SOLICITATION NOTICE
15 -- CANOPY, PERSONNEL PA
- Notice Date
- 4/13/2017
- Notice Type
- Presolicitation
- NAICS
- 314999
— All Other Miscellaneous Textile Product Mills
- Contracting Office
- Defense Logistics Agency, DLA Acquisition Locations, DLA Aviation, 8000 Jefferson Davis Highway, Richmond, Virginia, 23297-5000, United States
- ZIP Code
- 23297-5000
- Solicitation Number
- SPE4A717R0639
- Archive Date
- 5/13/2017
- Point of Contact
- Lonnie Copeland, Phone: 8042796154, Frances M. Wilhelm, Phone: (804)279-5959
- E-Mail Address
-
lonnie.copeland@dla.mil, Frances.Wilhelm@dla.mil
(lonnie.copeland@dla.mil, Frances.Wilhelm@dla.mil)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- N/A
- Description
- NSN 1670-01-651-9193, CANOPY, PERSONNEL PA; IAW BAE SYSTEMS PROTECTION SYSTEMS CAGE: 54786 P/N 361AS0100-9 Offers may be mailed to the Bid Desk or sent to: Bid Custodian E-mail at: DSCR.Biddesk@dla.mil Bid Custodian Fax: 804-279-4165 Please send a copy to the buyer: Email: Lonnie.Copeland@dla.mil THIS RFP IS Unrestricted Other Than Full and Open Competition This is a Life Support Item therefore surplus material WILL NOT be accepted This Solicitation will result in a fixed quantity contract. Total order quantity is 21 each. Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) applies. Higher level quality is required The required production lead-time is after receipt of order (ARO) FOB: Origin I: Origin A: Origin ANY BUY AMERICAN PROGRAM DESIGNATION NORTH AMERICAN INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (314999) SEE http://www.sba.gov/content/table-small-business-size-standards FOR THE CORRESPONDING SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD NO VARIATION IN QUANTITY ALLOWED The supplier shall notify in writing the testing lab, the Engineering Support Activity, and the contract administrator when testing reports and/or shipments are submitted IAW contract requirements to include tracking information. The DLA-BSM Internet Bid Board System (DIBBS) may not be used to provide an offer Any offer provided thru DIBBS will not be considered for award UPON REQUEST FROM THE CONTRACTING OFFICER, THE SUPPLIER SHALL SUBMIT AS PART OF ITS PROPOSAL, A DESCRIPTION OF THEIR COMPANY'S INTERNAL PROCEDURES FOR VERIFYING COUNTRY OF ORIGIN DATA PHASE DELIVERY IS ENCOURAGED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE GOVERNMENT. Please select one: ___Manufacturer ___Dealer Please select one: ___Small Business ___Large Business All offerors: Please submit your Internet address on your proposal. POC: ____________________________________________ Phone number: _____________________________________ Fax number: _____________________________________ E-mail address: _____________________________________ ANSI/ISO/ASQC 9001-2008 OR EQUIVALENT Please specify the higher-level quality standard: ________________________________ GOVERNMENT FIRST ARTICLE TEST Government First Article Test 1 EACH = $ ______ (1 EACH = 1 First Article Test) Number of samples to be tested = ________ Deliver FOB: Destination Inspection: Origin Acceptance: Destination (By the PCO) BY: ________ (Delivery Date of First Article) Ship To: COMMANDER CODE 466200D NAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV 1 ADMINISTRATION CIRCLE STOP 1118 BLDG 20210 CHINA LAKE, CA 93555-6100 Delivery Schedule: 060 Days ARO: Delivery of Textile Test Material Samples 035 Days: Government Testing, Evaluation, and Notification to Contractor 090 Days ARO: Delivery of Government First Article(s) units 035 Days: Government Testing, Evaluation, and Notification to Contractor 185 Days AFAA Delivery of Production Lot Test Samples 035 Days: Government Testing, Evaluation, and Notification to Contractor 015 DAPLTA: Delivery of Production Units --------------------------------------- 455 DARO (Days after Receipt of Order) IF THE REQUESTED/REQUIRED DELIVERY FOR THE FAT REPORT/FAT SHIP TIME CANNOT BE MET, OFFEROR(S) SHALL PROVIDE A PROPOSED DELIVERY SCHEDULE WITH DETAILS EXPLAINING WHY THE REQUESTED/REQUIRED DELIVERY CANNOT BE MET OFFERED DELIVERY: FIRST ARTICLE DELIVERY: ____ DAYS GOVERNMENT TEST & EVAL: 065 DAYS PRODUCTION UNITS/PLT TEST DELIVERY: _____ DAYS (After FAT APPROVAL) GOVERNMENT TEST & EVAL: 065 DAYS SHIPMENT OF PRODUCTION UNITS: 030 DAYS (After PLT APPROVAL) TOTAL DELIVERY TIME: _____ DAYS FIRST ARTICLE EXHIBIT SHALL BE SENT TO: WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB MATERIALS AND TEXTILES LAB ATTN: TESTING MONITOR FYA2358 ASC WNUV BLDG 17, RM 103 2060 MONAHAN WAY WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB OH 45433-7908 ***Note*** FAT/PLT Delivery: FOB Destination Inspection: Origin Acceptance: Destination ************************************************** IF YOU HAVE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED A FIRST ARTICLE TEST (FOR THE SAME PART NUMBER) WITHIN THE PAST THREE YEARS, YOU MAY SUBMIT A MATERIAL INSPECTION AND RECEIVING REPORT (WAWF RR) WITH YOUR QUOTE TO REQUEST WAIVER OF THE FIRST ARTICLE REQUIREMENT. IF REQUESTING A WAIVER: PROVIDE DD250'S ASSOCIATED WITH PREVIOUS CONTRACT AWARDS. ATTENTION: FAILURE TO PROVIDE PRICING AND DELIVERY ON THE FIRST ARTICLE REQUIREMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR COMPANY BEING CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE AND OFFER SUBMITTED WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR AWARD. IF THE OFFEROR HAS RECEIVED A CONTRACT OR PURCHASE ORDER FOR THE SAME NATIONAL STOCK NUMBERED ITEM SOUGHT UNDER THIS SOLICITATION SUBJECT TO A FIRST ARTICLE TEST, THE OFFEROR MUST IDENTIFY BOTH THE CONTRACT NUMBER AND DATE UNDER WHICH THE FIRST ARTICLE IS DUE. THE CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL USE THIS INFORMATION IN MAKING A DETERMINATION AS TO WHETHER THE FIRST ARTICLE CAN BE WAIVED FOR THE OFFEROR UNDER THE CURRENT SOLICITATION, OR ALTERNATELY, WHETHER A CONDITIONAL AWARD PENDING FIRST ARTICLE APPROVAL CAN BE MADE UNDER THE CURRECT SOLICITATION. "INSTRUCTIONS FOR CONTRACTOR ENTRIES INTO WIDE AREA WORKFLOW (WAWF) FOR GOVERNMENT FIRST ARTICLE TEST ADDITIVE LINE ITEM: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CODE THE RECEIVING REPORT FOR THE FAT ADDITIVE LINE ITEM IN WAWF AS FOLLOWS: INSPECTION AT ORIGIN SOURCE) - ENTER THE DCMA OFFICE DODAAC LISTED ON PAGE 1 OF THE ORDER. ACCEPTANCE BY OTHER - ENTER DODAAC ___________ IN THE ACCEPTOR FIELD. SHIP TO CODE - ENTER THE DODAAC OF THE TEST FACILITY LISTED IN FAR CLAUSE 52.209-4, OR IF NO DODAAC IS LISTED IN 52.209-4, USE DODAAC _________________. IF NO DODAAC IS AVAILABLE FOR THE DESIGNATED TEST FACILITY, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE UNABLE TO PROCESS A RECEIVING REPORT IN WAWF. THE CONTRACTOR IS INSTRUCTED TO PROCESS A MANUAL RECEIVING REPORT." ************************************************** Broadcast Acquisition Message (BAM) 2016-09 SUBJECT: Cyber Security This BAM is issued to notify the DLA Aviation Acquisition Workforce of revisions to DFARS 204.73, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting. This BAM supersedes BAM 2015-55. DFARS clause 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting, has been amended to provide contractors additional time to comply with the security requirements in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Effective immediately, contractors have until December 31, 2017 to comply with the NIST security requirements. As a result of the amendment, the language in DFARS Provision 252.204-7008, Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls and DFARS Clause 252.204-7009, Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of Third-Party Contractor Information has been updated. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ EVALUATION AND AWARD (FEBRUARY 2013) (a) AWARD. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and, if necessary, conduct discussions with all responsible offerors within the competitive range. The award will be made to the offeror whose proposal conforms to the terms and conditions of the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government. Therefore, award may be made to other than the lowest priced or the highest technically rated offer. (b) RELATIVE IMPORTANCE AND TRADE-OFFS. The Government will base the determination of best value on a comparative assessment of the offerors' prices, past performance, and the other evaluation factors identified elsewhere in this solicitation. The determination of best value also considers the relative importance of the evaluation factors. All evaluation factors, when combined, are: [ ] significantly more important than cost or price. As other evaluation factors become more equal, the evaluated cost or price becomes more important. [X ] approximately equal to cost or price; or [ ] significantly less important than cost or price. As the evaluated cost/price becomes more equal, relative importance of all other evaluation factors becomes more significant. The final award decision may involve a trade-off among cost or price and the non-price factors. Factors that may be considered in the trade-off process include, but are not limited to: Item criticality and weapons system application Current inventory status Historical delivery or quality problems Concerns over limited supply sources and industrial base Benefits from obtaining new sources (c) COST OR PRICE. The Government will evaluate the offered cost or price. The Government will add any other cost or price evaluation factors identified elsewhere in this solicitation (e.g. Buy American Act or FOB Origin transportation costs) to arrive at the offeror's evaluated cost or price. The evaluated cost or price will be used in conjunction with the other non-price factors to determine the best value to the Government. (d) PAST PERFORMANCE. Past performance includes, but is not limited to, the offeror's record of conforming to contract requirements and standards of good workmanship; adherence to contract schedules, including the administrative aspects of performance; the offeror's reputation for reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and generally, the offeror's business-like concern for the customer's interest. (i) The Automated Best Value System (ABVS) or the Past Performance Information Retrieval System - Statistical Reporting (PPIRS-SR), as applicable, will be used to evaluate quality and past performance on DLA awards (see 52.215-9003 or 52.215-9022). (ii) In addition, offerors may submit with their offer information on past and current Federal (non-DLA