SPECIAL NOTICE
A -- REQUEST FOR WHITE PAPERS: NASA SBIR PHASE II SEQUENTIAL AWARDS TO ADVANCE MOON TO MARS OBJECTIVES
- Notice Date
- 1/8/2021 1:23:16 PM
- Notice Type
- Special Notice
- NAICS
- 541713
— Research and Development in Nanotechnology
- Contracting Office
- NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER STENNIS SPACE CENTER MS 39529 USA
- ZIP Code
- 39529
- Solicitation Number
- 80NSSC21SEQUENTIALWP
- Response Due
- 2/25/2021 2:00:00 PM
- Archive Date
- 03/12/2021
- Point of Contact
- Theresa Stanley, Steven Brockway
- E-Mail Address
-
Agency-SBIR-STTRSolicitation@mail.nasa.gov, Agency-SBIR-STTRSolicitation@mail.nasa.gov
(Agency-SBIR-STTRSolicitation@mail.nasa.gov, Agency-SBIR-STTRSolicitation@mail.nasa.gov)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- SBA Total Small Business Set-Aside (FAR 19.5)
- Description
- 2021 Request for White Papers: NASA SBIR Phase II Sequential Awards to Advance Moon to Mars Objectives 1.� Background In order to support NASA�s ability to land humans and support a sustainable presence on the Moon , NASA is considering inviting companies to propose for Sequential Phase II awards with an elevated award value from $2.5 Million to $5 Million through the Agency�s Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) programs in 2021. These awards would facilitate rapid post Phase II development of technologies with the goal to infuse key technologies that reach specific milestones into specific NASA programs working to advance the objectives of the Moon to Mars campaign. 2.� Purpose Why is NASA requesting this information? The SBIR program is performing a portfolio evaluation exercise with the aim of determining what NASA SBIR Phase II technologies show the promise of risk reduction for Moon to Mars related programs, and what firms are capable candidates for further investment through a potential Sequential Phase II award. NASA has a large SBIR Phase II portfolio to evaluate, and this exercise will help accomplish two objectives: 1. Highlight and map SBIR Phase II technologies to NASA�s Moon to Mars Programs with white papers providing additional context and details about opportunities for small business technology development. 2. Provide a participatory method for interested parties to communicate that they are engaged and ready to support a subset of NASA�s Moon to Mars priorities that may be appropriate for small business participation, as described in this call for white papers. 3.� Disclaimer NASA reserves the right to use the information received from these white papers in any way it chooses, including determinations to invite companies to propose for a Phase II Sequential award. A Phase II Awardee may receive one additional, Sequential Phase II award to continue the work of an initial Phase II award without additional competition. Responding to this call for white papers is not a prerequisite to participating in any post Phase II program. This white paper can be used for programmatic planning to assess the state of small business capability and does not constitute a funding opportunity or a formal competition. Respondents should be advised that NASA takes no financial responsibility for any expenses incurred for responding to the white paper call. Future awards (if any) will be subject to and contingent upon the availability of funds. Respondents should not expect to receive feedback or reply to their submission. 4.� Timeline and Method for Responses NASA uses electronically supported business processes for the SBIR/STTR programs. An offeror must have internet access and an email address. Paper submissions are not accepted. The Electronic Handbook (EHB) for submitting white papers is located at http://sbir.nasa.gov under the Handbooks section; please refer to the SBIR/STTR Proposal Submission EHB link therein for the portal to submit a white paper. The EHB guides firms through the steps for submitting a white paper. All EHB submissions are through a secure connection. Communication between NASA�s SBIR/STTR programs and the firm is primarily through a combination of EHB and email. The submissions site will be available from January 8, 2021 to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2021. A complete white paper package shall be received no later than 5:00 p.m. EST on February 25, 2021, via the NASA SBIR/STTR website (http://sbir.nasa.gov), under the Handbooks section. The Electronic Handbook (EHB) will no longer accept submissions after the published deadline of 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2021 as reflected by the internal EHB clock. Submission after the deadline will result in the offeror receiving an access denied message from the EHB; this reflects that the deadline has been exceeded. Any remaining parts of the white paper package will not be uploaded or able to be completed. If a complete white paper package, containing all requested content per section 8 of this Request for White Papers, is not received by the 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time deadline, the white paper package will be determined to be incomplete and will not be assessed. Neither the NASA SBIR/STTR Technical Support Help Desk nor the NASA SBIR Program Management Office will be able to accept white paper packages after the 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2021 deadline has been exceeded. 5.� Eligibility Firms are eligible to submit a white paper if they have a prior NASA SBIR Phase II award from Program Years 2010 to present as long as the prior Phase II contract has not already received a Sequential Phase II award, from any government agency including NASA. Technical Need Areas indicate subtopics which the SBIR program has assessed as having content that may be applicable to these Technical Need Areas. However, firms with prior SBIR Phase IIs from NASA Program Years 2010 to present who have not yet received a Sequential Phase II award on that prior Phase II from any agency may submit a white paper in response to a Technical Need Area so long as they justify in the white paper how the continued development of their prior Phase II innovation meets stated goals within the Technical Need Area. For this 2021 Request for White Papers, NASA will be conducting a pilot to consider white papers on Phase IIs from other government agencies (OGAs). Firms with complete SBIR Phase II awards from certain other government agencies (OGAs). Firms with complete SBIR Phase II awards from a select group of OGAs �whose Phase II contracts were awarded in fiscal years 2011 to 2018 will also be allowed to submit white papers so long as the prior Phase II contract has not already received a Sequential Phase II award, from any government agency. For this 2021 Request for White Papers, NASA will be accepting white papers based on Department of Defense (DoD) Phase IIs from the aforementioned fiscal year range so long as they meet other appropriate eligibility criteria. White Papers that source from non-DOD OGA Phase IIs and/or that do not meet other applicability criteria will not be assessed. Firms may submit a white paper in response to an indicated Technical Need Area so long as they justify in the white paper how the continued development of their prior Phase II innovation meets stated goals within the Technical Need Area. Firms submitting white papers pertaining to OGA Phase II awards must identify the pertinent Phase II award identifying information (such as contract number), what form the prior Phase II award took (contract, grant, other), and whom the approving officials from the appropriate other government agency are for the relevant awards in the text of the white paper submission. Should NASA choose to invite a full proposal based on an OGA Phase II, the proposal will be contingent on the OGA granting NASA the permission to issue a Sequential Phase II award on the prior Phase II. Development efforts should largely continue from the end status and Technology Readiness Level (TRL) development status of the prior Phase II development and/or any continued efforts that happened since the end of the Phase II effort. The detailed effort should involve and justify the continued development of at least one of the primary technologies already developed during the prior applicable Phase II. While some re-development may be required for the specific application purposes called out in these Technical Need Areas, any significant new developments that differ from the prior Phase II technology or re-developments that impact the technology should be justified as pertinent to the original Phase II award and the Technical Need Area the white paper is being submitted under. Likewise, impacts to the starting Technology Readiness Level (TRL) should be justified. White papers on technologies that are not adequately justified as relevant continuations of the prior cited Phase II or are not compliant may not be assessed or considered. Additionally, only firms who continue to qualify as Small Business Concerns (SBCs), as defined here: http://sbir.nasa.gov/content/nasa-sbirsttr-program-definitions, are eligible to submit white papers. White paper submissions are limited to a maximum of 3 responses per Technology Need Area (TNA) and 4 responses total per firm. These Technical Need Areas may have multiple vested programs and/or use cases. Within that Technical Need Area, white papers may justify the technology as applicable to as few or as many of those applicable programs or cases as is appropriate; however, each white paper may only pertain to one Technical Need Area. These Technical Need Areas have been identified for this announcement due to their key and cross-program Moon to Mars relevance. Subtopics within the Technical Need Area were identified based on the technical applicability of the original solicitation subtopic to current needs, pertinence and timeliness to priority Moon to Mars objectives and needs, timeliness to the potential Moon to Mars needs, evaluations against the current state of the art and available technologies, and cross program relevance. Note that the lack of inclusion of a given subtopic/program year and the technologies developed from that cycle does not reflect a NASA position on those technologies. Note that while some subtopics in given program years are identified for a Technical Need Area, the original scope of those subtopics, and original awards therein, may have been more expansive than the current stated need. While a given prior award may be included within that subtopic and program year, please review the need statement for that Technical Need Area to decide if you think that your technology is pertinent to this current development opportunity. White papers on technologies that are not applicable, or whose development path diverges from the stated need, will not be considered. Developments must be directly related to and continue the prior Phase II work and must demonstrate relevance to both the applicable original solicitation subtopic and current cited NASA goals in this area. For Phase II awards from other government agencies, proposed technology development must demonstrate relevance to current cited NASA goals in this area but may also discuss cross-cutting applications. Note that any further development beyond the prior Phase II conducted (through various NASA SBIR program funding vehicles, other NASA mechanisms, or other development avenues), that may be completed or ongoing, should be discussed in establishing the current state of the technology leading into a potential future development effort. If there is ongoing work on the technology, detail the work, the anticipated completion timeframe, and any known risks/implications to a follow-on development resulting from the ongoing work. 6.