HQ Carlisle Barracks, U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, Directorate of Contracting, ATZE-DOC, Bldg 46, Carlisle PA 17013-5002

A -- STRATEGIC OUTREACH PROGRAM BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT Sol DABT43-95-R-BAA1. Due 060396. Contact 717/245-4631, Contracting Officer, Richard A. Myers. The stategic outreach program facilitates dialogue on national security issues between the Army and those outside the Army who are actively interested in security policy. Initiated in 1987, the outreach program is sponsored by the Office of the Chief of Staff, U.S. Army. The outreach program is designed to prompt academic thought and discussion on national security issues by providing a range of Army resources from subject matter experts to speak, present papers, and chair/participate in panels to hosting or COSPONSORING CONFERENCES. Current cosponsor interests include but not limited to the following themes: Alliances, Coalitions, and Joint Command and Control; Strategy for the War on Drugs; Total Force of the Future - Active Component/Reserve Component (AC/RC) mix, readiness, force relationships, contingency forces and mobility forces; Peacekeeping, Peacemaking, and Peace-Enforcement; Nontraditional Uses of Military Power; Ethic and Religious Conflict; Power Projection Army; Strategic Mobility; The Pacific Rim in the 21st Century; Technology XXI, the Technology Required to Leverage the Change to Increase Capabilities for the 21st century; Process of Change, the Process Required to Change the Army to Meet the Challenges of the 21st century; Maintaining Readiness in an Era of Declining Resources; Roles and Missions of the Active Component and Reserve Component - Interrelationships and Synergy; The Use of Armed Forces in the Domestic Assistance Missions; The Congress and the Military - Partners in National Security; The Legitimacy of Using Military Force to install Democracy Around the World; The Strategic Implications of Plagues and Pestilence. Submitting a Proposal. Page limitations are as stated below for each type of submission and for specific sections within the proposals: A ``page'' is double spaced 8 1/2 by 11 inches and print type not smaller than 12 characters per inch. All proposals should be submitted in three copies to the Contracting Office address as above. Bidders may submit proposals at any time prior to 6 April 1996. Proposals will be reviewed on a continuing basis as they are received. Submissions may take two forms, a Quick-look Proposa or a Formal Proposal. The Quick-look procedure is intended to minimize unnecessary effort in proposal preparation on the part of an offeror whose proposed work is not of interest under this BAA. AWC intends to respond to Quick-looks within 30 days of receipt indicating the Army's interest in receiving a Formal Proposal. Favorable review of the Quick-look will in no way guarantee an award if a Formal Proposal is submitted. Bidders are not required to submit Quick-looks prior to submitting Formal proposals. Quick Look Instructions. Quick-looks are limited to 5 pages and must contain the following elements: A) BAA number, topic title and subtitle, company or institution name and mailing address, conference location, tentative agenda and point of contact; B) description of the technical approach and technical objectives to beachieved with a description of the deliverables; C) estimate of the total costs (breakdown costs by major task) and desired Army Outreach funding or other resources; D) qualifications (names if known) of the principle investigator, key speakers, panelists, presenters and key staff to be committed to the project. Formal Proposal Intructions. Formal proposals are not limited in maximum number of pages however extraneous, repetitious or wordy submissions are NOT desired and will result in lower ratings. proposals must contain the following sections describing the proposed research: A) cover page including BAA number, topic title, topic subtitle, with technical and administrative points of contact along with E-mail address, telephone and fascimile numbers; B) one page summary indicating the technical basis for determining the effort to be unique and innovative, a description of the technical approach and technical objectives to be achieved and a description of the results, product and transferable technology expected from a prospective users' point of view; C) one page description of deliverables with expected publication date, with a statement of proprietary (copyright) claims indicating none, if none exist; D) one page summary of the schedule and important milestones; E) one page description of the facilities proposed to be utilized; F) Statement of Work (SOW) citing specific tasks, with government, co-sponser(s) and contractor resposibilities identified; G) one page listing (names) of key personnel along with the level of effort to be expended by each person, attach concise summaries of qualifications of those key personnel; H) one page description of your and cosponser(s) organizations, attach a listing of some previous accomplishments and ongoing work in this or closely related research; I) bibliography of relevant technical papers and research notes, which document the technical ideas upon which the proposal is based. J) describe proposed contract terms in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (see FAR Part 35). K) Uncomplicated estimatec cost breakdown including SF 1411 or preferably a similar contractor accounting format, to the level of effort (hours) for key individuals and major costs for the entire proposed contract. Where the effort consists of multiple portions which could easily be partitioned for purposes of funding, these should be identified as contract financing milestones for progress payments (see FAR part 32). Travel costs shall be computed in accordance with the Department of Defense, Joint Travel Regulation. List all sources, amounts and application of cosponsor funding or other resources, with the desired amount of Army funding or other resources. Evaluation Criteria. Sources for research will be selected by a formal technical business decision process (peer review). Individual proposal evaluation will be based on acceptability or unacceptability without regard to other proposals submitted under the announcement, however, all selected proposals may not be funded due to budgetary constraints. Evaluation of proposals will be conducted in accordance with the following criteria, listed in descending order of importance: (1) applicibility to current and future problems in the proposed technical area; (2) qualifications of the principle and key personnel; (3) understanding of the problem; (4) degree of innovation and creativity; (5) Organization experience; (6) organization and clarity of the proposal. The merit of the technical proposal will be evaluated in relation to the value and realism of the costs proposed and prioritized based upon the availability of funds. The Government reserves the right to select for award all, some or none of the proposals received. This notice constitutes the total BAA. No additional information is available, nor will a formal RFP or other solicitation regarding this announcement be issued. All responsible sources capable of satisfying the governments needs may submit a proposal which shall be considered by AWC. The majority of past awards were from $1,500 to $50,000 only occasionally higher, with most on a cost or resource sharing basis with the conference sponsor and many times other co-sponsors. Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HCBU) and Minority Institutions (MI) are encouraged to submit proposals and join others in submitting proposals, however, no portion of this BAA will be set aside for HBCU and MI participation, due to the impracticality of reserving discrete or severable areas of research. All Questions Shall Be In Writing And Directed To The Contracting Office. (233)

Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0004 19950822\A-0004.SOL)