|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF JANUARY 31,1995 PSA#1273R&D Contracting, Bldg 7, 2530 C Street, WPAFB OH 45433-7607 A -- SUBSYSTEMS INTEGRATED DESIGN ASSESSMENT TECHNOLOGY (SIDAT). THIS
ANNOUNCEMENT IS IN TWO PARTS. THIS IS PART 1 OF 2 SOL PRDA 95-05-FIK
DUE 031695 POC Mr. Raleigh Haney, Contract Negotiator, (513) 255-5901
Mr. Lawrence W. Kopa, Contracting Officer, (513) 255-5901. 17.
A--NOTICE: THIS ANNOUNCEMENT IS IN TWO PARTS. PART 1 OF 2 PARTS.
INTRODUCTION: Wright Laboratory (WL/FIVE) is interested in receiving
proposals (technical and cost) on the research effort described below.
Proposals in response to this PRDA shall be submitted by 16 March
1995, 1500 hours Eastern Time, addressed to Wright Laboratory,
Directorate of R&D Contracting, WL/FIKA, Building 7, Area B, Attn: Mr.
Raleigh Haney, 2530 C St, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7607. (1)
This is an unrestricted solicitation. Small businesses are encouraged
to propose on all or any part of this solicitation. Proposals submitted
shall be in accordance with this announcement. Proposals submitted
after the cutoff date specified herein shall be treated with
restrictions of FAR 52.215-10. A copy of this provision may be obtained
from the contracting point of contact. There will be no other
solicitation issued in regard to this requirement. Offerors should be
alert for any PRDA amendments that may permit subsequent submission of
proposal dates. Offerors who do not already have a copy of the current
Nov 92 WL guide entitled ''PRDA BAA Guide for Industry'' or SF 1411 may
request a copy from WL/FIKA, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7607, (513)
255-5901. B-- REQUIREMENTS (1) Introduction: Management of energy, both
in terms of power generation and usage requirements and the disposition
of waste heat, is a critical factor in the design of current air
vehicles, and will continue to be so in the future. Integrated
subsystems design assessment, allowing alternative applications of
basic subsystems technologies as well as variant component mixes within
subsystems, will enable engineers to quickly assess the capabilities of
existing technologies to meet overall system requirements. Subsystems
integrated design assessment is most effective when accomplished during
the conceptual design stage of the acquisition process, where design
and cost flexibility is the greatest. In order to produce this rapid
technical evaluation capability, modeling and simulation technologies
must be developed which can quantify the relationships between
operational and environmental requirements, subsystem and
component-level functions, and system-level performance/penalty
measures. The envisioned capability would be one wherein a top level
''virtual prototype'' of an air vehicle's subsystems can be quickly
assembled from on-line libraries of subsystem and component models,
using a graphics-oriented interface. Having the ability to quickly
assess system-level performance/penalty measures during the conceptual
design phase of system development, based on an analysis of subsystems
performance and an accurate simulation of their interactions, will
ensure that inconsistent or conflicting requirements are quickly
identified, and that the need to allocate resources for the development
of advanced, integrated technology, to satisfy an operational
requirement, is known prior to embarking on the detailed design. (2)
Technical Description: The objective of the SIDAT effort is to define
an approach to the development of a unique and innovative integrated
subsystem design-assessment capability. This effort is specifically
aimed at identifying or defining the mathematical modeling, analytic
methodologies, engineering procedures, and data processing technologies
required to accomplish the assessment. This effort will also define the
underlying framework detailing how these elements ought to be combined
to implement the desired capability. This effort will define and
validate the approach, tools and components, required to implement
SIDAT, but will not implement the actual capability. This effort is
divided into three specific tasks. First, develop the modeling
procedures and methodology for the capability. The modeling procedures
and methodology shall serve as the basic outline for development of
the SIDAT capability. Second, implement a rapidly-reconfigurable
concept visualization demonstrator (CVD). The CVD shall embody the
basic concepts of the SIDAT capability including: representations of
all user interfaces and mimicking the expert system aids intended for
the actual system. Each version of the CVD shall be distributed, in
order to allow the potential using community to fully evaluate the
concepts and provide feedback. Third, assess the payoffs and benefits
of such a system, and develop a road map for completing development of
this capability. The government estimates the following distribution
of effort in the tasks described below: 1) Modeling and Methodology:
50-60%, 2) Concept Visualization Demonstrator: 30-20%, and 3)
Payoff/Benefit/Road Map: 20%. Offeror, in his/her response, shall break
out each task by both technical effort and cost. MODELLING PROCEDURES
AND METHODOLOGY: The contractor shall develop a procedure and
methodology capable of performing effective and efficient energy
management assessment of integrated subsystem schemes. The contractor
shall identify, or develop and validate, the mathematical theories or
expert knowledge required to model the functionality and performance of
subsystems and components, including all critical subsystem
interactions. Modeling subsystem interactions shall include defining
the significant interfaces between subsystems and describing the
complex interrelationships among the many parameters representing
various subsystem functions. Because the many interrelationships make
mathematical modelling of subsystem functions quite involved,
methodologies shall be developed to make the models consistent with the
level of detail available at, and required for, conceptual design, and
to limit analysis to those parameters that have a meaningful effect on
the system level performance measures of interest such as: weight,
range, durability, and life cycle cost. The modeling and methodology
procedures shall identify or define all required data: types,
structures, dependencies, derivations, normalizations, transformations,
and exchange protocols, while adopting-- wherever possible--existing or
proposed standardization schemes. The modeling procedures and
methodology shall identify specific computer science disciplines (e.g.,
expert systems, modeling & simulation, object-oriented design networks,
and data base management systems) and the interactions of these
disciplines required to implement the SIDAT capability. This shall
include consideration of leveraging development by adapting existing
programs that offer capabilities similar to those sought by SIDAT, but
designed for different purposes. Modeling procedures and methodology
shall provide a comprehensive specification of the significant
integration links and interactions between components within a
subsystem and between subsystem. This includes physical, functional,
control, and energy interfaces. The models used in the assessment of
the interfaces shall represent only those links that have a meaningful
and quantifiable effect on system-level performance/penalty measures.
The methodology shall include development of strategies for ensuring
robust solution convergence, as well as methods to screen for illogical
or unreasonable system states, or input that would prevent accurate and
meaningful analysis. Modeling procedures and methodology shall define
the level of rigor of the mathematical modeling sufficient to obtain
required system-level impacts. CONCEPT VISUALIZATION DEMONSTRATOR: As
functional concepts and basic operating modes of the capability are
being defined, a rapidly-reconfigurable, working visualization of the
system concept shall be implemented. The concept visualization
demonstrator (CVD) shall serve to instantiate the vision for the SIDAT
capability, reflecting modes and features of the user interface and
basic system operation and control flow. Internally, the CVD shall
serve as a sounding board for ideas as the definition of the SIDAT
capability progresses. Externally, each new version of the CVD shall be
made available for free distribution, in order to allow potential users
to fully evaluate operational concepts and usability. The CVD shall
undergo formal review and evaluation, at least quarterly, in parallel
with the evolving concept of the SIDAT capability. Concept
visualization is intended only for use in evaluating the evolving SIDAT
definition, and shall be accomplished utilizing a commercial
off-the-shelf, rapid prototyping tool (or tool suite). CVD development
shall not be subject to DOD requirements for: Ada language,
MIL-STD-2167A documentation, or Operation, Maintenance and Support
(OM&S). PAYOFF/BENEFIT/ROAD MAP: The contractor shall quantify the
payoffs of the SIDAT capability. This shall include: identifying places
in the product development cycle wherein the SIDAT capability would
provide maximum benefit, identifying its potential contributions to
systems engineering, and determining how its output might best be
exploited by the using community. The contractor shall define a set of
validation criteria for the SIDAT methodology, which shall be
supported by a complete description of the rationale used in developing
the methodology. Risk assessment shall be performed to determine the
state of all identified technological disciplines, in terms of meeting
the requirements of an actual development effort. The contractor shall
create a program development plan to describe how the SIDAT methodology
would be implemented as an integrated design assessment capability.
This shall include recommendations on schedule, and manpower,
requirements including a breakout of the skills mix needed to
accomplish the system development. The contractor shall invite peer
review of the SIDAT capability through technical papers, refereed
journal articles, technical conferences, or any other open forums
wherein the SIDAT effort can be described and debated by the technical
community. The contractor shall hold quarterly reviews, at mutually
agreed upon locations (at least one per year at Wright-Patterson), to
present the current state of the research effort, including Modeling
and Methodology and the CVD. (3) Deliverable Items: The following
deliverable data items shall be proposed: (a) Status Report,
DI-MGMT-80368/T, monthly, (b) Contract Funds Status Report (CFSR),
DI-F-6004B/T, monthly, (c) Project Planning Chart, DI-MGMT-80507A/T,
monthly, (d) Presentation Material, DI-ADMN-81373/T, as required, (e)
Performance and Cost Report, DI-FNCL-80912/T, monthly, (f) Scientific
and Technical Reports, DI-MISC-80711/T, (Draft and Reproducible Final),
(g) Technical Videotape Presentation, DI-MISC-81275/T, (Draft and
Final), and (h) Scientific and Technical Reports, DI- MISC-80711/T,
(Contractor's Billing Voucher), monthly. (4) Security Requirements: It
is not anticipated that work performed under this contract will
involve classified information. (5) Other Special Requirements:
International Trade in Arms Restrictions(ITARs) apply. (0027) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0003 19950130\A-0003.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|