AWARD
47 -- Restrictor, Fluid Flow - Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition
- Notice Date
- 8/2/2016
- Notice Type
- Award Notice
- NAICS
- 336413
— Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
- Contracting Office
- Defense Logistics Agency, DLA Acquisition Locations, DLA Land and Maritime, P O Box 3990, Columbus, Ohio, 43218-3990, United States
- ZIP Code
- 43218-3990
- Solicitation Number
- SPE7M316R0011
- Archive Date
- 8/13/2016
- Point of Contact
- mandy l. phipps-kuhlman, Phone: 6146928675
- E-Mail Address
-
mandy.phipps-kuhlman@dla.mil
(mandy.phipps-kuhlman@dla.mil)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- N/A
- Award Number
- SPE7M316C0006
- Award Date
- 7/29/2016
- Awardee
- DreamFind, Inc.
- Award Amount
- $710,400.00
- Description
- Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition RESTRICTOR, FLUID FLOW. E/I F-16 AIRCRAFT. SAMPLING: IF THE APPLICABLE (OEM OR MILITARY) DRAWING, SPECIFICATION, STANDARD, OR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISION (QAP) SPECIFIES AN ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL), IT MAY BE USED TO ESTABLISH THE AUTHORIZED SAMPLE SIZE. HOWEVER THE SAMPLING ACCEPTANCE NUMBER SHALL BE REDUCED TO ZERO (0). EVEN THOUGH THE ACCEPTANCE LEVEL IS ELIMINATED, THE SAMPLE SIZE REMAINS THE SAME. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE OEM OR MILITARY DRAWING, SPECIFICATION, STANDARD, OR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS (QAPs) CHARACTERISTICS CLASSIFIED AS CRITICAL, MAJOR AND MINOR SHALL HAVE AN ASSIGNED AQL OF 0.10, 1.0, AND 4.0 RESPECTIVELY. ASQ H1331 TABLE 1 OR MIL-STD-1916 SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER MIL-STD-105 AND ASQ Z1.4. THESE PLANS ACCEPT ON ZERO DEFECTS AND REJECT THE ENTIRE LOT ON ONE DEFECT. A ZERO BASED SAMPLING PLAN SHALL BE USED, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY CONTRACT. Configuration Change Management - Engineering Change Proposal, Requests for Variance (Deviation or Waiver) February 2015 1. Requirements A. The Configuration Change Management section of SAE EIA-649-1 Configuration Management Requirement for Defense Contracts, Paragraph 3.3, shall be used for Configuration Control of material purchased under this contract. B. Furnished item(s) shall conform to the approved configuration requirements/revision specified, unless a Pre-Production Request for Variance (deviation) or a Post-Production Request for Variance (waiver), is processed and approved as provided by Paragraph 3. in this Standard Text Object (STO). Hereafter, the term #Request for Variance (RFV)# will also include Requests for Deviations and Waivers. 2. The definitions from EIA-649-1 apply to items being procured under this solicitation/contract, with the following clarification of Deviation & Waiver: A. Pre-Production RFV (previously known as deviation) requests permission to produce a product that does not conform to contract requirements/documentation for a limited amount of time and for specified effectivity. (A deviation differs from an engineering change in that an approved engineering change requires corresponding revision of the item's current approved configuration documentation, whereas a deviation does not.). B. Post-Production RFV (previously known as waiver) requests approval of product found during manufacture, or after having been submitted for Government inspection or acceptance, that departs from specified requirements, but nevertheless is considered suitable for use Page4 /33 PID Text "as is" or after repair by an approved method. 3. Contractor responsibilities. A. An Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) is used to make permanent changes in the Government technical data package (TDP). Pending approval of an ECP, contractual relief should be requested in writing by the Contractor using a RFV. B. Refer to FAR Part 48 Value Engineering for cost saving improvements to the Technical Data Package (TDP). C. All ECPs submitted by the Contractor will be deemed routine. If the Contractor considers an ECP as an emergency or urgent; they shall include in their ECP submittal an explanation and all applicable supporting documentation. All ECPs will be reviewed for a determination on criticality, and, if concurred to be an emergency, the appropriate processing time-frame negotiated with the ESAs will be followed and the Contractor will be notified of anticipated response time. D. For ECPs, Specification Change Notices (SCNs) or RFV, the Contractor must submit the applicable documentation listed in sub-paragraphs D.(1) through D.