MODIFICATION
D -- Indian Health Service Agency-wide Credentialing Management Solution
- Notice Date
- 4/10/2017
- Notice Type
- Modification/Amendment
- NAICS
- 518210
— Data Processing, Hosting, and Related Services
- Contracting Office
- Department of Health and Human Services, Indian Health Service, Division of Acquisition Policy, 801 Thompson, TMP 605, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, United States
- ZIP Code
- 20852
- Solicitation Number
- 17-236-SOL-00020
- Archive Date
- 4/28/2017
- Point of Contact
- Daniel Rosenstengel, , Kenneth G. Truesdale,
- E-Mail Address
-
Daniel.Rosenstengel@ihs.gov, kenneth.truesdale@ihs.gov
(Daniel.Rosenstengel@ihs.gov, kenneth.truesdale@ihs.gov)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- Total Small Business
- Description
- MANDATORY CRITERIA The below are mandatory criteria and will have to be met prior to award of the contract: a. Technical Capability of Software Solution b. Credentialing System Implementation Plan c. Training d. Technical Support e. Relevant Past Performance f. Price TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA The criteria below are listed in the relative order of importance. Technical Capability and Past Performance, when combined, are more important than price. Relative Order of Importance Factor 1 Factor 1: Technical Capability of Software Solution 2 Factor 2: Credentialing System Implementation Plan 3 Factor 3: Training (Initial and as needed) 4 Factor 4: Technical Support 5 Factor 5: Relevant Past Performance ADJECTIVAL RATING The Government will evaluate the Technical Proposal using the following adjectival rating. Rating Adjectival Description Blue Exceptional Greatly exceeds all minimum requirements of the criteria; has a high probability of success; contains no weaknesses or deficiencies. Green Good Exceeds all the minimum requirements of the criteria; has an above average probability of success; contains no significant weaknesses and only minor, correctable weaknesses exist. Orange Acceptable Meets all the minimum requirements of the criteria; has an average probability of success; no significant weaknesses and any deficiencies can be readily corrected. Yellow Marginal Fails to meet one or more of the minimum requirements of the criteria; low probability of success; major weaknesses and/or significant number of deficiencies exist. Red Unacceptable Fails to meet any of the minimum requirements of the criteria; proposal needs major revisions; very low probability of success. PAST PERFORMANCE Rating Symbol Definition Neutral N No past performance available for evaluation. Offeror has asserted that it has no directly related or similar relevant past performance experience. Proposal receives no merit or demerit for this factor. Outstanding O Based on the Offeror's record of past performance, no issues, concerns, or risks are associated with receiving timely services and contract performance. Past performance surveys and the Offeror's experiences indicate that the Offeror is capable of exceeding the requirements of the delivery order. The Contractor has demonstrated significant experience with and knowledge of the issues and problems of large organizations. Good G The Offeror's record of past performance indicates there is very little risk associated with receiving quality products, timely services and full contract performance. Past performance surveys and the Offeror's experience indicate the Offeror will meet or exceed the requirements of the delivery order. The Contractor has demonstrated experience with and knowledge of the issues and problems of large organizations. Acceptable A The Offer's record of past performance indicates that there is some potential risk associated with receiving quality products, timely services, and contract performance. Past performance surveys and the Offeror's experience indicate the Offeror may have some problems during performance of the delivery order. The Contractor has demonstrated limited experience with and knowledge of the issues and problems of large organizations. Unsatisfactory U The Offeror's record of past performance indicates it will be unable to perform successfully on the delivery order. COST/PRICE FACTORS Offeror(s) cost/price proposal will be evaluated for reasonableness. For a price to be reasonable, it must represent a price to the government that a prudent person would pay when consideration is given to prices in the market. Normally, price reasonableness is established through adequate price competition, but may also be determined through price reasonableness techniques as described in FAR 12.209. The Offeror shall submit firm fixed prices for all requirements. EVALUATION OF OPTIONS It is anticipated that any contract awarded from this solicitation will contain option provision(s) and periods(s) In accordance with FAR clause 52.217-5 Evaluation of Options, (July 1990) the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price of the basic requirement, except when it is determined in accordance with FAR 17.206(b) not to be in the Government's best interests. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s) SELECTION FOR AWARD FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items (Oct 2014). - This is a best value decision and award may be made to other than the lowest priced offeror. (a) The Government intends to award a firm fixed-price contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer, conforming to the solicitation, will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/HHS/IHS/AMB/17-236-SOL-00020/listing.html)
- Place of Performance
- Address: Phase 1- Pilot Areas, Billings Area Office – Billings, MT, Oklahoma Area Office – Oklahoma City, OK, Albuquerque Area Office – Albuquerque, NM, Phoenix Area Office - Phoenix, AZ, Phase 2 Areas:, Great Plains Area Office – Aberdeen, SD, Bemidji Area Office – Bemidji, MN, California Area Office – Sacramento, CA (2 new Youth Regional Treatment Centers), Nashville Area Office – Nashville, TN, Navajo Area Office – Window Rock, AZ, Portland Area Office – Portland, OR, IHS Headquarters - Rockville, MD, Rockville, Maryland, 20857, United States
- Zip Code: 20857
- Zip Code: 20857
- Record
- SN04465602-W 20170412/170410235004-715b88027d70f6f78261a039288329a4 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |