|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF JUNE 5,1995 PSA#1360WL/POKA, Bldg7, 2530 C ST, WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH 45433-7607 A -- ADVANCED LASER DIAGNOSTIC APPLICATTIONS SOL F33615-95-R-2507 DUE
070795 POC Pamela J. Covey, WL/POKA, 513-255-2730. Wright Laboratory
is interested in receiving proposals for the research effort described
below. This solicitation and resulting award shall be made in
accordance with the Research and Development Streamlined Contracting
Procedures (RDSCP) described in DFARS 235.70. This is the solicitation,
there will be no formal RFP or RFQ. The name, address and telephone
number of the representative of the contracting officer for this
solicitation is shown as POC above. This solicitation consists of this
notice, any subsequent amendments, and a supplemental package which is
available by writing to the above address. Offerors who did not respond
to synopsis POK-95-01 published 94DEC15 should provide, in writing,
their complete address information to Wright Laboratory (see above
address) in order to receive any subsequent amendments and the
supplemental package (if applicable). All of the mandatory terms,
clauses and provisions at DFARS 235.7006, Research and Development
Streamlined Contracting format, and the following optional items are
incorporated by reference:
b.3,B.6,C.2,E.1,E.4,F.1,G.2,G.3,G.4,I.42,I.43,I.47,I.49,I.53,I.63,I
.65,i.66,I.67,I.68,I.69,I.70,I.73,I.76,I.82,I.84,I.85,I.87,I.88,I.9
0,i.94,I.95,I.97,I.100,I.107,I.127,I.128,I.129,I.131,I.132,I.136,i.138
,I.141,I.145,I.146,I.147,I.148,I.153,I.155,I.157,I.159,I.161,I
.163,I.164,I.166,I .168, I.169,J.1,J.2,M.2. This solicitation includes
clauses and provisions from FAR 1990 edition updated through FAC 90-25
and DFARS 1991 edition updated through DAC 91-6. The standard
evaluation factors found in Section M of DFARS 235.7006 apply but are
modified as stated herein. Provision M.2 Evaluation Procedures and
Basis for Award, subparagraph (ii)(A) Technical, is replaced with the
following: The Technical subfactors are listed in descending order of
importance except Technical Approach/Understanding of the Problem and
Management are equal in importance. The Technical Factor is modified as
follows for this particular effort and this is the technical evaluation
criteria for this program: A. QUALIFICATION. The key element of success
of this program depends on the training, experience, capabilities,
creativity and productivity of the personnel assigned to the contract.
Persons with a variety of technical skills are required in order to
perform the research. The offeror's proposal will be evaluated to the
extent that it demonstrates that the personnel are qualified to perform
the tasks given in the Statement of Work. A demonstration of
qualifications will be based on the experience the offeror's personnel
have in the following areas that are deemed important for this effort.
(1) The offeror's personnel can develop and operate advanced laser
diagnostic equipment. (2) The offeror's personnel can design advanced
combustors, setup and conduct combustion evaluation experiments, and
interpret these experiments in terms of basic processes. (3) The
offeror's personnel can design, setup, and perform experiments relating
to the thermal stability of fuels. (4) The offeror's personnel can
develop direct numerical simulations for combustion and fuel
decomposition processes. B. TECHNICAL APPROACH/UNDERSTANDING OF THE
PROBLEM. The Government shall assess the offeror's technical proposal
and how well it demonstrates each of the following elements: (1) It is
essential that the offeror present a technical approach that defines
the experiments to be performed in meeting the requirements of the
technical tasks and identifies the diagnostic techniques needed to
perform the experiments. The approach must describe the experiments and
the diagnostic techniques in sufficient detail so that a technical
evaluation of the risks and benefits of the proposed approach can be
made. The offeror's proposal must demonstrate a working knowledge of
the types of laser diagnostics and analytical techniques that are
necessary to collect data for evaluating the performance of gas turbine
type combustors. (2) The problems of data interpretation, establishing
errors, and evaluating the performance of the diagnostic techniques
must be identified and discussed in sufficient detail to show the
offeror understands them. (3) The proposal must demonstrate a
fundamental understanding of combustion processes taking place in gas
turbine combustors. The proposal must demonstrate an understanding of
advance combustor concepts that can yield high performance and low
emissions. (4) The proposal must demonstrate a state-of-the-art
understanding of the chemistry and physics associated with the thermal
decomposition and deposition processes and the parameters that can
affect the thermal stability of fuels. The proposal must have an
approach to the evaluation of additives for JP-8+100 fuels which
describes the types of tests that are needed and background as to what
the tests are to simulate. C. MANAGEMENT. The Government shall assess
the offeror's technical proposal and how well it demonstrates each of
the following elements: (1) This program involves the management of
contractor personnel with a wide range of technical backgrounds. The
management approach for performing this program and the experience
obtained on other contracts with a similar approach involving personnel
with a wide range of technical backgrounds must be addressed in the
proposal. (2) The organization of the personnel with their
qualifications, their responsibilities in performing the proposed
research, personnel hours and the percentage of time each is expected
to spend at the Aero and Propulsion and Power Directorate will be
assessed. (3) The procedures to monitor and control budget and schedule
tasks will be evaluated. (4) The management approach will be evaluated
on practical concerns, such as: simplicity, ease of implementation,
estimated efficiency, and whether sufficient time is provided for each
individual to perform his or her responsibilities. D. COMPLIANCE. The
Government shall evaluate the offeror's technical proposal and how it
demonstrates each of the following elements: (1) The extent that the
proposal clearly and explicitly describes how each task in the
Statement of Work (SOW) will be accomplished. (2) The offeror's
proposal will be evaluated on the extent that it demonstrates unique
ideas with high potential pay-offs and the offeror's capabilities to
accomplish the effort. A Cost Plus Fixed Fee (Completion) type contract
is contemplated. The estimated period of performance is 60 months
commencing on or about 95 OCT 15 which includes 5 months for writing
and reviewing the final report. It is expected that this contract will
be awarded based upon a determination that there is adequate price
competition, therefore, the offeror is not required to submit or
certify cost or pricing data with its proposal. If, after receipt of
the proposals, the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price
competition does not exist in accordance with FAR 15.804-3, the offeror
shall provide certified cost or pricing data as required by the
Contracting Officer. To be responsive to this solicitation, submit an
original and 3 copies of your Technical proposal no later than 1500
hours, 95 JUL 07, addressed to: WRIGHT LABORATORY, BLDG 7, Attn: PAMELA
J. COVEY, WL/POKA, 2530 C ST, AREA B, WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH
45433-7607. Submit an original and 2 copies of your Cost proposal and
also your Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Subcontracting Plan
(if applicable), no later than 1500 hours, 95 JUL 21, to the same
address. The page limitations for technical and cost proposals are
specified in DFARS 252.235-7006 (L.24). The DD Form 1423, Contract Data
Requirements List, are included in the supplemental package. The
technical requirements, including the reporting requirements, are
contained in the supplemental package. The objective of this effort is
to continue development and application of advanced laser diagnostic
techniques to provide the technology necessary to correct problems in
existing systems caused by the conversion of JP-4 to JP-8 fuels and the
technology needed to develop fuels and combustor systems for advanced
aircraft. (0152) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0001 19950602\A-0001.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|