MODIFICATION
15 -- F-16 Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) Production
- Notice Date
- 12/14/2017
- Notice Type
- Modification/Amendment
- NAICS
- 336413
— Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Air Force, Air Force Materiel Command, AFLCMC / AFSC / AFNWC - HILL AFB, ., Hill AFB, Utah, 84056, United States
- ZIP Code
- 84056
- Solicitation Number
- FA8232-18-R-0001
- Archive Date
- 7/12/2018
- Point of Contact
- Eric A. Dumpert, Phone: 801-777-5964, Nathan P. Lee, Phone: 8017754928
- E-Mail Address
-
eric.dumpert.1@us.af.mil, nathan.lee.3@us.af.mil
(eric.dumpert.1@us.af.mil, nathan.lee.3@us.af.mil)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- Total Small Business
- Description
- 1. Attached questons and answers form industry 14 Dec 2017 Q: We downloaded the PPI tool from FBO on Wed. However, we do not see any Letter of Transmittals Templates, etc. Will the Government be providing these? A: No, use whatever format EZ source allows. Q: Our previous experience with Past Performance has usually had us sending out questionnaires to the contacts for each of the contracts we select. We did not see any questionnaires as part of the RFP package. Please confirm that there is no requirement to send out questionnaires to each of the POC's on our Past Performance section. A: There is no requirement for sending out questionnaires. Q: The RFP requests that we show relevancy to the SLEP effort for all Past Performance contracts selected. The PPI tool does not appear to allow for any charts, etc. If we were to include a chart to show relevancy does that count against the Page Limit? It's not clear to us how many pages the PPI information will take. Also, is it permissible to have an introduction to the Past Performance Section and if so does that count against the page limit? The page limit for the Past Performance volume just referenced 5 pages per contract but it wasn't clear if we could use any of those pages as a general page. A: The outputs of PPI Tool will not count towards your page limit. If there are things that you want to include in the proposal that fall out of the scope of the PPI Tool, you may include it in the Past Performance volume. Please keep in mind that the page count will be enforced on anything outside of the PPI Tool. Q: Please confirm that there is NOT a separate CLIN for FAI or tooling/NRE. A: There is no CLIN for First Article Inspection. There is no CLIN for tooling. There is no CLIN for nonrecurring engineering. Q: MKDCSLA & B included P/N 16B2115-15/-16, and -9 /-12 respectfully as manufacturing source controlled items (line 17 in both attachment "A"s) 201716924-10/-30, and MK5460 attachment "A"s do not have a line 17 nor is there any reference to these two part numbers. Were the P/N's omitted intentionally or is this an error? Should the 16B2115 parts be procured from controlled sources? A: This is an error but there is no missing information. 16B2115 does not require source approval Q: Each TDP Parts Listing excel file contains portions for effectivity numbers and qty. How do these numbers affect our proposal and/or pricing, if at all? A: The effectivities listed do not affect the proposal. Q: Each TDP P/L excel file states the following: "The Following are Time/Temperature Controlled Items And Will Not Be Furnished In Kits" What does that mean? Do we need to furnish them by any other type of shipment? Apart of the kits? Does these materials are for manufacturing uses only? A: "The Following are Time/Temperature Controlled Items And Will Not Be Furnished In Kits" means that you do not have to provide the kits. Q: In some of the TDP P/L excel files there are lines for Engineering data / ECN. How should we handle this info? Should we identify each and every ECN and see how it affects the kit? Or is it only a reference to a previously-completed ECN and we should disregard it? A: Disregard the engineering data, only worry about the parts/hardware listed in the kit. The EDL's list all Lockheed drawings, ECN's and specs necessary to procure the parts in the kit. Q: We can't find the Excel P/L's files for the following kits: 201716924-10, 201716924-30. We have all the other files (like 201716924-10 EDL - but it doesn't contain qty) A: 201716924 is an AF drawing of the kit list and will list what is in a -10 or a -30. It is listed on the EDL and is within the TDP/AMERDEC file. This is different than the other kits which have an MKPL Excel File. Q: In Kit MK5414A attachment A, section 22 (page 4) we see the following instruction: "Reduce the following kit parts...." But in the list itself we see values with zero. Does it mean we need to reduce the qty to zero? If so why don't some of the parts show on the delete section? For example NAS1724-4-14 or NAS1581A3T7 Or is the meaning we need to reduce "Zero" items - therefore no the reduce anything? A: Apologies for the different ways of wording things but just follow the directions. The note says "Reduce the following kit parts to the following quantities..." so if it lists a zero the quantity should be reduced to zero, effectively deleting it. Q: Here is a list of files that are missing. Part Number Description Notes Answers 16B1107-7 LONGERON Missing BP & PL. Lockheed Proprietary, no drawing available must procure from approved sources on Attachment A 16B1107-8 LONGERON Missing BP & PL. Lockheed Proprietary, no drawing available must procure from approved sources on Attachment A 16B5112-15 LONGERON Missing BP & PL. MK5425 shows this as deleted 16B540-29 PLATE Dash number not found on bp or pl... is there an EO that is missing? See 16B540 Zn B44 16B540-30 PLATE Dash number not found on bp or pl... is there an EO that is missing? See 16B540 Zn B44 16B660-13 Bushing Need most recent dwg revision or an EO that adds the -13 16B660 ECN 541N0 sent out 12/7/2017. Contact Lt Hartley if you have not received it. 16B660-51 Bushing Need most recent dwg revision or an EO that adds the -51 16B660 ECN 541N0 sent out 12/7/2017. Contact Lt Hartley if you have not received it. 16D700-743 BRACKET Dash number not found on bp... is there an EO that is missing? See 16D700 Zn C36 16K0685-1 BEARING Missing BP & PL. 16K0685 drawing and PL included in SLEP Additional Files Folder. 16Y010-9 SHIM Missing BP & PL. See Attachment A MK5414B Missing Attachment A SLEP is only procuring kits that are included in the solicitation. MK5423B Missing Attachment A SLEP is only procuring kits that are included in the solicitation. MK5425B Missing Attachment A SLEP is only procuring kits that are included in the solicitation. MK5427B Missing Attachment A SLEP is only procuring kits that are included in the solicitation. P6102 Glass Filled Nylon Need FQML for this spec Will provide file by 12/18/2017 Q: On PL of kit MK5414A shows parts ASPF-DT6-8 & ASPF-DT6-7. Both of them show description Fastener (C3629-6-8) & (C3629-8-7). Section 24 on attachment A states that when fastener C3629-X-Y is called out, you need to purchase three different items instead. It is our understanding that parts ASPF-DT6-8 & ASPF-DT6-7 also need to be replaced by those three items. Is it right? A: Yes that is correct. Q: Section 19 (last item) calls for adding 10 units of C3629-8-7. Does this call for 10 units of each part listed in section 24? A: Yes this is correct. Q: In kits MK5423A, MK5420A-D & MK 5425B we find "No Number" under the P/N column. Instead we find a P/N in the description column. It is our understanding the meaning is that the description shows the PN we need to purchase. Is that correct? A: Yes that is correct. Q: A lot of the drawings are in a very poor condition. Are there any digital copies of the data? A: There are no other versions of the drawings beyond what is in the data package. If there are specific cases where a drawing is truly illegible let us know and we can look at either interpreting it or finding a better quality scan. An updated 16RB526 drawing was added to the additional files folder because the scan on the data disks was considered illegible. Q: We need clarification on one of the requirements in Section L Paragraph 5.1 please. Is the client authorization letter referenced in the following sentence written by the Offeror or written by the Offeror's Client? "For each identified effort for a commercial customer, the offeror shall also submit a client authorization letter, authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the Offeror's performance." A: The client authorization letter is written by the offeror. 2. Extend the solisitation close date to 16 Jan 2018
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USAF/AFMC/OOALC/FA8232-18-R-0001/listing.html)
- Place of Performance
- Address: Contractor's facility., United States
- Record
- SN04766805-W 20171216/171214230856-885a87d813c484747f9e4047c5a2b28d (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |