SPECIAL NOTICE
A -- 2022 Request for White Papers: NASA SBIR/STTR Phase II Sequential Awards - TNA 1 & 2
- Notice Date
- 1/14/2022 10:21:43 AM
- Notice Type
- Special Notice
- NAICS
- 541715
— Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
- Contracting Office
- NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER STENNIS SPACE CENTER MS 39529 USA
- ZIP Code
- 39529
- Solicitation Number
- 80NSSC22SEQUENTIALWP1-2
- Response Due
- 2/15/2022 2:00:00 PM
- Point of Contact
- Theresa Stanley, Phone: 8776772123, Steven Brockway, Phone: 8776772123
- E-Mail Address
-
Agency-SBIR-STTRSolicitation@mail.nasa.gov, Agency-SBIR-STTRSolicitation@mail.nasa.gov
(Agency-SBIR-STTRSolicitation@mail.nasa.gov, Agency-SBIR-STTRSolicitation@mail.nasa.gov)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- SBA Total Small Business Set-Aside (FAR 19.5)
- Description
- 1. Background NASA is considering inviting companies to propose for Sequential Phase II awards with an elevated award value from $2.5 Million to $5 Million through the Agency�s Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs in 2022. These awards would facilitate rapid post Phase II development of technologies with the goal to infuse key technologies that reach specific milestones into specific NASA programs. 2. Purpose Why is NASA requesting this information? The SBIR/STTR program is performing a portfolio evaluation exercise with the aim of determining what NASA SBIR/STTR Phase II technologies show the promise of risk reduction for key programs, and what firms are capable candidates for further investment through a potential Sequential Phase II award. NASA has a large SBIR/STTR Phase II portfolio to evaluate, and this exercise will help accomplish two objectives: 1. Highlight and map SBIR/STTR Phase II technologies to key programs with white papers providing additional context and details about opportunities for small business technology development. 2. Provide a participatory method for interested parties to communicate that they are engaged and ready to support a subset of NASA�s priorities that may be appropriate for small business participation, as described in this call for white papers. Please note that there are two 2022 Requests for White Papers � please ensure that you are referring to the correct Request for White Papers as well as the correct Technical Need Area number when responding. 3. Disclaimer NASA reserves the right to use the information received from these white papers in any way it chooses, including determinations to invite companies to propose for a Phase II Sequential award. A Phase II Awardee may receive one additional, Sequential Phase II award to continue the work of an initial Phase II award without additional competition. Responding to this call for white papers is not a prerequisite to participating in any post Phase II program. This white paper can be used for programmatic planning to assess the state of small business capability and does not constitute a funding opportunity or a formal competition. Respondents should be advised that NASA takes no financial responsibility for any expenses incurred for responding to the white paper call. Respondents should not expect to receive feedback or reply to their submission. Future awards (if any) will be subject to and contingent upon the availability of funds. If proposal invitations do occur, NASA notionally anticipates reaching out to firms around May 2022. 4. Timeline and Method for Responses NASA uses electronically supported business processes for the SBIR/STTR programs. An offeror must have internet access and an email address. Paper submissions are not accepted. The Electronic Handbook (EHB) for submitting white papers is located at http://sbir.nasa.gov under the Handbooks section; please refer to the SBIR/STTR Proposal Submission EHB link therein for the portal to submit a white paper. The EHB guides firms through the steps for submitting a white paper. All EHB submissions are through a secure connection. Communication between NASA�s SBIR/STTR programs and the firm is primarily through a combination of EHB and email. The submissions site will be available from January 14, 2022 to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 15, 2022. A complete white paper package shall be received no later than 5:00 p.m. ET on February 15, 2022, via the NASA SBIR/STTR website (http://sbir.nasa.gov), under the Handbooks section. The Electronic Handbook (EHB) will no longer accept submissions after the published deadline of 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 15, 2022 as reflected by the internal EHB clock. Submission after the deadline will result in the offeror receiving an access denied message from the EHB; this reflects that the deadline has been exceeded. Any remaining parts of the white paper package will not be uploaded or able to be completed. If a complete white paper package, containing all requested content per section 8 of this Request for White Papers, is not received by the 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time deadline, the white paper package will be determined to be incomplete and will not be assessed. Neither the NASA SBIR/STTR Technical Support Help Desk nor the NASA SBIR/STTR Program Management Office will be able to accept white paper packages after the 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 15, 2022 deadline has been exceeded. 5. Eligibility NASA is requesting responses from SBIR/STTR Phase II awardees from specific NASA subtopics and, in the case of Other Government Agency (OGA) Phase IIs, specified topics, and program years only, as listed in the Technical Need Areas (Section 6). White papers from companies that have not had Phase II contracts within the specified topics/subtopics will not be assessed. Prior Phase II awards must also be completed, including any option periods, by July 1, 2022. Completed awards are awards where contract period of performance has expired, and all deliverables have been accepted by the Government. The prior Phase II contract also must not have already received a Sequential Phase II award, from any government agency including NASA. Firms must justify in the white paper how the continued development of their prior Phase II innovation meets stated goals within the Technical Need Area. Firms submitting white papers pertaining to OGA Phase II awards must identify the pertinent Phase II award identifying information (such as contract number), what form the prior Phase II award took (contract, grant, other), and whom the approving officials from the appropriate other government agency are for the relevant awards in the text of the white paper submission. Should NASA choose to invite a full proposal based on an OGA Phase II, the proposal will be contingent on the OGA granting NASA the permission to issue a Sequential Phase II award on the prior Phase II and the OGA confirming that the prior Phase II contract performance has ended and the firm has received all funding for the deliverables it provided to the Government. NASA uses electronically supported business processes for the SBIR/STTR programs. An offeror must have internet access and an email address. Paper submissions are not accepted. The Electronic Handbook (EHB) for submitting white papers is located at http://sbir.nasa.gov under the Handbooks section; please refer to the SBIR/STTR Proposal Submission EHB link therein for the portal to submit a white paper. The EHB guides firms through the steps for submitting a white paper. All EHB submissions are through a secure connection. Communication between NASA�s SBIR/STTR programs and the firm is primarily through a combination of EHB and email. The submissions site will be available from January 14, 2022 to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 15, 2022. A complete white paper package shall be received no later than 5:00 p.m. ET on February 15, 2022, via the NASA SBIR/STTR website (http://sbir.nasa.gov), under the Handbooks section. The Electronic Handbook (EHB) will no longer accept submissions after the published deadline of 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 15, 2022 as reflected by the internal EHB clock. Submission after the deadline will result in the offeror receiving an access denied message from the EHB; this reflects that the deadline has been exceeded. Any remaining parts of the white paper package will not be uploaded or able to be completed. If a complete white paper package, containing all requested content per section 8 of this Request for White Papers, is not received by the 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time deadline, the white paper package will be determined to be incomplete and will not be assessed. Neither the NASA SBIR/STTR Technical Support Help Desk nor the NASA SBIR/STTR Program Management Office will be able to accept white paper packages after the 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 15, 2022 deadline has been exceeded. 5. Eligibility NASA is requesting responses from SBIR/STTR Phase II awardees from specific NASA subtopics and, in the case of Other Government Agency (OGA) Phase IIs, specified topics, and program years only, as listed in the Technical Need Areas (Section 6). White papers from companies that have not had Phase II contracts within the specified topics/subtopics will not be assessed. Prior Phase II awards must also be completed, including any option periods, by July 1, 2022. Completed awards are awards where contract period of performance has expired, and all deliverables have been accepted by the Government. The prior Phase II contract also must not have already received a Sequential Phase II award, from any government agency including NASA. Firms must justify in the white paper how the continued development of their prior Phase II innovation meets stated goals within the Technical Need Area. Firms submitting white papers pertaining to OGA Phase II awards must identify the pertinent Phase II award identifying information (such as contract number), what form the prior Phase II award took (contract, grant, other), and whom the approving officials from the appropriate other government agency are for the relevant awards in the text of the white paper submission. Should NASA choose to invite a full proposal based on an OGA Phase II, the proposal will be contingent on the OGA granting NASA the permission to issue a Sequential Phase II award on the prior Phase II and the OGA confirming that the prior Phase II contract performance has ended and the firm has received all funding for the deliverables it provided to the Government. Development efforts should largely continue from the end status and Technology Readiness Level (TRL) development status of the prior Phase II development and/or any continued efforts that happened since the end of the Phase II effort. The detailed effort should involve and justify the continued development of at least one of the primary technologies already developed during the prior applicable Phase II. While some re-development may be required for the