Loren Data Corp.

'

 
 

COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF MARCH 1,1995 PSA#1293

Air FORCE WRIGHT LABORATORY ARMAMENT DIRECTORATE CONTRACTING DIVISION, WL/MNK, 101 WEST EGLIN BOULEVARD, Suite 337, EGLIN AFB, FL 32542- 6810

A -- ARMAMENT TECHNOLOGIES (PART 4 OF 4) SOL MNK-95-0001 POC CONTACT CAPTAIN CHARLES MORTON, Contracting Officer (904) 882-4294, EXT 3402. CONTINUATION OF PREVIOUS SYNOPSIS for Armament Technologies: C. PART II: PROPOSAL EVALUATION: Proposals submitted in response to this BAA will be evaluated as received using the factors given below. The factors are listed in descending order of importance. No further evaluation criteria will be used in selecting the proposals. 1. The overall scientific and/or technical merits of the proposal. 2. The potential contributions of the effort to the WL/MN mission and the extent to which the research effort will contribute to balancing the overall contract research program of this directorate. 3. The offeror's capabilities, related experience, facilities, techniques, or unique combinations of these which are integral factors for achieving the proposal objectives. 4. The qualifications, capabilities, and experience of the proposed principal investigator, team leader, and other key personnel who are critical to achieving the proposal objectives. 5. The offeror's record of past and present performance. 6. The reasonableness and realism of proposed costs and fees if any, and the availability of funds. Upon receipt of a proposal, the WL/MN technical staff will perform an initial review of its scientific merit and potential contribution to the Air Force mission and also determine if funds are expected to be available for the effort. Proposals not considered to have sufficient scientific merit or relevance to Air Force needs, or those in areas for which funds are not expected to be available, may be declined without further review. It is the policy of WL/MN to treat all proposals as privileged information prior to award, and to disclose the contents only for the purposes of evaluation. Proposals not declined as a result of initial review will be subject to an extensive evaluation by highly qualified scientists from within the Government. The offeror must indicate on the appropriate form any limitation to be placed on disclosure of information contained in the proposal. Each proposal will be evaluated based on the merit and relevance of the specific research proposed as it relates to the overall WL/MN program, rather than against other proposals for research in the same general area. D. PART III: PROPOSAL PREPARATION: Each proposal submitted should consist of two volumes. Volume 1 should provide the technical proposal and Volume 2 should address the price/cost portions of the proposal. Volume 1 should be limited to a total of 50 pages, including resumes, charts, figures, tables, etc. Pages in excess of the specified 50 pages will be removed and returned to the offeror before evaluation starts. A page is defined to be one side of a 8.5 x 11 inch piece of paper with information on it. Minimum print size is 10 point type, or 12 pitch. Submit four copies of the proposal. The technical portion of the proposal, Volume 1, should contain the following: 1. A title and abstract that includes a concise Statement of Work and basic approaches to be utilized. The Statement of Work should indicate the effort intended for each period of research. 2. A reasonably complete discussion stating the background and objectives of the proposed work, the approaches to be considered, and the resources to be employed. Include also the nature and extent of the anticipated results, and if known, the manner in which the work will contribute to the accomplishment of the agency's mission. 3. The names, brief biographical information, and a list of recent publications of the offeror's key personnel who will be involved in the research. Documentation of previous work or experience of the proposer in the field is especially important. 4. The type of support, if any, the offeror requests of the Armament Directorate, e.g. facilities, equipment, and materials. 5. The names of federal, state, local agencies or other parties receiving the proposals and/or funding the proposed effort of a similar nature. If none, so state. 6. The identity of facilities, specialized equipment, or other real property to be used for the work, if appropriate for an understanding of the technical work to be conducted. 7. Identify all on-going Government contracts and related past contracts. Provide a technical point of contact and telephone number for each contract cited. The cost portion of the proposal, Volume 2, should contain the following: 1. SF Form 1411 (Proposal Pricing Cover Sheet) for total proposal. 2. Summary by cost element and profit for total proposal. 3. Summary by cost element and profit for each contract line and sub-line item. 4. Labor summary for total proposal by categories, rates, and hours. Show which are level of effort, if applicable. For proposals from universities, the times and amounts to be charged should be identified by academic year and summer effort. 5. Labor summary for each line and sub-line item. 6. Explanation of how labor rates are computed, including base rates and escalation. 7. Identification of indirect rates by fiscal year and explanation of how established and base to which they apply. 8. Bill of materials detailing items by type, quantity, and unit price, total amount, and source of estimate. Provide vendor quotes. 9. Summary of all travel by destination, purpose, number of people and days, air fare, per diem, car rental, etc. 10. Consultants by name, rate, and number of days or hours. Furnish copy of consulting agreement, and identify prior agreements under which the consultant received the proposed rate. 11. Computer use by type, rate, and quality. 12. Other direct costs by type, amount, cost per unit and purpose. Specifically identify any costs for printing and publication. 13. DD Form 1861 if proposing facilities capital cost of money. 14. Subcontractor's proposal with prime offeror's price/cost analysis of subcontractor's proposal. If subcontractor was not competed, include justification. 15. Other terms and conditions, if any. 16. Forecast of monthly dollar commitments for the proposed contract period. 17. DD Form 1547 showing computation of proposed profit. 18. Type of contract proposed. (We expect most contracts to other than universities and non-profit organizations to be Firm Fixed Price.) 19. State whether you are a large business, small business, small disadvantaged business, nonprofit, educational, or historically black college or university. Options are discouraged and unpriced options will not be considered for award. Award of a grant to universities or nonprofit institutions, in lieu of a contract, will be considered and will be subject to the mutual agreement of the parties. The cost of preparing proposals in response to this announcement is not considered an allowable direct charge to any resulting contract, or any other contract. It is, however, an allowable expense to the normal bid and proposal indirect cost specified in FAR 31.205-18. Refer to the ''Proprietary Information'' and ''When and How to Submit'' sections of Air Force Material Command Unsolicited Proposal Guide, AFMC Pamphlet 64-101. The AFMC Form 190 is not applicable to BAAs. The guide may be obtained from AFDTC/BC, 205 West D Avenue Suite 449, Eglin AFB FL 32542-6863. The telephone number for this office is (904) 882-2843. Respondees should reference the above number (MNK BAA-95-0001) and a technical topic and contact name. Proposals should be sent to Ms. Virginia Wolfe, WL/MNGA, 101 W. Eglin Blvd. Suite 205, Eglin AFB FL 32542-6810. This announcement is open and effective for one year from date of publication. Proposers are warned that only contracting officers are legally authorized to obligate the government. (0058)

Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0004 19950228\A-0004.SOL)


A - Research and Development Index Page