SOLICITATION NOTICE
A -- Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) Utilizing New and Innovative Technologies for Long Range Fires Technology Development and Demonstration
- Notice Date
- 10/24/2016
- Notice Type
- Presolicitation
- NAICS
- 541712
— Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Army, Army Contracting Command, ACC - RSA (W31P4Q) Missile, BLDG 5303 SPARKMAN CIR, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, 35898-5090, United States
- ZIP Code
- 35898-5090
- Solicitation Number
- W31P4Q-17-R-0028
- Point of Contact
- Candace S. Tucker, Phone: 2568764900
- E-Mail Address
-
candace.s.tucker.civ@mail.mil
(candace.s.tucker.civ@mail.mil)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- N/A
- Description
- Using the Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) process, the US Army Aviation & Missile Research, Development & Engineering Center (AMRDEC), Weapons Development & Integration Directorate (WDI), Fire Support Capability Area (FSCA) is interested in receiving submittals from Offerors adept to identify, develop, integrate and flight demonstrate emerging long-range missile system technologies in support of the Army's Long Range Fires (LRF) combat mission. AMRDEC is inviting Offerors with demonstrated experience in the design, fabrication, integration, flight test, and fielding of tactical missile systems to submit Concept Papers and subsequently, upon express request by AMRDEC, formal Proposals. Concept Papers and proposals are to be focused on the design, fabrication, integration and flight-test demonstration of those component-level and system-level technologies necessary to enhance the range, precision and/or lethality of Army LRF against stationary and/or mobile land and/or sea targets, at ranges beyond 300 km, in all operating environments, while maintaining compatibility with the Army's existing Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) Family of Munitions (MFOM) Launch Platforms to the greatest extent possible. Proposals with new and innovative technologies are needed which could enhance the state-of-the-art and scientific knowledge for the technical areas listed below. Proposals should address and focus on one or more of the technical areas and capability demonstration listed. AMRDEC is interested in demonstrating technical advances in the following technology areas: (1) Inertial Navigation Technology - Highly accurate, low cost inertial sensors enabling precision long range navigation in GPS degraded or denied environments; (2) Multi-mode Seeker Technology - Active and/or passive seekers enabling target detection, acquisition, tracking, discrimination and aim-point selection in GPS degraded or denied environments; (3) High-temperature "Seeker Friendly" Dome Materials - High temperature "seeker friendly" dome materials capable of withstanding the thermal environments resulting from extended range, high velocity flight profiles, while simultaneously maximizing RF/IR/etc. seeker performance; (4) Signature Reduction Technology - Active and/or passive means of reducing the signature of the LRF Munition in the RF, IR and other common military detection bands; (5) Warhead Technology - Kinetic and Non-Kinetic means of enabling enhanced lethality and reduced packaging envelopes (weight and/or volume); (6) Digital Datalink Technology - Communication elements enabling secure smart-weapon network integration (aim-point coordination, arrival time synchronization, etc.); (7) Propulsion Technology - Enhanced performance propulsion systems (solid rocket motor, hybrid, gel, liquid, air-breathing, etc.) enabling extended range LRF missions; and (8) Attitude Control Technology - Enhanced performance altitude control systems (divert thrusters, canards, fins, jet vanes, etc.) enabling improved weapon system maneuverability, reduced packaging envelopes (weight and/or volume) and/or reduced power consumption. AMRDEC is interested in demonstrating the resulting technology-driven performance enhancements via sub-scale or full-scale flight test, potentially utilizing Army-provided MFOM test assets. All development activities related to this BAA are subject to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). Performance will require access to and/or generation of technical data, the export of which is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act, Executive Order 12470, and/or DOD Directive 5230.25. Foreign Nationals are not eligible to access US classified information. Since awards to US contractors will involve access to classified information, any US contractor or subcontractor considering this BAA cannot have foreign nationals working on the effort. This acquisition is not open to foreign firms, including any subcontracting effort under this BAA. Any contractor or subcontractor considering this BAA is advised that foreign national employees are prohibited from participating or working under this effort. For the purposes of accessing US classified information, Foreign Nationals (also known as foreign persons) means any person who is NOT a US citizen or naturalized citizen of the US, a lawful permanent resident; or a protected individual as defined by 8 U.S.C. 1324b (a)(3). The application process for this BAA includes two stages as follows: Stage 1-Prospective proposers should submit concept papers prior to the submission of a complete, more detailed proposal. Concept papers should follow the format, content