� Technical Need Areas 6.1 Technical Need Area 2021-1: Advanced Radiation Tolerant Technologies to Support In-Space Avionics and High Performance Space Computing (HPSC) Needs NASA seeks advances to enable dramatic improvements in avionics and instrument data processing systems. These advances will allow greater degrees of mission autonomy, crew interaction, and data collection and processing for the next generation of science instrumentation in support of not only the Artemis Program but also NASA�s greater science and exploration goals.� Specific needs include: � Technologies to enable the development of high performance, radiation hardened general purpose multi-core processor-based SOCs and flight computer boards including: Mixed signal IP for the Global Foundries 22FDX process, including Phase Locked Loop (PLL) and Serializer/Deserializer (SERDES) Fault tolerant processor IP (CPU Cores) with support for vector processing IP for SOC on-chip interconnect between CPU(s) and on-chip and off-chip memories and peripheral (I/O) interfaces IP for SOC RAD-tolerant/RAD-hard clock and reset design and management IP for SOC industry-standard interface. PCIe, DDR, Ethernet, etc. Fault tolerant processor IP development for software-defined/configured, high-performance applications and low-latency/deterministic applications System software for fault tolerance and power management of integrated high performance flight computer systems Radiation tolerant high bandwidth digitizers (> 10 GSPS) Radiation hardened multi-chip module volatile and non-volatile memory devices System-level solutions enabling the use of COTS coprocessor devices for mission critical applications in harsh radiation environments Radiation tolerant crew displays and system�level solutions�graphics processing technologies for crewed vehicles and assets for long term multiple mission use Supporting technologies to spaceflight computing systems, including onboard storage systems, point-of-load converters, instrument and sensor interfaces White papers should establish and justify pertinent metrics appropriate to the technology, discuss which and how pertinent metrics may have already been met in prior developments and, if not yet achieved, how near term advancement and testing could demonstrate and verify the potential for the technology to meet these ambitious goals. This may include, but is not limited to, performance, size, weight, reliability, extended operating environment tolerance, and power metrics. White papers should discuss any system integration and/or interface features, requirements, and challenges of their technology. With respect to the lunar and other exploration/science destination spaceflight usage of these technologies, efforts should include and discuss early risk reduction demonstrations of radiation and other pertinent environmental factor tolerance, as appropriate. Refer to the referenced Cross-Program Design Specification for Natural Environments (DSNE) for further information on environments associated with operational phases corresponding to lunar missions but please discuss any features and/or metrics that may enable further exploration or science missions. Efforts should also detail aspects and efforts related to achieving production run reproducibility and lot to lot verification of consistent performance. References: SLS-SPEC-159 - Cross-Program Design Specification for Natural Environments (DSNE) Revision H� https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205007447 � ���� � � � � � � � TNA 2021-1 Potentially Applicable Subtopics by Year 2010 - O1.02, O3.05, X6.02 2011 - S1.03, S3.05 2012 - H4.02, H6.02, A1.03 2014 - S1.02, S5.01, S5.03, S20.03 2015 - S5.01 2016 - S3.09, S5.03 2017 - S3.08, S5.03, Z6.01 2018 - S3.08 6.2 Technical Need Area 2021-2: System Development of Extreme Lunar Environment Mitigation Technologies for Lunar Exploration Vehicles and Payloads NASA is seeking to advance and implement environmental mitigation or management technologies that enable long duration operations across the full range of lunar surface environments. Specific needs include one or more of the following: Systems and materials, including coatings, for insulation, protection, and/or structures that maintain integrity and function over the full range of combined extreme lunar surface environmental effects including but not limited to thermal, radiation, and other effects Radiation tolerant thermal management systems for a variety of lunar exploration applications Extreme environment conditions may include: Surviving the long lunar night and/or long duration exploration of and/or operations within shadowed craters in darkness and associated thermal, radiation, and plasma conditions. Extremes of ambient lunar environment factors including, but not limited to, radiation, electromagnetic effects, plasma, vacuum, dust, and thermal conditions supporting operations at varied destinations including lunar poles; refer to the referenced Cross-Program Design Specification for Natural Environments (DSNE) for further information on environments associated with lunar surface operational phases. All environments associated with launch, transfer, landing, deployment, and operations of the lunar vehicles and/or payloads that this technology may be appropriate for. White papers should not only discuss the development of the technology but also detail how this technology may be pertinent or scalable to a specific or a range of lunar applications (including concepts and/or existing/future platforms for vehicles and/or payloads including habitation elements). Define anticipated requirements of your technology that would align with at least one representative vehicle or payload associated use case. White papers should discuss component, subsystem, and/or system integration and interface features, requirements, and challenges. White papers should define what the targeted key performance metrics and requirements of the proposed system(s) are with regards to pertinent environmental conditions and compare these versus the current state of the art (SOA). The key performance metrics and requirements of the system should be justified as to how they will enable the larger vehicle or payload to survive the lunar surface environments. Define what appropriate tests would be to adequately demonstrate the achievement of those metrics and requirements. Efforts should advance the maturity of the technology to readily progress toward a follow-on demonstration or implementation(s) as part of a flight payload(s) and/or vehicle(s). Please discuss and justify any development effort, features, and/or experience pertinent to maturing concepts to certifiable flight-ready hardware and routine production beyond demonstration. Discuss appropriate integrated system operational considerations and features. Efforts should discuss the expected state at the end of this effort and discuss gaps or additional development that would be required prior to vehicle or payload integration, operation, and/or use, if any. The development discussion should detail how the effort addresses key technical risks that would need to be overcome to enable infusion and/or commercialization into vehicles and payloads including representative integrated tests. Additionally, features or developments that will enable the repeated and affordable manufacturability, scaling for different applications, and integration of the system should be discussed. References/Target Metrics: SLS-SPEC-159 - Cross-Program Design Specification for Natural Environments (DSNE) Revision H� https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205007447� TNA 2021-2 Potentially Applicable Subtopics by Year 2010 - X3.04, X5.01, X5.03, S3.02 2011 - X11.01 2012 - H3.04, H5.01, H5.02 2014 - H3.01, H11.01, H20.02, S3.07 2015 - H3.03, H5.01, H5.03, H11.01, S3.07 2016 - Z2.01, Z3.01, S3.07 2017 - Z2.01, S3.06 2018 - Z2.01 6.3 Technical Need Area 2021-3: High Delta-V Propulsion for Small Spacecraft Lunar Applications and Beyond NASA is seeking to advance and operationally use compact, high throughput sub-kW electric propulsion systems for small spacecraft to enable multiple lunar exploration, science, and support missions as part of the greater Artemis program. Classes of Small Spacecraft that this development would be targeted for include spacecraft of various form factors including, but not limited to, large format CubeSats (12U) and microsatellite class spacecraft. Propulsion systems that can produce significant delta-V over the course of a mission are an enabling capability required by spacecraft to conduct lunar and deep-space spacecraft missions in support of technology and capability advancements by NASA�s Small Spacecraft Technology Program as well as multiple potential exploration, science, and space utilization missions by other end-users in NASA, other Federal Agencies, industry and academia. Several missions are being planned to conduct investigations/observations in the cis-lunar region and beyond. Examples in support of the Artemis program include distributed or swarm-based spacecraft missions, missions to conduct extensive mapping of lunar resources, and/or spacecraft supporting lunar communications network architectures, among others. This capability for small spacecraft is also essential to NASA�s Science Mission Directorate to fulfill the science missions envisioned within the decadal surveys. In order to meet NASA�s envisioned technology advancements in response to this call, proposed activities must target the production of complete end to end onboard propulsion systems that can be consistently and reliably manufactured, are compatible with the size, weight, and power constraints of small spacecraft,�can impart significant delta-V to large format CubeSats (12U) or microsatellite class spacecraft�and be capable of a multi-year mission with greater than thousands of hours of lifetime.