Aviation), State and local government and private sector contracts performed by the offeror at the proposed performance location within the last three years that are similar in nature to this acquisition. Offerors electing to submit this data must furnish at least the following information: name and address of the contracting entity; the contract number; award and completion dates; the dollar value; the contract type; the items or services provided; two references, with title and phone number; and any problems encountered and the corrective action taken by the offeror. (iii) By submitting past performance information, the offeror agrees to permit the Government's representatives to contact the listed references and inquire of the offeror's performance. If more than three contracts are identified, the Government reserves the right to randomly select and limit its review to three contracts. In addition to the information provided, the Government may consider information obtained from other sources when evaluating the offeror's past performance. Offerors will be given the opportunity to discuss negative past performance information obtained from references if the offeror has not had a previous opportunity to comment on that information. (iv) Offerors with no past performance history (whether internal or external to the Federal government) will not be evaluated favorably nor unfavorably. (e) PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FACTORS. The Government will use the past performance evaluation factors marked below in addition to cost or price and other evaluation factors specified in the solicitation. Unless indicated otherwise, past performance is significantly more important than other non-price factors. Within the past performance subfactors, ABVS scores/PPIRS assessments (as applicable) will be weighed most heavily. Historical quality history and delivery schedule compliance (not captured in ABVS/PPIRS) will be weighed more heavily than the remaining past performance subfactors. All other non-price evaluation factors specified in this solicitation weigh equally, unless otherwise indicated. [ ] ABVS Score/PPIRS-SR Assessments (52.215-9022) [ X ] PPIRS-SR Assessments (52.215-9003) (EProcurement) [ ] PPIRS-RC Assessments [ ] Historical Quality (not captured in ABVS/PPIRS) [ ] Historical Delivery Schedule Compliance (not captured in ABVS/PPIRS) [ ] ABILITYONE (52.215-9005) [ ] Mentoring Business Agreements (MBA) (52.219-9003) [ ] Other (specify): ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ EVALUATION AND AWARD - ALT I (MAY 2009) (e) QUOTED DELIVERY. The Government will evaluate the offeror's compliance with the delivery schedule specified in the solicitation. Quoting a greater number of days delivery than requested under the solicitation will result in the quote being evaluated less favorably than a quote meeting the requested delivery schedule. There will be no evaluation preference for offered delivery which is earlier than the requested delivery schedule. (f) NON-PRICE FACTORS. Quoted delivery and past performance will be evaluated equally, unless indicated otherwise below. ( ) Quoted Delivery is weighed more heavily than past performance. ( ) Past Performance is weighed more heavily than quoted delivery. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ TIME OF DELIVERY - INCREMENTAL DELIVERY (NOV 2011) (a) Offers in response to this solicitation will be evaluated as specified in the solicitation. Delivery shall be offered in terms of a number of days after date of award. The number of delivery days REQUIRED in this solicitation is calculated based on the Government's planned need and customer requirements. Unless delivery is identified elsewhere in the solicitation as an evaluation factor, Offerors are encouraged to confirm their delivery terms as closely as possible to the delivery days REQUIRED, and there will be no evaluation preference, or penalty for faster delivery. Offering a greater number of delivery days than the REQUIRED DELIVERY SCHEDULE may result in the offer not being considered; however, the Government reserves the right to consider offered delivery times that EXCEEDS the number of delivery days required by the Government. Delivery is REQUIRED by the Government in accordance with the following schedule: | REQUIRED DELIVERY SCHEDULE ITEM NO. QUANTITY WITHIN NO DAYS AFTER DATE OF AWARD (Any balance shall be delivered at the rate of every day thereafter.) |The Government may elect to consider for award only those offers that comply with the REQUIRED DELIVERY SCHEDULE but reserves the right to consider offered delivery times that EXCEED the number of delivery days required by the Government. The Offeror may propose an alternative delivery schedule below. If the Offeror proposes no other delivery schedule, the REQUIRED DELIVERY SCHEDULE above will apply. | OFFEROR'S PROPOSED DELIVERY SCHEDULE ITEM NO. QUANTITY WITHIN NO. DAYS AFTER DATE OF AWARD (Any balance shall be delivered at the rate of every days thereafter.)| **** ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/DLA/J3/DSCR/SPE4A717R0639/listing.html)
- Record
- SN04472318-W 20170415/170413235523-31dcdfa50f91e545ddba22c96ee951dd (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |