sufficient resources, and is able to plan, organize, and use those resources in a coordinated and timely fashion to meet the needs of the Government. The Government will evaluate the offeror's Technical Proposal to ensure that the offeror can sufficiently perform the requirements within the PWS adequately with emphasis on the elements of the technical subfactors listed below. The Technical Proposal shall clearly demonstrate how the contractor will accomplish/satisfy the requirements. The Technical Proposal shall NOT simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet the requirements in the PWS. If an offeror simply rephrases/restates the PWS, their Technical Proposal will be deemed unacceptable. The Technical Proposal will be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis and assigned one of the following ratings shown in Table 1 below: NOTE: If an offeror is found technically "unacceptable" whether initially or through discussions if conducted, the offeror will not be eligible for award and no further evaluations for price or past performance will be conducted. (b) Technical Subfactor 1: Manpower & Staffing Plan, meeting the requirements in PWS Section 3.1 Manpower Availability, Section 15 Hours of Operation, Section 16.1 Employee Clearance Requirements, and Section 18 Personnel specifically addressing Section 18.2 and 18.5. Description: This subfactor evaluates the offeror's proposed capability in providing manpower and staffing plan to enable effective execution of the PWS requirements. The plan shall contain the following information: (i) Projected manhours required per week to cover normal hours of operation. (ii) A description of proposed labor categories, experience, and technical certifications clearly identifying the number and use of full and/or part time laborers. (iii) An approach that demonstrates the ability to provide manpower coverage that will deliver a consistently flexible capability to support two to four simultaneous aircraft servicing operations during weekdays, weekends, and during 24/7 surged operations periods. (iv) An approach for ensuring personnel will be able to obtain and retain appropriate drivers licenses to operate a motor vehicle on the flight line. (v) An approach for obtaining secret security clearances. Subfactor 1 is met when a descriptive manning and staffing strategy is provided that clearly demonstrates; a comprehensive approach to the requested information in "a" through "e" above, the offeror's ability to meet the manning requirements stated in the PWS, and that their strategy will provide adequate service coverage for the workload estimates contained in Appendix C of the PWS. (c) Technical Subfactor 2: Employee Hiring, Training & Certification Plan, meeting requirements in PWS Sections 18.2 Servicer Qualifications and 18.3 Personnel Records (employee technical skill & experience validation), Section 19 Contractor Provided Training, and Section 20. Government Furnished Training. Description: This subfactor evaluates the offeror's proposed approach to deliver an employee hiring, skill validation, and training strategy that delivers a Transient Alert team that is professional and competent across a variety of military aircraft types and aircraft servicing needs as specified in the PWS. The plan shall contain the following information: (i) An approach for the recruitment of employees with the required technical skills and certifications. (ii) A description of how technical skills will be validated. (iii) An approach to how on-the-job and follow-on training will be implemented that will not disrupt day-to-day operations. (iv) A description of how training, qualification, and certification records will be documented and maintained. Subfactor 2 is met when the offeror provides a plan that adequately explains the requested information in "a" through "d" above and clearly demonstrates the following: the ability to hire and retain qualified personnel, and the ability to provide a robust training program to ensure properly skilled and certified personnel. (d) Technical Subfactor 3: FOD/DOP and Safety Program Plan, meeting PWS Section 3.7 Foreign Object Damage (FOD) and Dropped Object Prevention (DOP) Programs, and Section 3.10. Safety Program Description: This subfactor evaluates the offeror's proposed overall approach in establishing and operating effective FOD/DOP and Safety Programs. The plan shall contain the following information: (i) A description of employee roles. (ii) A description of company policies. (iii) A description of project management processes and how they align to ensure effective safety and FOD/DOP prevention protocols that will support and sustain the aircraft servicing operations and hours of operation requirements of the PWS without causing service degradation or loss of capability. Subfactor 3 is met when the offeror delivers a descriptive narrative that explains the requested information in "a" through "c" above. This subfactor should not be confused with the required Data Items for FOD Plan (CDRL D001) and Safety Plan (CDRL C001) under CLIN 0005, This subfactor will be to evaluate the offerors overall approach to these programs. The detailed individual plans will be required by the awardee after contract award IAW the respective CDRLs. NOTE: All subfactors must clearly demonstrate the ability to support two to four simultaneous aircraft servicing operations if necessary during weekdays, weekends, and during 24/7 surged operations periods. Reference the PWS Appendix for workload estimates to aid in developing your proposal. 3. Factor 3: Past Performance The Past Performance evaluation results in an assessment of the offeror's probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. A past performance evaluation will be performed on the lowest priced offer found to be technically acceptable. Offerors will receive a Performance Confidence Assessment rating and a Relevancy Assessment rating; see tables 2 and 3 respectively. If the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer is not found to have "substantial Confidence" performance assessment rating the government will evaluate the next lowest offer, this process will continue (in order by price) until an offer is found to have "Substantial Confindence" performance assessment rating or until all offerors are evaluated. (a) Ratings The Past Performance factor will receive one of the performance confidence assessments ratings described below. TABLE 2- PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS Rating Description SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. LIMITED CONFIDENCE Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. NO CONFIDENCE Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE (NEUTRAL) No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. (b) Past Performance Evaluation Process The past performance evaluation considers each offeror's demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in providing services that meet the contract's requirements. Performance confidence is assessed at the overall Past Performance factor level after evaluating aspects of the offeror's recent past performance, focusing on performance that is relevant to the Technical subfactors and Price factor taking into consideration their relative order of importance stated in 52.212-2(a). The Government may consider past performance in the aggregate in addition to on an individual contract basis. In conducting the Past Performance evaluation, the Government reserves the right to use both the information provided in the offeror's Past Performance proposal volume and information obtained from other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Contractor Performance Assessment Retrieval System (CPARS), past performance questionnaires, government customer interviews, applicable commercial clients and any other source deemed necessary to obtain additional information that will be used in the evaluation of the offeror's past performance. (c) Recency Assessment An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be either ongoing or must have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation for a minimum of six (6) months. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated. (d) Relevancy Assessment An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is relevant. Relevancy in regards to scope is based on the similarities between a given past performance effort and the requirements of this effort, which is defined by the PWS. Relevancy in regards to magnitude is based on the similarities between a given past performance effort and this TA requirement in terms of overall contract value with a minimum value of $150K annually. Past performance references in excess of the given limit will not be evaluated. A relevancy determination of the offeror's past performance will be made based upon the aforementioned considerations, including joint venture partner(s) and major and critical subcontractor(s) performing more than 25% of the services. In determining the relevancy of effort performed under individual past performance contracts, the government will only consider the specific effort or portion consistent with that proposed by the prime, subcontractor or teaming partner. The past performance information obtained from other sources will be used to establish the relevancy of past performance. The Government will use the following relevancy definitions when assessing recent, relevant contracts: Table 3 - Rating Definition VERY RELEVANT Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. RELEVANT Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. SOMEWHAT RELEVANT Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. NOT RELEVANT Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. (e) Performance Quality Assessment The Government will consider the performance quality of recent, relevant efforts (how well the contractor performed on the contracts). For each recent past performance citation reviewed, the performance quality of the work performed will be assessed for the technical subfactors and price factor, however all aspects of performance that relate to this acquisition may be considered. The quality assessment consists of an in-depth evaluation of all past performance information available, regardless of its source. The Government will use the following quality levels when assessing recent, relevant efforts: Table 4 - Quality Assessment Rating/Color Description EXCEPTIONAL (E)/BLUE During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action. VERY GOOD (VG)/PURPLE During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action. SATISFACTORY (S)/GREEN During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action. MARGINAL (M)/YELLOW During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required. UNSATISFACTORY(U)/RED During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or fail) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required. NOT APPLICABLE (N)/WHITE Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know. As a result of the relevancy and quality assessments of the recent contracts evaluated, offerors will receive an integrated Performance Confidence Assessment rating; see Table 2 above. Although the past performance evaluation focuses on performance that is relevant to the technical subfactors and price factor, the resulting Performance Confidence Assessment rating is made at the factor level and represents an overall evaluation of contractor performance. Offerors without a record of recent/relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and, as a result, will receive an "Unknown Confidence" rating for the Past Performance factor. More recent performance will have a greater impact on the Performance Confidence Assessment than less recent or relevant effort. A strong record of relevant past performance may be considered more advantageous to the Government than an "Unknown Confidence" rating. Likewise, a more relevant past performance record may receive a higher confidence rating and be considered more favorably than a less relevant record of favorable performance. (x) Offerors shall include a completed copy of the provision at 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications -- Commercial Items, with its offer. (xi) The clause at 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions -- Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition and a statement regarding any addenda to the clause. (xii) FAR 52.212-5 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT STATUTES OR EXECUTIVE ORDERS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (DEVIATION 2013-O0019) (Jan 2014) (xiii) OTHER FAR CLAUSES AND PROVISIONS 52.203-6 Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government (SEP 2006), with Alternate I (OCT 1995) (41 U.S.C. 4704 and 10 U.S.C. 2402) 52.204-7 System for Award Management 52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel (JAN 2011) 52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards (JUL 2013) (Pub. L. 109-282) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note) 52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance (Jul 2013) 52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment. (AUG, 2013) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note). 52.209-7 Information Regarding Responsibility Matters (JUL 2013) 52.209-9 Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters (JUL 2013) (41 U.S.C. 2313) 52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations (MAY 2012) (section 738 of Division C of Pub. L. 112-74, section 740 of Division C of Pub. L. 111-117, section 743 of Division D of Pub. L. 111-8, and section 745 of Division D of Pub. L. 110-161) 52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications--Commercial Items (NOV 2015) 52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications--Commercial Items--Alternate I (OCT 2014) 52.217-3 Evaluation Exclusive of Options (APR 1984) 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services (NOV 1999) 52.217-9 Option to Extend the Term of the Contract (MAR 2000) 52.219-6 Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C. 644). 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns (MAY 2014) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(2) and (3). 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C. 637(a)(14)). 52.219-28 Post-Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation (JUL 2013) 52.222-3 Convict Labor (IAW FAR 22.202)(JUN 2003) 52.222-17 Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers (May 2014) 52.222-21 Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (IAW FAR 22.810(a)(1))(FEB 1999) 52.222-26 Equal Opportunity (IAW FAR 22.810(e)) (MAR 2007) 52.222-35 Equal Opportunity for Veterans (Jul 2014)(38 U.S.C. 4212). 52.222-36 Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities (July 2014) (29 U.S.C. 793). 52.222-37 Employment Reports on Veterans (July 2014) (38 U.S.C. 4212). 52.222-40 Notification of employees rights under the national labor relations act (DEC 2010) 52.222-41 Service Contract Labor Standards (MAY 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 67). 52.222-42 Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires (MAY 2014) 52.222-43 Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Labor Standards--Price Adjustment (Multiple Year and Option Contracts (MAY 2014) 52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons (FEB 2009) (22 U.S.C. 7104(g)). 52.222-55 Minimum Wages Under Executive Order 13658 (DEC 2015). 52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving (AUG 2011) (E.O.13513). 52.224-1 Privacy Act Notification (APR 1984) 52.224-2 Privacy Act (APR 1984) 52.225-1 Buy American--Supplies (May 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 83) 52.225-13 Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases (June 2008) (E.O.'s, proclamations, and statutes administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury). 