�It is anticipated that systems capable of imparting a total delta-V of 1 km/s or greater would be enabling for a number of mission applications at Earth, the Moon and beyond. If targeting less that 1 km/s, please justify the expected delta-V for the targeted class of spacecraft and show that the system would be able to insert a payload into a lunar orbit from a lunar transfer trajectory and maintain that lunar orbit for a period of time. Systems must also be tolerant to the deep space radiation and associated other environments from launch through lunar/cis-lunar use. In your response, please discuss and justify all pertinent key metrics of your technology. Define anticipated requirements of your technology that would align with at least one representative lunar exploration support or science mission for at least one form factor with a payload of a defined size. At a minimum, it can be assumed that the system would need to be able to insert a payload into a lunar orbit from a lunar transfer trajectory and maintain that lunar orbit for a period of time. Identify the technology development and testing required to meet the needs of the lunar mission and to target your technology to the appropriate class of spacecraft. Please also consider and discuss the systems compatibility with appropriate size, weight, and power constraints of the targeted class of small spacecraft, compatibility with secondary launch opportunities and/or range safety, and compatibility with the cislunar and deep space environment. Discussion may include development such as life extension, increased propellant throughput, developments related to use of alternative propellants, as well as technology development for supporting subsystems including power generation, storage and processing units. Please also consider and discuss how the life expectancy, propellant throughput expectancy, and deep space environmental compatibility would be demonstrated and tested. In the context of an approximate 2-year long Sequential Phase II effort, discuss how full, representative, and/or accelerated testing of life and other factors may occur, including any pertinent modeling and diagnostic efforts used for demonstration or verification purposes. Likewise, beyond a Sequential Phase II effort, discuss what follow on activities would be required to complete life testing and/or certify use for the planned lifetime of the system, if appropriate. Detail design factors for tolerating environments, how appropriate environmental demonstrations and verifications would occur, and when in your development process these tests and verifications would occur. Refer to the referenced Cross-Program Design Specification for Natural Environments (DSNE) for further information on environments with certain phases of lunar missions that may be applicable considerations. Metrics should, at a minimum, include thrust level, specific impulse, propulsive throughput, among other pertinent metrics including mass, volume, power requirements, etc. Features that enable aspects such as steering/thrust vector control should also be discussed. Please discuss any system integration and interface requirements and/or developments including, but not limited to, mechanical, control, thermal, and power considerations. A key goal for this effort is to advance concepts such that a reliable production line of units could be created to support multiple future missions and missions that may require multiple consistent assets. To that end, features and developments associated with ensuring production quality and the ability to reliably manufacture propulsion systems that can achieve consistent performance metrics across multiple units and production runs should be detailed. Production lead times should be consistent with the short development cycles of small spacecraft missions. Unit costs should be favorably influenced by manufacturability improvements and volume production. Please discuss features or developments aimed at optimizing throughput of the manufacturing, assembly, and testing of production line systems. Efforts should discuss how the technology will be developed in order to address these needs and considerations. Efforts should mature the technology in this Sequential effort so as to be able to readily progress to a follow-on flight demonstration; please discuss and justify any development effort, features, and/or experience pertinent to maturing concepts to certifiable flight-ready hardware and routine production beyond demonstration. Efforts should discuss the expected state at the end of this effort and discuss gaps or additional development that would be required prior to a flight demonstration, if any. References: SLS-SPEC-159 - Cross-Program Design Specification for Natural Environments (DSNE) Revision H� https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205007447� TNA 2021-3 Potentially Applicable Subtopics by Year 2010 - S2.01, S3.04, X2.04 2011 - S3.04, X2.03 2012 - S3.03, E1.01 2014 - Z20.01, S3.02 2015 - Z4.01, S3.02 2016 - S3.02 2017 - Z8.01, S3.02 2018 - Z8.01, Z10.02 7.� Formatting Constraints: Note: The government administratively screens all white papers and may not assess any response that does not conform to the following formatting requirements and page limitations. Page Limitations and Margins A white paper shall not exceed a total of 10 standard 8 1/2 x 11 inch (21.6 x 27.9 cm) pages. White papers uploaded with more than 10 pages may not be accepted by the electronic handbook (EHB) system or assessed. Each page shall be numbered consecutively at the bottom. Margins shall be 1.0 inch (2.5 cm). The space allocated to each part of the white paper will depend on the project chosen and the company�s approach. The additional fields required for submission in the system will not count against the 10-page limit. Type Size� No type size smaller than 10 point shall be used for text or tables, except as legends on reduced drawings. White papers prepared with smaller font sizes may not be assessed. Header/Footer Requirements Header must include firm name, Phase II contract number, and white paper title. Footer must include the page number and proprietary markings if applicable. Margins can be used for header/footer information. Classified Information� NASA does not accept white papers that contain classified information. Project Title The white paper project title shall be concise and descriptive of the proposed effort. The title should not use acronyms or words like ""Development of"" or ""Study of."" The NASA research subtopic title or TNA title must not be used as the white paper title. 