|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF FEBRUARY 10,1995 PSA#1281District of Columbia, Department of Public Works, Water and Sewer
Utility Administration, Attention: Ms. Deidre A. Saunders, A/E Liaison,
Office of Engineering Services, 5000 Overlook Avenue, S.W., Washington,
D.C. 20032-5397 C -- REQUEST FOR A/E QUALIFICATIONS STATEMENTS FOR UPDATING OF
QUALIFIED A/E LIST AND FILES The District of Columbia, Department of
Public Works, requests the submittal of qualifications statements from
consulting engineering firms, and submittal of updated statements from
firms who have previously submitted, who are interested in providing
professional engineering and related services required for projects in
the Water and Sewer Utility Administrations's (WASUA) 6-year Capital
Improvements Program (CIP). Services will involve planning, design and
construction phase engineering, startup assistance and operations and
maintenance manual preparation. Construction phase work may include
both detailed inspection of construction and management of selected
construction contracts. Additionally, the Department may elect to
contract for basic engineering services on a ``task order'' basis, both
in and outside of the Capital Improvements Program for utility
engineering including systems planning and analysis, design phase, and
construction phase services. An active database of all A/E firms
expressing interest is required by law under Title 27 D.C. Municipal
Regulations, Chapter 26, Section 2625, and will be updated annually
within the Office of the Administrator, WASUA. Firms seeking award must
submit both SF 254 and SF 255 forms. Statements should indicate the
makeup of local staff and include the firm's Dun and Bradstreet
Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Number. Statements must clearly
indicate the engineering disciplines and type of services for which the
firm wishes to be considered, using the established ``Experience
Profile Code Numbers'' associated with Standard Form 254 (GSA - Fed.
Proc. Reg. 41 CFR 1-16.803). Further, statements should also clearly
indiate not more than four (4) areas of specialization for which the
firm has an established background and proven expertise, and include
Standard Form 255 demonstrating the background and expertise claimed.
To be eligible for consideration, a firm must furnish evidence of its
authority to render a professional engineering services in the District
of Columbia or furnish a certification of their commitment to obtain
such authority prior to award of any resulting agreement. Prospective
respondents to this request are referred to the D.C. Code which
specifies legal requirements pertaining to providing professional
engineering services in the District of Columbia. Title 2, Chapter 23,
``Professional Engineer's Registration Act'' in particular is
pertinent. Firms selected for services will be required to utilize
engineers maintaining valid registration in the District of Columbia in
the appropriate engineerng disciplines. Any resulting agreement will
have, as a goal, the performance of 35 percent of the agreement work
(based on dollar value) through the use of 30 percent disadvantaged
business enterprises (DBE) and five percent women-owned business
enterprises (WBE) holding currently valid certificates of registration
under any state's minority, women's, or other disadvantaged business
enterprise certification program in accordance with 40 CFR Part 33.240.
A copy of a valid MBE/DBE/WBE certificate must be submitted with the
qualification statements for the prime firm. Work under any resulting
agreement is also subject to compliance with Mayor's Order No. 92-138
pertaining to ``Employment Agreement Goals and Objectives for the
Department of Public Works Construction and Service Contracts'' to the
extent feasible and consistent with applicable federal law. This order
contains the following basic goals and objectives: (a) At least
fifty-one percent of all jobs performed on the contract are to be
performed by employees who are residents of the District of Columbia;
(b) At least fifty-one percent of new hires for work on the DPW
contract must be residents of the District of Columbia, preferably
referred from the District of Columbia Department of Employment
Services; and (c) One hundred percent of all apprentices employed for
work on the DPW contract shall be residents of the District of
Columbia, registered in programs approved by the D.C. Apprenticeship
Council of the District of Columbia Department of Employment Services.
Qualifications will be evaluated in accordance with the process and
criteria specified in 40 CFR Section 35.937-3 and 27 DCMR (District of
Columbia Municipal Regulations) Sections 2620 through 2623. The most
highly qualified firms will be requested to submit technical proposals
for further consideration. Qualifications and proposal evaluations
will be based upon: (a) Professional qualifications necessary for
satisfactory performance of the required services; (b) Specialized
experience, technical competence in, and familiarity with, the type of
work required; (c) Capacity to accomplish the work in the required
time; (d) Past performance on contracts with the District, other
governmental entities, and private industry in terms of cost control,
quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules; and (e)
Acceptability under other appropriate evaluation criteria including
avoidance of personal and organizational conflicts of interest. (f)
Location of the firm and commitment to the District's goals concerning
the employment of District residents, minorities and disadvantaged
businesses, to the extent allowed by Federal and District law. Proposal
evaluations will be conducted by an architect-engineer evaluation board
composed of members who, collectively, have experience in architecture,
engineering, construction, and District and related procurement
matters. Members of the evaluation board will include highly qualified
professional employees of the District and may include private
practitioners of architecture, engineering, or related professions. No
firm shall be eligible for award of an architect-engineer agreement
during the period in which any of its principals or associates is
participating as a member of the awarding evaluation board. The
Department of Public Works has established an overhead rate ceiling for
architect-engineer and consultant contracts. In accordance with
Departmental Order No. 85, the maximum allowable rate for indirect
costs (overhead) shall be 140 percent. All work under the proposed
agreement will be subject to this limit. Firms ultimately selected from
this list for the performance of engineering services will be required
to submit cost and pricing data in accordance with the District of
Columbia ``Procurement Practices Act of 1985.'' Any agreement resulting
from this request for qualification statements may be funded in part by
a grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and will
be subject to regulations contained in 40 CFR Sections 35.936, 35.937
and 35.939. Neither the United States nor the Environmental Protection
Agency is, nor will be, a party to this request or any resulting
agreement. To be considered, six (6) copies of qualification statements
must be received by 4:00 p.m. on March 17, 1995 at the following
office: District of Columbia, Department of Public Works, Water and
Sewer Utility Administration, Attention: Ms. Deidre A. Saunders, A/E
Liaison, Office of Engineering Services, 5000 Overlook Avenue, S.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20032-5397. The manager for this project, Ms. Deidre
Saunders may be contacted on (202) 645-6281 concerning any questions
prospective respondents may have. (038) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0017 19950209\C-0002.SOL)
C - Architect and Engineering Services - Construction Index Page
|
|