and submission criteria outlined in this notice. Stage 2-Interested Offerors will be contacted within 120 days to submit full proposals. Unsuccessful Offerors will receive notification of the results of their concept paper review within 120 days. Concept papers and proposals will not be returned. Concept Paper In Stage 1, Offerors should submit a summary concept paper for evaluation. Concept papers must be emailed directly to the email address identified at the end of this announcement. Concept papers should address the required content and adhere to the format detailed below to be considered for Stage 2. In order to streamline the proposal process and to assist Offerors in determining whether to incur the cost of generating a formal BAA proposal, it is requested that the Offerors first submit a summary concept paper for evaluation. From this summary concept paper the Government will indicate whether the subject matter technology described is of interest to the Government and whether a formal proposal would be likely to succeed. The Government, at its option, may provide comments that might be of assistance to the submitter in determining how or whether to submit a BAA proposal. Concept papers will be evaluated as soon as they are received. Acknowledgement of receipt of concept papers will not be made, and concept papers will not be returned. THE CONTRACTING OFFICE WILL ASK ONLY THOSE OFFERORS WITH PROMISING CONCEPT PAPERS TO SUBMIT FULL TECHNICAL AND COST PROPOSALS. Offerors are not authorized to submit a formal proposal unless expressly requested to do so by the Contracting Office. Because of the flight test driven focus of this effort and the specified 48-month period of performance, Offerors must be able to show demonstrated experience in the definition, development, production, flight-demonstration, and deployment of fielded U.S. Weapon Systems in order to be considered for evaluation. Offerors are NOT authorized to submit a formal proposal unless expressly requested to do so by the Contracting Office. The Contracting Office will notify Offerors within 120 days of receipt of concept paper if a full proposal is requested. Concept papers not selected for full proposal submission will be disposed of in a manner that protects proprietary data. All proprietary material should be clearly marked. The summary concept paper should state the proposed technical concept including the rationale and objectives, methodology, expected results, and its contribution to the AMRDEC. In addition, the summary concept paper should include a period of performance, anticipated cost and Offeror's past performance on Government contracts. The concept paper shall adhere to the following format: 1) File Type: Microsoft Word (.docx); 2) Page Size: 8½ x 11 inches, 1 inch Margins, single-spaced; 3) Font: Arial, 12 point (text); Arial, 10 point (captions & tables); 4) Page Count: No more than ten (10) pages, not including a cover page, table of contents, definitions and references. Concept papers exceeding the page limit will not be evaluated. Pages shall be numbered consecutively. Proprietary material should be clearly marked. The statement "Releasable to Government Agencies and their supporting Contractors for Review Only" must accompany any proprietary submission. No classified data shall be included. Content. Concept Papers are to be organized in accordance with the following: Cover Page: Concept Paper Title, BAA Number and Title, Date of Submission, Principle Investigator Name, Organization Name, Mailing address, Email address, Phone Number(s), Fax Number(s) (if available). This section falls outside the Concept Paper page count limitation, not to exceed 1 page; Table of Contents: Automatically generated, hyperlinked, Table of Contents. This section falls outside of the Concept Paper page count limitation, not to exceed 1 page; Executive Summary: The Concept Paper should briefly summarize and address the following topics: (1) What are the performance deficiencies being addressed within the proposed activity? (2) How do current technologies and practices limit the performance of existing systems? (3) What are the specific activities being proposed to remove these limitations and improve system performance? (4) What are the specific performance objectives of the proposed activity? (5) On what grounds does the Offeror base their confidence in the success of the proposed activity? (6) What has the Offeror previously achieved that might give the Government confidence in the success of the proposed activity? (7) How long will it take to execute the proposed activity? (8) How much will it cost to fully execute the proposed concept or activity? Technical Section. This section should address the following: 1) Define the Problem: Describe the current problem or need. Describe the state-of-art and limits of current practice. Provide any appropriate background material; 2) Present the Solution: Explain the approach to solving the problem and highlight what is new/innovative in the proposed approach that will remove limitations in current practice and improve performance. Describe how much improvement is expected in the various issues to be addressed. Explain why these improvements are significant and to whom: 3) Assess the Feasibility: Explain on what grounds the offeror/team bases confidence in success. High risk approaches should be grounded on solid scientific principles. Proposals should clearly provide