specific application purposes called out in these Technical Need Areas, any significant new developments that differ from the prior Phase II technology or re-developments that impact the technology should be justified as pertinent to the original Phase II award and the Technical Need Area the white paper is being submitted under. Likewise, impacts to the starting Technology Readiness Level (TRL) should be justified. White papers on technologies that are not adequately justified as relevant continuations of the prior cited Phase II or are not compliant may not be assessed or considered. Additionally, only firms who continue to qualify as Small Business Concerns (SBCs), as defined here: http://sbir.nasa.gov/content/nasa-sbirsttr-program-definitions, are eligible to submit white papers. White paper submissions are limited to a maximum of 3 responses per Technology Need Area (TNA). These Technical Need Areas may have multiple vested programs and/or use cases. Within that Technical Need Area, white papers may justify the technology as applicable to as few or as many of those applicable programs or cases as is appropriate; however, each white paper may only pertain to one Technical Need Area. These Technical Need Areas have been identified for this announcement due to their near-term NASA relevance. Topics/subtopics within the Technical Need Area were identified based on the technical applicability of the original solicitation subtopic to current needs, pertinence and timeliness to priority objectives and needs, evaluations against the current state of the art and available technologies, and cross program relevance. Note that the lack of inclusion of a given subtopic/program year and the technologies developed from that cycle does not reflect a NASA position on those technologies. Note that while some topics/subtopics in given program years are identified for a Technical Need Area, the original scope of those topics/subtopics, and original awards therein, may have been more expansive than the current stated need. While a given prior award may be included within that topic/subtopic and program year, please review the need statement for that Technical Need Area to decide if you think that your technology is pertinent to this current development opportunity. White papers on technologies that are not applicable, or whose development path diverges from the stated need, will not be considered. Developments must be directly related to and continue the prior Phase II work and must demonstrate relevance to both the applicable original solicitation subtopic and current cited NASA goals in this area. For Phase II awards from other government agencies, proposed technology development must demonstrate relevance to current cited NASA goals in this area but may also discuss cross-cutting applications. Note that any further development beyond the prior Phase II conducted (through various NASA SBIR/STTR program funding vehicles, other NASA mechanisms, or other development avenues), that may be completed or ongoing, should be discussed in establishing the current state of the technology leading into a potential future development effort. If there is ongoing work on the technology, detail the work, the anticipated completion timeframe, and any known risks/implications to a follow-on development resulting from the ongoing work. 6. Technical Need Areas 6.1 Technical Need Area 2022-1: �Advanced Instrument Systems to Support Wildfire and Climate Impact Science NASA�s Science Mission Directorate�s (SMD) Earth Science Division (ESD), in accordance with national priorities, seeks to rapidly advance and implement science instrument packages into airborne and/or suborbital vehicles to perform near-term studies of climate change and the impacts thereof. This may include (but is not limited to) studies of studies of aerosols, cloud particles/traits, trace gases, diagnostics to predict and characterize wildfires, among others. Please discuss and justify what your instrument development was designed to address and identify what other pertinent climate and effect studies may be accomplished/augmented by the capabilities of your instrument package.� Earth science measurements from space are considerably enhanced by observations from generally far less costly suborbital instruments and sensor systems. These instruments and sensors support direct science, calibration/validation, and environmental monitoring activities by providing ancillary data for satellite calibration and validation, algorithm development/refinement, and finer scale process studies. In addressing wildfires, instrument needs exist in the pre-fire, active fire, and post fire environment. In general, there are needs for persistent surveillance and abilities to observe beneath the cloud deck. Specific needs include but are not limited to: Visible and Near Infrared (NIR) at ~200m resolution Mid-Wave Infrared and Long-Wave Infrared at ~400m resolution Structure and mapping with cloud masking and water body detection Thermal anomaly detection (and the automated detection thereof) Gas sensors, real-time monitoring of carbon emissions, smoke plume diagnostics, and sensors that can aid in informing fuel/fire/atmosphere/smoke models at 30m resolution Sensors to aid in correlating cloud height with burn intensity Diagnostics for model inputs including vegetation moisture, soil moisture, density of ground fuels, and determination of canopy fuels Hyperspectral imaging that can aid in improved mapping of forest burn extent Intelligent systems that can inform and coordinate observing assets for adaptive and responsive targeting of instrumentation Full instrument system (not subcomponent) advancements are sought that can be advanced to a complete (or near-complete) state ready for integration on aircraft, UAS, balloons, and/or suborbital vehicles to address one or more of these needs. Advancements towards orbital/in-space utilization will also be considered. Complete instrument systems are desired, including features such as remote/unattended operation and data acquisition as well as minimum size, weight, and power consumption. Discuss within your technical approach the current development status of the technology and the required effort to advance the technology to a complete full sensor system package ready for potential integration, test, and flight following the completion of this effort. Discuss what need(s) your instrument and its associated capabilities will address. All proposals must summarize the current state of the art and demonstrate how the proposed sensor system represents a significant improvement over the state of the art. White papers should establish and justify pertinent metrics appropriate to the technology, discuss which and how pertinent metrics may have already been met in prior developments and, if not yet achieved, how near term advancement and testing could demonstrate and verify the potential for the technology to meet these ambitious goals. As part of your discussion, identify what potential platforms your technology would be applicable to and appropriate design features and considerations thereof. This includes details on expected size, weight, power, data recording/transmission, command, and other interface requirements that would be applicable to your technology for the platform(s). Identify what developments would be necessary to tailor your technology to the targeted platform(s) for implementation. If potentially applicable to multiple platforms, discuss if and what separate developments would be required. If that is the case, discuss if the separate developments are achievable within the scope of this effort or if additional development would be required for tailoring to other platform(s) and which specific platform would be initially targeted under this effort. If able, white papers should identify pertinent potential teaming, users, and or specific vehicles that may serve as the next potential implementation and/or demonstration partner. While letters of agreement/commitment/support/etc. are not required within white papers, please identify those that have been engaged with and/or designed toward, and the level of engagement Discuss how you will verify not only the performance of the instrument but how you will also verify that requirements on the instrument package appropriate to the deployment and implementation on the vehicle platform(s). This may include environmental, load, and interface requirement validations, among others. Discuss what methods will be utilized for those verifications, what expected metrics will be utilized, and if/how actual and/or representative testing will be carried out. Efforts should also detail aspects and efforts related to achieving production run reproducibility of multiple units. TNA 2022-1 Applicable NASA Subtopics by Solicitation Year: 2011 - S1.08 2012 - S1.08, S1.09 2014 -� S1.07, S5.03 2015 � S1.07, S1.08 2016 � S1.07, S1.08, S5.03 2017 � S1.08, S5.03 2018 � S1.08, S5.03 2019 � S1.08, S5.03 6.2 Technical Need Area 2022-2: High Delta-V Small Orbital Maneuvering Vehicle/Transfer Stage Development NASA and industry represent prospective customers for sending small-spacecraft payloads in the near term to the cislunar environment, with longer term potential for farther destinations such as near-Earth objects, Mars, or Venus. The lunar destinations in this case include the lunar surface, with specific interest in the South Pole, low lunar and frozen lunar orbits, and cislunar space, including Earth-Moon LaGrange points (e.g., E-M L3) and the lunar Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO) intended for Gateway. In future missions, NASA may transport small spacecraft to Venus for scientific discovery, to Mars to serve as precursors and infrastructure for human (and scientific) exploration, and on small-spacecraft missions to near-Earth objects for science measurements needed to understand prospective threats to Earth, and perhaps even for resource extraction and return to Earth. The ultimate goal is to exploit the advantages of low-cost and rapidly produced CubeSats and small spacecraft, defined as total mass less than 180 kg fueled, by enabling them to reach these locations. Due to the current limits of SmallSat propulsion capabilities and the constraints of rideshare opportunities, NASA has an interest in the development of low-cost transfer stages and small Orbital Maneuvering Vehicles (OMVs) to guide and propel small spacecraft on trajectories to the vicinity of the Moon, then enable their insertion into the above-referenced orbits or within sufficient proximity to achieve and maintain final orbit under their own power. Small Orbital Maneuvering Vehicles (OMVs) and/or transfer stage/transfer vehicles (forthwith referred to as OMVs, generically) are an enabling capability that will allow small spacecraft to conduct lunar and deep-space spacecraft missions in support of technology and capability advancements by NASA�s Small Spacecraft Technology (SST) program as well as multiple potential exploration, science, and space utilization missions by other end-users in NASA, other Federal Agencies, industry and academia. Several missions are being planned to conduct investigations/observations in the cis-lunar region and beyond. Examples in support of the Artemis program include distributed or swarm-based spacecraft missions, missions to conduct extensive mapping of lunar resources, and/or spacecraft supporting lunar communications network architectures, among others. This capability for small spacecraft is also essential to NASA�s Science Mission Directorate to fulfill the science missions envisioned within the decadal surveys. These same capabilities and others will later need to be extended for small spacecraft to explore nearby planets. OMVs may also have additional capabilities in the ability to reposition or enhance the capabilities and life of other assets in Low Earth Orbit and beyond. In order to support NASA�s end goal for the establishment of OMV assets, proposed activities must target the development leading to the production of a full vehicle/stage. Component technology developments alone are not being requested. System developments with activities pertaining to the key hardware integration of the system into a OMV or the development of an OMV will be considered. OMV architectures and designs shall be compatible with U.S. small launch vehicles that are currently flying or will be launching imminently White papers shall identify one or more relevant launch vehicles; while letters of agreement/commitment/support/etc. are not required within white papers, please identify providers that have been engaged with and/or designed toward, and the level of engagement From those vehicles/providers, please identify induced driving requirements and key constraints that may influence your design, constraints, and vehicle operations. This includes describing how the design fits within the constraints of those vehicles. Beyond small launch vehicles, please identify any additional compatibility features and/or implications regarding other secondary launch opportunities/secondary payload adapters Define the transfer capability of the proposed system (i.e., from low Earth orbit (LEO), geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO), etc., to low lunar orbit (LLO), NHRO, E-M L3, etc.) It is anticipated that there are a range of needs for small OMVs that can impart 2.5 to 5 km/s delta-V to a passenger small spacecraft; discuss your propulsion solution for this and the anticipated delta-V that will be imparted to the potential passenger small spacecraft (or range thereof if adaptable to a range of passengers). Any and all propulsion chemistries and methods may be considered, including electric propulsion, as long as the design closes within the reference mission constraints, and offer reasonable transfer times to referenced destinations. Justify the expected delta-V for the targeted class of passenger spacecraft and discuss other pertinent propulsion metrics such as thrust and specific impulse (Isp). Discuss your interface(s) with the passenger spacecraft; identify requirements that would be imposed on the passenger spacecraft including mechanical control, communications and control needs, among others. Describe the method(s) to deploy one or more SmallSat payloads into the target trajectory or orbit Concepts that can demonstrate improvements in cost and reliability and those that reduce requirements (thermal, power, etc.) on the payload are also highly desired Additionally, discuss your design and required technology development for other supporting subsystems including power generation, storage and processing units. OMVs designs shall contain all requisite systems for navigation, propulsion, and communication in order to complete the mission. Systems must also be tolerant to the deep space radiation and associated other environments from launch through lunar/cis-lunar use. Designs that can provide support services to the deployed SmallSat payloads to expand their mission utility, such as communications relaying or Pointing, Navigation and Timing (PNT) information, are also of significant interest In your response, please discuss and justify all pertinent key metrics of your technology. Define anticipated requirements of your technology that would align with at least one representative exploration support or science mission with at least one passenger spacecraft of a defined size. Identify the technology development and testing required to meet the needs of the mission and to target your technology to the appropriate class of spacecraft. Please also consider and discuss the systems compatibility with appropriate size, weight, and power constraints of the targeted class of passenger spacecraft, compatibility with secondary launch opportunities and/or range safety, and compatibility with the cislunar and deep space environment. Please also consider and discuss how the life expectancy, propellant throughput expectancy, and deep space environmental compatibility would be demonstrated and tested. In the context of an approximate 2-year long Sequential Phase II effort, discuss how full and/or representative testing of key factors may occur. Likewise, beyond a Sequential Phase II effort, discuss what follow on activities would be required to complete appropriate testing and/or certify use for the planned lifetime of the system, if appropriate. Detail design factors for tolerating environments, how appropriate environmental demonstrations and verifications would occur, and when in your development process these tests and verifications would occur. Refer to the referenced Cross-Program Design Specification for Natural Environments (DSNE) for further information on environments with certain phases of lunar missions that may be applicable considerations. Metrics should, at a minimum, include pertinent metrics including mass, volume, power requirements, propulsive, control, etc.� As stated, please discuss any system integration and interface requirements and/or developments including, but not limited to, mechanical, control, thermal, and power considerations for both the OMV to launch vehicle and OMV to passenger spacecraft. A key goal for this effort is to advance concepts such that a reliable production line of units could be created to support multiple future missions. To that end, features and developments associated with ensuring production quality and the ability to reliably manufacture propulsion systems that can achieve consistent performance metrics across multiple units and production runs should be detailed. Production lead times should be consistent with the short development cycles of small spacecraft missions. Unit costs should be favorably influenced by manufacturability improvements and volume production. Please discuss features or developments aimed at optimizing throughput of the manufacturing, assembly, and testing of production line systems. Efforts should discuss how the technology will be developed in order to address these needs and considerations. Efforts should mature the technology in this Sequential effort so as to be able to readily progress to at least a critical design review (CDR) level of maturity for the OMV or system with the intent that a review of the completion of this effort and that CDR may inform the potential for a future continued development effort leading to a flight demonstration. Should the potential effort have aspects that may progress beyond a CDR, please identify where in the proposed effort a CDR, or like review, occur Efforts should discuss the expected state of the system/OMV at the end of this effort and what associated deliverables may be Discuss the discuss gaps and/or additional development that will be required leading to the completion of verifications/qualification and the production of a unit prior to a flight demonstration, if any Please discuss and justify any development effort, features, and/or experience pertinent to maturing concepts to certifiable flight-ready hardware and routine production beyond demonstration. References: SLS-SPEC-159 - Cross-Program Design Specification for Natural Environments (DSNE) Revision H� https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205007447��������� TNA 2022-2 Applicable Subtopics by Solicitation Year: 2015 � T1.01, S3.02, SB152-008 (DOD) 2016 � T1.01, S3.02, AF162-009 (DOD), AF162-010 (DOD) 2017 � T1.01, S3.02, Z8.01, Z9.01, SB173-006 (DOD) 2018 � Z8.01, Z9.01, Z10.02 2019 � Z8.01, Z9.01� � � � 7.�� Formatting Constraints: Note: The government administratively screens all white papers and may not assess any response that does not conform to the following formatting requirements and page limitations. Page Limitations and Margins A white paper shall not exceed a total of10 standard 8 1/2 x 11 inch (21.6 x 27.9 cm) pages. White papers uploaded with more than 10 pages may not be accepted by the Electronic Handbook (EHB) system or assessed. Each page shall be numbered consecutively at the bottom. Margins shall be 1.0 inch (2.5 cm). The space allocated to each part of the white paper will depend on the project chosen and the company�s approach. The additional fields required for submission in the system will not count against the 10-page limit. Type Size� No type size smaller than 10 point shall be used for text or tables, except as legends on reduced drawings. White papers prepared with smaller font sizes may not be assessed. Header/Footer Requirements Header must include firm name, Phase II contract number, and white paper title. Footer must include the page number and proprietary markings if applicable. Margins can be used for header/footer information. Classified Information� NASA does not accept white papers that contain classified information. Project Title The white paper project title shall be concise and descriptive of the proposed effort. The title should not use acronyms or words like ""Development of"" or ""Study of."" The research topic title or TNA title must not be used as the white paper title. 8. Requested Content of White Paper This part of the submission must consist of all seven (7) parts listed below in the given order. All seven parts of the white paper must be numbered and titled. Parts that are not applicable must be included and marked �Not Applicable.� The requested table of contents is provided below: Part 1: � Table of Contents - Page 1 Part 2:�� Identification and Significance of the Innovation and Results of the Phase II Contract Part 3:�� Technical Objectives for the Sequential Phase II Part 4:�� Work Plan Part 5:�� Key Personnel Part 6:�� Facilities/Equipment/Corporate Capabilities Part 7:�� Related, Essentially Equivalent and Duplicate Proposals and Awards 8.1 Detailed White Paper Content Requirements Part ...
- Web Link
-
SAM.gov Permalink
(https://sam.gov/opp/cb3841975025432588a78903088be6f5/view)
- Place of Performance
- Address: USA
- Country: USA
- Country: USA
- Record
- SN06217788-F 20220116/220114230059 (samdaily.us)
- Source
-
SAM.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's SAM Daily Index Page |