SOLICITATION NOTICE
10 -- Remote Weapon Systems (RWS)
- Notice Date
- 9/23/2021 11:39:27 AM
- Notice Type
- Solicitation
- NAICS
- 332994
— Small Arms, Ordnance, and Ordnance Accessories Manufacturing
- Contracting Office
- W6QK ACC-PICA PICATINNY ARSENAL NJ 07806-5000 USA
- ZIP Code
- 07806-5000
- Solicitation Number
- W15QKN-21-R-0025
- Response Due
- 11/22/2021 1:00:00 PM
- Archive Date
- 12/07/2021
- Point of Contact
- Angelica Merino, Stephanie Kless
- E-Mail Address
-
usarmy.pica.acc.mbx.crows-team@mail.mil, usarmy.pica.acc.mbx.crows-team@mail.mil
(usarmy.pica.acc.mbx.crows-team@mail.mil, usarmy.pica.acc.mbx.crows-team@mail.mil)
- Description
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------9/23/2021--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Questions and Answers 1. Ref: Section L states, ""Format. The submission SHALL be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume SHALL be clearly identified and SHALL begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume SHALL be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and Request for Proposal (RFP) number in the header and/or footer. A Table of Contents SHALL be created using the Table of Content feature in MS Word. MS Word (doc) files SHALL use the following page setup parameters: Page Size, Width 8.5 Page Size, Height 11"" Q: Section L requests a number of process charts and technical drawings that will not� fit on a single 8.5"" x 11"" page size even using 8 point font. Will the government please confirm that 11"" x 17"" (Ledger Size) foldout pages can be used for large drawings and tables as is standard practice on many RFPs? A: 11"" x 17"" (Ledger Size) foldout pages can be used for large drawings and tables, but the amount of pages allowed will remain the same. 2. Ref: Section L requires an IMS to be submitted as part of the Management Factor along with a narrative analysis as stated in paragraph L (i) 2.c, ""Provide an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) that, at minimum, includes all activities required for FAT and all activities leading up to building the FAT systems and conducting a successful FAT; and other appropriate supporting events (e.g., test, approval, and key meetings). The IMS WILL also include major/key subcontractor and supplier schedules. An analysis SHALL be furnished that shows the proposed schedule is supportable and achievable considering other contract requirements, downtime, and delays. The IMS MUST clearly illustrate the interdependencies of all activities, events, and milestones; and explain the critical path and any factors affecting it."" Q: To ensure adequate detail to support effective government analysis, will the government allow the IMS to be presented as an .mpp file as an appendix and excluded from page count? A: The IMS can be presented in .mpp file as an appendix and excluded from page count. 3. Ref: Required Recapitalization/Overhaul/Reset Production Rates: Up to 50 systems per month no later than 180 days after award*. *For orders awarded in accordance with Section H0001 ""H.1. Cumulative Quantity Pricing"", ""after award"" shall be replaced with ""after the end of the award Cumulative Quantity Period as defined in H.1.2."" Ramp up from 50 per month to a surge requirement of up to 150 per month within four months of PCO direction. Required Conversions Rate: Up to 50 conversions per month after 180 days from award*. Ramp up from 50 per month to a surge requirement of up to 150 per month within four months of PCO direction. *For orders awarded in accordance with Section H0001 H.1. Cumulative Quantity Pricing, after award shall be replaced with after the end of the award Cumulative Quantity Period as defined in H.1.2. Q: The Statement of Work (SOW) and Section F requires the recapitalization and conversion of CROWS units as part of the contractual effort but does not specify which legacy systems are to be converted and to which configuration. Will the government please clarify which legacy systems are to be converted? Will the government please clarify to which configuration these systems are to be converted? A: Following contract award, when a requirement for a conversion arises it will be handled via modification. 4. The Offeror shall provide information for small business participation and subcontracting in a table format in accordance with the following example: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Small Business Participation Table (in Millions) | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Business Category | $ Cost All Contracts | % of SB Participation | Cost Total SubK | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Contract Total Price | $43.00 | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | SB | $10.34 | 24.00% | $10.34 of $43.00 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | SDB | $2.86 | 6.65% | $2.86 of $43.00 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | SDB | $2.36 | 5.50% | $2.36 of $43.00 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | WOSB | $1.55 | 3.60% | $1.55 of $43.00 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | HUBZone SB | $1.08 | 2.50% | $1.08 of $43.00 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | VOSB | $1.55 | 3.60% | $1.55 of $43.00 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | SDVOSB | $1.46 | 3.40% | $1.46 of $43.00 | Q: The Small Business Participation Table lists SDB twice with different percentage values for each. Will the government please clarify or correct the Small Business Participation table? A: This chart is to be used as an example only; offerors should submit their own numbers. Q: What is the anticipated award date for the CROWS RWS program? A: �Current plan is to award in 4th Quarter FY 2022 Q: Is there flexibility on the delivery timeline after ARO? The FRP lists ARO + 180 days for initial deliveries. Based on industry supply chain lead times and manufacturing schedules the contractor would propose ARO + 15 months for initial deliveries. A: No. Lead time at 180 days is essential for meeting customer requirements. �Q: Per the RFP, required RWS production rates will be 50 systems per month no later than 180 days after award. Is this 50 of each system variant, or 50 systems total? A: 50 systems total Q: Per the RFP, there is a requirement for first article testing and 4 systems of each configuration. Are the 4 systems of each configuration expected to be delivered prior to the ARO + 180 days schedule, or are they expected to be included in initial deliveries? A: The first article systems are expected to be delivered after successful completion of first article testing. Q: Is the expectation that the initial award will be for 4 First Article Test units for each system, and then a subsequent award of ARO + 6 months will follow for full rate production? A: the expectation is that the minimum delivery order (which will be placed at the time of contract award), will not be ARO + 6 months but instead will be delivered 6 months after successful completion of FAT. Additional orders will follow after successful completion of first article and the timeline of ARO + 6 months would become applicable again. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------9/3/2021--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Question: Can the proposal due date be extended? Answer:� Given the reasoning in this request for an extension, the Government will not extend the 90 day proposal response time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8/31/2021------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: The following language will be changed from: The POCs shall be instructed to electronically complete Part II of the questionnaire and e-mail the entire questionnaire to the Contracting Officer within thirty (30) calendar days of the release of the RFP. To: The POCs shall be instructed to electronically complete Part II of the questionnaire and e-mail the entire questionnaire to the Contracting Officer fifteen (15) calendar days prior of the closing of the RFP. Note: The following language will be changed from: The Government must receive this list within thirty (30) calendar days after release of the RFP. To: The Government must receive this list fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the closing of the RFP. The following are questions and answers received for the solicitation: Question: Reference (1) a. above: If an offeror proposes to use past performance as a major subcontractor to a Government program, and as the Government does not have privity of contract with a subcontractor, may the offeror request their Prime Contractor (to the Government program) to complete Part II of the questionnaire? The Prime Contractor is in a position to provide qualitative information. Answer:� Refer to Section L(1)(a) � (k), on page 97 of 121. Question: Reference (5) above: In some cases the subcontractor does not know the identity of the prime contractor�s Government Agency POCs and may not be able to provide the requested government POC information. In this case, can we submit the prime contractor POCs in lieu of Government POCs? Answer: �Refer to section L(5) on page 98 of 121. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Army Contracting Command - New Jersey (ACC-NJ), Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000, on behalf of Project Manager Soldier Lethality (PM SL), issues this competitive request�for the procurement of the RWS.�This requirement is in support of new and existing RWS for continued support of the existing fielded Common Remotely Operating Weapon Station (CROWS).� CROWS is to be procured under this acquisition. The program will support new and emerging customer requirements to include RWS variants such as Abrams Low Profile, Navy Mk-50, United States Marine Corps (USMC) Amphibious Remote Weapon Station (ARWS) and Stryker.� This acquisition will also include requirements for kit spare parts, kits, conversions, shop replaceable units, line replaceable units, engineering services, depot labor, field service technician support, and logistics services. The applicable NAICS code is: 332994. The acquisition approach is to issue a full and open competitive (F&OC), Hybrid Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) and Time and Material (T&M) contract will be awarded to one (1) contractor.� For U.S. & Canadian Companies: In order to process a request for the data, each requester (U.S. & Canada) must complete and submit a DD2345 Military Critical Technical Data Agreement, AMSTA-AR Form 1350 Technical Data Request Questionnaire, and Non-Disclosure Agreement which will be provided. The agreement will include requirements for limiting distribution of data and the destruction of data provided or reproduced. For Other Foreign Companies: In order to process a request for the data, each requester (Other Foreign) must complete and submit a AMSTA-AR Form 1350 Technical Data Request Questionnaire and a Non-Disclosure Agreement which will be provided and also be compliant with the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). The agreement will include requirements for limiting distribution of data and the destruction of data provided or reproduced. This announcement serves as notification that export control procedures regulated by the ITAR are in effect on the above stated data. Contractors that are interested in receiving this data must be in compliance with the ITAR and possess the proper authorities to receive this data and are encouraged to do so as soon as possible. The data will be marked Distribution Statement B Distribution authorized to U.S. Government agencies only. All other requests for this data shall be referred to Project Manager Soldier Lethality. Foreign vendors and contractors shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations regarding export-controlled items, including, but not limited to, the requirement for Contractors to register with the Department of State in accordance with the ITAR. The Contractors responsibility to comply with all applicable laws and regulations regarding export-controlled items exists independent of, and is not established or limited by, the information provided above. The Government anticipates making one award. All information is to be furnished at no obligation to the Government. The contractor should ensure that all attachments are down loaded and reviewed carefully prior to submission. If a contractor is planning on submitting a proposal in response to the RFP, the contracting officer should be notified prior to the due date to arrange drop off. TELEPHONE INQUIRIES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED Email: usarmy.pica.acc.mbx.crows-team@mail.mil The points of contact for this action are: Army Contracting Command � New Jersey Attention:� ACC-NJ-SL Attention:� Angelica M. Merino, Contract Specialist, Building 9, Phipps RD., Picatinny Arsenal, NJ�� 07806-5000 Email: �angelica.m.merino.civ@mail.mil AND Army Contracting Command � New Jersey Attention:� ACC-NJ-SL Attention:� Stephanie G. Kless, Contracting Officer, Building 9, Phipps RD., Picatinny Arsenal, NJ�� 07806-5000 Email: stephanie.g.kless.civ@mail.mil �
- Web Link
-
SAM.gov Permalink
(https://beta.sam.gov/opp/4e2f44bba43f4a5d876717723e4ff0aa/view)
- Record
- SN06142501-F 20210925/210923230130 (samdaily.us)
- Source
-
SAM.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's SAM Daily Index Page |