Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY - FEDBIZOPPS ISSUE OF MARCH 29, 2017 FBO #5605
SOURCES SOUGHT

Z -- Fort Hood 12000 Block Rolling Pin Barracks Renovation, Fort Hood, Texas

Notice Date
3/27/2017
 
Notice Type
Sources Sought
 
NAICS
236220 — Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
 
Contracting Office
Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, USACE District, Fort Worth, Attn: CESWF-CT, PO Box 17300, Fort Worth, Texas, 76102-0300, United States
 
ZIP Code
76102-0300
 
Solicitation Number
W9126G-17-U-0764
 
Point of Contact
Richard D. Feller, Phone: 8178861165, John H Rodgers, Phone: 877-866-1048
 
E-Mail Address
richard.feller@usace.army.mil, john.h.rodgers@usace.army.mil
(richard.feller@usace.army.mil, john.h.rodgers@usace.army.mil)
 
Small Business Set-Aside
N/A
 
Description
The Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District is soliciting comments from the construction community addressing the potential use of Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) from large scale construction projects (exceeding $25 million). This market survey is being posted for the Fort Hood Block Rolling Pin Barracks Renovation, Fort Hood, Texas This will be a solicitation for a construction contract award for Fiscal Year 2017. THIS IS A PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT SURVEY ONLY. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL, REQUEST FOR QUOTE, OR INVITATION FOR BID. THERE WILL NOT BE A SOLICITATION, SPECIFICATIONS, OR DRAWINGS AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. Background / Scope Summary: This project will revitalize/renovate five Rolling Pin Barracks within the 12000 Block of Fort Hood, TX. This project will replace the failing HVAC system, repair interior finishes impacted by moisture/high humidity, update the living areas, renovate the building exterior, provide storage rooms, and improve site drainage. Renovations shall increase the life expectancy of the Barracks by 25-years. The Design-Build Contract will include both Design and Construction of the required renovations. Project Labor Agreement: A Project Labor Agreement (PLA) is defined as a pre-hire collective bargaining agreement with one or more labor organizations that establishes the terms and conditions of employment for a specific construction project and is an agreement described in 29 U.S.C. 158(f). Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 22.503 Policy provides that: (a) PLAs are a tool that agencies may use to promote economy and efficiency in Federal procurement. Pursuant to Executive Order 13502, agencies are encouraged to consider requiring the use of project labor agreements in connection with large-scale construction projects. (b) An agency may, if appropriate, require that every contractor and subcontractor engaged in construction on the project agree, for that project, to negotiate or become a party to a project labor agreement with one or more labor organizations if the agency decides that the use of project labor agreements will: (1) Advance the Federal Governments interest in achieving economy and efficiency in Federal procurement, producing labor-management stability, and ensuring compliance with laws and regulations governing safety and health, equal employment opportunity, labor and employment standards, and other matters; and (2) Be consistent with law. Reference: Provision: 52.222-33 Notice of Requirement for Project Labor Agreement Clause 52.222-34 Project Labor Agreement. Some of the factors that may be considered regarding their use are: a.) The involvement of multiple contractors and/or subcontractors working in multiple crafts or trades. b.) The complexity of the project. c.) Shortage of skilled labor in the region. d.) Completion of the project will require an extended period of time. e.) The use of PLA's on other comparable projects. f.) The promotion of the Governments long term programs interests such as training of skilled workforce for future projects. g.) The possibility of labor disputes that threaten timely completion. h.) Additional costs from use of PLAs may be cost prohibitive. In consideration of the above factors, and any others which may be deemed appropriate, the construction community is invited to comment on the potential use of PLAs for the aforementioned project. Of particular interest to the Government are responses to the following questions: a. Should PLAs be executed on selected large dollar contracts within the above referenced location by the Fort Worth District? What other factors should the Corps consider before deciding to include PLA provisions in a Fort Worth District contract? What type of project should or should not be considered for PLA? b. Is the use of PLAs effective in achieving economy and efficiency in Federal procurement? What is the estimated relative cost impact, or any other economies or efficiencies derived by the Federal Government, if using PLAs? Will a PLA impact the cost of submitting an offer? c. Is the use of PLAs effective in producing labor-management stability? Have labor disputes or other labor issues contributed to project delays in the local area? d. Is the use of PLAs conducive to ensuring compliance with laws and regulations governing safety and health, equal employment opportunity, labor and employment standards, and other relevant matters? Are there instances where these standards have not been met on Federal contracts in the local area? Were PLAs used for those specific contracts? e. Projects will require multiple construction contractors and/or subcontractors employing workers in multiple crafts or trades. Do you foresee any work on projects that may result in both the prime contractor and at least one subcontractor, or two or more subcontractors, employing the same trade? f. Are there concerns by prime contractors on the availability of skilled construction labor? Information may reference current apprenticeship statistics and workforce age demographics. g. Completion of anticipated projects will require extensive performance periods. Will a PLA impact the completion time? What is the anticipated volatility in the labor market for the trades required for the execution of the project? Would a PLA benefit a project which contains a unique and compelling mission-critical schedule? h. Where have PLAs been used on comparable projects undertaken by Federal, State, municipal, or private entities in the geographic area of this project? i. Will the use of PLAs impact the ability of potential Offerors and subcontractors to meet small-business utilization goals? Please provide your comments via e-mail to the Contract Specialist, Mr. Richard D. Feller at richard.feller@usace.army.mil and courtesy copy the Contracting Officer, John H. Rodgers at john.h.rodgers@usace.army.mil no later than 2:00 p.m., 11 April 2017.
 
Web Link
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USA/COE/DACA63/W9126G-17-U-0764/listing.html)
 
Record
SN04448303-W 20170329/170327234538-ee2804ef661d7dbfd902ffdbfe2f6f67 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.