(4)to the Administrative Contracting Officer(ACO), with an information copy to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO). Failure to submit a complete legible package may result in return of the ECP/RFV without processing. (1) Documentation listed in Paragraph 3.3.1 (for ECPs), 3.3.2 (RFV), 3.3.3 (for SCNs) or 3.3.4 (for Notices of Revision (NORs)) of the latest revision of EIA-649-1. (2) DD Form 1692 (current revision) for ECP. (3) DD Form 1694 (current revision) for RFV. (4) DD Form 1695 (current revision) for NOR. 4. DLA#s responsibilities: A. Upon receipt of the ECP or RFV, the PCO will ensure that the applicable product specialist receives the copy from DCMA. B. Within five (5) working days from the date of receipt of the Contractor's ECP or RFV from DCMA, the PS must submit the requests and any supporting documentation via a 339 to the appropriate Engineering Support Activity (ESA), when applicable. C. Routine ECPs will be processed within 90 days from receipt by the ESA. RFVs will be evaluated and processed within 30 days from receipt by the ESA or as negotiated with the ESA. (1) The contractor will be notified in writing of approval by the return of an approved copy of the ECP or RFV. Approval will be reflected by signature of the contracting activity or a review activity specifically identified in the contract. (2) The contractor will be notified in writing of disapproval including reason(s) for disapproval. 5. For an approved RFV or an approved ECP, when the request affects the Contract, a modification will be issued to the contract incorporating the applicable requirement changes. Only a Contracting Officer is authorized to issue a modification incorporating the approved RFV and/or ECP. 6. Questions regarding the status of previously submitted ECP or RFV Page5 /33 should be directed to the PCO. 7. The submission of an ECP or RFV by the Contractor does not affect the required delivery date of the contract. If a delivery date change is needed, it must be negotiated with the Contracting Officer and documented via modification to the contract. 8. The period of time for evaluation and approval/disapproval of an ECP and/or a RFV, as specified in Paragraph 4. C., shall not constitute excusable delay in the performance of this Contract by the Contractor or in any way relieve the contractor from compliance with the contract delivery schedule. The submission of an ECP and/or RFV by the Contractor shall not preclude the Government from exercising its rights under any clause of the Contract. (End) THIS ITEM HAS TECHNICAL DATA SOME OR ALL OF WHICH IS SUBJECT TO EXPORT-CONTROL REGULATIONS. DISTRIBUTION OF THE TECHNICAL DATA AND ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD ARE LIMITED TO THOSE SUPPLIERS QUALIFIED THROUGH JCP CERTIFICATION, OR TO THOSE LICENSED BY EITHER THE DEPARTMENTS OF STATE OR COMMERCE; OR TO FOREIGN SUPPLIERS PURSUANT TO INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS. TO APPLY FOR JCP CERTIFICATION, COMPLETE DD FORM 2345, MILITARY CRITICAL TECHNICAL DATA AGREEMENT, FORM IS AVAILABLE AT THE WORLD WIDE WEB ADDRESS HTTP://WWW.DLIS.DLA.MIL/JCP OR BY WRITING TO: DLA LOGISTICS INFORMATION SERVICE FEDERAL CENTER 74 WASHINGTON AVE., NORTH BATTLE CREEK, MI 49037-3084 TO MANUFACTURE THIS ITEM, NON-JCP CERTIFIED SUPPLIERS MUST SUBMIT A CURRENT MANUFACTURING LICENSE AGREEMENT, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT, DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT OR OFF-SHORE PROCUREMENT AGREEMENT APPROVED BY THE DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS WITH THE OFFER, UNLESS AN EXEMPTION UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF ITAR SECTION, 125.4 EXEMPTIONS OF GENERAL APPLICABILITY, AND/OR EAR PART 740 ARE APPLICABLE. NON-JCP CERTIFIED SUPPLIERS SEEKING EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE CONTRACTING OFFICER WITH AN APPLICABLE AGREEMENT OR IDENTIFY WHICH ITAR/EAR EXEMPTION APPLIES TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA. NOTE: JCP CERTIFIED CONTRACTORS WHO RECEIVE TECHNICAL DATA PURSUANT TO THEIR DD FORM 2345 CERTIFICATION MAY NOT FURTHER DISSEMINATE SUCH DATA UNLESS FURTHER DISSEMINATION OF THE TECHNICAL DATA IS EXPRESSLY PERMITTED BY DODD 5230.25. 52.246-11 Higher Level Contract Quality Requirement (Manufacturers) FAR CLAUSE 52.246-11 APPLIES. A QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ISO 9001:2008; A PROGRAM COMPARABLE TO ISO 9001:2008 Page6 /33 (EXAMPLE SAE AS 9100), THE FOLLOWING TAILORED VERSION OF ISO 9001:2008; OR A PROGRAM COMPARABLE TO THE TAILORED VERSION OF ISO 9001:2008 (EXAMPLE SAE AS 9003) IS REQUIRED. MIL-I-45208 AND MIL-Q-9858 ARE OBSOLETE AND NO LONGER CONSIDERED SUITABLE WHEN HIGHER LEVEL QUALITY IS REQUIRED. IN THE TAILORED VERSION OF THE ISO 9001:2008, ANY REFERENCES WHICH CITE THE ENTIRE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ARE INTERPRETED AS EXCLUSIONS TO THIS DOCUMENT. DLA TAILORED HIGHER LEVEL QUALITY CLAUSE FROM ISO 9001:2008 4.1 General requirements, [excluding reference to 1.2 and excluding NOTE 3 c)] 4.2.1 General, [excluding subparagraph a)] 4.2.2 Quality manual, [excluding subparagraph a)] 4.2.3 Control of documents 4.2.4 Control of records 5.1 Management commitment 5.3 Quality policy 6.2.2 Competence, training and awareness 6.4 Work environment 7.1 Planning of product realization, [excluding NOTE 2] 7.2.1 Determination of requirements related to the product 7.2.2 Review of requirements related to the product 7.2.3 Customer communication 7.3.7 Control of design and development changes 7.4.1 Purchasing process 7.4.3 Verification of purchased product 7.5.1 Control of production and service provision 7.5.3 Identification and traceability 7.5.4 Customer property 7.5.5 Preservation of product 7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring equipment 8.1 General, [excluding subparagraph b) and subparagraph c)] 8.2.2 Internal audit 8.2.4 Monitoring and measurement of product 8.3 Control of nonconforming product 8.5.2 Corrective action 8.5.3 Preventive action NOTE: THIS IS A RESTRICTED SOURCE ITEM MANUFACTURED TO THE OEM DRAWING(S) CITED HEREIN AND AS OF THE DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION ONLY THE SOURCE(S) CITED BELOW HAS/HAVE BEEN PREQUALIFIED TO MANUFACTURE THE ITEM. OFFERS BASED ON SUPPLYING OTHER MANUFACTURER'S PARTS SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY TECHNICAL AND OTHER DATA SUFFICIENT TO EVALUATE THE ITEM FOR THE INTENDED APPLICATION AS PER DLAI 3200.1, ENCL 6. SAID EVALUATION MAY TAKE AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME AND MAY THEREFORE BE APPLICABLE TO FUTURE PROCUREMENTS. FINAL APPROVAL AUTHORITY REST WITH THE GOVERNMENT DESIGN CONTROL ACTIVITY. Page7 /33 CERTIFICATE OF QUALITY COMPLIANCE IS MANDATORY. HIGHER LEVEL CONTRACT QUALITY REQUIREMENTS MIL-I-45208 INSPECTION SYSTEM APPLIES. TO ENSURE THAT ONLY JCP CERTIFIED CONTRACTORS RECEIVE AWARDS FOR SOLICITATION ITEMS THAT ARE SUPPORTED BY EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA, THE BUYER MUST CONFIRM THE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO AWARD. THE JCP HOME PAGE IS LOCATED AT THE FOLLOWING WEB ADDRESS: HTTP://WWW.LOGISTICSINFORMATIONSERVICE.DLA.MIL/JCP/. CLASS I OZONE DEPLETING CHEMICALS ARE NOT TO BE USED NOR INCORPORATED IN ANY ITEMS TO BE DELIVERED UNDER THIS CONTRACT.THIS PROHIBITION SUPERSEDES ALL SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BUT DOES NOT ALLEVIATE ANY PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS. SUBSTITUTE CHEMICALS MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL UNLESS THEY ARE AUTHORIZED BY THE SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. CRITICAL APPLICATION ITEM HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION 55820 P/N 169363-2 THE LEE COMPANY DBA 92555 P/N VDLX0501050A IAW BASIC DRAWING NR 55820 169363 REVISION NR D DTD 04/14/1997 PART PIECE NUMBER: IAW REFERENCE DRAWING NR 55820 169363-2 REVISION NR DTD 05/20/2015 PART PIECE NUMBER: Manufacturer's Code and Part Number (if applicable): HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION 55820 P/N 169363-2 THE LEE COMPANY DBA 92555 P/N VDLX0501050A Drawing Number (if applicable): IAW BASIC DRAWING NR 55820 169363 REVISION NR D DTD 04/14/1997 PART PIECE NUMBER: IAW REFERENCE DRAWING NR 55820 169363-2 REVISION NR DTD 05/20/2015 PART PIECE NUMBER: Quantity (including option quantity): 400 Unit of Issue: EA Destination Information: Hill AFB Delivery Schedule: 180 Specifications, plans or drawings are not available. This acquisition is for supplies for which the Government does not possess complete, unrestrictive technical data; therefore, the Government intends to solicit and contract with only approved sources under the authority of 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1). Approved sources are: HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION 55820 P/N 169363-2 THE LEE COMPANY DBA 92555 P/N VDLX0501050A While price may be a significant factor in the evaluation of offers, the final award decision will be based upon a combination of price, delivery, past performance and other evaluation factors as described in the solicitation. TYPE OF SET-ASIDE: unrestricted
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/DLA/J3/DSCC/Awards/SPE7M316C0006.html)
- Record
- SN04205533-W 20160804/160802235634-9302097d8db1c3f66f25b537d8c7e82d (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |