Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
SAMDAILY.US - ISSUE OF MAY 29, 2021 SAM #7119
SOURCES SOUGHT

19 -- U.S. Navy Ships, Support Ships, Boats and Craft Cost Driver Input

Notice Date
5/27/2021 10:45:02 AM
 
Notice Type
Sources Sought
 
NAICS
336612 — Boat Building
 
Contracting Office
NAVSEA HQ WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-5000 USA
 
ZIP Code
20376-5000
 
Solicitation Number
N00024-21-R-2219
 
Response Due
7/2/2021 11:00:00 AM
 
Archive Date
07/17/2021
 
Point of Contact
Maureen Barlow, Matthew Warncke
 
E-Mail Address
maureen.d.barlow@navy.mil, matthew.warncke@navy.mil
(maureen.d.barlow@navy.mil, matthew.warncke@navy.mil)
 
Description
Request for Information (RFI) This Request for Information (RFI) is being released to solicit input on how the Navy can better conduct business with industry in procurement of boats and craft. �Parties are not required to respond to this RFI and are not required to address every question/topic below.� Responses to this RFI are for internal PMS325G market research only and individual responses will not be made public. Program Executive Office (PEO) Ships, Support Ships, Boats and Craft (PMS325G), issues this RFI to solicit industry comments on cost drivers and other issues associated with Navy contract requirements and specifications. This RFI is for planning purposes only and shall not be construed as an invitation for bid, request for quotation, request for proposal, or as an obligation on the part of the Government to acquire any products or services. No entitlement to payment of direct or indirect costs or charges by the Government will arise as a result of contractor responses to this announcement. This request does not constitute a solicitation for proposals or the authority to enter negotiations to award a contract.� All information must be received without restrictive markings. Do NOT submit proprietary data with the information provided. Do NOT submit any information that is classified or improperly marked as classified information (please note that this includes marking a document with the term Confidential). As a part of the response to this RFI, interested sources can indicate in a matrix form (Excel spreadsheet) which specifications and/or requirements tend to be cost or time-consuming drivers when compared to building the same boat commercially and/or for another agency. A notional matrix is attached which addresses the following items: Specification Items Contract Items including Statement of Work (SOW) Documentation and Requirements including testing, certifications, and Pre-Delivery Inspections and Trials (PDITs) Technical Data Package (TDP) Builders can also provide input in their own format with or without specific costs identified. Feedback is also welcome on the following: 1.General Estimated cost and hours for proposal development 2. Technical / Specification Items Name brand items and alternatives (please address specific items and cost) Over/under specifying, or specification clarity TDP and Data Requirements Delivery and Acceptance process (PDIR) 3. Contract Language SOW / Contract Contract clauses impacting costs (e.g. Configuration Management, Cybersecurity) Use of commercial warranty, warranty start date, warranty Fleet interface Payment and invoicing process, specifically provide feedback on financing payment terms Proposal submittal to award lead time impact on pricing Level of pricing information requested 4. Strategy Solicitations (RFP/RFQ) timelines and proposal requirements Low Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) vs Best Value General Services Administration (GSA) vs. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12 Multiple awards vs Single award Use of Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts and ideas for structuring pricing (for example: issues with locking in prices for 5 years, amortizing prices for lead hulls, thoughts on pre-production Contract Line Item (CLIN), or separate CLIN for lead boat if there is a break in production, step ladder pricing, escalation) Which set of commercial standards are most cost effective and most commonly used (ABS, ABYC, ISO, etc.) Shipping concerns over 5-year period Obsolescence management Use of IDIQ contracts and delivery/production schedules. Supply chain impacts Any additional items for consideration Submittal Options: (1) MS Excel spreadsheet matrix with cost comparison information and/or (2) Narrative addressing cost drivers or any other improvement feedback Where to submit: Email responses or inquiries should be sent to Matt Warncke at matthew.warncke@navy.mil, Roxie Thomas at Roxie.thomas@navy.mil, and Maureen Barlow at maureen.d.barlow@navy.mil. To help ensure proper receipt, name the email �Contract Cost Drivers� in the subject field. No telephone inquiries will be accepted and requests for solicitation packages will not be honored, as a solicitation is not prepared at this time. When to Submit: Responses are requested by 02 July 2021 by 2:00 PM
 
Web Link
SAM.gov Permalink
(https://beta.sam.gov/opp/8df63d104d32447384bf864b9701099b/view)
 
Place of Performance
Address: Washington Navy Yard, DC 20376, USA
Zip Code: 20376
Country: USA
 
Record
SN06015817-F 20210529/210527230116 (samdaily.us)
 
Source
SAM.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's SAM Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.