52.228-5 Insurance--Work on a Government Installation (JAN 1997). 52.228-16 Performance and Payment Bonds--Other Than Construction (NOV 2006). 52.229-4 Federal, State, and Local Taxes (State and Local Adjustments) (FEB 2013). 52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--System for Award Management (July 2013) (31 U.S.C. 3332). 52.233-3 Protest After Award (AUG 1996) 52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim (OCT 2004) (Pub. L. 108-77, 108-78). 52.237-2 Protection of Government Buildings, Equipment, and Vegetation (APR 1984). 52.245-1 Government Property (APR 2012). 52.245-9 Use and Charges (APR 2012). 52.251-1 Government Supply Sources (APR 2012). 52.252-2 Clauses incorporated by reference 52.252-6 Authorized Deviations in clauses (APR 1984). 252.204-7004 Alternate A, System for Award Management 252.204-7006 Billing Instructions (OCT 2005) 252.204-7011 Alternative Line-Item Structure (SEP 2011) 252.205-7000 Provision of Information to Cooperative Agreement Holders (DEC 1991) 252.211-7007 Reporting of Government-Furnished Property (AUG 2012) 252.217-7028 Over and Above Work (DEC 1991) 252.222-7007 Representation Regarding Combating Trafficking in Persons (JAN 2015). 252.223-7001 Hazard Warning Labels (DEC 1991) 252.223-7006 Prohibition on Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of Toxic or Hazardous Materials--Basic (SEP 2014) 252.226-7001 Utilization of Indian Organizations, Indian-Owned Economic Enterprises, and Native Hawaiian Small Business Concerns (SEP 2004) 252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment request and Receiving reports 252.232-7006 Wide Area WorkFlow Payment instructions 252.232-7007 Limitation of Government's Obligation (APR 2014). 252.237-7010 Prohibition on Interrogation of Detainees by Contractor Personnel (JUL 2013). 252.245-7001 Tagging, Labeling, and Marking of Government-Furnished Property (APR 2012). 252.245-7002 Reporting Loss of Government Property (APR 2012). 252.245-7003 Contractor Property Management System Administration (APR 2012). 252.245-7004 Reporting, Reutilization, and Disposal (MAR 2015). 252.251-7000 Ordering from Government Supply Sources (AUG 2012). 5352.201-9101 Ombudsman (a) An ombudsman has been appointed to hear and facilitate the resolution of concerns from offerors, potential offerors, and others for this acquisition. When requested, the ombudsman will maintain strict confidentiality as to the source of the concern. The existence of the ombudsman does not affect the authority of the program manager, contracting officer, or source selection official. Further, the ombudsman does not participate in the evaluation of proposals, the source selection process, or the adjudication of protests or formal contract disputes. The ombudsman may refer the interested party to another official who can resolve the concern. (b) Before consulting with an ombudsman, interested parties must first address their concerns, issues, disagreements, and/or recommendations to the contracting officer for resolution. Consulting an ombudsman does not alter or postpone the timelines for any other processes (e.g., agency level bid protests, GAO bid protests, requests for debriefings, employee-employer actions, contests of OMBC A-76 competition performance decisions). (c) If resolution cannot be made by the contracting officer, the interested party may contact the Center ombudsmen, Mr Kevin Flinders AFMC OL_H/PZC 801-777-6549, kevin.flinders@us.af.mil. Concerns, issues, disagreements, and recommendations that cannot be resolved at the Center/MAJCOM/DRU or AFISRA level, may be brought by the interested party for further consideration to the Air Force ombudsman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary (ADAS) (Contracting), SAF/AQC, 1060 Air Force Pentagon, Washington DC 20330-1060, phone number (571) 256-2397, facsimile number (571) 256-2431. (d) The ombudsman has no authority to render a decision that binds the agency. (e) Do not contact the ombudsman to request copies of the solicitation, verify offer due date, or clarify technical requirements. Such inquiries shall be directed to the Contracting Officer (End of clause) 5352.223-9000 Elimination of Use of Class I Ozone Depleting Substances (OSDs) (NOV 2012) 5352.223-9001 Health and Safety on Government Installations (NOV 2012). 5352.242-9000 Contractor Access to Air Force Installations (NOV 2012). (xiv) Additional Contract Requirement or Terms and Conditions: N/A (xv) Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS): N/A (xvi) For additional information regarding the solicitation contact SSgt Kirk Herman at 801-586-8594. (xvii) Attachments: 1. Performance Work Specification (PWS) dated 17 Mar 2016 2. DD 1423s A001-F001 3. DD 254 4. DD 254 FOUO Addendum 5. DD 254 OPSEC Addendum 6. Wage Determination No.: 2005-2531, Rev 17
 

Web Link

FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USAF/AFMC/OOALC/FA8201-16-R-HillTA/listing.html)
 

Place of Performance

Address: 6038 Aspen Ave, Bldg 1289 NE, Hill AFB, Utah, 84056, United States

Zip Code: 84056
 

Record

SN04063796-W 20160330/160328233848-2dccbf98075b491110c03291a614a03b (fbodaily.com)
 

Source

FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

---

| FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |