|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF APRIL 5,1995 PSA#1318HQ Space and Missile Systems Center, SMC/MCX, 2420 Vela Way, Suite
1467-A8, Los Angeles AFB, CA 90245-4659 A -- MILSATCOM TECHNOLOGY STUDIES SOL BAA 94-01 POC Mr. Joseph P.
Schleifer, Contracting Officer, (310) 336-4729; Technical POC's: Lt
Scott Bechtloff, Payload, (310) 336-4645; Lt Jim Tuttle, Terminal,
(617) 271-6933. Advanced EHF Portion of the Military Satellite
Communications (MILSATCOM) Technology Studies Update: to CBD
announcement, Friday 17 May 1994. This change updates the closing date
for BAA 94-01 from 30 April 1995 to 17 May 1995. OVERVIEW: The
Advanced EHF satellite system may begin Engineering and Manufacturing
Development by 2000. A successful technology program will reduce the
development risk for the future Advanced EHF systems through
feasibility demonstrations of critical technology. Relevant technology
projects will be performed between FY95 and FY2000, with durations of
a few months to several years. This Broad Agency Announcement
initiates implementation of the MILSATCOM Technology Program. The FY95
funding of approximately $20M is limited to technology investigations
which directly support an Advanced EHF communications system and will
focus on critical payload technology. All data and devices from all
resulting contracts will be used by the MILSATCOM Joint Program Office
(MJPO) to support the technology program. STATEMENT OF WORK: New and
innovative approaches are sought to reduce the cost of an advanced EHF
system through reductions in size, weight, power, and production
costs. Most contracts will last approximately one year with options to
renew for additional one year periods. The total contract value,
including options, per project will range from $0.2M-5M. The following
projects are representative of those being considered by the MJPO.
However, proposals may be submitted for any projects that have
potential to reduce the cost of an Advanced EHF system. 1. EHF payload
technologies: 1.1 Investigate alternative payload processing methods
and architecture which will reduce payload expense, size, weight, and
power while allowing flexibility to adapt to future requirements and
evolving technology. Postulated technologies should be linked to trends
in industry, well defined commercial and Government investment, and/or
proposed technology projects. 1.2 Investigate methods for reducing the
weight of uplink nulling antennas. Methods to be investigated include,
but are not limited to, the use of MMIC and/or optical devices. 1.3
Investigate the feasibility of advanced, light weight multiple beam
agile antenna designs and their use in satellite systems. 1.4
Investigate advanced wideband frequency synthesizers and frequency
generation concepts. 1.5 Investigate methods for reducing the weight
and increasing the efficiency of downlink antennas. Methods to be
investigated include, but are not limited to, transmit phased array
antennas. 1.6 Investigate methods for decreasing the weight and power
impact of crosslink subsystems. 2 Airborne EHF terminal: 2.1
Investigate thin, lightweight, advanced phased array antennas. Methods
to be investigated include, but are not limited to, thermal management
and scan angle issues, and RF-distribution verses optically distributed
architecture. 2.2 Investigate advanced EHF devices for application in
solid state power amplifiers and phased array antennas, including
device efficiency and cost issues. 3 Other Areas: We are also
interested in receiving submissions for any other projects that offer
the potential for substantial cost savings in MILSATCOM space,
terminal, and control segments. DELIVERABLES: The following items
represent a partial list of deliverables: monthly cost, schedule, and
technical performance reports, program protection cost report (for
classified projects only), and a final report on the project's
contribution to life cycle cost savings, interim and final reviews, and
agendas and minutes for all meetings. Detailed design drawings and
performance characteristics of the device shall be included in the
final report if applicable. The data derived from these studies may be
used in future Government procurements, and must be available for such
use at no cost to the Government or its contractors. All data and
devices delivered will be considered Government property. SECURITY
REQUIREMENTS: All proposal abstracts shall be UNCLASSIFIED. Security
requirements for the individual projects will be provided in the
notification requesting a full proposal. SELECTION CRITERIA: The
purpose of the proposal abstract is to allow contractors to propose
projects while avoiding unwarranted effort on the part of an offeror
whose work is not of interest to the Government. All proposal abstracts
submitted will become Government property unless disposal or return is
requested by the offeror. Offerors submitting proposal abstracts found
to be consistent with this BAA and of sufficient interest to the
Government will be invited to submit a full (technical and cost)
proposal. Such an invitation does not assure that the offeror will be
awarded a contract. The criteria to be used for selection of the
proposal abstracts and full proposals are: 1) Project's innovative and
sound approach to reduce costs for future systems. 2) Cost of the
project. The following criteria will also be considered in the full
proposal stage. 3) Ability to transition the technology to the
production phase. 4) Increase in capability of the appropriate future
system. 5) Offeror's record of past and present performance. 6)
Offeror's capabilities and facilities. 7) Security clearance (if
needed). The criteria listed above are in order of importance to the
Government. No further evaluation criteria will be used in selecting
the proposals. Proposal abstracts and the full proposals that will
follow will be evaluated by members of the MILSATCOM Technology Program
System Team and their SETA and FFRDC support. PROPOSAL ABSTRACT
PREPARATION INFORMATION: Submit 10 copies with a maximum of five single
sided pages, including figures, of 12 point type, 1.5 spaced, and one
inch margins. Proposal abstracts that address different areas will be
submitted under separate cover. The format is as follows: Section 1 -
Number of Project (ex. 1.1 for EHF payload processing), Title, Period
of performance, Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) Cost, Name of Company.
Section 2 -Task Objective. Section 3 - Technical Summary. Section 4 -
Cost Summary. Send Proposal abstracts to: Lt Scott Bechtloff SMC/MCX
2420 Vela Way, Suite 1467-A8 Los Angeles, CA 90245-4659. To be
available for contract award at the earliest possible date, proposal
abstracts must be received forty-five (45) calendar days after the
announcement publication date, or if the forty-fifth day falls on a
non-business day, on the next calendar day of business. Reply letters
to these abstracts will be mailed approximately 30 days after this
date. PROPOSALS: Instructions for proposal preparation will be in the
letter requesting complete technical and cost proposals. ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION: Refer to the ''Proprietary Information'' and ''When and
How to Submit'' sections of the Air Force Material Command Unsolicited
Proposal Guide from each activity's publication distribution office.
The AFMC Form 91 is not applicable to BAA's. Responses should reference
this BAA's number (BAA 94-01). This BAA is open until 17 May 95. The
expected award date for contracts is no sooner than 1Nov94. Contracts
will be cost plus fixed fee or firm fixed price, depending upon the
type and complexity of the project addressed in the proposal abstract.
Proposal abstracts received by 31May94 are to be valid through 1Feb95,
or if submitted after 31May 94 to be valid for nine months. SMC/MC will
be the final decision authority for selecting technologies for funding.
Contracts will potentially be awarded by the MJPO, Rome Labs, Phillips
Labs, and Air Force Terminal Program Office. Invitation packages for
each project will be sent out from the appropriate contracting
organization. The Government reserves the right to award all or none of
the contracts associated with the projects described in this
announcement. In the case of submissions of equal caliber, preference
will be given to small and small, disadvantaged businesses. Small
businesses are encouraged to participate. To request a copy of the
industry distribution version of the MILSATCOM Technology Plan, contact
Lt Scott Bechtloff (address listed above). Distribution to foreign
sources will be delayed until the plan has been officially approved for
foreign release. Foreign-owned offerors are advised that their
participation is subject to foreign disclosure review. Data subject to
export control constraints may be involved and only firms on the
Qualified Contractor Access List (QCAL) will be allowed access to such
data. Offerors are cautioned that only contracting officers are
legally authorized to commit the Government. Additionally, the cost of
preparing proposals in response to this announcement is not an
allowable direct charge to any resulting contract or any other
contract, but may be an allowable expense to the normal bid and
proposal indirect cost in FAR 31.205-18. All questions and requests
related to this announcement must be in writing (except as noted
below). The Air Force has been directed to discontinue use of hazardous
materials as part of the implementation of Pollution Prevention
measures in our acquisition programs. Contracts issued after 1Jun93 may
not specify the use of Class I Ozone Depleting Chemicals (ODCs) and the
Government may not accept any delivered end items containing them.
Substitute substances must comply with Section 5, Toxic Substances
Control Act and Section 612 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 as
specified by the EPA proposed rule ''Stratospheric Ozone Protection:
Significant New Alternatives Policy Program'' (40 CFR Part 82).
Alternatives which are hazardous or Class II ODCs may be used only as
a last resort after all environmentally preferable alternatives have
been evaluated and rejected for technical and/or economic reasons.
INDUSTRY BRIEFING: A briefing will be presented on Tue, 17May94, at
2350 East El Segundo Blvd., El Segundo, CA 90245-4691, Building A1,
Room 1062 at 0800. The meeting will be UNCLASSIFIED. Offerors are
limited to two attendees, and must notify Lt Scott Bechtloff in writing
by 11May94 at the address (SMC/MCX) above or by fax (310) 336-4905. The
information at the industry briefing will include a discussion of the
EHF portion of the MILSATCOM Technology Plan, along with a
clarification, in general terms, of the proposal evaluation criteria.
Questions, both oral and written, will be permitted at the industry
brief. A written package of all questions and answers will be furnished
to each prospective offeror after the industry brief. An Ombudsman has
been appointed to hear concerns from offerors during the proposal
development phase of this acquisition. The purpose of the Ombudsman is
not to diminish the authority of the program director or contracting
officer, but to communicate contractor concerns, issues, disagreements
and recommendations to the appropriate Government personnel. When
requested, the Ombudsman will maintain strict confidentiality as to the
source of the concern. The Ombudsman does not participate in the
evaluation of proposals or in the selection process. Interested parties
are invited to call Mr. William Maikisch at (310) 363-0208. (0093) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0001 19950404\A-0001.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|