Loren Data's SAM Daily™

FBO DAILY - FEDBIZOPPS ISSUE OF OCTOBER 26, 2019 FBO #6544
DOCUMENT

C -- CONSTRUCTION: 557-20-1-5907-0001, Modify USP 797 Area for Compliance (VA-19-00102672) - Attachment

Notice Date

10/24/2019
 

Notice Type

Attachment
 

NAICS

541330 — Engineering Services
 

Contracting Office

Department of Veterans Affairs;VISN 7 Network Contracting Activity;501 Greene Street;Hatcher Building - Suite 2;Augusta GA 30901
 

ZIP Code

30901
 

Solicitation Number

36C24720R0006
 

Archive Date

1/31/2020
 

Point of Contact

Jason Kinchen
 

E-Mail Address

3-0188
 

Small Business Set-Aside

N/A
 

Description

This modification is to delete evaluation factors in the Pre-Solicitation and replace them with the ones below and insert Past Performance Questionnaire. Evaluation Factors: SELECTION CRITERIA: Selection will be based on the following criteria: PER FAR 36.602- Professional qualifications necessary for satisfactory performance of required service and working together as a team (in-house and/or consultants(s). (The firm and A/E on staff representing the project or signing drawings in each discipline must be licensed to practice in accordance with the Georgia State law requirements. Provide Professional License numbers and or proof of Licensure.) Specialized experience and technical competence in the type of work required, including, where appropriate, experience in energy conservation, pollution prevention, waste reduction, and the use of recovered materials. (Include Government and private Experience on similar projects) Capacity to accomplish work in the required time. (Provide firms experience with similar size projects and available capacity of key disciplines). Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules. (Government Past Performance Information Systems may be accessed) PER VAAR 836.602-1 Reputation and standing of the firm and its principal officials with respect to professional performance, general management, and cooperativeness. (Awards, Outstanding Merits, Recommendations) Record of significant claims against the firm because of improper or incomplete architectural and engineering services. Specific experience and qualifications of personnel proposed for assignment to the project and their record of working together as a team. The selected A/E must have previous experience in the design of high cost high tech medical equipment site prep within Medical Facilities. The A/E must provide documentation of at least three designs of new builds or renovations within Medical Facilities of equal scope and magnitude. The design experience submitted under this criterion must have been completed within the past three (3) years and must contain references with names, and phone numbers, and submitted along with the SF330. PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation 36C24919R0112 A/E - Construct MRI & SPEC-CT HCHT Site Prep Building at the Dublin VAMC. PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS The Network Contracting Office (NCO) 7, Augusta, GA has issued a solicitation for the for the aforementioned project. Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your organization as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to NCO 7 Network Contracting Office, Augusta, GA. The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Offeror shall only submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Section A of the questionnaire as provided to the assessors. Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated. Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than the solicitation due date of July 15, 2019. Assessor is requested to send electronically to jason.kinchen@va.gov. Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request. PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors) Solicitation Number 36C24720R0006 Project/Requirement 557-CSI-378 - A/E - Construct MRI & SPEC-CT HCHT Site Prep Building Customer/Agency Department of the Veteran Affairs, NCO 7, Augusta, GA 1. Prospective Government Contractor s ______________________________________ Name and Address: ______________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________ 2. Contractor Point of Contact: ___________________________________________ 3. Phone number (with area code):__________________________________________ 4. Assessor Contract Award number: ________________________________________ 5. Description of Services provided under contract: _______________________________________________________________________ 6. Contract award date: ___________ Contract Amount: Initial ___________Final ____ 7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date: _________________________ ASSESSOR INFORMATION: Assessor Name Title Phone Number/Email Address 8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to NCO 9 Network Contracting Office, Murfreesboro, Tennessee ____________________________________________ (Signature) _____________________________________________ __________________________ (Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date) SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors). RATING SCALE Definitions Past Performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Description Acceptable (A) Based on the offeror s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror s performance record is unknown. Unacceptable (U) Based on the offeror s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided. QUALITY OF SERVICE 1. Rate the contractor s compliance with contractual requirements. A U 2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service. A U PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING: SCHEDULE 1. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by contract requirements. A U PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING: BUSINESS RELATIONS 1. Overall rating of contractor s business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolving any problems, etc.) A U 2. Rate the working relationship between contractor s management, and your company (i.e. contractor s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer). A U 3. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required submittals and reports in a timely manner. A U 4. Rate the contractor s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution. A U 5. Overall rating of contractor s business relations. A U PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING: How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor? ______ Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor. ______ Would most likely award another contract to this contractor. ______ Would not award another contract to this contractor. PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING: Overall Rating of Contractor s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed. Acceptable Unacceptable GENERAL COMMENTS ASSESSOR: Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement. ü Role Period of Involvement Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer Technical Project Lead/Project Officer OTHERS ________________________________________ __________________________ (Signature) (Date) ________________________ __________________________ (Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name) ____________________________ ______________________________ (Phone Number) (Organization)
 

Web Link

FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/VA/AuVAMC/VAMCCO80220/36C24720R0006/listing.html)
 

Document(s)

Attachment
 

File Name: 36C24720R0006 36C24720R0006_2.docx (https://www.vendorportal.ecms.va.gov/FBODocumentServer/DocumentServer.aspx?DocumentId=5200593&FileName=36C24720R0006-001.docx)

Link: https://www.vendorportal.ecms.va.gov/FBODocumentServer/DocumentServer.aspx?DocumentId=5200593&FileName=36C24720R0006-001.docx

 

Note: If links are broken, refer to Point of Contact above or contact the FBO Help Desk at 877-472-3779.
 

Record

SN05482095-W 20191026/191024230801-eb8b058d8b0ec4fa6e794b0353f60123 (fbodaily.com)
 

Source

FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

---

| FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |