Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
SAMDAILY.US - ISSUE OF JULY 17, 2024 SAM #8268
SPECIAL NOTICE

20 -- Request for Information (RFI) - Integrated Power System (IPS) for DDG(X)

Notice Date
7/15/2024 5:51:02 AM
 
Notice Type
Special Notice
 
NAICS
335999 — All Other Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and Component Manufacturing
 
Contracting Office
DEPT OF DEFENSE
 
ZIP Code
00000
 
Solicitation Number
N00024-24-R-2339
 
Response Due
8/15/2024 9:00:00 AM
 
Archive Date
08/15/2024
 
Point of Contact
Michelle Singer
 
E-Mail Address
michelle.s.singer2.civ@us.navy.mil
(michelle.s.singer2.civ@us.navy.mil)
 
Description
Synopsis: The Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) is hereby issuing a Request for Information (RFI) on behalf of the DDG(X) Guided Missile Destroyer Program Office (PMS 460), seeking information from power and propulsion equipment manufacturers, power systems integrators, academia, and other interested parties to support the design and development of the ship propulsion system for the DDG(X) Guided Missile Destroyer. This RFI is for informational and planning purposes only and shall not be construed as a request for proposal, request for a quote, or as an obligation on the part of the government. There will not be a solicitation, specifications, or drawings available. There is no funding associated with this announcement. DDG(X) Overview: PMS 460 is responsible for the planning, design, development, ship acquisition of the DDG(X) Guided Missile Destroyer, and to successfully transfer the ship to the Fleet. The DDG(X) program will leverage the DDG 51 Flight III combat system, feature flexible power and propulsion, while identifying and evaluating the integration of non-developmental systems into a new hull design with space, weight, available power, and cooling (SWAP-C) margins and reservations to accommodate future platform flexibility and growth opportunities to meet future Fleet requirements. On the same day as the release of this RFI, July 15, 2024, the Navy (PMS 460) will conduct a DDG(X) Power and Propulsion Industry Day. The objective of this Industry Day is to provide the power and propulsion system industry base with situational awareness of high level ship and power and propulsion requirements derived from Top Level Requirements (TLRs); ��the role of the PMS 460 organization and relationships with key governmental and industry stake holders; upcoming procurements in support of land based testing; the present status of power and propulsion design trade space; plans for power and propulsion digital engineering, surrogate testing at a Navy land-based test/engineering site to reduce critical system risks, and overall risk management plans; shipbuilders role as power and propulsion integrator; and integration of the power and propulsion system in the DDG(X) notional ship concepts. Digital engineering will be a collaborative activity with the Navy, by way of the Naval Surface Warfare Center Philadelphia Division (NSWCPD) and the Florida State University Center for Advanced Power Systems (FSU-CAPS), whom the Navy has contracted with to assist with Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) in advance of surrogate and full scale testing at NSWCPD. A key theme from the Industry Day is the Navy�s intent to use non-developmental technologies for power and propulsion to reduce risk, since the Navy sees the biggest risk being the integration and control system� elements into the unique DDG(X) configuration that need to be reduced through land-based testing to minimize discovery during ship construction and activation. The Navy also noted the need to collaborate with industry to jointly develop several processes going forward: (1) for information established for power and propulsion to be shared with the broader industry base; (2) to leverage industry Internal Research and Development (IRAD) investments in hardware and simulations to reduce risk for DDG(X); (3) to receive from industry computer simulation models for any major hardware component to then run those simulations in the context of a complete power and propulsion system; and (4) to identify other industry equipment that can be used for test and characterization in a power and propulsion system that may be available for evaluation. This RFI will aid in the evolution of these processes in the near term. The Navy has allocated functionality within the DDG(X) IPS into the following areas: Power Generation (POG) providing electrical power to all electrical and propulsion loads on the ship; also includes intakes and uptakes providing gas turbine and/or diesel engine combustion air intake and exhaust paths for generators. Propulsion (PRO) comprised of two shaft lines powered by propulsion motor drives and/or mechanically coupled gas turbines to provide for ship�s propulsion; also includes the propulsion shafting system providing the interface from output of the propulsion motors and/or reduction gears to the ship�s propellers to generate thrust. Power Distribution Primary (PDP) for transmission of electrical power to the propulsion system and load centers; comprised of medium voltage switchboards arranged in a radial or zonal configuration to distribute 4160 VAC or 13.8 kVAC throughout the ship. Power Distribution Secondary (PDS) for transmission of electrical power from load centers to individual loads throughout the ship in a zonal or radial distribution architecture incorporating transformers at the PDP/PDS interface. Electrical Plant Controls (EPC) is the subsystem responsible for monitoring and controlling interactions between all the other subsystems as well as power management that ensures the power demanded by propulsion and ship service loads does not exceed generating capacity and transition management responsible for reconfiguring the electric plant when alternative lineups are needed. The Navy (PMS 460) will establish a data accession list (DAL) for the power and propulsion industry base, and the first artifact to be contained in this data repository will be the presentation materials briefed at the July 15, 2024 DDG(X) Power and Propulsion Industry Day. While those in attendance received this material, for those not in attendance, and those wishing to continue to receive limited distribution controlled unclassified information pertaining to the DDG(X) power and propulsion system, a request must be sent to Michelle Singer at michelle.s.singer2.civ@us.navy.mil and Kimberly Chaney at Kimberly.a.chaney2.civ@us.navy.mil Upon verification that the requestor is a bona fide U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) contractor familiar with the procedures to handle technical data packages that may include limited distribution information the entity will be placed on a distribution list for this information. Evidence in the form of an executed DD Form 2345 (MILITARILY CRITICAL TECHNICAL DATA AGREEMENT) signed by both the DoD and Canadian Official will be required prior to receipt. Note: only completed DD Form 2345s signed by the US and Canadian designated officials will be accepted and not incomplete forms signed only by the company. Prior submission of the DD Form 2345 can be verified at the e-mail addresses noted above in lieu of retransmission. The validity date on the DD Form 2345 will equate to the duration of access unless replaced subsequently by a renewed DD Form 2345. Request for Information / Responses: It is with the above understanding that PMS 460 seeks responses from the surface combatant power and propulsion system industry base to the questions below and also seeks comments on the provided documents referenced above. DDG(X) Propulsion Trade space: As a result of changes to the DDG(X) Top Level Requirements, the Navy is reevaluating potential power and propulsion architectures. With information the Navy has collected from previous RFIs and other sources, a fully electric IPS system or a mechanically boosted IPS system have been identified as the trade space for power and propulsion architectures that will meet DDG(X) requirements for power and propulsion. The Navy is seeking to understand the latest industry capabilities to inform the DDG(X) power and propulsion system. Major Trade Space Equipment: Electric Propulsion System (Drives, Motors ,Dynamic Brakes, electric motor isolation breakers) Propulsion Gas Turbines Main Reduction Gear (Locked train double reduction driven by one or two gas turbines) Clutches (Reduction gear input and output clutches) Propulsion System Trade Space: Technology Readiness Level 6 or higher Power Feed to Electric Propulsion System of13.8kVAC or 4160VAC Propulsion shafting RPM trade space �between120-160 rpm Total Propulsion Shaft Power trade space between68-76 MW Electric Propulsion System Output Power trade space between 12-32MW (6MW to 16MW per shaft) Gas Turbine Output power trade space between 44-88MW (22MWs to 44MWs per shaft) Gas Turbine Output rated RPM trade space between3000-9000rpm For all responses that are provided please qualify the data beginning provided to allow understanding of the context of what has been provided. (for example; existing, estimated, ROM, published, demonstrated, etc.). After receipt and review of the provided information, follow-on discussions will be as required to clarify received by PMS460: General Power and Propulsion System Queries (For all equipment/components under the propulsion system trade space offered by your company for DDG(X)): Provide historic performance of propulsion trade space components, current product lines and highlight those which are military applications? Provide Facility capabilities that reside in the US and those that reside outside the US? Capability to design/manufacture the DDG(X) trade space equipment, predict equipment performance and then verify predictions? Please provide relevant examples in the last 10 years. Provide means to quantify technical support availability? Provide product availability and whether the products are currently in use in Navy applications? If products are currently in production what modifications could be made to the product to meet military requirements?? Would modifications have any detriment to product performance or reliability? Industry�s perspective on the PROs/CONs of combined diesel electric and gas turbine (GT) CODLAG vs �combination of diesel electric or GT (CODLOG) propulsion systems when� driving a fixed pitch propeller Description of existing component engineering and design capability, including whether the technical resources are located in the United States or overseas, and existing site facility clearance levels.� If additional capabilities are actively being implemented or are planned in the near future, please describe those as well. However the emphasis of the response should be on capability that exists and is available today and whether that capability resides within the USA. Description of existing component manufacturing and testing (performance, including acoustic performance testing) capability, including whether the resources are located in the United States or overseas, and existing site facility clearance levels.