8.� Requested Content of White Paper This part of the submission must consist of all seven (7) parts listed below in the given order. All seven parts of the white paper must be numbered and titled. Parts that are not applicable must be included and marked �Not Applicable.� The requested table of contents is provided below: Part 1: � Table of Contents - Page 1 Part 2:�� Identification and Significance of the Innovation and Results of the Phase II Contract Part 3:�� Technical Objectives for the Sequential Phase II Part 4:�� Work Plan Part 5:�� Key Personnel Part 6:�� Facilities/Equipment/Corporate Capabilities Part 7:�� Related, Essentially Equivalent and Duplicate Proposals and Awards 8.1� Detailed White Paper Content Requirements Part 1: Table of Contents The white paper shall begin with a brief table of contents indicating the page numbers of each of the parts of the white paper. Part 2: Identification and Significance of the Proposed Innovation Succinctly describe: The proposed innovation. The proposed innovation relative to the state of the art. Current development status, including any work beyond the initial Phase II. The relevance and significance of the proposed innovation to an interest, need or needs described in section 5 (Eligibility and Technical Need Areas). The product-market fit, identifying specific NASA programs or missions and/or commercial services or capabilities as the intended market. Please be advised that the evaluators may review the Phase II final technical report to verify accuracy of this summary. However respondents should not rely on this and should include relevant high-level Phase II results in the white paper. Part 3: Technical Objectives Define the specific objectives of the Sequential Phase II research and technical approach. This section should be high-level. Part 4: Work Plan Include a high-level description of the Sequential Phase II R/R&D plan to meet the technical objectives and to align with the identified NASA program or mission and/or commercial services or capabilities. The work plan should indicate what will be done, where it will be done and how the R/R&D will be carried out. Discuss the methods planned to achieve each task or objective. High-level task descriptions and planned accomplishments including high-level project milestones shall be included. Milestones should include major tests and/or resulting points of TRL advancement within the overall development effort. Identify the estimated milestone payments and schedule (at a high level) and if these subset efforts can be accomplished in parallel or in sequence. Discuss the rationale for why these milestones have been chosen and how their completion enables the further infusion, commercialization, and/or the next appropriate ground or flight demonstration of this technology. Period of performance can be determined by the firm based on the specific project, but 24 months can be used as a general guideline. Please also mention any significant subcontracts or consultants and the approximate percentage of work they will be performing. Subcontractors are subject to the same limitations as in a regular Phase II project as shown below: SBIR Phase II Subcontracts/Consultants The proposed subcontracted business arrangements including consultants, must not exceed 50 percent of the research and/or analytical work [as determined by the total cost of the proposed subcontracting effort (to include the appropriate OH and G&A) in comparison to the total effort (total contract price including cost sharing, if any, less profit if any)].��� Part 5: Key Personnel/ Corporate Capabilities Identify the Principal Investigator and any other critical participants and provide an abbreviated description of their experience and credentials. Please do not provide full curriculum vitae (CVs). Briefly describe the workforce plan to perform the proposed work and the company�s overall resources and capability to manage larger ($2.5M-5M) contracts. Also include a description of any corporate or subcontractor/consultant flight hardware development experience. Part 6: Facilities/Equipment Briefly describe the necessary instrumentation and facilities to be used to perform the proposed work, Companies must ensure their resources are adequate and address any reliance on external sources, such as government furnished equipment or facilities. Part 7: Related, Essentially Equivalent, and Duplicate Proposals and Awards WARNING � While it is permissible with proposal notification to submit identical proposals or proposals containing a signif...
- Web Link
-
SAM.gov Permalink
(https://beta.sam.gov/opp/b9ed7f7c83e249c982d3c726ea0a8c55/view)
- Place of Performance
- Address: USA
- Country: USA
- Country: USA
- Record
- SN05887872-F 20210110/210108230101 (samdaily.us)
- Source
-
SAM.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's SAM Daily Index Page |