|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF MARCH 13,1995 PSA#1301WL/FIK, R&D CONTRACTING DIRECTORATE, 2530 C Street WPAFB, OH 45433-
7607 A -- A--HYDRODYNAMIC RAM ANALYTICAL METHODS SOL PRDA NO: 95-06-FIK POC
Kathy Walston, Contract Negotiator, (513) 255-4427. A--INTRODUCTION:
Wright Laboratory (WL/FIKF) is interested in receiving proposals
(technical and cost) on the research effort described below. Proposals
in response to this shall be submitted by 25 April 95, 1500 hours
Eastern Time, addressed to Wright Laboratory, Directorate of R&D
Contracting, Building 7, Area B, Attn: (Kathy Walston, WL/FIKF)
Wright-Patterson AFB OH 45433-7607. This is an unrestricted
solicitation. Small businesses are encouraged to propose on all or part
of this solicitation. Proposals submitted shall be in accordance with
this announcement. Proposal submission after the cutoff date specified
herein shall be treated IAW restrictions of FAR 52. 215-10, copy of
this provision may be obtained from the contracting point of contract.
There will be no other solicitation issued in regard to this
requirement. Offerors should be alert for any PRDA amendments that may
be published. Offerors should request a copy of the WL guide entitled,
''PRDA and BAA Guide for Industry''. This guide was specifically
designed to assist offerors in understanding the PRDA/BAA proposal
process. Copies may be requested from WL/FIKF, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH
45433-7607, telephone (513) 255-4427. B--REQUIREMENTS: (1) Technical
Description: Phase 1... Established hydrodynamic ram damage prediction
codes and a state- of-the-art ALE code will be used to model a set of
previously tested specimens involving various levels of geometric
detail. Baselines (involving pressure, strain, displacement, and damage
prediction accuracy) will be established for each code relative to
empirical data. Special note will be made concerning each code's
limitations and predictive capabilities as a function of geometry. No
enhancements to the codes (with the possible exception of using a
generally accepted failure criterion) will be attempted during this
baselining effort. The contractor will also make special note of
critical steps in the modeling process and choices which must be made
to achieve desired results. Lessons learned will be used to guide
development of hydrodynamic ram specific subroutines during Phase 2. A
subtask to this baselining effort will be a brief analytical
evaluation of the effects of high-strain rate material properties on
predicted strains and displacements. The most geometrically detailed
specimen modeled in the baseline study will be the VS-8-01 test
article. Offerors are encouraged to request drawings of the test
article from the technical point of contact, listed herein. (Requests
must be in writing, faxes acceptable.) Drawings must be requested
within 15 days of this CBD announcement. Upon completion of the
analysis, the contractor will generate a synopsis of key datapoints
involving specific pressure, strain, and displacement information.
Model vs. test data correlation will be performed by Government
engineers to maintain data propriety. Phase 2... This task involves the
development of hydrodynamic ram specific subroutines which apply to
aircraft integral fuel tanks. Primary interest is in composite thin-
walled vessels that contain fluid and are penetrated by exploding
projectiles. The subroutines are expected to be analytical in nature
and incorporate expert systems to lead the analyst through the input
process, explaining the implications of each modeling choice. Upon
contractor completion of the hydrodynamic ram specific subroutines, the
contractor will interface the subroutines with an ALE code (baselined
in Phase 1). Each of the test cases modeled in Phase 1 will be
remodeled by the contractor using the enhanced ALE code. The contractor
shall show evidence of expertise required to run and modify the ALE
code and reflect accessibility to the code's authoring organization.
The degree to which analytical predictions agree with VS-8-01 test data
will be determined by the Government. Upon completion of the technical
effort and verification of the code's accuracy, the Government will
release a complete set of VS-8-01 test data to the contractor for
reporting purposes. (2) Deliverable items: The following deliverable
data items shall be required: (a) Status Report, DI-MGMT-80368/T,
monthly, (b) Funds and Man-Hour Expenditure Report, DI-FNCL- 80331/T,
monthly, (c) Project Planning Chart, DI-MGMT-80507A/T, monthly, (d)
Contract Funds Status Report (CFSR) DI-F-6004B/T, quarterly, (e)
Presentation Material, DI-ADMN- 81373/T, as required, (f) Scientific
and Technical Reports, Contractor's Billing Voucher, DI- MISC-80711/T,
monthly, (g) Scientific and Technical Reports, DI-MISC-80711/T, (Draft
and Reproducible Final), (h) Computer Software Product End Items,
DI-MCCR-80700, (one/R). (3) Security Requirements: It is anticipated
that work performed under this contract will remain unclassified. Work
will, however, be restricted in accordance with the DoD Military
Critical Technologies List. (4) Other Special Requirements:
International Trade in Arms Restrictions apply. C--ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION: (1) Anticipated Period of Performance: The total length of
the technical effort is estimated to be 27 months. The contractor shall
also provide for an additional 4 months for processing/completion of
the final report. (2) Expected Award Date: 1995 June - July. (3)
Government Estimate: The Government funding profile is estimated as
follows: FY95 $75,000.00, FY96 $105,000.00, and FY97 $285,000.00, for
a total of $465,000.00. (4) Type of Contract: Cost Plus Fixed Fee
(CPFF). Any grants awarded will be cost (no fee). (5) Government
Furnished Equipment: Drawings of the VS-8-01 hydrodynamic ram test
article will be provided. (6) Size Status: Firms responding should
indicate whether they are or are not a socially and economically
disadvantaged business, a Historically Black College or
University/Minority Institution, whether or not they are a woman-owned
business, and should also indicate their size status. For the purpose
of this acquisition, the size standard is 500 employees (SIC 8731).
(7) Notice to Foreign-Owned Firms: Such firms are asked to immediately
notify the Air Force point cited below upon deciding to respond to
this announcement. Foreign contractors should be aware that
restrictions may apply which could preclude their participation in this
acquisition. D--PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS: (1) General
Instructions: Offerors should apply the restrictive notice prescribed
in the provision of FAR 52.215-12, Restriction on Disclosure and Use of
Data, to trade secrets or privileged commercial and financial
information contained in their proposals. Proposal questions should be
directed to one of the points of contact listed at the end of the
PRDA. Offerors should consider instructions contained in the WL PRDA
and BAA Guide for Industry referenced in Section A of this
announcement. Technical and cost proposals, submitted in separate
volumes, are required and must be valid for 180 days. Proposals must
reference the above PRDA number. Proposals shall be submitted in an
original and six copies. All responsible sources may submit a proposal
which shall be considered against the criteria set forth herein.
Offerors are advised that only contracting officers are legally
authorized to contractually bind or otherwise commit the Government.
(2) Cost Proposal: The accompanying cost proposal/price breakdown shall
be supplied on an SF 1411, together with supporting schedules, and
shall contain a person-hour breakdown per task. Copies of the above-
referenced forms may be obtained from the contracting office cited. The
costs should be broken down by phase. (3) Technical Proposal: The
technical proposal shall include a discussion of the nature and scope
of the research and the technical approach. Additional information on
prior work in this area, descriptions of available equipment, data and
facilities, and resumes of personnel who will be participating in this
effort should also be included as attachments to the technical proposal
and are not included in the page limit. The technical proposal shall
include a Statement of Work (SOW) detailing the technical tasks
proposed to be accomplished under the proposed effort and suitable for
contract incorporation. Any questions concerning SOW preparation shall
be referred to the Technical Point of Contact cited in this
announcement. (4) Offerors should refer to the WL Guide referenced in
Section A to assist in SOW preparation. (5) PL98-94 applies. Offerors
must submit an approved DD Form 2345, Export Controlled DoD Technical
Data Agreement with their proposal. (6) Page Limitations: The technical
proposal shall be limited to 50 pages (12 pitch or larger type), double
spaced, single sided, 8.5 by 11 inches. Pages in excess of this
limitation will not be considered by the Government. Cost proposals
have no limitation, however, offerors are requested to keep cost
proposal to 75 pages as a goal. (7) Preparation Cost: This announcement
does not commit the Government to pay for any response preparation
cost. The cost of preparing proposals in response to this PRDA is not
considered an allowable direct charge to any resulting or any other
contract. It is, however, an allowable expense to the normal bid and
proposal indirect cost as specified in expense to the normal bid and
proposal indirect cost as specified in FAR 31.205-18. E--BASIS FOR
AWARD: The selection of a source for the contract award will be based
on an evaluation of offerors' responses (both technical and cost
aspects) to determine the overall merit of your proposal in response to
the announcement. The technical aspect, which is ranked as the first
order of priority, shall be evaluated based upon the following criteria
which are of equal importance: (a) new and creative solutions, (b) the
offeror's understanding of the scope of the technical effort, (c)
soundness of offeror's technical approach, (d) the availability of
qualified technical personnel and their experience with applicable
technologies, (e) the offeror's past experience with applicable
analytical codes and modeling projectile-generated fluid-structure
interactions, and (f) organization, clarity, and thoroughness of the
proposed Statement of Work. Cost, which includes consideration of
proposed budgets and funding profiles, is ranked as the second order of
priority. No other evaluation criteria will be used. The technical and
cost information will be evaluated at the same time. The Air Force
reserves the right to select for award of a contract, grant, or
cooperative agreement, any, all, part, or none of the proposals
received. Award of a grant to universities or nonprofit institutions,
or a cooperative agreement, in lieu of a contract, will be considered
and will be subject to the mutual agreement of the parties. F--POINTS
OF CONTACT: (1) Technical Contact Point: Questions on technical issues
may be referred to the Project Engineers, Marty Lentz or Greg
Czarnecki, WL/FIVS Bldg. 63, 1901 Tenth St., Wright-Patterson Air Force
Base, OH 45433-6543, (513) 255-6823. (2) Contracting/Cost Contact
Point: Questions related to contract/cost issues should be directed to
the Wright Laboratory, Directorate of Research and Development
Contracting, Kathy Walston, WL/FIKF, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base OH
45433-7607, (513) 255-4427. (0068) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0020 19950310\A-0020.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|