� If additional capabilities are actively being implemented or are planned in the near future, please describe those as well, however the emphasis of the response should be on capability that exists and is available today, along with whether or not that capability resides in the USA today and whether any planned new resources will reside within the USA. Summary of recent combatant propulsion system design references.� Please identify specific ship classes, key standards/specifications for the system, the input power and RPM, the output power and RPM, and any unique design features of note.� Please categorize as follows: Design of the propulsion system to naval standards (please specify to which standards) Design of the propulsion system to naval combatant standards with shock hardening requirements (please specify to which standards �Design of the propulsion system to naval combatant standards with shock/vibration hardening and structure borne noise performance requirements, including prediction of shock and structure borne noise performance (please specify to which standards), a summary of recent combatant component manufacturing references.� Please identify specific ship classes, key standards/specifications for the equipment, the input power and RPM, the output power and RPM, and any unique design features of note.� If not designed in-house, please indicated what entity performed the design. Please categorize as follows: Manufacturing of the component to naval standards (please specify to which standard Manufacturing of the component to naval combatant standards with shock hardening requirements (please specify to which standards Manufacturing of the component to naval combatant standards with shock hardening and structure borne noise performance requirements, including prediction of shock and structure borne noise performance (please specify to which standards) Provide approximate lead times to design, manufacture, factory test and deliver the component to a land-based testing (please provide duration for each of these major categories of activity and identify to what extent they overlap). Please cite how these time frames compare to prior first of class equipment the supplier has designed, manufactured, factory tested (including any limitations on power and endurance test durations), and delivered to NSWCPD.�� Please provide lead times for government to receive Preliminary Interface and Final Control Documents (ICDs) after contract award. Please provide schedules assuming a propulsion shaft line with a reduction gear with a single input from a large marine gas turbine, a single output, and design to the following generic standards/ specifications for each of the following three scenarios: USN naval standards (or other navy standards if no USN experience) USN naval combatant standards with shock hardening requirements (or other navy standards if no USN experience) USN naval combatant standards with shock hardening and structure borne noise performance requirements (or other navy standards if no USN experience) Have any hybrid systems used power take-off (propulsion derived ship service) on commercial vessels or naval applications of similar size?� What has been the experience What capability exist to support testing in factory facilities? What restrictions exist such as ability to fully load equipment? Is equipment capable of being tested in conjunction of real time modeling? Propulsion Clutches: A range of sizes, weights, torque and power levels of clutch concepts that can support the propulsion trade space on the input and output of the reduction gear. Also provide maintenance envelopes. Types/Technologies available? Space, Weight, Auxiliaries, Power and cooling required for each clutch type/technology. Provide ability to lock in/lock out clutch from shaftline Industry�s assessment on whether a clutch is required on the high-speed side of the reduction gear. �(i.e. hold main reduction gear (MRG) with PGT power turbine shaft brake, release the unloaded MRG along with the power turbine, and then engage to the propulsion shaft on the LS side of the MRG) What restrictions might be for engaging/disengaging the clutch Is this transition expected to be �soft� or �hard�� How much time is required to engage or disengage the clutch? What are the input to output side clutch shaft speed limits, if any, for engaging and disengaging the clutch?� What happens if these limits are exceeded? Will the clutches require the shaft to be stopped to engage/disengage and/or to lock the shaft out? Given the trade space, what is possible for the MRG output clutch? Are there any US suppliers that offer a marine friction disc clutch for our application?� Proposed timeline to develop the input and output clutch designs?� Required time for testing, including shock and vibe testing? Engagement disengagement operations, can the unit be commanded to engage/disengage or is clutch operation automatic? Largest size clutch (torque rating) that has been used/supports marine/military application? Support elements, what is needed to support clutch operations? Alignment requirements? For the Friction Disc Clutch vendors, is there interest in making a marine clutch in the torque range we need? Can they be made in the USA? Synchro-Self-Shifting (SSS)or Friction Disk �clutch questions: What is the recommended in-line output clutch that could work for our trade space?� Is it likely a non in-line (quill shaft mounted) clutch can work in our trade space?� Please describe clutch operation in What controls, if any, are needed to enable commanded engagement and disengagement of the clutch to allow the gas turbine to be running offline and selectively be engaged and disengaged? Please describe any alignment requirements associated with large clutches. Please describe any flexing concerns regarding use of a large clutch and how such issues are best addressed (e.g. approaches for foundations, gear casings, etc.) What is the largest non in-line clutch?� If we have both an input clutch and an output clutch, do they have any suggestions and limitations as to which clutch should be engaged first? Describe clutches in our trade space in use on a ship that is in service? How many have been sold? How many in-line? How many quill shaft? Which is in service, if any are? What is the test and/or operational experience with clutches? Please describe any shaft alignment tasks required during construction and anticipated over the life of the ship due to the multiple sets of bearings (main reduction gear, clutch, electric motor, thrust bearing).� Please describe any design, engineering and integration challenges that are imposed by selecting a fixed propeller being powered by a gas turbine, such as achieving a specific design ship speed given the propeller characteristics and gear reduction ratio are fixed; how is the gas turbine and reduction gear inertia controlled to enable the clutch to disengage, and stay disengaged once the braking resistors are engaged to stop the shaft?� Does the available clutch lock-in allow for the use of a turning gear downstream of the clutch to rotate a shaft segment or gear upstream of the clutch? Reduction gear: A range of sizes, weights, torque and power levels of reduction gear concepts that can support the propulsion trade space. Also provide equipment maintenance envelopes. What would the timeline be to design, build and test an MRG for DDG(X)? What test plan would industry recommend for MRG development, including any associated clutch and control systems?� (Prototyping, factory testing, first article testing and/or land-based USN testing.) Are there any special controls system operating restrictions to account for warming the gear and lubricating oil after long periods of the ship operating on electric power and the gas turbine being idle before engaging the gas turbine to drive the ship to speeds requiring the gas turbine power? Does the manufacturer recommend a turning gear included on the reduction gear itself? Does the in-yard maintenance / storage of the gear prior to being placed in service require the use of a turning gear? Has industry incorporated low speed clutches on a reduction gear housings? Examples? Propulsion Gas Turbines: Identify Gas Turbines in the power range identified. Engine flat power rating (i.e.: Navy Standard Day 100F, 4/6-inch H20 inlet exhaust loss, in accordance with standard Navy conditions and methodology in accordance with NCDS 234) and any prior qualifications Power turbine design speed at rated power, speed torque operating envelope, max shaft breakaway torque capacity, and low power turbine speed operational constraints/limitations. Preferred and alternate starting method and Start Characteristics, Length of time (both minimum and maximum) from beginning the start sequence Shipboard module Size (L x W x H) and Weight including gas turbine module and any remotely mounted auxiliaries to be provided as part of package.� � Specific fuel consumption (mechanical drive nominal cubic load line over full power/torque range) Engine Airflow, Exhaust Volume and Temperature over operating range. Existing/Estimated Airborne and Structure borne Noise data and to what standards it was collected/reported. Size and weight of removable engine component (to establish equipment removal routes) Module Cooling including Engine Enclosure Airflow and Package Cooling Flows with Preferred Cooling Medium and Heat loads Preferred and alternate fire suppression agents Existing Shock Qualifications or Characterization of Shock Capability in accordance with MIL-DTL-901 Existing Industrial & Marine population Manufacturing location of gas turbine and major package subcomponents Demonstrated Engine/Package Reliability Maintainability Features including ability to perform corrective maintenance of engine while installed in module (identify any routine maintenance that requires disassembly of enclosure) Characterization of Logistics Support Capability (parts availability, repair centers, presence at USN ports, etc.�) Characterization of required non-recurring engineering, if any, and necessary timeline to provide shipboard module design. Identify any mechanical drive operating limits including transient loading conditions (limits being thermal or mechanical cycles and stresses that adversely affect fatigue life, operations that increase fouling or otherwise shorten time between scheduled maintenance requirements, etc.) Maximum continuous torque/power/rpm ratings Are there any limitations to the application and removal of loads? Limitations on abrupt loading/unloading? Inclined operation limits Low speed or low load operating limits Torque limit Overspeed limit Capability curves Engine efficiency data (SFC data) Low speed operation at high/maximum rated torque showing any efficiency degradation specific fuel consumption characteristic across power range for NSD and ISO conditions Sensitivity to off-design conditions (accounting for operations in areas where the USN inlet temperature used for rating the machine is exceeded routinely) What are the projected engineering, production, and qualification testing lead times for a shipset of gas turbine modules (assuming all necessary requirements are established)? Please provide lead times for government to receive Preliminary Interface and Final Control Documents (ICDs) after contract award. What timeframe in years is this answer valid for? Application history/pedigree for the gas turbines including: existing military/ naval applications, qualifications, and description of modifications/ testing necessary to implement in a US Navy main propulsion mechanical drive mil-spec/shock/vibration/EMI application Percentage(%) of commonality between marine/naval/commercial offerings Percentage(%) �of commonality between engines in the same family Number of GTs in commercial applications Number in marine use Number in MPGT use Description of technologies or applications which improve maintainability, increase availability, reduce fuel consumption, or provide any other measurable benefit to reduced total ownership costs. Description of how the proposed solution minimizes cost and impact to ship integration. This description should include, but is not limited to, total weight, required total volume allocation for intakes/uptakes and structural and auxiliary interfaces. Electric Propulsion System (EPS): A range of sizes, weights, torque and power levels for electric propulsion system components (Motor, Drive, Dynamic Brake, etc.) for each technology that suits�our trade space. Also provide equipment maintenance envelopes. What are the current motor technologies in service in CODLAG/CODLOG�and electric propulsion systems driving fixed pitch propellers? What are the current drive technologies in service in CODLAG/CODLOG�and electric propulsion systems driving fixed pitch propellers? Has industry integrated Thermal Ionization Detectors into motor and drive technologies in service? Can Thermal Ionization Detectors be integrated into the propulsion motor drives and the propulsion motors being offered to detect conditions that are precursors to arc flash events?� Has industry integrated temperature sensors for bolted connections? Has industry integrated Staubli type connectors into medium voltage equipment? What is the TRL of transformerless drive solutions?� Would these drives use active front end rectification?� How would harmonics and/or common mode issues be addressed?� What are the practical limits on system voltage if transformerless drives are used? Is the equivalent of field weakening possible for permanent magnet motor solutions? Propulsion Controls: What Control System Approaches have been successfully implemented in CODLAG/CODLOG and electric propulsion systems driving fixed pitch propellers? Is a local controller required to allocate throttle commands to EPS and PGT in CODLAG? Please describe the existing CODLAG/CODLOG control system mated with a fixed pitch propeller and how modes of operation are transitioned from electric-only to GT during acceleration, including how much time it takes to make such transitions. Please describe the existing CODLAG/CODLOG control system mated with a fixed pitch propeller and how modes of operation are transitioned from GT to electric during deceleration and/or reversing, including how much time it takes to make such transitions. Please describe the existing electric propulsion control systems mated with a fixed pitch propeller and how modes of operation are transitioned from electric-only to GT during acceleration, including how much time it takes to make such transitions. Auxiliary Propulsion (Thrusters) Are there shock qualified electric motor driven deployable azimuth thrusters offered larger than 1000 kW? If so, which models have been shock qualified? If not, which models would they expect to pass shock qualification? What is the size and weight of the provided VFD for those thrusters? Also provide equipment maintenance envelopes. Is there any shock or durability concerns for a Stem style deployable thruster vs a Canister style deployable thruster? DDG(X) Medium and Low Voltage Power Distribution Trade space: Primary Distribution System (PDP) subsystem is responsible for transmission of electrical power to the propulsion system and load centers. Comprised of HV Switchboards (SWBDs) arranged in a radial or zonal configuration distribute 4,160 VAC or 13.8 kVAC throughout the ship. High Resistance Grounding Resistors provide high resistance path to ground for phase imbalances in the system and provide POG equipment protection in the event of a ground fault. PDP will provide a MIL-STD-1399 compliant interface for distribution to electrical loads greater than 500kW. Secondary Distribution System (PDS) subsystem is responsible for transmission of electrical power from load centers to individual loads throughout the ship. The PDS is likely to be a zonal or radial distribution architecture incorporating transformers at the PDP/PDS interface; however, converter-based are still in trade space.� PDS transformers are currently based on CVN-78 13.8 kVAC designs.� PDS will provide a MIL-STD-1399 compliant interface for distribution of low-voltage AC and DC power to Ship Service Load and WSS systems.� The list of ship�s Electric Loads is configuration managed via the Electric Power Load Analysis (EPLA). �Medium and Low Voltage Power Distribution: For equipment offered in the trade space, provide dimensions, weights, and equipment maintenance envelopes. For equipment offered in the trade space, provide approximate lead times to design, manufacture, factory test and deliver the component to the U.S. Navy NSWCPD facility in Philadelphia for land-based testing (please provide duration for each of these major categories of activity and identify to what extent they overlap). Please cite how these time frames compare to prior first of class equipment the supplier has designed, manufactured, factory tested (including any limitations on power and endurance test durations), and delivered to NSWCPD.�� Please provide lead times for government to receive Preliminary Interface and Final Control Documents (ICDs) after contract award. Are there plans to develop MIL-Spec 24643 qualified cable for high power 15kV distribution systems? Are there plans to develop a robust reduced size 15kV switchboards and/or circuit breakers to accommodate less than 1000A power demands with consideration of the proper shipboard creepage and clearance? Are there plans to produce 4160V Mil-Qualified circuit breakers rated for 2000A or higher? Are there plans to develop MV to LV power transformers with reduced size, weight, and/or losses for shipboard use? Are there any practical sensing devices planned to detect temperature rise in bolted and/or compressed electrical connections? Are there plans to incorporate standard Point on Wave (POW) devices for current inrush limiting for transformers? Is cable industry investigating methods that enable EPR insulation systems to pass circuity integrity flame tests? Are there plans to qualify tap changing transformers for Navy applications? Are there new advances in thermal ionization and arc fault detection equipment for shipboard applications that we can expect? Are there plans for development of Marine / MIL-Spec qualified Staubli connectors for MV or LV equipment? Are there plans to qualify solid-state relays for MV switchboards? Are there plans to develop novel MV bus transfer devices for high power systems? Is the industry considering establishing marine control systems below 30V to remove safety issues from more equipment? Cybersecurity:� What current and near-term technologies for securing and encrypting communications?� Cybersecurity:� Any ""bump in the wire"" tech that does not add latency, or minimizes the latency for encryption and decryption? Cybersecurity:� Is Zero Trust Architecture being implemented? Cybersecurity: Is there a plan to ensure logic-bearing devices and other hardware, software, firmware that processes or stores information used in EPC are protected from supply chain compromise? Software Development:� Are companies using DevOps more? Software Development:� Any companies doing ""over the air"" updates for Industrial Controls and Automation?� Or remote downloads? DDG(X) Modeling and Simulation: The Navy is actively seeking models suitable for exploring both component level and system level computer simulations (in nonrealtime and in realtime) of the IPS to identify potential risks, contribute to risk reduction, steer the development of IPS solutions and requirements, and validate such solutions and requirements in a virtual environment. The Navy will need access to suppliers� models and code suitable for such activities for the various components, sub-systems, and major systems that industry believes are applicable for the DDG(X) IPS. The Navy will also need access to suppliers� control hardware to support Control Hardware-in-the-Loop (CHIL) simulations. Modeling and Simulation: If your design practice includes modeling and simulation efforts in product development, what specific single component, sub-system, or system model relevant to the planned DDG(X) IPS test program or anticipated tactical hardware do you have readily available and how is it used in your product development? Please include the specific studies the model is used for transient stability analysis (e.g. dynamic studies, harmonic analyses, short-circuit analyses, common-mode analyses, EMI studies, etc.), the model resolution (e.g. average value, dynamic, static, electromagnetic transient, etc.), and the physics and time constants represented. Please include specific software environments the models are created in. If applicable, please include how modeling is used to develop software control code throughout product development. If applicable, please describe your use of CHIL and how you recommend using CHIL to support IPS design. What are your current capabilities to perform real-time modeling as well as CHIL? What tools have you already adopted in your organization to support product development? Describe gaps and needs you may foresee needing development in future. What model(s) would still need to be developed (gaps in the models that require investment) that would be appropriate for DDG(X) IPS modeling and simulation. How long will it tak...
 
Web Link
SAM.gov Permalink
(https://sam.gov/opp/20fc050820454717971316be788395b0/view)
 
Place of Performance
Address: DC, USA
Country: USA
 
Record
SN07128006-F 20240717/240715230106 (samdaily.us)
 
Source
SAM.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's SAM Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.