technical justification as to why the proposed methods and approaches are feasible. Program Management Section. This section should address: 1). Management: Define both the organizations and the individuals within those organizations that make up the team, including expected duties, relevant capabilities and task responsibilities of team members, and expected relationships among members. Biographies are not necessary at this stage unless for key researchers, and no more than three lines for each should be provided; 2). Resource Utilization: Describe the notional facilities required to execute the proposed activity (office space, laboratory space, assembly and integration space, test ranges, etc.), their location and accessibility to the Government customer. Describe any unique equipment and/or analytical resources that might be required to execute the proposed activity; 3). Demonstrated Capability: Describe, in detail, corporate experience in the design, fabrication, integration, flight test, and fielding of tactical missile systems, and detail how the lessons learned during the execution of those efforts is to be leveraged in minimizing risk during execution of the Long Range Fires Technology Development & Demonstration Program effort. Cost Section. Provide a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost estimate, broken out by Government fiscal year, for the duration of the proposed effort. Vendor quotes are not required. Definitions. Define all acronyms and symbols in the document. This section falls outside the Concept Paper page count limitation, not to exceed 1 page. References. Use standard AIP or IEEE formatting. This section falls outside of the Concept Paper page count limitation, not to exceed 1 page. A review of concept papers by the Government will determine which efforts are of sufficient interest to merit a formal proposal. Concept papers will be evaluated based on technical merit and Offeror's past performance. Technical merit will rank significantly higher than past performance. If there is sufficient interest, a formal proposal will be requested. Concept Paper Evaluation Concept Papers will be distributed by the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) to the designated Government Subject Matter Expert (SME) team for review and evaluation weekly. Every 15 days, the SME team chairperson will provide the COR with a numerical rating and summary of all concept papers received in the SME's designated Technology Focus Area during the 15 day evaluation period. At the end of 30 days, if a concept paper is selected for a Request for Proposal (RFP), the SME team chairperson will provide a detailed summary of all evaluations completed during the 30 days prior to the request and a justification for selecting that particular concept paper for RFP. The COR will be responsible for sending the evaluation to the AMRDEC Acquisition Office every 60 days, or before if a RFP is required. Acquisition has 120 days to provide a response (negative/ RFP) to the contractor. Concept papers will be evaluated using the following criteria: Concept Papers will be reviewed by AMRDEC personnel and their support contractors to ensure that the Offeror meets the specified experience and capability requirements, and that the submitted concept falls within the stated objectives of the BAA. Concept papers that fail to satisfy either criteria will not be formally evaluated. Selected Concept Papers will be formally evaluated by AMRDEC personnel and their support contractors. AMRDEC will base the technical merit evaluation on the contractor's demonstrated capability and competence in categories that include: 1) Understanding and insight into the LRF mission role within Army combat doctrine; 2) Understanding and insight into the emerging threats driving the need for LRF performance improvements; 3) Understanding and insight into current state-of-the-art and emerging/near-term long-range missile system technologies; 4) Demonstrated experience in the development, delivery, integration and flight demonstrating new missile system technologies; and 5) Perceived value to AMRDEC of the proposed capability enhancements to be demonstrated. Concept Paper Evaluation Scoring The following numerical ratings will be applied to the evaluation criteria: - Demonstrated understanding of the evolving LRF Mission Requirements and emerging Threats (25 points) - Demonstrated understanding of state-of-the-art and emerging/near-term long range missile system technologies (25 points) - Proposed technology development, integration and flight demonstration of performance enhancement technologies within Army LRF missiles (25 points) - Demonstrated missile system technology development and transfer experience (15 points) - Cost reasonableness (10 points) The overall ratings for combined criteria for concept papers is as follows: Excellent (80+), Good (79-59), Unsatisfactory (<59). Concept papers receiving an overall rating of less than 80 will not be considered for a request for proposal (RFP). The Government reserves the right to request further clarification or request presentations to enhance our understanding of the Offeror's submittal as part of the Evaluation process. If there is sufficient interest within the Government, a formal proposal will be requested from the Offeror. Contractors are not authorized to submit formal proposals unless invited to do so by the Contracting Office. The Contracting Office will notify Offerors within 120 days as to whether or not their concept paper was selected for formal proposal. Concept papers not selected for formal proposal submission will be disposed of in a manner that protects proprietary data. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SELECT ANY, ALL, PART, OR NONE OF THE CONCEPT PAPER RESPONSES RECEIVED. All concept papers, proposals, written communications or documentation concerning this BAA shall be forwarded to the Contracting Office point of contact (POC): Ms. Candace S. Tucker, via e-mail at candace.s.tucker.civ@mail.mil, with a copy to the Contracting Officer, Ms. Janet Childers, via e-mail at janet.childers@us.army.mil. Facsimile concept paper submissions are not authorized under this announcement. No classified data shall be included in the concept paper or proposal. Contractors are not authorized to submit formal proposals unless invited to do so by the Contracting Office. THIS ANNOUNCEMENT IS AN EXPRESSION OF INTEREST ONLY AND DOES NOT COMMIT THE GOVERNMENT TO MAKE ANY AWARD OR TO PAY FOR ANY RESPONSE PREPARATION COSTS. The cost of proposal preparation or response to a BAA is not considered an allowable direct charge to any resultant contract or any other contract and interested parties should be alert for any BAA amendments that may be published. The Government, at its option, may provide comments that might be of assistance to the Offeror in determining how or whether to submit a full BAA proposal. Proposals. In Stage 2 of the BAA application process, the interested Offerors will be contacted within 120 days to submit full proposals. Contractors are not authorized to submit formal proposals unless invited to do so by the Contracting Office after the evaluation of concept papers, as described above. THE CONTRACTING OFFICE WILL ASK ONLY THOSE OFFERORS WITH PROMISING CONCEPT PAPERS TO SUBMIT FULL TECHNICAL AND COST PROPOSALS. AMRDEC is interested in receiving proposals for the research efforts described under this BAA. Awards as a result of this announcement will take the form of a contract. Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) contracts are expected to be awarded, with the period of performance for each IDIQ contract estimated to be no less than 12 months and to not exceed 60 months. This includes time for preparation, approval, and distribution of the final report. The Proposal shall adhere to the following format: 1) File Type: Microsoft Word (.docx); 2) Page Size: 8½ x 11 inches, 1 inch Margins, single-spaced; 3) Font: Arial, 12 point (text); Arial, 10 point (captions & tables); 4) Page Count: No more than thirty (30) pages, not including a cover page, table of contents, definitions and references. Proposals exceeding the pages limit will not be evaluated. Pages shall be numbered consecutively. Proprietary material should be clearly marked. The statement "Releasable to Government Agencies and their supporting Contractors for Review Only" must accompany any proprietary submission. No classified data shall be included. Content. The Government will provide SELECTED Offerors with proposal content requirements. Generally, proposal content and format shall contain and not be limited to: (1) Performance Work Statement (PWS): The PWS should be a concise document suitable for incorporation into a resultant contract. It should provide a qualitative description of the proposed work, which should be described in terms of advancement, improvement, or end product to be developed. The PWS should state the objectives to be achieved and how these objectives would benefit the Government. These objectives should be stated in terms of their potential usefulness to the advancement of tactical missile propulsion technology. The PWS should also include a proposed schedule detailing significant milestones and deliverables; (2) One page resumes of the Offeror's key personnel (including alternates, if desired) who will be involved in the research. Documentation of previous work or experience in the field of the proposer is especially important; (3) The type of support, if any, the Offeror requests of the AMRDEC, such as facilities, equipment, or materials. Any request by Offerors for Government furnished property/equipment must be clearly identified in the proposal. The Government is under no obligation to comply with such requests. Thus, Offerors should make provisions for alternate approaches in the event the Government is unwilling or unable to provide the requested property/equipment; (4) A statement regarding possible impact, if any, of the proposal's effect on the environment; (5) A brief description of your organization; (6) The facilities to be used for the work, if appropriate for and understanding of the proposal; (7) A listing of current similar R&D contracts along with Government POCs (contracting officer & technical) shall be included. The financial portion of the proposal should contain a cost estimate that is sufficiently detailed by element of cost for meaningful evaluation and must include sufficient detail to support and explain all costs proposed, giving figures and narrative explanation. Cost proposals must contain certifiable cost or pricing data, and shall be in sufficient detail to allow direct and indirect rate verification. The budget must include the total estimated cost of the project. The estimated project costs must be broken down for each year of the program to show the following: (1) A list of participants, not necessarily by name, showing the time and number of direct productive person hours (DPPHs) to be charged by principal investigator(s), research associates, and assistants, and the total amount per year to be paid to each from the project. For proposals from universities, the time and amounts to be charged should be identified by academic year and summer effort; (2) An itemized list of permanent equipment showing the cost of each item. Permanent equipment is any article of non-expendable tangible personal property having a useful life of more than two years, and an acquisition cost of $500 or more per unit; (3) A general description and total estimated cost of expendable equipment and supplies; (4) Contemplated expenditures for travel with brief explanation. Travel budgets that exceed $1,500 per principal investigator per year or that include foreign travel or travel by other than principal investigators will require special investigation; (5) Other direct costs; (6) Cost for consulting services, if any, showing number of days, daily rates, and estimated travel/per diem costs. The need for consulting services must be fully justified; (7) Indirect costs indicating whether rates used are fixed or provisional, and the time frames to which they are applicable (e.g., a fixed rate may apply until a specified date, after which the rate becomes provisional); (8) The fee, if any, which the organization proposes to assess the research project; (9) Subcontracts and material costs proposed must be fully supported and documented (written quotes, engineering estimates, etc.). Pursuant to Section 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)), it is the policy of the Government to enable small business concerns to be considered fairly as subcontractors to contractors performing work or rendering services as prime contractors or subcontractors under Government contracts, and to assure that prime contractors and subcontractors carry out this policy. Subcontracting goals for small businesses are thirty-five (35%) percent. Subcontracting goals for small disadvantage businesses, and women-owned small businesses are five (5%) percent. Subcontracting goals for HUBZone small businesses, for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses and Historically Black Colleges & University/Minority Institutions (HBCUs/MIs) are three (3%) percent. Pursuant to FAR 19.708, all formal proposals over $550,000 that are not submitted by a small business concern will be required to submit a small business subcontracting plan with their formal proposal. These goals are to be considered when proposals are submitted. Potential Deliverables. The following is a list of possible Contract Data Requirements that might be required when submitting a proposal. The following reports may be required (specific reporting requirements will be specified by the Government in the event a contractor is requested to submit a formal proposal): 1) DI-ADMN-81373, Presentational Material, as required; 2) DI-ADMN-81505, Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes, as required; 3) DI-MGMT-80004A, Management Plan, as required; 4) DI-MGMT-80227, Contractor's Progress, Status and Management Report, as required; 5) DI-MISC-80508B, Technical Report - Study/Services (Final), as required; 6) DI-MISC-80508B, Technical Report - Study/Services (Interim), as required; 7) DI-NDTI-80809B, Test/Inspection Report, as required; 8) DI-QCIC-80553A, Acceptance Test Plan, as required; 9) DI-SESS-81001E, Conceptual Design Drawings/Models, as required; 10) DI-SESS-81002F, Developmental Design Drawings/Models & Associated Lists, as required; 11) DI-SESS-81248B, Interface Control Document DI-SESS-81704, Test Plans/Test Procedures, as required; 12) US Army Contractor Manpower Reporting Requirements, as required. Long term proposals should contain a summary of the work contemplated for each 12-month period, so that contracts may be negotiated for an entire five-year project or for individual one-year increments of the total project. A detailed performance schedule for each discrete task must be included along with cost data to include labor-by-labor category. To be eligible for award of a contract, a prospective contractor must meet certain minimum standards pertaining to financial resources, and ability to comply with the performance schedule. The frequency and type of data item will vary due to research topic and proposal content. THIS ACQUISITION IS NOT OPEN TO FOREIGN PARTICIPATION AT ANY LEVEL. The Government anticipates that contract awards resulting from this BAA will be in the form of Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) contracts with total period of performance estimated to be up to 48 months, including time for preparation, approval, and distribution of the final report. For planning purposes, individual awards are anticipated from $1.0M up to $135M, with the combined total of all BAA awards not to exceed $148M. Multiple awards are possible. The Government reserves the right to make awards without discussions with Offerors. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions with Offerors prior to contract award if the technical monitor determines them to be necessary. The Government anticipates that any contract resulting from this BAA will be funded on an incremental basis as provided by FAR 52.232-22 Limitation of Funds. Proposals will be evaluated on their own merit without regard to other proposals submitted under this announcement. The primary basis for selecting proposals for acceptance shall be technical merit, importance to agency programs, and funds availability. Management, cost realism and reasonableness, and past performance shall also be considered. The following factors will be considered in the evaluation of proposals received under this BAA. Proposal Evaluation Criteria Award consideration will be based on technical, cost, and the contractor's past performance. AMRDEC will base the Technical Evaluation on the contractor's proposal to include the following criteria: 1) demonstrated understanding of LRF mission within Army combat doctrine and emerging threats to be engaged; 2) demonstrated understanding and experience in advanced emerging technologies required for long range missile systems; 3) proposed innovative concepts and missile technology enhancements supported by engineering analysis, integration and test activities required to successfully conduct a flight demonstration; 4) proposed resources (equipment, facilities, personnel) and experience to perform the proposed fabrication, integration and test effort and transition developed technologies; and 5) potential contribution to AMRDEC's Long Range Fires mission. The Cost Evaluation on contractor's proposal will be based on the following criteria: 1) Cost reasonableness of the contractor's cost proposal will be evaluated. Cost reasonableness means a fair and reasonable price; i.e., the price that a prudent businessperson would pay for an item or service under competitive market conditions, given a reasonable knowledge of the marketplace. Reflects a clear understanding of the requirements, and is consistent with the various elements of the other parts of the proposal; 2) Finally, the government will assess the risk associated with the contractor's cost proposal. The Past Performance Evaluation will be based on demonstrated successful execution of past weapon system definition, development, and test efforts. Elements to be evaluated include the following criteria: 1) relevancy of cited programs; 2) recency of cited programs: 3) successful satisfaction of SOW objectives in cited programs; 4) adherence to development and delivery schedules in cited programs; and 5) adherence to program budgets in cited programs. Proposal Evaluation Scoring The following numerical ratings will be applied to the evaluation criteria: Technical 60% - Understanding LRF mission and emerging threats (10%) - Understanding and experience in advanced technologies (10%) - Proposed demonstration program supported by engineering and test (20%) - Proposed resources and experience to perform proposed program (10%) - Potential contribution to AMRDEC's Long Range Fires mission/Importance to Agency Programs (10%) Cost: 20% - Cost Reasonableness (10%) - Cost Risk (10%) Past Performance: 20% - Relevancy (10%) - Recency (10%) The overall ratings for combined criteria for proposals is as follows: Excellent (80+), Good (79-59), Unsatisfactory (<59). Proposals receiving an overall rating of less than 80 will not be considered for a contract award. The Government reserves the right to request further clarification or request presentations to enhance our understanding of the Offeror's submittal as part of the Evaluation process. In accordance with the guidelines described in FAR 15.605 and 35.008, primary emphasis in the evaluation will be given to the Technical assessment, which is deemed significantly more important than the Cost assessment. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SELECT FOR AWARD ANY, ALL, PART, OR NONE OF THE PROPOSAL RESPONSES RECEIVED. The Government reserves the right to make awards without discussions with Offerors. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions with Offerors prior to contract award if the technical monitor determines them to be necessary. This Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) is issued under the provisions of paragraph 6.102(d)(2) of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which provides for the competitive selection of research proposals. Contract(s) based on responses to this BAA are considered to be the result of full and open competition and in full compliance with the provisions of PL 98-369, The Competition in Contracting Act of 1984. This BAA is an expression of interest only and does not commit the Government to make any award or to pay for any response preparation costs. This BAA shall remain in effect for a period of one-year from date of posting. Oral communications are not acceptable in response to this notice. Email your questions to Candace S. Tucker, Contracting Office POC, at candace.s.tucker.civ@mail.mil. Contracting Office Address: US Army Contracting Command-Redstone, ATTN: CCAM-RDB, Building 5400, Fowler Road, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898-5280.
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/notices/77ebe6db7ffefa585ab67dd4d3ccd29a)
- Place of Performance
- Address: US Army Contracting Command-Redstone, US Army Aviation & Missile Research, Development & Engineering Center, ATTN: CCAM-RDB, Building 5400 Fowler Road, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, 35898-5280, United States
- Zip Code: 35898-5280
- Zip Code: 35898-5280
- Record
- SN04310963-W 20161026/161024234031-77ebe6db7ffefa585ab67dd4d3ccd29a (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |